Saturday, May 29, 2010

Re: Medarticles hi frnds need followings articles plz help

Buzz It
1,2,3, 5 sent

anand
http://med-videos.blogspot.com/

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:19 AM, phytochem <ujwal47@gmail.com> wrote:
1)Journal of General Microbiology 130 (1984), 2975-2982; DOI
10.1099/00221287-130-11-2975
Septal Sealing in the Basidiomycete Coriolus versicolor
R. C. Aylmore, G. E. Wakley and N. K. Todd
Department of Biological Sciences, Washington Singer Laboratories,
University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK

2)Ultrastructure of the wood-decay fungus, Coriolus versicolor, in
relation to a catechol-induced bimodal growth response
R. Taylor, W.V. Dashek, A.L. Williams, G.C. Llewellyn, W.C. Shortle,
C.E. O'Rear and J.E. Mayfield
International Biodeterioration
Volume 24, Issues 4-5, 1988, Pages 343-358
doi:10.1016/0265-3036(88)90020-6

3)Light and electron microscopic studies of meiosis in the basidia of
Pholiota terrestris
Journal Protoplasma
Publisher       Springer Wien
ISSN    0033-183X (Print) 1615-6102 (Online)
Issue   Volume 94, Numbers 1-2 / March, 1978
DOI     10.1007/BF01275536
Pages   83-108
Subject Collection      Biomedical and Life Sciences
SpringerLink Date       Tuesday, March 29, 2005

4)BASIDIOCARP AND MYCELIUM MORPHOLOGY OF GANODERMA LUCIDUM KARST.
STRAINS ISOLATED IN HUNGARY
Journal Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica
Publisher       Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN    1217-8950 (Print) 1588-2640 (Online)
Issue   Volume 46, Number 1 / April 1999
DOI     10.1556/AMicr.46.1999.1.5
Pages   41-52
Subject Group   Biomedical and Life Sciences
Online Date     Friday, July 22, 2005

5)Cultural Studies and Genetics of Sexuality of Ganoderma lucidum and
G. tsugae in Relation to the Taxonomy of the G. lucidum Complex
James E. Adaskaveg and Robert L. Gilbertson
Mycologia, Vol. 78, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1986), pp. 694-705
(article consists of 12 pages)
Published by: Mycological Society of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3807513

thank you
ujwal47@
gmail.com

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

Re: Medarticles monaldi

Buzz It

enclosed

anand
http://med-videos.blogspot.com/
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:06 PM, fsas <fsas@telefonica.net> wrote:

Necesitaria el siguiente artículo:
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 73(1):34-43 (2010)
Long-term oxygen therapy in COPD: evidences and open questions of
current indications.
 A Corrado,  T Renda and  S Bertini
gracias
Fsas

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

[socialactionfoundationforequity:2732 A Novel on PPTCT

Buzz It

 

Dear all,

PPTCT is the main programme in NACP-III, and rightly so. Unless we assure that newborns are HIV free, it is impossible to eradicate HIV from this world. ART is to control and treat HIV infection, but prevention is the only measure to handle this epidemic; particularly when the epidemic has reached the third stage. Foetus/newborn of HIV

affected woman is the important victim of third stage.
Keeping this in mind, Naval Prakashan of Pune has recently published a novel titled 'Sanrakshita'. This novel has very subtly tackled the issue of PPTCT.

The author of the novel himself being an Obstetrician and Gynaecologist working in the field of HIV/AIDS has given full justice to the contents of this novel.

It touches the issues of PLHIV mother, counselling and medical management of HIV affected pregnant woman & management of newborn of such mothers.

Therefore this novel should be read widely by general public, counsellors and even medical practitioners who are not practicing HIV or PPTCT. In fact every NGO should possess this book in their library.

Name of Novel: Sanrakshita
Publisher: Naval Prakashan, Pune
Distribution: Dilipraj Prakashan, Pune
Author: Dr. Nishikant Shrotri
Language: Marathi
Pages: 264
MRP of book Rs.260.00/-

Nishikant Shrotri
e-mail: <nishparna@hotmail.com>



The battle for the FIH Hockey World Cup Drag n' drop

Re: Medarticles books

Buzz It
   Avery's Diseases of the Newborn, 8th Edition
by: H. William Taeusch, Roberta A. Ballard, Christine A. Gleason
en
 

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:46 PM, abderrahim habzi <ahabzi@yahoo.fr> wrote:

Dear Friends  I have a an exam I need urgently  some books of neonatology  Can you help me Thank you very very  much

  Avery's Diseases of the Newborn, 8th Edition
by: H. William Taeusch, Roberta A. Ballard, Christine A. Gleason
en
Fetal and Neonatal Effects of Maternal Disease by Anron Y. Sweet

Neonatal Kidney and Fluid-Electrolytes by JosGe Strauss, Louise Strauss

Taybi and Lachman's Radiology of Syndromes, Metabolic Disorders and Skeletal Dysplasias by Ralph Lachman


--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.



--
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Roxana M. Brandt
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~



--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

rec.bicycles.racing - 25 new messages in 8 topics - digest

Buzz It
rec.bicycles.racing
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

rec.bicycles.racing@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Federal Investigation widened... - 5 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/27cdb77f089bfdaf?hl=en
* CFE - 5 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/cd678cdd6d994ee6?hl=en
* Cleaning and scrubbing a new tyre. - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/be745755af3b3b18?hl=en
* What a shame - 5 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/39ee131428c0a418?hl=en
* Still in Lance's Innocence Camp ? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/791f129b5933acea?hl=en
* Rec.bicycles.doping - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/c2655ba9e9fe66ed?hl=en
* Evans - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/de2fcfd7842d8bbe?hl=en
* Leadville is a little safer tonight - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/e1546c9946374096?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Federal Investigation widened...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/27cdb77f089bfdaf?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 11:14 am
From: DA74


On May 29, 6:16 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On May 28, 10:42 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 8:19 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > On May 28, 6:33 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 28, 2:31 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 28, 3:19 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 28, 9:22 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 28, 10:20 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > you think it's more plausible that Floyd made up the all
> > > > > > > > the allegations of doping within US Postal, doping with each
> > > > > > > > participant named, made up the story about the blood in the fridge,
> > > > > > > > made up the story of the roadside team transfusion, made up the story
> > > > > > > > about Lim (his closest advisor who coached him to a TdF win and
> > > > > > > > subsequently defended him to anyone who would listen in print or
> > > > > > > > video)
>
> > > > > > > On that last point: don't forget that Lim now works for Armstrong, for
> > > > > > > whom Landis clearly holds significant animosity. Falsely accusing Lim
> > > > > > > could be a way of paying him back for "defecting" to the other side.
>
> > > > > > > Andy Coggan
>
> > > > > > So you think he went with the tactic of implicating himself over the
> > > > > > course of his entire career and opening himself up to numerous civil
> > > > > > and criminal liabilities to make a couple of false accusations against
> > > > > > Lim for "defecting to the other side"?
>
> > > > > > That is quite a theory Dr.
>
> > > > > By all accounts, Landis doesn't have a penny to his name, so it would
> > > > > be a waste of time and money for Lim or Leipheimer to sue him for
> > > > > defamation.
>
> > > > I don't think this is about renumeration. These guys are household
> > > > names in the cycling community and beyond. They have reputations that
> > > > one would think they'd protect. Especially with sponsorships that can
> > > > sometimes dwarf their rider salaries. Sponsorships are based on one's
> > > > reputation.
>
> > > > A court victory or settlement is what they would be after here to
> > > > clear their names. LA indicated immediately that he wasn't interested
> > > > in pursuing the matter. That should be shocking to his fans. None of
> > > > the others accused have even breathed the notion of suing him. That
> > > > fact alone seems to speak quite loudly.
>
> > > Sure, Leipheimer, Lim, Zabriskie, etc., have "skin in the game", but
> > > Landis doesn't, so why should he be afraid of smearing anyone and
> > > everyone with false accusations?
>
> > He's obviously unafraid of either telling the truth or smearing them
> > but I don't see what that has to do with my point which was in regard
> > to these guys defending their good names in a court of law. You seem
> > to be changing the subject a bit here.
>
> No, you're the one who seems to have lost the plot a bit. My point is
> that Landis really has no reason not to lie about having received a
> transfusion by Lim. How Lim or Leipheimer feel or respond really has
> nothing to do with it.

Well then it looks like we're right back to my surprise at your
incredible theory that Floyd either truly or falsely implicated
himself by admitting to doping over the course of his entire career
thereby burning any last bridges in the pro cycling community and
completely erasing whatever shred of a reputation he had left - all
this to seek retribution from those whom he either held animosity or
wanted to pay back for defecting to the other side - and at the same
time opening himself up to potential civil and criminal liabilities.

That is an amazing theory.

Another theory that is admittedly a bit less logically circuitous is
that his latest story is true. Maybe time will tell. And maybe not.
-DA74


== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 11:44 am
From: DA74


On May 29, 6:22 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On May 28, 6:15 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 2:24 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > On May 28, 3:34 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 28, 9:31 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 28, 11:20 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 28, 9:12 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 28, 10:33 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On May 28, 8:24 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On May 28, 9:55 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On May 28, 3:50 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 27, 11:55 pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On May 27, 11:29 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Keep in mind that we are talking abou two riders with TdF GC
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ambitions, meaning that their strongest allegiance is to themselves.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > dumbass,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > fuentes was working with several TdF GC riders at the same time.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > As I said, *if* Lim did in fact provide transfusions to both Landis
> > > > > > > > > > > and Leipheimer, he didn't do it because he was paid to do so by Landis/
> > > > > > > > > > > Phonak.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Andy Coggan
>
> > > > > > > > > > Cogster - Come on now. No one suggested Floyd or Phonak paid for
> > > > > > > > > > Leipheimer's alleged transfusion from Lim. Your point was that you
> > > > > > > > > > thought Floyd's story was "illogical" because that would have Lim
> > > > > > > > > > working on both riders while he was an employee of Floyd/Phonak. (I
> > > > > > > > > > think everyone else here assumed Levi would cover the cost of his own
> > > > > > > > > > transfusion).
>
> > > > > > > > > In 2005 and 2006, Lim was paid by Landis to be his *personal*
> > > > > > > > > assistant, and the two were quite closely connected. Thus, as I said
> > > > > > > > > before if he (Lim) performed a transfusion for Leipheimer (another GC
> > > > > > > > > contender, but riding for a different team), he must have done so as a
> > > > > > > > > favor to someone, or because he was paid additional money by someone
> > > > > > > > > other than Landis. Neither of these two possibilties make a lot of
> > > > > > > > > sense to me when you consider that the allegation is that the
> > > > > > > > > transfusions took place at the same time, i.e., that Landis was aware
> > > > > > > > > that Lim was (allegedly) providing his services to Leipheimer as well.
> > > > > > > > > IOW, why would Landis let Lim undermine his own chances that way, and
> > > > > > > > > why would Lim be so up-front about his disloyal/mercenary behavior?
>
> > > > > > > > > Andy Coggan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > Cogster - The ProTour world may be a lot more inbred than you purport
> > > > > > > > to understand it to be. You are basing your argument on the assumption
> > > > > > > > that Floyd's payments to Lim retained him as his exclusive
> > > > > > > > preparatore. What caused you to make this assumption?
>
> > > > > > > I'm not making that assumption. I'm making the assumption that if Lim
> > > > > > > were going to sell his services to somebody else, he wouldn't be so
> > > > > > > obvious about it.
>
> > > > > > > Andy Coggan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > OK. Then you are making the assumption that Floyd felt he had an
> > > > > > exclusive relationship with Lim. Why do you make that assumption?
>
> > > > > Because of 1) the obvious closeness of their relationship, and 2) the
> > > > > role model Armstrong likely provided to Landis as to how such
> > > > > professional arrangements should be structured (just ask John Cobb).
>
> > > > I just cannot see where you make the leap from what you describe as
> > > > "obvious closeness" to exclusivity, where you think Landis had Lim all
> > > > to himself. Then you make an even bigger leap by assuming Landis took
> > > > professional arrangement cues from his "role model" - You then go on
> > > > to assume that Lance sets up his aerodynamic professional arrangements
> > > > the same way he set up his preparatore professional arrangements.
> > > > Seriously?
>
> > > Seriously (in that I find the conclusion plausible, not that I'm
> > > convinced that it is true). That is, if I were paying someone to act
> > > as my "preparatore" I would most certainly do my best to keep the
> > > arrangement exclusive (be that by paying them more, threatening them,
> > > keeping them under close tabs, whatever). Conversely, if I were acting
> > > as a "preparatore" I wouldn't go flaunting the fact that I was working
> > > with multiple competing riders by performing transfusions in the same
> > > room at the same time, as that would tend to undercut the value of my
> > > services.
>
> > Well you should take comfort in the fact that it appears you are a
> > whole lot smarter at this dope thing than Floyd, Levi and Allen
> > Fucking Lim.
> > > > > Again, I don't consider what Landis has alleged (with respect to Lim
> > > > > providing transfusions) *impossible* - just quite implausible (and not
> > > > > just because of the fact that Leipheimer was supposedly also there).
>
> > > > Right. You feel this way because of a deck stacked with your personal
> > > > assumptions that really don't have any basis in facts.
>
> > > > Do you think it's possible that these ProTour riders, especially the
> > > > very small US contingent share more information than you might
> > > > realize? Have you ever been to Girona? It's quite small. Most of these
> > > > guys all live within blocks of each other, that is if they're not
> > > > sharing the same house. Did you ever think that maybe these
> > > > friendships transcend the temporary nature of the teams they are
> > > > currently under contract with? Did you ever think that maybe just
> > > > maybe they all band together and it's a matter of "us" versus "them",
> > > > with "them" being everyone outside their small tight group? And that
> > > > maybe they might share the same time proven, test proven, "safe"
> > > > preparation methods with each other? Did you ever think that this
> > > > preparation for a race might be the same to them as getting a bike
> > > > tuned up? Did you ever think that maybe none of this is a big secret
> > > > to those on the inside?
>
> > > As I said before, Landis has a credibility problem, and he himself
> > > admits that he has no physical evidence to support his allegations.
> > > You therefore have to evaluate the truthfulness of his accusations in
> > > light of normal human behavior, known personal allegiances and
> > > grudges, people's training and background, etc. In that context, his
> > > claim that Lim provided transfusions to both he and Leipheimer and at
> > > the same place and the same time does not make much sense to me.
>
> > I don't think there is any mistaking the fact that Floyd has a lot of
> > problems. So would you at least agree that Allen Fucking Lim is a
> > shitty physiologist because he had no clue his rider with whom he had
> > an exclusive personal training relationship was doped up to his eye-
> > teeth?
>
> No, I would not agree with that statement. Lim is not a medical
> doctor, and would not/did not have access to anything other than his
> power data. As I have pointed out to Lafferty (and been quoted by
> CyclingNews, etc.) many times before, you can't rely on such numbers
> (or VO2max testing, etc.) to definitively determine who is or isn't
> doping.
>
> Andy Coggan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

How can you say with such certainty that Lim did not have access to
anything other than Floyd's power data?

-DA74


== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:31 pm
From: Michael Press


In article
<8b786408-7abe-4368-b3ae-df69076ae03c@n37g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
DA74 <davidastor74@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I think if the accused have nothing to hide they'd jump at the chance
> to clear their names,

Not everyone thinks that way.
Some accusations are not worth noticing.
Some are not worth defending against.
We, speaking for the best in our culture,
put the burden of proof on the accuser.

But it is a good game you have going there.
Demand that an athlete prove he is clean.

> but if there is something to hide then the
> current tactic is definitely advised.

--
Michael Press


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 1:22 pm
From: DA74


On May 29, 12:31 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <8b786408-7abe-4368-b3ae-df69076ae...@n37g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I think if the accused have nothing to hide they'd jump at the chance
> > to clear their names,
>
> Not everyone thinks that way.
> Some accusations are not worth noticing.
> Some are not worth defending against.
> We, speaking for the best in our culture,
> put the burden of proof on the accuser.

I completely agree, the burden is absolutely on the accuser. The
problem I'm pointing out is that these are very strong, very specific
allegations disseminated to the far reaches of the earth. I think an
athlete with absolutely nothing to hide and a reputation (read
sponsorship $) to protect would be far more eager to defend themselves
than this group named by Floyd.


> But it is a good game you have going there.
> Demand that an athlete prove he is clean.

Easy bro. I just expressed surprise that they are not defending their
good names a bit more eagerly. I expressed surprise that Lance
immediately indicated that he had no interest in pursuing any kind of
legal action against Floyd because

"You know, legal action takes time, takes energy, and takes a lot of
money. I have sued a few people in my day and you know, been
successful there and proved my innocence through that and I don't need
to do that anymore. My energy needs to be devoted to the team, to Live
Strong to my kids."

This is the guy whose foundation sued a company for making BarkStrong
dog collars.
-DA74


== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 4:46 pm
From: curtis@the-md-russells.org


On Sat, 29 May 2010 13:22:27 -0700 (PDT), DA74
<davidastor74@hotmail.com> wrote:

>This is the guy whose foundation sued a company for making BarkStrong
>dog collars.

C'mon, you know this is not the same thing at all. It is more straight
forward and is defending a trademark. Ignore it and it lets more than
the camel's nose under the tent.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

==============================================================================
TOPIC: CFE
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/cd678cdd6d994ee6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:20 pm
From: "A. Dumas Fred"


H. Fred Kveck wrote:
> I wonder if BMC will look to pick up some more riders that can ride
> support in GTs at the end of the year.

Like Hincapie, Ballan & Santambrogio? They should have been at the Giro.


== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:41 pm
From: Betty Munro


Fred Flintstein wrote:
> He'll be 34 next year. I don't know that he's the guy to build
> around for the future.

Perhaps he and Vino can join Radioshack to help improve the average.


== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 1:31 pm
From: bar


On May 29, 3:41 pm, Betty Munro <n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Fred Flintstein wrote:
> > He'll be 34 next year. I don't know that he's the guy to build
> > around for the future.
>
> Perhaps he and Vino can join Radioshack to help improve the average.

fuck it. i think it's time for an all-aussie super team next year, to
be led in the grand tours by CFE. i think there's enough talent out
there ...


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 2:42 pm
From: "H. Fred Kveck"


In article <cb575$4c0168e3$53578816$19794@cache5.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>,
"A. Dumas Fred" <alexandre@dumas.fr> wrote:

> H. Fred Kveck wrote:
> > I wonder if BMC will look to pick up some more riders that can ride
> > support in GTs at the end of the year.
>
> Like Hincapie, Ballan & Santambrogio? They should have been at the Giro.

Yes, I was thinking that BMC spread themselves a little thin. But I suppose that
the ToC was still important for them, being a somewhat "local" race.


== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 2:56 pm
From: "H. Fred Kveck"


In article <yb6dnfZpE8ozxZzRnZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"Mike Jacoubowsky" <MikeJ@ChainReaction.com> wrote:

> "H. Fred Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote in message
> news:YOURhoward-6BFC57.09344529052010@news.giganews.com...
> > In article
> > <fedf15b4-b3f4-4952-a710-fd0c9910d3bd@40g2000pry.googlegroups.com>,
> > Scott <hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
> >> strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
> >> about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
> >> seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
> >> think he left it 'too little, too late'.
> >
> > Based on the stage 16 TT, I don't think CFE will be able to gain enough
> > time on Nibali and Scarponi to get on the box. I think if he'd been able to
> > gain about 30 seconds today, it might have been possible. You're right
> > about his newfound aggressive style. I wonder if BMC will look to pick up
> > some more riders that can ride support in GTs at the end of the year.
> >
> > Arroyo has been another big surprise in this race.
>
> Sorry, but Cadel has to take responsibility for his lack of team mates. When
> he negotiates with a team, he's in control of his destiny. He can choose to
> work with someone that will guarantee a team built around him, or not. He
> can decide to go for a smaller salary and larger bonus with a Grand Tour
> win, with more $$$ for support folk. He can choose to not worry or deal
> appropriately with the egos that come with the type of rider that could keep
> up with him.
>
> Next time I talk with Chris Horner, who was his room-mate during the TdF a
> few years back, I've got to ask him about this. What goes on in Cadel's
> head, regarding team mates? I remember even that year he was berating his
> team for not supporting him well enough, and wondered how that made Chris
> feel.

I think you've made some good points, Mike. BMC showed up with a lot of guys that
I'm not really familiar with, as in, they've never made much of an impression on me.
But sometimes those guys do the job just fine. I wonder if he's hard enough to get
along with that some of their stronger riders actually opted out.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Cleaning and scrubbing a new tyre.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/be745755af3b3b18?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:39 pm
From: Frederick the Great


In article <ja0Mn.36013$Ak3.9054@newsfe16.iad>, "z, fred" <Nope@not.ca>
wrote:

> Tom Sherman °_° wrote:
> > On 5/28/2010 10:12 PM, thirty-six aka Trevor Jeffrey wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> I've got IPA in an aerosol for degreasing[...]
> >
> > India Pale Ale? ;)
> >
>
> My thoughts exactly.

Whenever I suspect India pale ale is
about to be aerosolized I clear the area.

--
Old Fritz


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:47 pm
From: Betty Munro


Frederick the Great wrote:
> Whenever I suspect India pale ale is
> about to be aerosolized I clear the area.

Pity Ryan's on sabbatical. I'm sure he'd have wanted some lite beer in
an aerosol spray.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 1:16 pm
From: thirty-six


On 29 May, 20:39, Frederick the Great <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article <ja0Mn.36013$Ak3.9...@newsfe16.iad>, "z, fred" <N...@not.ca>
> wrote:
>
> > Tom Sherman °_° wrote:
> > > On 5/28/2010 10:12 PM, thirty-six aka Trevor Jeffrey wrote:
> > >> [...]
> > >> I've got IPA in an aerosol for degreasing[...]
>
> > > India Pale Ale? ;)
>
> > My thoughts exactly.
>
> Whenever I suspect India pale ale is
> about to be aerosolized I clear the area.

Even when hopped with best East Kent Goldings?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: What a shame
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/39ee131428c0a418?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:43 pm
From: Scott


that some Swiss guy spoiled Simoni's last bid for a big prize on the
penultimate day of his pro racing career. I can't believe he sprinted
against Simoni for the Cima Coppi. Tschopp got a well deserved stage
win, but he may not have gotten that win if he hadn't had Simoni by
his side for their break up the Gavia. Sprinting for that prize was
sort of, well, punk.


== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:48 pm
From: Betty Munro


Scott wrote:
> that some Swiss guy spoiled Simoni's last bid for a big prize on the
> penultimate day of his pro racing career. I can't believe he sprinted
> against Simoni for the Cima Coppi. Tschopp got a well deserved stage
> win, but he may not have gotten that win if he hadn't had Simoni by
> his side for their break up the Gavia. Sprinting for that prize was
> sort of, well, punk.

You mean he deserves the chop ?


== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 1:25 pm
From: bar


On May 29, 3:48 pm, Betty Munro <n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Scott wrote:
> > that some Swiss guy spoiled Simoni's last bid for a big prize on the
> > penultimate day of his pro racing career.  I can't believe he sprinted
> > against Simoni for the Cima Coppi.  Tschopp got a well deserved stage
> > win, but he may not have gotten that win if he hadn't had Simoni by
> > his side for their break up the Gavia.  Sprinting for that prize was
> > sort of, well, punk.
>
> You mean he deserves the chop ?

i agree, it was a dick move. but then, Chopper didn't exactly have the
stage win sealed up at that point either.

seeing gibo come across the line with the fans cheering was nice
though. surely he'll end up a DS somewhere next year ...


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 2:59 pm
From: "H. Fred Kveck"


In article <f50f5ea2-f417-458a-ba57-ba7ba905d2cb@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,
bar <barbaricia@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 29, 3:48 pm, Betty Munro <n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> > Scott wrote:
> > > that some Swiss guy spoiled Simoni's last bid for a big prize on the
> > > penultimate day of his pro racing career.  I can't believe he sprinted
> > > against Simoni for the Cima Coppi.  Tschopp got a well deserved stage
> > > win, but he may not have gotten that win if he hadn't had Simoni by
> > > his side for their break up the Gavia.  Sprinting for that prize was
> > > sort of, well, punk.
> >
> > You mean he deserves the chop ?
>
> i agree, it was a dick move. but then, Chopper didn't exactly have the
> stage win sealed up at that point either.
>
> seeing gibo come across the line with the fans cheering was nice
> though. surely he'll end up a DS somewhere next year ...

How many languages does he speak?


== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 3:41 pm
From: bar


On May 29, 5:59 pm, "H. Fred Kveck" <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com>
wrote:
> In article <f50f5ea2-f417-458a-ba57-ba7ba905d...@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>  bar <barbari...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 29, 3:48 pm, Betty Munro <n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> > > Scott wrote:
> > > > that some Swiss guy spoiled Simoni's last bid for a big prize on the
> > > > penultimate day of his pro racing career.  I can't believe he sprinted
> > > > against Simoni for the Cima Coppi.  Tschopp got a well deserved stage
> > > > win, but he may not have gotten that win if he hadn't had Simoni by
> > > > his side for their break up the Gavia.  Sprinting for that prize was
> > > > sort of, well, punk.
>
> > > You mean he deserves the chop ?
>
> > i agree, it was a dick move. but then, Chopper didn't exactly have the
> > stage win sealed up at that point either.
>
> > seeing gibo come across the line with the fans cheering was nice
> > though.  surely he'll end up a DS somewhere next year ...
>
>    How many languages does he speak?

dunno. but I like what he says about that dirtbag basso

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/simoni-makes-one-final-attack-in-the-mountains

p.s. CN is now clearly using 3rd graders to write their news; check
the heading "Still not no forgiveness for Basso" and the paragraph
that just mysteriously ends ...


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Still in Lance's Innocence Camp ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/791f129b5933acea?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 12:45 pm
From: Michael Press


In article
<35ec7a8a-9e75-4b13-a299-30cd3cf933c4@q23g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
raamman <raamman@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 28, 4:25 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <9925bed5-eeb5-4f6b-9fe9-468fccead...@s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  raamman<raam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On May 27, 4:09 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <0dff1f72-8f85-4fc3-bd71-98885fb3e...@d12g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > >  raamman<raam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On May 26, 4:32 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <6b0eee3d-3a43-4f93-b797-94173d071...@e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > > > >  --D-y <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Don't trust testing, don't trust "truth machines" (which are coming,
> > > > > > > supposedly), with humans at the controls.
> >
> > > > > > Truth machines exist. Some brain scans resolve
> > > > > > brain activity well enough to detect when the
> > > > > > subject is lying.
> >
> > > > > who interprets the scans and determines who or what is lying ?
> >
> > > > Do you suppose I argue that the human element is not
> > > > present, or not corruptible?
> >
> > > > People in general have the capacity to know when
> > > > somebody is lying. Why they do not exercise their
> > > > capacity is a good question.
> >
> > > I don't mean to sound curt, but
> >
> > > yes, you can tell that to the innocents in jail.
> >
> > Did you tell that to the innocents in jail?
> > You sound curt, you are gratuitously curt,
> > you meant to sound curt, and you want to be curt.
> >
> > I laugh at your pretensions of caring.
> > Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
>
> Is that your lie detector not working or are you just happy to hear
> from me ?

I asked first.

--
Michael Press

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Rec.bicycles.doping
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/c2655ba9e9fe66ed?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 1:22 pm
From: steve


Just wondering.

I haven't sen much about racing going on this month. I guess everyone
was so excited about catching Lance (Sorry LANCE) doping they missed
the races in Italy and California.

Steve


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 4:19 pm
From: "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni."


On May 29, 1:22 pm, steve <SJgerdem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Just wondering.
>
> I haven't sen much about racing going on this month. I guess everyone
> was so excited about catching Lance (Sorry LANCE) doping they missed
> the races in Italy and California.


Dumbass -

I think you jumped the shark on that one. What are the vast majority
of today's posts about?

thanks,

Fred. presented by Gringioni.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Evans
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/de2fcfd7842d8bbe?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 1:25 pm
From: steve


Is it just me or do others think Evans efforts in the Giro should have
produced better results than 5th. I wonder where he would have placed
if BMC had brought a real team to the Giro.

Steve


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 1:26 pm
From: bar


On May 29, 4:25 pm, steve <SJgerdem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is it just me or do others think Evans efforts in the Giro should have
> produced better results than 5th. I wonder where he would have placed
> if BMC had brought a real team to the Giro.
>
> Steve

you mean, like hincapie ... buwhahahahaha


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 2:14 pm
From: "K. Fred Gauss"


steve wrote:
> Is it just me or do others think Evans efforts in the Giro should have
> produced better results than 5th. I wonder where he would have placed
> if BMC had brought a real team to the Giro.

Given the teams they brought, Astana and BMC needed to work together on
stage 11 to prevent themselves from falling so far back. Even with a
strong team, Basso and Nibali had their hands full making up the deficit.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Leadville is a little safer tonight
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/e1546c9946374096?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 4:47 pm
From: curtis@the-md-russells.org


On Sat, 29 May 2010 08:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Amit Ghosh
<amit.ghosh@gmail.com> wrote:

>On May 28, 5:48 pm, "B. Lafferty" <b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Bicycle education class??
>
>dumbass,
>
>yes. it's taught by jobst brandt.

Excessive punishment, bordering on cruel and unusual.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.bicycles.racing"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.bicycles.racing+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

Medarticles books

Buzz It

Dear Friends  I have a an exam I need urgently  some books of neonatology  Can you help me Thank you very very  much

 

Fetal and Neonatal Effects of Maternal Disease by Anron Y. Sweet

Neonatal Kidney and Fluid-Electrolytes by JosGe Strauss, Louise Strauss

Taybi and Lachman's Radiology of Syndromes, Metabolic Disorders and Skeletal Dysplasias by Ralph Lachman


--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

Medarticles hi frnds need followings articles plz help

Buzz It
1)Journal of General Microbiology 130 (1984), 2975-2982; DOI
10.1099/00221287-130-11-2975
Septal Sealing in the Basidiomycete Coriolus versicolor
R. C. Aylmore, G. E. Wakley and N. K. Todd
Department of Biological Sciences, Washington Singer Laboratories,
University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK

2)Ultrastructure of the wood-decay fungus, Coriolus versicolor, in
relation to a catechol-induced bimodal growth response
R. Taylor, W.V. Dashek, A.L. Williams, G.C. Llewellyn, W.C. Shortle,
C.E. O'Rear and J.E. Mayfield
International Biodeterioration
Volume 24, Issues 4-5, 1988, Pages 343-358
doi:10.1016/0265-3036(88)90020-6

3)Light and electron microscopic studies of meiosis in the basidia of
Pholiota terrestris
Journal Protoplasma
Publisher Springer Wien
ISSN 0033-183X (Print) 1615-6102 (Online)
Issue Volume 94, Numbers 1-2 / March, 1978
DOI 10.1007/BF01275536
Pages 83-108
Subject Collection Biomedical and Life Sciences
SpringerLink Date Tuesday, March 29, 2005

4)BASIDIOCARP AND MYCELIUM MORPHOLOGY OF GANODERMA LUCIDUM KARST.
STRAINS ISOLATED IN HUNGARY
Journal Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1217-8950 (Print) 1588-2640 (Online)
Issue Volume 46, Number 1 / April 1999
DOI 10.1556/AMicr.46.1999.1.5
Pages 41-52
Subject Group Biomedical and Life Sciences
Online Date Friday, July 22, 2005

5)Cultural Studies and Genetics of Sexuality of Ganoderma lucidum and
G. tsugae in Relation to the Taxonomy of the G. lucidum Complex
James E. Adaskaveg and Robert L. Gilbertson
Mycologia, Vol. 78, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1986), pp. 694-705
(article consists of 12 pages)
Published by: Mycological Society of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3807513

thank you
ujwal47@
gmail.com

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

rec.bicycles.racing - 26 new messages in 9 topics - digest

Buzz It
rec.bicycles.racing
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

rec.bicycles.racing@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Lance don't know nothing bout no doping - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/aee6b68949d5ef2e?hl=en
* The positive effect of the Landis Accusations... - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/8a54446db20f12af?hl=en
* Chapeau - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/57f54d357752ed0f?hl=en
* Federal Investigation widened... - 6 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/27cdb77f089bfdaf?hl=en
* Landis revelations : pieces of the puzzle falling into place...LA's 2009 TDF
blood profile explained ? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a1c101c55187feef?hl=en
* Still in Lance's Innocence Camp ? - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/791f129b5933acea?hl=en
* Leadville is a little safer tonight - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/e1546c9946374096?hl=en
* CFE - 8 messages, 7 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/cd678cdd6d994ee6?hl=en
* Giro d'Italia, stage 20 summary - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/ce3f630fce069be0?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lance don't know nothing bout no doping
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/aee6b68949d5ef2e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, May 28 2010 11:06 pm
From: Kyle Legate


On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:38:55 -0700, --D-y wrote:

> On May 28, 1:30 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On May 28, 11:48 am, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On May 28, 11:56 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > So how does one rationalize this level of bullsimple bullshit with
>> > > the facts we know now?
>>
>> > > Lance the most scientific and thorough cyclist in the history of
>> > > sport doesn't even have faint knowledge of people and events that
>> > > are in his direct sphere of influence?
>>
>> > > Lance is a god damn cocksucking lying coward.  Yellow really is the
>> > > only color for him, unless Crayola introduces "cunt red".
>>
>> > dumbass,
>>
>> > you've got lafferty disease.
>>
>> > you will go nuts like lafferty has if you cannot accept that there
>> > are people who may have cheated or done underhanded things and done
>> > well for themselves and will feel little or no negative consequences.
>>
>> > a lot of people, including some cyclists that fall in this category.
>>
>> > for example riis is as admitted doper yet he is one of the most
>> > highly regarded team managers and his rider dominated the northern
>> > classics. riss' success stems almost directly from his (admitted)
>> > doping - so why doesn't lafferty dream about riis in handcuffs ?
>>
>> I can't speak for Lafferty and I appreciate the occasional grift - the
>> issue I have with Lance is that he's been a complete liar in his
>> innocence, he has failed to do anything to give back to the sport that
>> he's taken so much out of, (he has the political clout to set up a
>> federal law for cyclist's safety as an example - hasn't  even done it
>> for Texas and/or even lend his name to something concrete like setting
>> up more trails and bike paths as seen in Europe.
>
> <http://cityofaustin.org/publicworks/bikeway.htm> That "happened"
> because Lance endorsed it.
>
> Mellow Johnny's is located on a bike route, and is a "commuter center"
> with showers. Very close to the center of downtown, put there on purpose
> as a part of a move toward living and working "central"; certainly not
> the best location for pure bottom line profits.
>
> Let's see... LAF. Race for the Roses. Tour de Cure. Junior program (and
> a healthy contribution to my club's unofficial junior program).
>
And don't forget about the blood analysis machine he bought for the UCI.


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 5:43 am
From: RicodJour


On May 28, 2:30 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 28, 11:48 am, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 28, 11:56 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > So how does one rationalize this level of bullsimple bullshit with the
> > > facts we know now?
>
> > > Lance the most scientific and thorough cyclist in the history of sport
> > > doesn't even have faint knowledge of people and events that are in his
> > > direct sphere of influence?
>
> > > Lance is a god damn cocksucking lying coward.  Yellow really is the
> > > only color for him, unless Crayola introduces "cunt red".
>
> > dumbass,
>
> > you've got lafferty disease.
>
> > you will go nuts like lafferty has if you cannot accept that there are
> > people who may have cheated or done underhanded things and done well
> > for themselves and will feel little or no negative consequences.
>
> > a lot of people, including some cyclists that fall in this category.
>
> > for example riis is as admitted doper yet he is one of the most highly
> > regarded team managers and his rider dominated the northern classics.
> > riss' success stems almost directly from his (admitted) doping - so
> > why doesn't lafferty dream about riis in handcuffs ?
>
> I can't speak for Lafferty and I appreciate the occasional grift - the
> issue I have with Lance is that he's been a complete liar in his
> innocence, he has failed to do anything to give back to the sport that
> he's taken so much out of, (he has the political clout to set up a
> federal law for cyclist's safety as an example - hasn't  even done it
> for Texas and/or even lend his name to something concrete like setting
> up more trails and bike paths as seen in Europe.
>
> He's just a selfish lying cunt.  Other than that I don't think about
> it much.

Which bothers you more - the fact that another person doesn't do
things the way you would do them, or the fact that you're not that
person?

You're also being a bit myopic about LANCE's impact, but that's okay.

R


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 10:09 am
From: --D-y


On May 29, 1:06 am, Kyle Legate <n...@none.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:38:55 -0700, --D-y wrote:
> > On May 28, 1:30 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On May 28, 11:48 am, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On May 28, 11:56 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > So how does one rationalize this level of bullsimple bullshit with
> >> > > the facts we know now?
>
> >> > > Lance the most scientific and thorough cyclist in the history of
> >> > > sport doesn't even have faint knowledge of people and events that
> >> > > are in his direct sphere of influence?
>
> >> > > Lance is a god damn cocksucking lying coward.  Yellow really is the
> >> > > only color for him, unless Crayola introduces "cunt red".
>
> >> > dumbass,
>
> >> > you've got lafferty disease.
>
> >> > you will go nuts like lafferty has if you cannot accept that there
> >> > are people who may have cheated or done underhanded things and done
> >> > well for themselves and will feel little or no negative consequences.
>
> >> > a lot of people, including some cyclists that fall in this category.
>
> >> > for example riis is as admitted doper yet he is one of the most
> >> > highly regarded team managers and his rider dominated the northern
> >> > classics. riss' success stems almost directly from his (admitted)
> >> > doping - so why doesn't lafferty dream about riis in handcuffs ?
>
> >> I can't speak for Lafferty and I appreciate the occasional grift - the
> >> issue I have with Lance is that he's been a complete liar in his
> >> innocence, he has failed to do anything to give back to the sport that
> >> he's taken so much out of, (he has the political clout to set up a
> >> federal law for cyclist's safety as an example - hasn't  even done it
> >> for Texas and/or even lend his name to something concrete like setting
> >> up more trails and bike paths as seen in Europe.
>
> > <http://cityofaustin.org/publicworks/bikeway.htm> That "happened"
> > because Lance endorsed it.
>
> > Mellow Johnny's is located on a bike route, and is a "commuter center"
> > with showers. Very close to the center of downtown, put there on purpose
> > as a part of a move toward living and working "central"; certainly not
> > the best location for pure bottom line profits.
>
> > Let's see...  LAF. Race for the Roses. Tour de Cure. Junior program (and
> > a healthy contribution to my club's unofficial junior program).
>
> And don't forget about the blood analysis machine he bought for the UCI.

<g> And some people still think he's kinda stupid.
--D-y

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The positive effect of the Landis Accusations...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/8a54446db20f12af?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 2:16 am
From: Betty Munro


Ken Prager wrote:
> Nary a mention of that no-talent attention-monger in ten days...

Well now that you mention it Berlin does seem to have a bit of a double
obsession so maybe he'll have a LANCE-Liz sandwich for breakfast.


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 9:18 am
From: "H. Fred Kveck"


In article <bk27d7-vv3.ln1@donaldm.homeip.net>, Betty Munro <none@mailinator.com>
wrote:

> Ken Prager wrote:
> > Nary a mention of that no-talent attention-monger in ten days...
>
> Well now that you mention it Berlin does seem to have a bit of a double
> obsession so maybe he'll have a LANCE-Liz sandwich for breakfast.

Eaten with Kunich's fork?


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 9:38 am
From: "K. Fred Gauss"


Betty Munro wrote:
> Ken Prager wrote:
>> Nary a mention of that no-talent attention-monger in ten days...
>
> Well now that you mention it Berlin does seem to have a bit of a double
> obsession so maybe he'll have a LANCE-Liz sandwich for breakfast.

Tasteless joke of the day.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Chapeau
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/57f54d357752ed0f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 4:14 am
From: Betty Munro


Fred Flintstein wrote:
> David Arroyo. A beautiful stage, ridden with great
> heart and courage.

Pity the (RAI) coverage didn't show much of the descent of the Motirolo
as one minute he was 40 seconds behind the Evans group and the next he
was past the Evans group and catching Vino.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Federal Investigation widened...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/27cdb77f089bfdaf?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 5:33 am
From: "A. Dumas Fred"


Andy Coggan wrote:
> On May 28, 2:59 am, "A. Dumas Fred" wrote:
>> Andy Coggan wrote:
>>> as unlikely that not only the UCI but also the IOC covered up
>>> Armstrong's alleged positive doping test for a mere $100k).
>> Depends on where the results are sent. As I understand it, everything
>> goes through the UCI first, so they would be able to act as gatekeeper.
>
> Not according to the IOC.

But only the UCI is supposed to have the key from sample ID to rider
name, right? So do the labs send notification of (anonymous) positive
results to WADA or IOC?


== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 6:16 am
From: Andy Coggan


On May 28, 10:42 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 28, 8:19 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 6:33 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 28, 2:31 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 28, 3:19 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 28, 9:22 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 28, 10:20 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > you think it's more plausible that Floyd made up the all
> > > > > > > the allegations of doping within US Postal, doping with each
> > > > > > > participant named, made up the story about the blood in the fridge,
> > > > > > > made up the story of the roadside team transfusion, made up the story
> > > > > > > about Lim (his closest advisor who coached him to a TdF win and
> > > > > > > subsequently defended him to anyone who would listen in print or
> > > > > > > video)
>
> > > > > > On that last point: don't forget that Lim now works for Armstrong, for
> > > > > > whom Landis clearly holds significant animosity. Falsely accusing Lim
> > > > > > could be a way of paying him back for "defecting" to the other side.
>
> > > > > > Andy Coggan
>
> > > > > So you think he went with the tactic of implicating himself over the
> > > > > course of his entire career and opening himself up to numerous civil
> > > > > and criminal liabilities to make a couple of false accusations against
> > > > > Lim for "defecting to the other side"?
>
> > > > > That is quite a theory Dr.
>
> > > > By all accounts, Landis doesn't have a penny to his name, so it would
> > > > be a waste of time and money for Lim or Leipheimer to sue him for
> > > > defamation.
>
> > > I don't think this is about renumeration. These guys are household
> > > names in the cycling community and beyond. They have reputations that
> > > one would think they'd protect. Especially with sponsorships that can
> > > sometimes dwarf their rider salaries. Sponsorships are based on one's
> > > reputation.
>
> > > A court victory or settlement is what they would be after here to
> > > clear their names. LA indicated immediately that he wasn't interested
> > > in pursuing the matter. That should be shocking to his fans. None of
> > > the others accused have even breathed the notion of suing him. That
> > > fact alone seems to speak quite loudly.
>
> > Sure, Leipheimer, Lim, Zabriskie, etc., have "skin in the game", but
> > Landis doesn't, so why should he be afraid of smearing anyone and
> > everyone with false accusations?
>
> He's obviously unafraid of either telling the truth or smearing them
> but I don't see what that has to do with my point which was in regard
> to these guys defending their good names in a court of law. You seem
> to be changing the subject a bit here.

No, you're the one who seems to have lost the plot a bit. My point is
that Landis really has no reason not to lie about having received a
transfusion by Lim. How Lim or Leipheimer feel or respond really has
nothing to do with it.

> I think if the accused have nothing to hide they'd jump at the chance
> to clear their names, but if there is something to hide then the
> current tactic is definitely advised.
>
> > > > As for criminal liabilities, what US law would Landis have broken by
> > > > receiving a blood transfusion in foreign country? (Landis has already
> > > > told the French to k***-off with respect to the hacking incident, so
> > > > clearly he's not concerned about foreign prosecution.)
>
> > > I'm talking about the US only. I don't think he'll ever visit France
> > > again. If I'm not mistaken one of the Times pieces mentioned that he
> > > may have to work an immunity deal to continue speaking with Novitzky
> > > because his email allegations left him open to potential charges.
>
> > Again, what crime could he possibly be charged with by claiming that
> > Lim performed a transfusion on him in a foreign country?
>
> I simply stated that I was suprised with your theory that Floyd may
> have implicated himself in his quest to take down Lim for defecting to
> the "other side", thereby opening himself up to potential civil and
> criminal charges. You made the leap to the transfusion in France. What
> is and is not chargable prosecutable here in the US is another story
> that will be hitting theaters soon.

No leap: I have been discussing the accusation against Lim, and only
against Lim, all along.

Andy Coggan


== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 6:22 am
From: Andy Coggan


On May 28, 6:15 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 28, 2:24 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 3:34 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 28, 9:31 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 28, 11:20 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 28, 9:12 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 28, 10:33 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 28, 8:24 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On May 28, 9:55 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On May 28, 3:50 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On May 27, 11:55 pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 27, 11:29 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Keep in mind that we are talking abou two riders with TdF GC
> > > > > > > > > > > > ambitions, meaning that their strongest allegiance is to themselves.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > dumbass,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > fuentes was working with several TdF GC riders at the same time.
>
> > > > > > > > > > As I said, *if* Lim did in fact provide transfusions to both Landis
> > > > > > > > > > and Leipheimer, he didn't do it because he was paid to do so by Landis/
> > > > > > > > > > Phonak.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Andy Coggan
>
> > > > > > > > > Cogster - Come on now. No one suggested Floyd or Phonak paid for
> > > > > > > > > Leipheimer's alleged transfusion from Lim. Your point was that you
> > > > > > > > > thought Floyd's story was "illogical" because that would have Lim
> > > > > > > > > working on both riders while he was an employee of Floyd/Phonak. (I
> > > > > > > > > think everyone else here assumed Levi would cover the cost of his own
> > > > > > > > > transfusion).
>
> > > > > > > > In 2005 and 2006, Lim was paid by Landis to be his *personal*
> > > > > > > > assistant, and the two were quite closely connected. Thus, as I said
> > > > > > > > before if he (Lim) performed a transfusion for Leipheimer (another GC
> > > > > > > > contender, but riding for a different team), he must have done so as a
> > > > > > > > favor to someone, or because he was paid additional money by someone
> > > > > > > > other than Landis. Neither of these two possibilties make a lot of
> > > > > > > > sense to me when you consider that the allegation is that the
> > > > > > > > transfusions took place at the same time, i.e., that Landis was aware
> > > > > > > > that Lim was (allegedly) providing his services to Leipheimer as well.
> > > > > > > > IOW, why would Landis let Lim undermine his own chances that way, and
> > > > > > > > why would Lim be so up-front about his disloyal/mercenary behavior?
>
> > > > > > > > Andy Coggan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > Cogster - The ProTour world may be a lot more inbred than you purport
> > > > > > > to understand it to be. You are basing your argument on the assumption
> > > > > > > that Floyd's payments to Lim retained him as his exclusive
> > > > > > > preparatore. What caused you to make this assumption?
>
> > > > > > I'm not making that assumption. I'm making the assumption that if Lim
> > > > > > were going to sell his services to somebody else, he wouldn't be so
> > > > > > obvious about it.
>
> > > > > > Andy Coggan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > OK. Then you are making the assumption that Floyd felt he had an
> > > > > exclusive relationship with Lim. Why do you make that assumption?
>
> > > > Because of 1) the obvious closeness of their relationship, and 2) the
> > > > role model Armstrong likely provided to Landis as to how such
> > > > professional arrangements should be structured (just ask John Cobb).
>
> > > I just cannot see where you make the leap from what you describe as
> > > "obvious closeness" to exclusivity, where you think Landis had Lim all
> > > to himself. Then you make an even bigger leap by assuming Landis took
> > > professional arrangement cues from his "role model" - You then go on
> > > to assume that Lance sets up his aerodynamic professional arrangements
> > > the same way he set up his preparatore professional arrangements.
> > > Seriously?
>
> > Seriously (in that I find the conclusion plausible, not that I'm
> > convinced that it is true). That is, if I were paying someone to act
> > as my "preparatore" I would most certainly do my best to keep the
> > arrangement exclusive (be that by paying them more, threatening them,
> > keeping them under close tabs, whatever). Conversely, if I were acting
> > as a "preparatore" I wouldn't go flaunting the fact that I was working
> > with multiple competing riders by performing transfusions in the same
> > room at the same time, as that would tend to undercut the value of my
> > services.
>
> Well you should take comfort in the fact that it appears you are a
> whole lot smarter at this dope thing than Floyd, Levi and Allen
> Fucking Lim.

> > > > Again, I don't consider what Landis has alleged (with respect to Lim
> > > > providing transfusions) *impossible* - just quite implausible (and not
> > > > just because of the fact that Leipheimer was supposedly also there).
>
> > > Right. You feel this way because of a deck stacked with your personal
> > > assumptions that really don't have any basis in facts.
>
> > > Do you think it's possible that these ProTour riders, especially the
> > > very small US contingent share more information than you might
> > > realize? Have you ever been to Girona? It's quite small. Most of these
> > > guys all live within blocks of each other, that is if they're not
> > > sharing the same house. Did you ever think that maybe these
> > > friendships transcend the temporary nature of the teams they are
> > > currently under contract with? Did you ever think that maybe just
> > > maybe they all band together and it's a matter of "us" versus "them",
> > > with "them" being everyone outside their small tight group? And that
> > > maybe they might share the same time proven, test proven, "safe"
> > > preparation methods with each other? Did you ever think that this
> > > preparation for a race might be the same to them as getting a bike
> > > tuned up? Did you ever think that maybe none of this is a big secret
> > > to those on the inside?
>
> > As I said before, Landis has a credibility problem, and he himself
> > admits that he has no physical evidence to support his allegations.
> > You therefore have to evaluate the truthfulness of his accusations in
> > light of normal human behavior, known personal allegiances and
> > grudges, people's training and background, etc. In that context, his
> > claim that Lim provided transfusions to both he and Leipheimer and at
> > the same place and the same time does not make much sense to me.
>
> I don't think there is any mistaking the fact that Floyd has a lot of
> problems. So would you at least agree that Allen Fucking Lim is a
> shitty physiologist because he had no clue his rider with whom he had
> an exclusive personal training relationship was doped up to his eye-
> teeth?

No, I would not agree with that statement. Lim is not a medical
doctor, and would not/did not have access to anything other than his
power data. As I have pointed out to Lafferty (and been quoted by
CyclingNews, etc.) many times before, you can't rely on such numbers
(or VO2max testing, etc.) to definitively determine who is or isn't
doping.

Andy Coggan


== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 6:34 am
From: Andy Coggan


On May 29, 7:33 am, "A. Dumas Fred" <alexan...@dumas.fr> wrote:
> Andy Coggan wrote:
> > On May 28, 2:59 am, "A. Dumas Fred" wrote:
> >> Andy Coggan wrote:
> >>> as unlikely that not only the UCI but also the IOC covered up
> >>> Armstrong's alleged positive doping test for a mere $100k).
> >> Depends on where the results are sent. As I understand it, everything
> >> goes through the UCI first, so they would be able to act as gatekeeper.
>
> > Not according to the IOC.
>
> But only the UCI is supposed to have the key from sample ID to rider
> name, right? So do the labs send notification of (anonymous) positive
> results to WADA or IOC?

My understanding is that they do. IOW, if there had been a positive
test during the 2002 (or 2001) Tour de Suisse, both the Swiss
federation and the IOC would have been informed of that fact by the
lab.

Hence, the only way of cutting off the flow of information would have
been to bribe the lab directly - but that would require knowing which
lab to bribe, as well as probably bribing multiple lab members. That
is certainly not an impossible scenario, but it isn't what Landis has
claimed.

Andy Coggan

== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 8:02 am
From: curtis@the-md-russells.org


On Fri, 28 May 2010 13:34:58 -0700 (PDT), DA74
<davidastor74@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Do you think it's possible that these ProTour riders, especially the
>very small US contingent share more information than you might
>realize?
'
I think it is unlikely and would be founded only on the demonstrable
stupidity of some members of the Pro Tour. People commit crimes every
day and continue for years and decades among people that they
socialize with and head for the bars with every Friday and the whole
contingent, including the owners of the business defrauded, are
thoroughly surprised when the investigators show up with the boxes.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...


== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 11:14 am
From: DA74


On May 29, 6:16 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On May 28, 10:42 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 8:19 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > On May 28, 6:33 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 28, 2:31 pm, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 28, 3:19 pm, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 28, 9:22 am, Andy Coggan <acog...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 28, 10:20 am, DA74 <davidasto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > you think it's more plausible that Floyd made up the all
> > > > > > > > the allegations of doping within US Postal, doping with each
> > > > > > > > participant named, made up the story about the blood in the fridge,
> > > > > > > > made up the story of the roadside team transfusion, made up the story
> > > > > > > > about Lim (his closest advisor who coached him to a TdF win and
> > > > > > > > subsequently defended him to anyone who would listen in print or
> > > > > > > > video)
>
> > > > > > > On that last point: don't forget that Lim now works for Armstrong, for
> > > > > > > whom Landis clearly holds significant animosity. Falsely accusing Lim
> > > > > > > could be a way of paying him back for "defecting" to the other side.
>
> > > > > > > Andy Coggan
>
> > > > > > So you think he went with the tactic of implicating himself over the
> > > > > > course of his entire career and opening himself up to numerous civil
> > > > > > and criminal liabilities to make a couple of false accusations against
> > > > > > Lim for "defecting to the other side"?
>
> > > > > > That is quite a theory Dr.
>
> > > > > By all accounts, Landis doesn't have a penny to his name, so it would
> > > > > be a waste of time and money for Lim or Leipheimer to sue him for
> > > > > defamation.
>
> > > > I don't think this is about renumeration. These guys are household
> > > > names in the cycling community and beyond. They have reputations that
> > > > one would think they'd protect. Especially with sponsorships that can
> > > > sometimes dwarf their rider salaries. Sponsorships are based on one's
> > > > reputation.
>
> > > > A court victory or settlement is what they would be after here to
> > > > clear their names. LA indicated immediately that he wasn't interested
> > > > in pursuing the matter. That should be shocking to his fans. None of
> > > > the others accused have even breathed the notion of suing him. That
> > > > fact alone seems to speak quite loudly.
>
> > > Sure, Leipheimer, Lim, Zabriskie, etc., have "skin in the game", but
> > > Landis doesn't, so why should he be afraid of smearing anyone and
> > > everyone with false accusations?
>
> > He's obviously unafraid of either telling the truth or smearing them
> > but I don't see what that has to do with my point which was in regard
> > to these guys defending their good names in a court of law. You seem
> > to be changing the subject a bit here.
>
> No, you're the one who seems to have lost the plot a bit. My point is
> that Landis really has no reason not to lie about having received a
> transfusion by Lim. How Lim or Leipheimer feel or respond really has
> nothing to do with it.

Well then it looks like we're right back to my surprise at your
incredible theory that Floyd either truly or falsely implicated
himself by admitting to doping over the course of his entire career
thereby burning any last bridges in the pro cycling community and
completely erasing whatever shred of a reputation he had left - all
this to seek retribution from those whom he either held animosity or
wanted to pay back for defecting to the other side - and at the same
time opening himself up to potential civil and criminal liabilities.

That is an amazing theory.

Another theory that is admittedly a bit less logically circuitous is
that his latest story is true. Maybe time will tell. And maybe not.
-DA74

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Landis revelations : pieces of the puzzle falling into place...LA's
2009 TDF blood profile explained ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a1c101c55187feef?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 5:37 am
From: "B. Lafferty"


On 5/28/2010 11:45 PM, Brad Anders wrote:
> On May 28, 2:50 pm, "B. Lafferty"<b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On 5/28/2010 3:11 PM, Brad Anders wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 27, 4:59 pm, Anton Berlin<truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On May 27, 6:24 pm, Brad Anders<pband...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> You seem to be missing the point. The bike side of the "Science of
>>>>> Lance" wasn't a significant factor in his winning 7 TDF's. All that
>>>>> crap about his aged tires and 100 gm on his TT bike making a huge
>>>>> difference is simply ridiculous hyperbole that's been debunked 100
>>>>> times on r.b.tech. Wind tunnel testing for the top TT riders has been
>>>>> standard practice for years, Lance is no different. I don't believe
>>>>> for a second that his new helmet saved 23 seconds in his TT, either,
>>>>> as that is a purely theoretical prediction based on a fractional
>>>>> difference in drag as measured in a tunnel, and extrapolated to real-
>>>>> world conditions. If it made him think he was going to save 23
>>>>> seconds, that's probably where 99% of the benefit came from. IMO,
>>>>> Lance's TT position sucks, anyway, though he's not as bad as Indurain,
>>>>> who TT'ed on raw power.
>>
>>>>> The real "Science of Lance" that made a difference was his training
>>>>> preparation and rigorous use of testing to assess when he needed to do
>>>>> next, along with meticulous preparation, proper mental attitude, team
>>>>> preparation and management, and a hell of a lot of good luck. That's
>>>>> what he did that resulted in a competitive advantage, and I salute him
>>>>> for doing a better job than his competitors did. Even his competitors
>>>>> acknowledge that Lance's passion for cycling and attention to detail
>>>>> is simply far beyond that of nearly all pros, plenty of quotes out
>>>>> there on this.
>>
>>>>> Brad Anders
>>
>>>> Started out as scientist and ended as a gushing little schoolgirl.
>>>> You and GBMT should try to go 50/50 on buying Lance's jock strap off
>>>> EBAY and take turns licking the cup.
>>
>>>> The 'passion' comes from the fact he's doping and the training doesn't
>>>> burn him out and trash him like clean non-doped humans.
>>
>>> Personally, I think Lance is an asshole. Everything I said about why
>>> he's a winner is well-known, including the comments from other pros
>>> who have remarked about his dedication. As for his doping, I haven't
>>> seen any evidence he's doing anything that his competition doesn't
>>> to.
>>
>>> Oh, and if I only want to watch "clean non-doped humans" in pro
>>> cycling, please send me a list, thanks.
>>
>>> Brad Anders
>>
>> Curling
>
> Beta blockers.
>
> Brad Anders
Ale.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Still in Lance's Innocence Camp ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/791f129b5933acea?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 5:54 am
From: RicodJour


On May 27, 10:42 pm, --D-y <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 3:09 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <0dff1f72-8f85-4fc3-bd71-98885fb3e...@d12g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
>
> >  raamman <raam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On May 26, 4:32 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <6b0eee3d-3a43-4f93-b797-94173d071...@e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > >  --D-y <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > Don't trust testing, don't trust "truth machines" (which are coming,
> > > > > supposedly), with humans at the controls.
>
> > > > Truth machines exist. Some brain scans resolve
> > > > brain activity well enough to detect when the
> > > > subject is lying.
>
> > > who interprets the scans and determines who or what is lying ?
>
> > Do you suppose I argue that the human element is not
> > present, or not corruptible?
>
> > People in general have the capacity to know when
> > somebody is lying. Why they do not exercise their
> > capacity is a good question.
>
> Years ago on the Carson Tonight show, an expert did a segment on
> "knowing" when people were lying, by facial expressions, perhaps other
> physical giveaways.
> At that time, the "expertise" (according to this expert anyhow) was
> that a few people can totally fake it, at least as far as facial
> expressions, and maybe other mannerisms or "tells".

Google 'facial action coding'.

R

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 8:25 am
From: raamman


On May 28, 4:25 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <9925bed5-eeb5-4f6b-9fe9-468fccead...@s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  raamman<raam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 27, 4:09 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <0dff1f72-8f85-4fc3-bd71-98885fb3e...@d12g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > >  raamman<raam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On May 26, 4:32 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <6b0eee3d-3a43-4f93-b797-94173d071...@e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > > >  --D-y <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Don't trust testing, don't trust "truth machines" (which are coming,
> > > > > > supposedly), with humans at the controls.
>
> > > > > Truth machines exist. Some brain scans resolve
> > > > > brain activity well enough to detect when the
> > > > > subject is lying.
>
> > > > who interprets the scans and determines who or what is lying ?
>
> > > Do you suppose I argue that the human element is not
> > > present, or not corruptible?
>
> > > People in general have the capacity to know when
> > > somebody is lying. Why they do not exercise their
> > > capacity is a good question.
>
> > I don't mean to sound curt, but
>
> > yes, you can tell that to the innocents in jail.
>
> Did you tell that to the innocents in jail?
> You sound curt, you are gratuitously curt,
> you meant to sound curt, and you want to be curt.
>
> I laugh at your pretensions of caring.
> Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
>
> --
> Michael Press- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Is that your lie detector not working or are you just happy to hear
from me ?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Leadville is a little safer tonight
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/e1546c9946374096?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 8:41 am
From: Amit Ghosh


On May 28, 5:48 pm, "B. Lafferty" <b...@nowhere.com> wrote:

>
> Bicycle education class??

dumbass,

yes. it's taught by jobst brandt.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: CFE
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/cd678cdd6d994ee6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 9:01 am
From: Scott


Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
think he left it 'too little, too late'.


== 2 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 9:31 am
From: "K. Fred Gauss"


Scott wrote:
> Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
> strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
> about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
> seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
> think he left it 'too little, too late'.

My opinion on him is slowly changing. I just can't get past his little
dog and threatening to cut someone's head off. That moment still defines
him, to me.


== 3 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 9:31 am
From: Fred Flintstein


Scott wrote:
> Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
> strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
> about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
> seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
> think he left it 'too little, too late'.

50 seconds on Scarponi, 51 on Nibali. 15km to work with, and
a 200m climb. It's possible, but it certainly won't be easy.

As a comparison, the final TT in the 1989 Tour was 15km, and
Lemond picked up 58 seconds on Fignon.

The opener in Amsterdam was 8.4 km, and it went like this:

CFE
Nibali @ 8 seconds
Scarponi @ 19 seconds

It's possible, but unlikely. A stage win could happen though.

Fred Flintstein


== 4 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 9:34 am
From: "H. Fred Kveck"


In article <fedf15b4-b3f4-4952-a710-fd0c9910d3bd@40g2000pry.googlegroups.com>,
Scott <hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
> strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
> about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
> seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
> think he left it 'too little, too late'.

Based on the stage 16 TT, I don't think CFE will be able to gain enough time on
Nibali and Scarponi to get on the box. I think if he'd been able to gain about 30
seconds today, it might have been possible. You're right about his newfound
aggressive style. I wonder if BMC will look to pick up some more riders that can ride
support in GTs at the end of the year.

Arroyo has been another big surprise in this race.


== 5 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 10:41 am
From: Fred Flintstein


H. Fred Kveck wrote:
> You're right about his newfound
> aggressive style. I wonder if BMC will look to pick up some more riders that can ride
> support in GTs at the end of the year.

He'll be 34 next year. I don't know that he's the guy to build
around for the future.

Fred Flintstein


== 6 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 10:58 am
From: Betty Munro


Scott wrote:
> Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
> strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
> about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
> seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
> think he left it 'too little, too late'.

Dunno about the GC but perhaps if he'd gone a bit earlier he could have
had a stage win today.


== 7 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 11:06 am
From: Bob Martin


in 316172 20100529 185805 Betty Munro <none@mailinator.com> wrote:
>Scott wrote:
>> Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
>> strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
>> about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
>> seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
>> think he left it 'too little, too late'.
>
>Dunno about the GC but perhaps if he'd gone a bit earlier he could have
>had a stage win today.

He made his points jersey a little safer.


== 8 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 11:10 am
From: "Mike Jacoubowsky"


"H. Fred Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote in message
news:YOURhoward-6BFC57.09344529052010@news.giganews.com...
> In article
> <fedf15b4-b3f4-4952-a710-fd0c9910d3bd@40g2000pry.googlegroups.com>,
> Scott <hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Too bad he didn't have a team to support him. He's ridden pretty
>> strongly and most surprisingly, aggressively throughout the Giro. How
>> about that late attack today??? If only he could've taken a few more
>> seconds, maybe he could TT his way back onto the podium tomorrow. I
>> think he left it 'too little, too late'.
>
> Based on the stage 16 TT, I don't think CFE will be able to gain enough
> time on
> Nibali and Scarponi to get on the box. I think if he'd been able to gain
> about 30
> seconds today, it might have been possible. You're right about his
> newfound
> aggressive style. I wonder if BMC will look to pick up some more riders
> that can ride
> support in GTs at the end of the year.
>
> Arroyo has been another big surprise in this race.

Sorry, but Cadel has to take responsibility for his lack of team mates. When
he negotiates with a team, he's in control of his destiny. He can choose to
work with someone that will guarantee a team built around him, or not. He
can decide to go for a smaller salary and larger bonus with a Grand Tour
win, with more $$$ for support folk. He can choose to not worry or deal
appropriately with the egos that come with the type of rider that could keep
up with him.

Next time I talk with Chris Horner, who was his room-mate during the TdF a
few years back, I've got to ask him about this. What goes on in Cadel's
head, regarding team mates? I remember even that year he was berating his
team for not supporting him well enough, and wondered how that made Chris
feel.

--Mike Jacoubowsky
Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReaction.com
Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Giro d'Italia, stage 20 summary
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/ce3f630fce069be0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, May 29 2010 11:02 am
From: Bob Martin


Stage 20 : May 29, Bormio - Passa del Tonale, 178 km

1 Johann Tschopp (Swi) Bbox Bouygues Telecom 5.26.47
2 Cadel Evans (Aus) BMC Racing Team 0.16
3 Ivan Basso (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0.25
4 Michele Scarponi (Ita) Androni Giocattoli
5 David Arroyo Duran (Spa) Caisse d'Epargne 0.41
6 Vincenzo Nibali (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0.43
7 John Gadret (Fra) AG2R La Mondiale 0.48
8 Bauke Mollema (Ned) Rabobank 0.50
9 Daniele Righi (Ita) Lampre-Farnese Vini 0.57
10 Vasil Kiryienka (Blr) Caisse d'Epargne 1.02


Changes in GC, stage 20 compared to stage 19 :

Biggest gainers by position :
+19 Matthew Lloyd
+19 Daniele Righi
+18 Stefano Pirazzi
+16 Michael Schar
+15 Gilberto Simoni
+15 Craig Lewis
+15 Cayetano Sarmiento Tunarrosa
+13 Yukiya Arashiro
+12 Anders Lund
+11 Vasil Kiryienka

Biggest losers by position :
-10 Valerio Agnoli
-9 Alessandro Bisolti
-9 Jan Bakelandts
-8 Francesco Failli
-8 Rigoberto Uran Uran
-7 Giampaolo Caruso
-7 Jackson Rodriguez
-7 Jerome Pineau
-7 Juan Horrach Rippoll
-6 Andriy Grivko
-6 Branislau Samoilau

Biggest gainers by time :
+0:37 Johann Tschopp
+0:13 Cadel Evans

Biggest losers by time :
-38:07 Luca Mazzanti
-37:57 Alessandro Bertolini
-37:57 Christopher Sutton
-37:57 Dario Andriotto
-37:57 Guillaume Le Floch
-37:57 Luke Roberts
-37:57 Markus Fothen
-37:57 Michiel Elijzen
-37:57 Sebastien Hinault
-37:47 Alan Marangoni
-37:47 Brent Bookwalter

Favourites by position :
+1 Vladimir Karpets
+1 Alexandre Vinokourov
-2 Carlos Sastre Candil
-3 Linus Gerdemann
-5 Bradley Wiggins

Favourites by time :
+0:13 Cadel Evans
-0:08 Michele Scarponi
-0:26 Vincenzo Nibali
-1:09 Alexandre Vinokourov
-1:22 Damiano Cunego
-2:06 Vladimir Karpets
-3:23 Carlos Sastre Candil
-14:26 Linus Gerdemann
-37:37 Bradley Wiggins

Top 3 and favourites GC standings (previous stage in parens) :
1 Ivan Basso 87:23:00 (unchanged)
2 David Arroyo Duran 1:15 (was 2nd at 0:51)
3 Vincenzo Nibali 2:56 (was 3rd at 2:30)
4 Michele Scarponi 2:57 (was 4th at 2:49)
5 Cadel Evans 3:47 (was 5th at 4:00)
.....
7 Alexandre Vinokourov 7:31 (was 8th at 6:22)
8 Carlos Sastre Candil 8:55 (was 6th at 5:32)
.....
11 Damiano Cunego 16:45 (was 11th at 15:23)
.....
14 Vladimir Karpets 25:09 (was 15th at 23:03)
.....
16 Linus Gerdemann 34:31 (was 13th at 20:05)
.....
40 Bradley Wiggins 1:48:11 (was 35th at 1:10:34)

Top 10 on Points table with previous in parens:
1 Cadel Evans 136 (was 1st with 116 points)
2 Alexandre Vinokourov 112 (was 2nd with 105 points)
3 Ivan Basso 104 (was 5th with 88 points)
4 Vincenzo Nibali 104 (was 3rd with 94 points)
5 Michele Scarponi 103 (was 4th with 89 points)
6 Jerome Pineau 69 (was 6th with 74 points)
7 Filippo Pozzato 67 (unchanged)
8 Damiano Cunego 64 (was 10th with 61 points)
9 John Gadret 64 (was 11th with 55 points)
10 Gregory Henderson 59 (was 9th with 64 points)

Top 10 on Mountains table with previous in parens:
1 Matthew Lloyd 56 (was 2nd with 29 points)
2 Ivan Basso 41 (was 1st with 35 points)
3 Johann Tschopp 38 (was 43rd with 1 points)
4 Cadel Evans 35 (was 3rd with 25 points)
5 Michele Scarponi 25 (was 4th with 21 points)
6 Ludovic Turpin 20 (was 5th with 20 points)
7 Rubens Bertogliati 16 (was 8th with 16 points)
8 Simone Stortoni 16 (was 9th with 16 points)
9 Vincenzo Nibali 15 (was 10th with 15 points)
10 Chris Sorensen 15 (was 11th with 15 points)

Retirements to date : Stage
Gabriel Rasch (Nor) Cervelo Test Team 20 <<<
Mathieu Claude (Fra) Bbox Bouygues Telecom 20 <<<
Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Acqua & Sapone 20 <<<
William Bonnet (Fra) Bbox Bouygues Telecom 20 <<<
Xavier Tondo Volpini (Spa) Cervelo Test Team 20 <<<
Andre Greipel (Ger) Team HTC - Columbia 19
Arnold Jeannesson (Fra) Caisse d'Epargne 19
Christopher Froome (GBr) Sky Professional Cycling Team 19
Danilo Hondo (Ger) Lampre - Farnese Vini 19
Dario Cataldo (Ita) Quick Step 19
Julian Dean (NZl) Garmin - Transitions 19
Marcel Sieberg (Ger) Team HTC - Columbia 19
David Loosli (Swi) Lampre - Farnese Vini 17
Federico Canuti (Ita) Colnago - CSF Inox 17
Francesco Reda (Ita) Quick Step 17
Ermanno Capelli (Ita) Footon - Servetto 16
Leonardo Bertagnolli (Ita) Androni Giocattoli - Diquigiovani 16
Mickael Buffaz (Fra) Cofidis, Le Credit en Ligne 16
Giampaolo Cheula (Ita) Footon - Servetto 15
Guillaume Blot (Fra) Cofidis, Le Credit en Ligne 15
Manuel Belletti (Ita) Colnago - CSF Inox 15
Matthew Harley Goss (Aus) Team HTC - Columbia 15
Paul Voss (Ger) Team Milram 15
Robert McEwen (Aus) Team Katusha 15
Tyler Farrar (USA) Garmin - Transitions 15
Anthony Ravard (Fra) AG2R La Mondiale 13
David Millar (GBr) Garmin - Transitions 13
Domenico Pozzovivo (Ita) Colnago - CSF Inox 13
Jack Bobridge (Aus) Garmin - Transitions 13
Morris Possoni (Ita) Sky Professional Cycling Team 13
Dominik Roels (Ger) Team Milram 12
Wouter Weylandt (Bel) Quick Step 12
Adam Blyth (GBr) Omega Pharma - Lotto 11
Adam Hansen (Aus) Team HTC - Columbia 11
Alberto Loddo (Ita) Androni Giocattoli - Diquigiovani 11
Alexsandr Dyachenko (Kaz) Astana 11
Enrico Gasparotto (Ita) Astana 11
Jeffry Louder (USA) BMC Racing Team 11
Martin Pedersen (Den) Footon - Servetto 11
Mauro Santambrogio (Ita) BMC Racing Team 11
Rene Mandri (Est) AG2R La Mondiale 11
Thomas Rohregger (Aut) Team Milram 11
Valentin Iglinskiy (Kaz) Astana 11
Baden Cooke (Aus) Team Saxo Bank 9
Alessandro Petacchi (Ita) Lampre - Farnese Vini 8
Andrea Masciarelli (Ita) Acqua & Sapone 8
Anthony Charteau (Fra) Bbox Bouygues Telecom 8
Dmitry Kozontchuk (Rus) Rabobank 8
Fabian Wegmann (Ger) Team Milram 8
Francesco Masciarelli (Ita) Acqua & Sapone 8
John Murphy (USA) BMC Racing Team 8
Sacha Modolo (Ita) Colnago - CSF Inox 8
Eros Capecchi (Ita) Footon - Servetto 7
Marzio Bruseghin (Ita) Caisse d'Epargne 7
Guillaume Bonnafond (Fra) AG2R La Mondiale 6
Michele Merlo (Ita) Footon - Servetto 6
Paolo Tiralongo (Ita) Astana 6
Christian Vandevelde (USA) Garmin - Transitions 3
Martin Kohler (Swi) BMC Racing Team 2
Total retirements : 59


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.bicycles.racing"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.bicycles.racing+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

gsk

https://secure.shareit.com/shareit/checkout.html?PRODUCT[300429992]=1&languageid=1&stylefrom=300429992&backlink=http%3A%2F%2Fforexguide.blogspot.com&cookies=1¤cies=USD&pts=VISA,MASTERCARD,AMEX,DC