Friday, July 16, 2010

[socialactionfoundationforequity:3521 Re: Jharkhand panchayats to have e-Secretariat

Buzz It
Dear All,

It is an encouraging news. Kerala, the front runner state has
established computers and internet in the panchayats, but not e-
governance so far.

Regards,

K Rajasekharan
http://decwatch.org

On Jul 16, 7:36 pm, Avnish Jolly <avnishjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jharkhand panchayats to have e-Secretariathttp://igovernment.in/site/jharkhand-panchayats-have-e-secretariat-37991
>
> It is aimed at encouraging e-Governance mechanism at the grass root
> level of the democratic set up
> Published on 07/15/2010 - 08:16:15 AM
> By Chandrabindu
> Ranchi: All panchayats offices across Jharkhand will have e-Secretariat
> —a gift the state government has proposed to encourage e-Governance
> mechanism at the lowest-level of democratic set up.
>
> To begin with, as many as 1,610 gram panchayats out of the total 4,565
> will get computers with net connectivity. Secretariat of the rest gram
> panchayats will be computerised in two subsequent phases.
>
> Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)
> Commissioner Sunil Kumar Barnwal said that construction of the office
> building that would house secretariat of 1,610 had begun.
>
> "Computerisation work will commence by the end of this fiscal, when
> the building would be handed over to Gram Panchayats," he added.
>
> Apart from serving as storehouse of database of each individual of the
> panchayats and documents related to development activities, the e-
> Secretariat will also be tasked to keep the records of work and
> payments made to the workers under various schemes of the MGNREGA
> going in the area.
>
> Labour cost of the building of each panchayat secretariat is estimated
> to cost Rs 10 lakh. The fund for the purpose has been arranged from
> the MGNREGA scheme.
>
> Construction cost pegged around Rs 11 lakh, however, would be borne
> out by the state from the central assistance under the Backward Region
> Grant Fund (BRGF).
>
> Expenses incurred on the computerisation of the Panchayat offices will
> have to be shared equally by the Rural Development and the Information
> Technology Departments.
>
> "The main reason behind the decision to arm Panchayat offices with
> computers and Internet-facility is to make the grassroots democracy
> function in an efficient way. This will also help these centres double
> up as knowledge centre for villagers," Barnwal said.
>
> The proposed e-Secretariat will also help ease the problems for
> villagers to have various types of certificates like residential,
> income and caste related ones as they could have them at their
> doorsteps. Till now, they need to go to block offices or the district
> headquarters to have these certificates.
>
> These e-Secretariats would become fully functional as soon as the
> Panchayat polls are concluded by the year-end, the officials said.

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

rec.bicycles.racing - 25 new messages in 11 topics - digest

Buzz It
rec.bicycles.racing
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

rec.bicycles.racing@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Argy Bargy - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/64b5eb75dfb613df?hl=en
* Washington Post --More Details of Armstrong Investigation - 3 messages, 3
authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/faedac5e31ba3c86?hl=en
* Farrar - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a0c82fd693db60b1?hl=en
* Specialized is kicking ass this tour... - 4 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/1d01e54c8ff2555b?hl=en
* Two observations - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/d9c3e765d998886a?hl=en
* Contador: "All I Really Need to Know About Being a Good Teammate I Learned
From Lance" - 6 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/47a2f6f02b79bc57?hl=en
* Lance: Doper and Ecoterrorist? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/320c13156ba0f5d5?hl=en
* Huh - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/dc2c9813baf58e47?hl=en
* Lafferty was totally fucking wrong about Lance getting arrested in France! -
2 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/b76f57f21176d546?hl=en
* "We presume he is now riding clean..." - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/dc3fbc21abc940bb?hl=en
* Tour de France, stage 12 summary - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f606595cc3e7eaa9?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Argy Bargy
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/64b5eb75dfb613df?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 3:58 pm
From: Scott


On Jul 16, 12:31 pm, Fred Flintstein
<bob.schwa...@sbcREMOVEglobal.net> wrote:
> On 7/16/2010 12:36 PM, Zeno wrote:
>
> > On Jul 16, 5:16 am, Carl Sundquist<carl.sundqu...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >> Dumbass,
>
> >> One head butt is ok, but two or three isn't? If head butting is so
> >> wrong there should be a specific rule against it, but there isn't.
>
> > There isn't a specific rule about pulling a knife and stabbing the guy
> > either.
>
> > Zeno
>
> You know, I was just pondering this in the context of Superweek
> sprints. A head butt or three would not get you tossed but pulling
> a gun or a knife might. Maybe. There are guys at Superweek that
> would have a Tour sprinter for lunch.
>
> Fred Flintstein

You're assuming that the guys at Superweek could keep up with the Tour
sprinters. You can't headbutt someone if you can't catch them.


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 4:14 pm
From: Plano Dude


On Jul 16, 5:58 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 12:31 pm, Fred Flintstein
>
>
>
> <bob.schwa...@sbcREMOVEglobal.net> wrote:
> > On 7/16/2010 12:36 PM, Zeno wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 16, 5:16 am, Carl Sundquist<carl.sundqu...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > >> Dumbass,
>
> > >> One head butt is ok, but two or three isn't? If head butting is so
> > >> wrong there should be a specific rule against it, but there isn't.
>
> > > There isn't a specific rule about pulling a knife and stabbing the guy
> > > either.
>
> > > Zeno
>
> > You know, I was just pondering this in the context of Superweek
> > sprints. A head butt or three would not get you tossed but pulling
> > a gun or a knife might. Maybe. There are guys at Superweek that
> > would have a Tour sprinter for lunch.
>
> > Fred Flintstein
>
> You're assuming that the guys at Superweek could keep up with the Tour
> sprinters.  You can't headbutt someone if you can't catch them.

There are plenty of riders at Superweek who can go as fast as the Tour
sprinters in a criterium, but not at the end of a 200 km stage.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Washington Post --More Details of Armstrong Investigation
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/faedac5e31ba3c86?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 4:07 pm
From: Plano Dude


On Jul 16, 4:29 pm, "B. Lafferty" <b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/16/AR201...

It's out of the time in question but was a reason announced why Don
Caitlin and Armstrong cancelled their agreement to test and publish
his blood and urine lab results during Armstrong's comeback?


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 5:22 pm
From: "B. Lafferty"


On 7/16/2010 7:07 PM, Plano Dude wrote:
> On Jul 16, 4:29 pm, "B. Lafferty"<b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/16/AR201...
>
> It's out of the time in question but was a reason announced why Don
> Caitlin and Armstrong cancelled their agreement to test and publish
> his blood and urine lab results during Armstrong's comeback?
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/cycling/news/story?id=3900247


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 6:20 pm
From: Keith


On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:22:38 -0400, "B. Lafferty" <bl@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 7/16/2010 7:07 PM, Plano Dude wrote:
>> On Jul 16, 4:29 pm, "B. Lafferty"<b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/16/AR201...

"A couple of guys have confirmed components of what [Landis] said, but
what Novitzky is really interested in is not whether Lance Armstrong
used EPO to win the Tour de France -- that's not his mandate -- but
whether there was tax evasion, contract fraud, importing drugs, using
money to buy pharmaceuticals," said an individual with knowledge of
the investigation. "That's why the investigation has gone global."

>> It's out of the time in question but was a reason announced why Don
>> Caitlin and Armstrong cancelled their agreement to test and publish
>> his blood and urine lab results during Armstrong's comeback?
>http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/cycling/news/story?id=3900247

"Instead, Armstrong is set to announce Thursday that he'll post test
results from cycling's international federation and his own Astana
cycling team on his Web site, www.livestrong.com."

Something he stopped doing after Jakob M¿rkeberg found it surprising
that his hematocrit level should have gone up during the 2009 TDF tour
->
http://www.playthegame.org/news/detailed/blood-doping-expert-armstrongs-blood-values-could-indicate-blood-doping-4514.html

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Farrar
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a0c82fd693db60b1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 4:09 pm
From: Plano Dude


On Jul 16, 5:56 pm, thirty-six <thirty-...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On 16 July, 22:08, Uncle Dave <davidco...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> > Why didn't you tell me he was riding with a fractured wrist?  You let
> > me slag the guy off and all the while he's being some kind of hero in
> > rapidly changing geeky lenses.  What is the matter with you people?!
> > Have you no shame?
>
> > UD
>
> Two days ago he said he was feeling better.   Steroids, opiates along
> with er, would that be called cheating?

Maybe he was touched by the hand of Valentino Rossi.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Specialized is kicking ass this tour...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/1d01e54c8ff2555b?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 5:00 pm
From: cicero venatio


Have you noticed Specialized has taken over, and has the most impressive
performance so far. What was especially noteworthy was Contador's
Specialized Roubaix vs Lance's Trek Madone on the cobbles, it was so
obvious which bike was performing and what bike wasn't.


== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 5:19 pm
From: "B. Lafferty"


On 7/16/2010 8:00 PM, cicero venatio wrote:
> Have you noticed Specialized has taken over, and has the most impressive
> performance so far. What was especially noteworthy was Contador's
> Specialized Roubaix vs Lance's Trek Madone on the cobbles, it was so
> obvious which bike was performing and what bike wasn't.

I don't understand why I can't get my Specialized to climb well. :-)


== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 7:17 pm
From: Anton Berlin


On Jul 16, 7:00 pm, cicero venatio <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Have you noticed Specialized has taken over, and has the most impressive
> performance so far.  What was especially noteworthy was Contador's
> Specialized Roubaix vs Lance's Trek Madone on the cobbles, it was so
> obvious which bike was performing and what bike wasn't.

I'm a Ridley man but I did feel a twinge of wanting when I saw
Boonen's Roubaix winning bikes in the Flanders museum and at Jowan in
Kluisbergen

cycling heaven on earth in that area


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 8:52 pm
From: DirtRoadie


On Jul 16, 6:19 pm, "B. Lafferty"
> I don't understand why I can't get my Specialized to climb well.  :-)

Wow! Lafferty may ride a bicycle!
Yes, Henry, I know.
DR

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Two observations
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/d9c3e765d998886a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 5:35 pm
From: Jimmy July


On 07/16/2010 02:17 PM, Uncle Dave wrote:
> On Jul 16, 10:12 pm, Frederick the Great<rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> In article<4c409...@news.x-privat.org>,
>> Jimmy July<J...@JimmyJim.JimJimJim> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/16/2010 09:42 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
>>>> Who want's the tour to end before it gets started and because of
>>>> shitty course selection?
>>
>>> Who wants it to end because LANCE isn't winning?
>>
>> I do!
>
> If there's anyone out there who thought that Armstrong had a cat in
> hell's chance of wining this Tour, then I'd like to meet them. I have
> some really neat Get-Rich-Quick schemes I'd like to discuss. All you
> do is copy this email and send it to everyone in the known universe,
> then send me your bank details - don't forget the password, that's
> vital if you don't want anyone to steal from you - and your personal
> fortune will change overnight.

Of course LANCE had a chance at winning. He would, too, if it weren't
for all the dirty dopers who invaded the sport after he retired.

By the way, you remind me of a Nigerian Prince I used to know!


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 8:05 pm
From: "derFahrer@gmail.com"


On Jul 16, 12:40 pm, Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Second, does anyone besides the French give a damn about the mountains
> classification anymore?

I blame that on Virenque.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Contador: "All I Really Need to Know About Being a Good Teammate I
Learned From Lance"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/47a2f6f02b79bc57?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 5:45 pm
From: DirtRoadie


On Jul 16, 9:13 am, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
> Vino can't be too happy right now...

Contador was racing (and gaining time on) Schleck, not Vino.


== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 6:27 pm
From: RicodJour


On Jul 16, 12:42 pm, Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 10:13 am, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> > Vino can't be too happy right now...
>
> Perhaps, but at least AC didn't gift the stage to Rodriguez as a slap
> in the face to Vino.

I wasn't 100% convinced with the sprint. I only watched it the once,
but I thought at the time that they might have made an agreement
including a show sprint.

This was one of the rare times that I actually thought Contador lead
with his head. He gave Vino a polite slap down, forged an alliance,
and gained time, and he was able to do this without burning any
bridges. Chapeau.

R


== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 6:31 pm
From: --D-y


On Jul 16, 2:26 pm, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
> In article
> <f23e7330-950c-4837-aae5-7bde5832a...@e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
>  Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 16, 10:13 am, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
> > > Vino can't be too happy right now...
>
> > Perhaps, but at least AC didn't gift the stage to Rodriguez as a slap
> > in the face to Vino.
>
> AC didn't gift the stage but instead pulled Rodriguez's sorry ass along
> for 2 KM.  I seriously doubt that Rodriguez would have won the stage
> without the help from AC.

That's how the game is played. Need time? Go get it, Señor Pistolero!
Thanks for the tow!
The "what ifs" are moot. Hey, Contador should have just dropped
Rodriguez if he wouldn't pull!

Stage win at age 31, in his first Tour, beats Contador in a sprint
after a wicked little climb that kicked everyone else's butt incl.
Vino.
There's one nailed to the wall.

As a former sometimes opportunistic and perhaps even occasionally
crafty sprinter, D-y really liked that one; I only got to see the end
of the race this time, didn't catch the earlier action yet.
Replay, please! (I'm an American)
--D-y


== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 7:23 pm
From: RicodJour


On Jul 16, 9:31 pm, --D-y <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2:26 pm, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
> >  Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jul 16, 10:13 am, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Vino can't be too happy right now...
>
> > > Perhaps, but at least AC didn't gift the stage to Rodriguez as a slap
> > > in the face to Vino.
>
> > AC didn't gift the stage but instead pulled Rodriguez's sorry ass along
> > for 2 KM.  I seriously doubt that Rodriguez would have won the stage
> > without the help from AC.
>
> That's how the game is played. Need time? Go get it, Señor Pistolero!
> Thanks for the tow!
> The "what ifs" are moot. Hey, Contador should have just dropped
> Rodriguez if he wouldn't pull!

He wasn't worried about Rodriguez being there.

> Stage win at age 31, in his first Tour, beats Contador in a sprint
> after a wicked little climb that kicked everyone else's butt incl.
> Vino.
> There's one nailed to the wall.
>
> As a former sometimes opportunistic and perhaps even occasionally
> crafty sprinter, D-y really liked that one; I only got to see the end
> of the race this time, didn't catch the earlier action yet.
> Replay, please! (I'm an American)

I'd prefer if you didn't announce that last. I'm American, too. :)~

R


== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 7:43 pm
From: Davey Crockett


RicodJour a écrit profondement:

| I'd prefer if you didn't announce that last. I'm American, too. :)~

That's OK - We'll ovelook it just this once

--
Deaths among illegal immigrants crossing the Arizona desert from Mexico
is soaring so high this month that the medical examiner's office is
using a refrigerated truck to store some of them, the chief examiner
said Friday. Gee, what a dirty rotten shame. I think I will cry me a big ole river ;)


== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 8:57 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"

"DirtRoadie" <DirtRoadie@aol.com> wrote in message
news:a3b0ab38-5814-40ec-946b-294bb74d1db3@w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 16, 9:13 am, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
> Vino can't be too happy right now...

:: Contador was racing (and gaining time on) Schleck, not Vino.

Dumbass -

Vino doesn't care about Schleck.

Vino cares about Vino. Did you see his gesture as he crossed the line today?

Must be interesting at the Astana dinner table, although it's not as
publicized as last year.

thanks,

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lance: Doper and Ecoterrorist?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/320c13156ba0f5d5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 6:33 pm
From: Keith


On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:44:41 -0700 (PDT), NoDannyNo
<riggodeezil@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> > This tremendous flow of H2O, which is 38 times what the average
>> > household in the city uses in the summer, comes as Texas is going
>> > through a dry spell and officials are asking people to cut back on
>> > watering their lawns. "We are definitely short on rain," Lisa Rhodes,
>> > a spokeswoman for the authority, said with a sigh.
>>
>> > Mr. Armstrong declined to be interviewed. "
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/16/us/16lance.html
>
>ÒIÕm a little shocked,Ó he told The Statesman. ÒThereÕs no
>justification for that much water.Ó He added, ÒI need to fix this.Ó
>
>The article is almost a year old. Did he "fix this"?

Sure, like he kept his promise to Heras to help him win the Vueta when
he joined US Postal to help him level the competition in the climbs in
2002 and 2003.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Huh
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/dc2c9813baf58e47?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 7:06 pm
From: Carl Sundquist


Robbie Ventura just said that Craig Hummer can average 275-300 watts
on a three hour ride. Damn.


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 7:49 pm
From: "derFahrer@gmail.com"


On Jul 16, 10:06 pm, Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Robbie Ventura just said that Craig Hummer can average 275-300 watts
> on a three hour ride. Damn.

Hummer must be giving RV hummers.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lafferty was totally fucking wrong about Lance getting arrested in
France!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/b76f57f21176d546?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 7:26 pm
From: Anton Berlin


On Jul 16, 2:53 pm, Frederick the Great <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <f63ca5be-1ce3-4ab4-9b34-1511c8ab1...@u36g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>  Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > 2nd it's in the post and link given
>
> > ( a 2005 US study showed that of various cancer patients 20% were
> > former steroid users but said that more research was needed )  ( a
> > typical conclusion to get more grant money)
>
> > "Supplement use is common and increasing among patients with
> > testicular cancer. The use of exercise performance-enhancing
> > supplements was as great as 20%."
>
> What is the rate of PED use in the population?
> The population being the at risk for testicular
> cancer population.
>
> All of what you bring up are first out of the gate
> studies with headline cachet. We have seen this
> before. After a while the reason for the correlation emerges.
>
> Hormone replacement therapy.
> Breast cancer screening.
> Injecting Hg into infants.
> Al and Parkinson's disease.
> Eat margarine, not butter
> because margarine is better for you.
> Whoops! Another one bites the dust.
>
> --
> Old Fritz

Old fritz - I couldn't agree more ! http://www.forkandbottle.com/pantry/butter/images/isigny.gif


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 7:34 pm
From: Anton Berlin


On Jul 16, 5:57 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 9:28 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 16, 9:17 am, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 15, 11:47 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 15, 11:33 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 15, 4:42 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Cancer charity or humanitarian work is a zero sum game that Armstrong
> > > > > > actually grifts off of.  Look at how much energy and cash is put
> > > > > > towards 'cancer'.  Numerous organizations, boards and backoffices
> > > > > > taking a piece of the pie.  Liestrong's director takes a healthy $250k
> > > > > > salary on a budget of only $32M a year.
>
> > > > > > Compare that with the ACS taking in a $1B a year where the CEO takes
> > > > > > 1/10th of the comparative salary.
>
> > > > > > People that want to 'help' cancer patients will find a way without
> > > > > > Lance Armstrongs bullshit charity.  All he's done is cut the pie in
> > > > > > smaller pieces added overhead costs and tried to make himself look
> > > > > > good in others and his own twisted self image.
>
> > > > > > If Lance didn't play with steroids so much at the OTC he never would
> > > > > > have given cancer a 2nd thought.    Or had it in the first place more
> > > > > > than likely.
>
> > > > > Doesn't it ever occur to you to look at facts before you spew???
> > > > > There is no established link whatsoever between steroid use and
> > > > > testicular cancer.
>
> > > > You really stuck your cock in your mouth, Look around before you write
> > > > stupid cunt thoughts.
>
> > > >http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078499.htm
>
> > > > Steroids linked to cancer, self harm, birth defects
>
> > > > During the 1970s and 1980s, the former East Germany conducted a state-
> > > > sanctioned program administering anabolic steroids to its athletes.
>
> > > > Now the horrific consequences of the doping program are beginning to
> > > > emerge.
>
> > > > A study of 52 of the athletes has revealed that not only do they have
> > > > serious health issues, but their children have high rates of physical
> > > > and mental deformities.
>
> > > > And a quarter of the athletes suffer from cancer.
>
> > > > ( a 2005 US study showed that of various cancer patients 20% were
> > > > former steroid users but said that more research was needed )  ( a
> > > > typical conclusion to get more grant money)
>
> > > > "Supplement use is common and increasing among patients with
> > > > testicular cancer. The use of exercise performance-enhancing
> > > > supplements was as great as 20%."
>
> > > >http://www.ergo-log.com/teston6.html
>
> > > > Testosterone supplement causes aggressive prostate cancer
>
> > > >http://www.ergo-log.com/prostatecancer.html
>
> > > > Lancet: link between prostate cancer and steroids in bodybuilder
>
> > > Please point out anything in all that info that speaks to the issue of
> > > a link between steroid use and testicular cancer.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > First I never used 'testicular cancer' I wrote cancer.
>
> > "If Lance didn't play with steroids so much at the OTC he never would
> > have given cancer a 2nd thought."
>
> > 2nd it's in the post and link given
>
> > ( a 2005 US study showed that of various cancer patients 20% were
> > former steroid users but said that more research was needed )  ( a
> > typical conclusion to get more grant money)
>
> > "Supplement use is common and increasing among patients with
> > testicular cancer. The use of exercise performance-enhancing
> > supplements was as great as 20%."
>
> > 3rd, cancer (like fire and jesus) works in mysterious ways, sometimes
> > the burn pattern makes sense and sometimes the source might have come
> > from across the room.
>
> > Can anyone definitely say that one person's cancer started here and
> > not there when examining a patient?  Not that I am aware of - they
> > just cut out the offending bits, radiate and chemo the crumbs and hope
> > for the best.
>
> Yeah, you wrote cancer and not specifically testicular cancer, but
> even you have to admit that the reference to never thinking about
> cancer if he hadn't done steroids is an implication that his
> particular cancer was caused by steroids, which it wasn't.  And yes,
> people can tell where one person's cancer started.  Oncologists do it
> all the time.
>
> Face it, you don't like LA, but to perpetuate some bullshit myth that
> he got testicular cancer because of PED use, particularly steroids,
> while at the OTC or anywhere else, is just stupid and/or
> disingenuous.  I'm betting it's a bit of both.

Scott - you know about Greg Strock and the out of court settlement
Armstrong and Carmichael made?

People respond differently - one gets a suppressed immune system,
another gets testicular cancer, another gets crohns etc etc....

Same drug administered by the same guys and sometimes in the same
room - read up. these and more

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/04/10/60II/main284958.shtml

http://velonews.competitor.com/2006/04/news/six-years-later-strock-case-comes-to-court_9763

==============================================================================
TOPIC: "We presume he is now riding clean..."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/dc3fbc21abc940bb?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 8:58 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"

"Phil H" <pholman50@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:19db2ccc-dd55-4ac1-8e0b-064307cc844c@y21g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 16, 9:38 am, "B. Lafferty" <b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On 7/16/2010 12:31 PM, Carl Sundquist wrote:
>
> > On Jul 16, 10:05 am, RicodJour<ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> >> - Phil on Vino 3 km from the top
>
> >> R
>
> > Actually, he said "totally clean". It's not clear if that means bread
> > and water clean, legally clean, or totally under the radar clean.
>
> And it's a rebuttable presumption.

:: More than that.....it's not provable.

Dumbass -

As always, advocates for either side would be talking out their ass.

thanks,

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Tour de France, stage 12 summary
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f606595cc3e7eaa9?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 9:01 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"

"Bob Martin" <bob.martin@excite.com> wrote in message
news:A000o.26776$Sl7.4583@hurricane...

:
: Favourites by time :
: +0:10 Joaquin Rodriguez
: +0:10 Alberto Contador Velasco
: -0:05 Roman Kreuziger
: -0:05 Robert Gesink
: -0:07 Levi Leipheimer
: -0:21 Luis Leon Sanchez Gil
: -0:21 Ivan Basso
: -0:21 Carlos Sastre
: -0:21 Cadel Evans
: -0:21 Bradley Wiggins
: -3:25 Lance Armstrong

Maybe Schleck should be in the favorites' list.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.bicycles.racing"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.bicycles.racing+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

Re: Medarticles Request for articles !

Buzz It
Thanks a lot Sir !

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

rec.bicycles.racing - 25 new messages in 11 topics - digest

Buzz It
rec.bicycles.racing
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

rec.bicycles.racing@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Two observations - 5 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/d9c3e765d998886a?hl=en
* Armstrong's Artlessness - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/41ead7ce73aae673?hl=en
* Argy Bargy - 4 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/64b5eb75dfb613df?hl=en
* "We presume he is now riding clean..." - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/dc3fbc21abc940bb?hl=en
* More kudus to Julian Dean - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/1978cca078261cf0?hl=en
* Contador: "All I Really Need to Know About Being a Good Teammate I Learned
From Lance" - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/47a2f6f02b79bc57?hl=en
* Lafferty was totally fucking wrong about Lance getting arrested in France! -
3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/b76f57f21176d546?hl=en
* Important Development for Tugboat* - Kibble and Bits to return ! - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/af42357ce5025c23?hl=en
* Farrar - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a0c82fd693db60b1?hl=en
* Washington Post --More Details of Armstrong Investigation - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/faedac5e31ba3c86?hl=en
* New Road ID commercial - idiot Bob Roll discusses crashing in a forest. - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/bd6b539824584935?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Two observations
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/d9c3e765d998886a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 11:04 am
From: Ben Trovato


On Jul 16, 9:40 am, Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First, just a reminder: If not for the protest led by Saxo teammate
> Cancellara that allowed Schleck to catch up to the peloton, Schleck
> would be about 4 minutes behind Contador.
>
> Second, does anyone besides the French give a damn about the mountains
> classification anymore?

Saxo wasn't the only team with its leaders behind, and if the others
had wanted to ride, they would have (remember the protest against
Cavendish in the Tour de Suisse?). I'd rather see gaps caused by a
known conditions like pavés or an HC col than occuring as the result
of some motor oil spilled across the road.

The non-French teams are built around their contenders for yellow or
green; and a decline in the number of summit finishes makes it easier
for spotted jersey contenders to go early and finish late.


== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 11:21 am
From: Anton Berlin


On Jul 16, 12:33 pm, Jimmy July <J...@JimmyJim.JimJimJim> wrote:
> On 07/16/2010 09:42 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
>
> > Who want's the tour to end before it gets started and because of
> > shitty course selection?
>
> Who wants it to end because LANCE isn't winning?

Lance for fucks sake !


== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:12 pm
From: Frederick the Great


In article
<98977de0-7250-409f-a4ad-1d40ce90c42c@z8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,
Carl Sundquist <carl.sundquist@gmail.com> wrote:

> First, just a reminder: If not for the protest led by Saxo teammate
> Cancellara that allowed Schleck to catch up to the peloton, Schleck
> would be about 4 minutes behind Contador.
>
> Second, does anyone besides the French give a damn about the mountains
> classification anymore?

Possibly not. The green jersey is often won by the
fastest sprinter. The mountains jersey is never won by
the strongest climber. Look at the stages and plot
which climbs to win. Look for a single day exploit. The
green jersey is won in scrums at the finish line giving
it more glamour.

--
Old Fritz


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:12 pm
From: Frederick the Great


In article <4c40980b@news.x-privat.org>,
Jimmy July <Jim@JimmyJim.JimJimJim> wrote:

> On 07/16/2010 09:42 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
> > Who want's the tour to end before it gets started and because of
> > shitty course selection?
> >
>
> Who wants it to end because LANCE isn't winning?

I do!

--
Old Fritz


== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:17 pm
From: Uncle Dave


On Jul 16, 10:12 pm, Frederick the Great <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article <4c409...@news.x-privat.org>,
>  Jimmy July <J...@JimmyJim.JimJimJim> wrote:
>
> > On 07/16/2010 09:42 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
> > > Who want's the tour to end before it gets started and because of
> > > shitty course selection?
>
> > Who wants it to end because LANCE isn't winning?
>
> I do!

If there's anyone out there who thought that Armstrong had a cat in
hell's chance of wining this Tour, then I'd like to meet them. I have
some really neat Get-Rich-Quick schemes I'd like to discuss. All you
do is copy this email and send it to everyone in the known universe,
then send me your bank details - don't forget the password, that's
vital if you don't want anyone to steal from you - and your personal
fortune will change overnight.

UD


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Armstrong's Artlessness
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/41ead7ce73aae673?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 11:12 am
From: "B. Lafferty"


On 7/16/2010 12:59 PM, Anton Berlin wrote:
> I love it. From the same people that used to sniff his chamois after
> each stage.
>
> Lance is going to start his 12 step program anyday now.

I didn't know there was a twelve step program leading to truthfulness.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Argy Bargy
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/64b5eb75dfb613df?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 11:31 am
From: Fred Flintstein


On 7/16/2010 12:36 PM, Zeno wrote:
> On Jul 16, 5:16 am, Carl Sundquist<carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dumbass,
>>
>> One head butt is ok, but two or three isn't? If head butting is so
>> wrong there should be a specific rule against it, but there isn't.
>>
>
> There isn't a specific rule about pulling a knife and stabbing the guy
> either.
>
> Zeno

You know, I was just pondering this in the context of Superweek
sprints. A head butt or three would not get you tossed but pulling
a gun or a knife might. Maybe. There are guys at Superweek that
would have a Tour sprinter for lunch.

Fred Flintstein


== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:03 pm
From: Ben Trovato


On Jul 16, 8:06 am, Betty <n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Anton Berlin wrote:
> > it's a fuggin aussie and a kiwi - for christ's sake they got rugby in
> > their blood
>
> Perhaps they should introduce a yellow card/red card system into
> sprinting. I wonder how many red cards Abdu would have got.

Depends on how well Abdu's opponents would have mastered the arts of
diving and screaming...


== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:42 pm
From: Carl Sundquist


On Jul 16, 12:36 pm, Zeno <zwarbirdm...@zenoswarbirdvideos.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 5:16 am, Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dumbass,
>
> > One head butt is ok, but two or three isn't? If head butting is so
> > wrong there should be a specific rule against it, but there isn't.
>
> There isn't a specific rule about pulling a knife and stabbing the guy
> either.
>
> Zeno

Dumbass,


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 3:58 pm
From: Scott


On Jul 16, 12:31 pm, Fred Flintstein
<bob.schwa...@sbcREMOVEglobal.net> wrote:
> On 7/16/2010 12:36 PM, Zeno wrote:
>
> > On Jul 16, 5:16 am, Carl Sundquist<carl.sundqu...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >> Dumbass,
>
> >> One head butt is ok, but two or three isn't? If head butting is so
> >> wrong there should be a specific rule against it, but there isn't.
>
> > There isn't a specific rule about pulling a knife and stabbing the guy
> > either.
>
> > Zeno
>
> You know, I was just pondering this in the context of Superweek
> sprints. A head butt or three would not get you tossed but pulling
> a gun or a knife might. Maybe. There are guys at Superweek that
> would have a Tour sprinter for lunch.
>
> Fred Flintstein

You're assuming that the guys at Superweek could keep up with the Tour
sprinters. You can't headbutt someone if you can't catch them.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: "We presume he is now riding clean..."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/dc3fbc21abc940bb?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 11:39 am
From: Phil H


On Jul 16, 9:38 am, "B. Lafferty" <b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On 7/16/2010 12:31 PM, Carl Sundquist wrote:
>
> > On Jul 16, 10:05 am, RicodJour<ricodj...@worldemail.com>  wrote:
> >> - Phil on Vino 3 km from the top
>
> >> R
>
> > Actually, he said "totally clean". It's not clear if that means bread
> > and water clean, legally clean, or totally under the radar clean.
>
> And it's a rebuttable presumption.

More than that.....it's not provable.

Phil H


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 11:55 am
From: RicodJour


On Jul 16, 2:39 pm, Phil H <pholma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 9:38 am, "B. Lafferty" <b...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > On 7/16/2010 12:31 PM, Carl Sundquist wrote:
> > > On Jul 16, 10:05 am, RicodJour<ricodj...@worldemail.com>  wrote:
>
> > >> - Phil on Vino 3 km from the top
>
> > > Actually, he said "totally clean". It's not clear if that means bread
> > > and water clean, legally clean, or totally under the radar clean.

Oh...I thought he was referring to his hygiene. ;)

> > And it's a rebuttable presumption.
>
> More than that.....it's not provable.

It's a presumption, not an assertation!

I thought it was a lovely way for Phil to get a dig in.

R

==============================================================================
TOPIC: More kudus to Julian Dean
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/1978cca078261cf0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 12:03 pm
From: thirty-six


On 16 July, 13:10, Dumbass <tadams...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 6:23 am, thirty-six <thirty-...@live.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 16 July, 11:00, Uncle Dave <davidco...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 15, 9:51 pm, drmofe <stew...@wic.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > > > ...for getting a-head of Mark Renshaw...
> > > > ...for getting in his face...
>
> > > > Capital job!
>
> > > Well, call me old fashioned, but if you're a lead out man then you're
> > > supposed to get your sprinter to the head of affairs rather than
> > > simply annoy the opposition.  At the time of the "head butting"
> > > incident, Farrar isn't actually on Dean's wheel, but is behind
> > > Cavendish and dithering as to which wheel to follow.  
>
> > If you know there going to be some gameplay, you want a bit of space
> > in case they come down..
>
> > > One thing's for
> > > certain it isn't Dean's. Looking at it again, Garmin's moves do seem
> > > odd, particularly from above.  Firstly, Dean has evidently forgotten
> > > about his man and appears to be going for glory himself.  Doh!  When
> > > Cavendish goes, Farrar initially moves across to the left to follow
> > > him but, failing to get on then moves markedly to the right which
> > > brings him behind Renshaw.  Renshaw then takes him back to the barrier
> > > but I can see that my first thought that was a worse move than the
> > > head-butting incident was wrong.  It was just stupidity on Farrar's
> > > part.  Why would you deliberately move from chasing the favourite back
> > > into the path of his lead-out man?  You might not think you're going
> > > to beat him but surely if you concentrate on chasing him and have a
> > > clear path to the line you should take it?  If Garmin continue to ride
> > > like that it won't matter if they get the whole of HTC disqualified
> > > somebody is going to beat them every time...
>
> > > UD- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> If Butt-Head wanted room on his right, then he should have pedaled
> faster and no let Dean speed past him on a good line.

You're right, but it's a bit much to be disqualified for a clash (even
though legal) which was instigated by another.


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 1:19 pm
From: Frederick the Great


In article
<58443455-e019-455e-944b-2616bb9aa41a@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
Dumbass <tadamsmar@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Jul 16, 6:00 am, Uncle Dave <davidco...@t-online.de> wrote:
> > On Jul 15, 9:51 pm, drmofe <stew...@wic.co.nz> wrote:
> >
> > > ...for getting a-head of Mark Renshaw...
> > > ...for getting in his face...
> >
> > > Capital job!
> >
> > Well, call me old fashioned, but if you're a lead out man then you're
> > supposed to get your sprinter to the head of affairs rather than
> > simply annoy the opposition.  At the time of the "head butting"
> > incident, Farrar isn't actually on Dean's wheel, but is behind
> > Cavendish and dithering as to which wheel to follow.  One thing's for
> > certain it isn't Dean's. Looking at it again, Garmin's moves do seem
> > odd, particularly from above.  Firstly, Dean has evidently forgotten
> > about his man and appears to be going for glory himself.  Doh!  When
> > Cavendish goes, Farrar initially moves across to the left to follow
> > him but, failing to get on then moves markedly to the right which
> > brings him behind Renshaw.  Renshaw then takes him back to the barrier
> > but I can see that my first thought that was a worse move than the
> > head-butting incident was wrong.  It was just stupidity on Farrar's
> > part.  Why would you deliberately move from chasing the favourite back
> > into the path of his lead-out man?  You might not think you're going
> > to beat him but surely if you concentrate on chasing him and have a
> > clear path to the line you should take it?  If Garmin continue to ride
> > like that it won't matter if they get the whole of HTC disqualified
> > somebody is going to beat them every time...
> >
> > UD
>
> You are completely full of crap, as anyone can see from the video:
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/15/mark-renshaw-head-butt-vi_n_648297.html
>
> Farrar was on Dean's wheel and Cav was trying to get on Dean's wheel.
> Everyone had good reason to want to be on Dean's wheel because Butt-
> Head clearly had no legs left. Butt-Head needed to come off left but
> he was fading so fast that *his* lead rider was still on his left, so
> he trying to cheat his way right.

You left out the part where Dean is drifting left into Renshaw, 1.10 et seq.
Perhaps Dean was obeying the left pointing arrow painted on the road.

> Cav was violating Farrar's line trying to get on Dean's wheel

Hunh? Farrar was sucking exhaust.
He needed a Gruber to get past Cavendish.

> since
> Butt-Head was in his way. Cav read the situation better than Farrar,
> Farrar should have resisted Cav's move to the right.

???

Cavendish moved _left_ for his sprint.

--
Old Fritz


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 1:56 pm
From: Uncle Dave


On Jul 16, 6:35 pm, Dumbass <tadams...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 9:38 am, Uncle Dave <davidco...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 16, 1:35 pm, Dumbass <tadams...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 16, 6:00 am, Uncle Dave <davidco...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 15, 9:51 pm, drmofe <stew...@wic.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > > > > ...for getting a-head of Mark Renshaw...
> > > > > ...for getting in his face...
>
> > > > > Capital job!
>
> > > > Well, call me old fashioned, but if you're a lead out man then you're
> > > > supposed to get your sprinter to the head of affairs rather than
> > > > simply annoy the opposition.  At the time of the "head butting"
> > > > incident, Farrar isn't actually on Dean's wheel, but is behind
> > > > Cavendish and dithering as to which wheel to follow.  One thing's for
> > > > certain it isn't Dean's. Looking at it again, Garmin's moves do seem
> > > > odd, particularly from above.  Firstly, Dean has evidently forgotten
> > > > about his man and appears to be going for glory himself.  Doh!  When
> > > > Cavendish goes, Farrar initially moves across to the left to follow
> > > > him but, failing to get on then moves markedly to the right which
> > > > brings him behind Renshaw.  Renshaw then takes him back to the barrier
> > > > but I can see that my first thought that was a worse move than the
> > > > head-butting incident was wrong.  It was just stupidity on Farrar's
> > > > part.  Why would you deliberately move from chasing the favourite back
> > > > into the path of his lead-out man?  You might not think you're going
> > > > to beat him but surely if you concentrate on chasing him and have a
> > > > clear path to the line you should take it?  If Garmin continue to ride
> > > > like that it won't matter if they get the whole of HTC disqualified
> > > > somebody is going to beat them every time...
>
> > > > UD
>
> > > You are completely full of crap, as anyone can see from the video:
>
> > Are you blind or simply won't see?  Ignoring Petacchi's man coming up
> > on the right, from the moment that video first shows the overhead
> > view, Farrar is nowhere near Dean's wheel.  Dean and Renshaw are
> > tussling, Cavendish is on Renshaw's wheel and Farrar is behind
> > Cavendish.  The closest Farrar comes to Dean is when he has to avoid
> > him as Dean starts to slide back.  I don't know what you're talking
> > about, but I'm talking about what happens in that video not somewhere
> > back along the road.
>
> > UD- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Just look at Butt-Head swerving around first to the right into Dean
> and Farrar's line and then to the left to get into Farrar's new line.

I wasn't disputing that Renshaw was out of order. You wrote "Farrar
was on Dean's wheel and Cav was trying to get on Dean's wheel."
Farrar wasn't on Dean's wheel at all in the video, maybe right at the
beginning but not in any of the footage from above. My point was that
Dean had screwed up anyway by losing Farrar and there was no reason
for Renshaw to do what he did as Farrar was adrift. Maybe he should
fit wing mirrors...

UD

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Contador: "All I Really Need to Know About Being a Good Teammate I
Learned From Lance"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/47a2f6f02b79bc57?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 12:26 pm
From: Ken Prager


In article
<f23e7330-950c-4837-aae5-7bde5832a83f@e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Carl Sundquist <carl.sundquist@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 16, 10:13 am, Ken Prager <pra...@ieee.org> wrote:
> > Vino can't be too happy right now...
>
> Perhaps, but at least AC didn't gift the stage to Rodriguez as a slap
> in the face to Vino.

AC didn't gift the stage but instead pulled Rodriguez's sorry ass along
for 2 KM. I seriously doubt that Rodriguez would have won the stage
without the help from AC.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lafferty was totally fucking wrong about Lance getting arrested in
France!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/b76f57f21176d546?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 12:43 pm
From: Frederick the Great


In article
<01649184-7c1b-4f03-831e-c52bf8d22f46@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,
Anton Berlin <truth_88888@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Jul 15, 11:33 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 15, 4:42 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Cancer charity or humanitarian work is a zero sum game that Armstrong
> > > actually grifts off of.  Look at how much energy and cash is put
> > > towards 'cancer'.  Numerous organizations, boards and backoffices
> > > taking a piece of the pie.  Liestrong's director takes a healthy $250k
> > > salary on a budget of only $32M a year.
> >
> > > Compare that with the ACS taking in a $1B a year where the CEO takes
> > > 1/10th of the comparative salary.
> >
> > > People that want to 'help' cancer patients will find a way without
> > > Lance Armstrongs bullshit charity.  All he's done is cut the pie in
> > > smaller pieces added overhead costs and tried to make himself look
> > > good in others and his own twisted self image.
> >
> > > If Lance didn't play with steroids so much at the OTC he never would
> > > have given cancer a 2nd thought.    Or had it in the first place more
> > > than likely.
> >
> > Doesn't it ever occur to you to look at facts before you spew???
> > There is no established link whatsoever between steroid use and
> > testicular cancer.
>
> You really stuck your cock in your mouth, Look around before you write
> stupid cunt thoughts.
>
>
>
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078499.htm
>
> Steroids linked to cancer, self harm, birth defects
>
> During the 1970s and 1980s, the former East Germany conducted a state-
> sanctioned program administering anabolic steroids to its athletes.
>
> Now the horrific consequences of the doping program are beginning to
> emerge.
>
> A study of 52 of the athletes has revealed that not only do they have
> serious health issues, but their children have high rates of physical
> and mental deformities.
>
> And a quarter of the athletes suffer from cancer.
>
> ( a 2005 US study showed that of various cancer patients 20% were
> former steroid users but said that more research was needed ) ( a
> typical conclusion to get more grant money)
>
> "Supplement use is common and increasing among patients with
> testicular cancer. The use of exercise performance-enhancing
> supplements was as great as 20%."
>
>
>
> http://www.ergo-log.com/teston6.html
>
> Testosterone supplement causes aggressive prostate cancer
>
>
>
> http://www.ergo-log.com/prostatecancer.html
>
> Lancet: link between prostate cancer and steroids in bodybuilder

The poison is in the dose. Any toxicologist will tell you this.
The toxicity of a substance is a very non-linear function
of the dose. Each substance has a threshold dose below which
it is not toxic.

--
Old Fritz


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 12:53 pm
From: Frederick the Great


In article
<f63ca5be-1ce3-4ab4-9b34-1511c8ab12b0@u36g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Anton Berlin <truth_88888@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 2nd it's in the post and link given
>
> ( a 2005 US study showed that of various cancer patients 20% were
> former steroid users but said that more research was needed ) ( a
> typical conclusion to get more grant money)
>
>
> "Supplement use is common and increasing among patients with
> testicular cancer. The use of exercise performance-enhancing
> supplements was as great as 20%."

What is the rate of PED use in the population?
The population being the at risk for testicular
cancer population.

All of what you bring up are first out of the gate
studies with headline cachet. We have seen this
before. After a while the reason for the correlation emerges.

Hormone replacement therapy.
Breast cancer screening.
Injecting Hg into infants.
Al and Parkinson's disease.
Eat margarine, not butter
because margarine is better for you.
Whoops! Another one bites the dust.

--
Old Fritz


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 3:57 pm
From: Scott


On Jul 16, 9:28 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 9:17 am, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 15, 11:47 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 15, 11:33 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 15, 4:42 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Cancer charity or humanitarian work is a zero sum game that Armstrong
> > > > > actually grifts off of.  Look at how much energy and cash is put
> > > > > towards 'cancer'.  Numerous organizations, boards and backoffices
> > > > > taking a piece of the pie.  Liestrong's director takes a healthy $250k
> > > > > salary on a budget of only $32M a year.
>
> > > > > Compare that with the ACS taking in a $1B a year where the CEO takes
> > > > > 1/10th of the comparative salary.
>
> > > > > People that want to 'help' cancer patients will find a way without
> > > > > Lance Armstrongs bullshit charity.  All he's done is cut the pie in
> > > > > smaller pieces added overhead costs and tried to make himself look
> > > > > good in others and his own twisted self image.
>
> > > > > If Lance didn't play with steroids so much at the OTC he never would
> > > > > have given cancer a 2nd thought.    Or had it in the first place more
> > > > > than likely.
>
> > > > Doesn't it ever occur to you to look at facts before you spew???
> > > > There is no established link whatsoever between steroid use and
> > > > testicular cancer.
>
> > > You really stuck your cock in your mouth, Look around before you write
> > > stupid cunt thoughts.
>
> > >http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078499.htm
>
> > > Steroids linked to cancer, self harm, birth defects
>
> > > During the 1970s and 1980s, the former East Germany conducted a state-
> > > sanctioned program administering anabolic steroids to its athletes.
>
> > > Now the horrific consequences of the doping program are beginning to
> > > emerge.
>
> > > A study of 52 of the athletes has revealed that not only do they have
> > > serious health issues, but their children have high rates of physical
> > > and mental deformities.
>
> > > And a quarter of the athletes suffer from cancer.
>
> > > ( a 2005 US study showed that of various cancer patients 20% were
> > > former steroid users but said that more research was needed )  ( a
> > > typical conclusion to get more grant money)
>
> > > "Supplement use is common and increasing among patients with
> > > testicular cancer. The use of exercise performance-enhancing
> > > supplements was as great as 20%."
>
> > >http://www.ergo-log.com/teston6.html
>
> > > Testosterone supplement causes aggressive prostate cancer
>
> > >http://www.ergo-log.com/prostatecancer.html
>
> > > Lancet: link between prostate cancer and steroids in bodybuilder
>
> > Please point out anything in all that info that speaks to the issue of
> > a link between steroid use and testicular cancer.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> First I never used 'testicular cancer' I wrote cancer.
>
> "If Lance didn't play with steroids so much at the OTC he never would
> have given cancer a 2nd thought."
>
> 2nd it's in the post and link given
>
> ( a 2005 US study showed that of various cancer patients 20% were
> former steroid users but said that more research was needed )  ( a
> typical conclusion to get more grant money)
>
> "Supplement use is common and increasing among patients with
> testicular cancer. The use of exercise performance-enhancing
> supplements was as great as 20%."
>
> 3rd, cancer (like fire and jesus) works in mysterious ways, sometimes
> the burn pattern makes sense and sometimes the source might have come
> from across the room.
>
> Can anyone definitely say that one person's cancer started here and
> not there when examining a patient?  Not that I am aware of - they
> just cut out the offending bits, radiate and chemo the crumbs and hope
> for the best.

Yeah, you wrote cancer and not specifically testicular cancer, but
even you have to admit that the reference to never thinking about
cancer if he hadn't done steroids is an implication that his
particular cancer was caused by steroids, which it wasn't. And yes,
people can tell where one person's cancer started. Oncologists do it
all the time.

Face it, you don't like LA, but to perpetuate some bullshit myth that
he got testicular cancer because of PED use, particularly steroids,
while at the OTC or anywhere else, is just stupid and/or
disingenuous. I'm betting it's a bit of both.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Important Development for Tugboat* - Kibble and Bits to return !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/af42357ce5025c23?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 12:46 pm
From: Anton Berlin


This is an important precedent for Tugboat*

http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/news?slug=ap-ath-jonesmedals-appeal

GENEVA (AP)—American sprinters who were stripped of their 2000
Olympics relay medals because teammate Marion Jones was doping won an
appeal Friday to have them restored.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled in favor of the women, who
had appealed the International Olympic Committee's decision to
disqualify them from the Sydney Games.

The court said the IOC and International Association of Athletics
Federations rules in 2000 did not allow entire teams to be
disqualified because of doping by one athlete.
Other popular stories on Yahoo!:

* The curse of the LeBron James diamond pendant
* Pink falls mid-concert, rushed to hospital
* Tornado-like winds stop play at the British Open

The IOC said the ruling was "disappointing and especially unfortunate
for the athletes of the other teams who competed according to the
rules."

In Sydney, Jearl Miles-Clark, Monique Hennagan, LaTasha Colander Clark
and Andrea Anderson were part of the squad that won gold in the 4x400
relay. Chryste Gaines, Torri Edwards, Nanceen Perry and Passion
Richardson were on the 4x100 bronze medal squad.

All but Perry joined the appeal.

"The panel found that at the time of the Sydney Olympic Games there
was no express IOC or IAAF rule in force that clearly allowed the IOC
to annul the relay team results if one team member was found to have
committed a doping offense," CAS said.

Now that the case is over, Richardson can relax, her medal safe and
secure in a wooden frame at the home of her parents in Florida.

"It's been a long three years, a long hard fight," Richardson told The
Associated Press in a phone interview. "I wanted to believe they would
do what was right, but there were some times where I wasn't as
certain. Today, they did what was right."

Richardson spoke to Gaines and Miles-Clark and said that "everyone is
extremely excited."

"Finally, the fight is over," Richardson said.

In 2007, Jones admitted she was doping in Sydney and also lost her
individual golds in the 100 and 200 meters and bronze in the long
jump. She spent about six months in a Texas prison in 2008 for lying
about using performance-enhancing drugs and her role in a check-fraud
scam.

She has since made a comeback in basketball with the Tulsa Shock of
the WNBA.

"I've totally moved on," Jones told The AP on Friday in San Antonio,
where the Shock were preparing to play the Silver Stars. "I'm moving
forward."

Jones said she had not heard about the CAS decision and had not spoken
to her former Olympic teammates recently. She declined further
comment.

"She made some very poor choices. That's something she has to live
with," said Richardson, who no longer has any ill will toward her
former teammate. "We did what we were supposed to do and did it with
fairness. You have to learn to forgive and forget."

The CAS panel of three lawyers acknowledged the ruling might be unfair
to relay teams that competed "with no doped athletes" but added the
decision "exclusively depends on the rules enacted or not enacted by
the IOC and the IAAF at the time of the Sydney Olympic Games."

The CAS inflicted a further defeat on the IOC by ordering the Olympic
body to pay 10,000 Swiss francs ($9,500) toward the athletes' legal
costs.

Mark Levinstein, the Washington, DC-based lead attorney for the
athletes, said there is still a lawsuit pending against the USOC.

"All they had to do was say, 'The rules are the rules, leave them
alone,' and this didn't happen," Levinstein said in a phone interview.
"To have your own national Olympic committee turn its back on you, it
was sad."

The USOC issued a statement saying it respects the decision of the
CAS.

"Although we continue to believe that the U.S. medals in the 4x100 and
4x400 meter women's relays were unfairly won due to Ms. Jones' doping,
we have always recognized that the athletes who made up the U.S. teams
might have a legal basis on which to defend these medals," said
Patrick Sandusky, chief communications officer for the USOC.

"We are sorry that Ms. Jones' actions continue to have a negative
effect on the world of sport and express our sympathy for all of the
athletes who competed cleanly at the Olympic Games in Sydney and were
damaged by Ms. Jones' poor decisions."

United States Track and Field president Stephanie Hightower and CEO
Doug Logan said in a joint statement, "Although USATF was not a party
to this case, we are sympathetic to any clean athlete who was robbed
of something because of Marion Jones' cheating: competitors,
teammates, fans and anyone who strives for fair competition."

The IOC has now lost two CAS rulings within five weeks involving
Olympic medals stripped.

"What better confirmation of independence can you have than the baby
you have created says no to you?" IOC president Jacques Rogge told The
AP in New York. "We're disappointed that we lose the case, of course.
But it strengthens us to say to the athletes, 'You can trust the Court
of Arbitration. They are independent. They are free. They can rule
against the IOC."'

Belarus hammer throwers Vadim Devyatovskiy and Ivan Tsikhan won their
appeals last month against disqualification from the 2008 Beijing
Games and regained their silver and bronze medals, respectively. Both
had elevated levels of testosterone, but the CAS panel said tests were
invalid because international laboratory standards in Beijing were not
respected.

"The IOC will continue to enforce its zero tolerance policy in the
fight against doping for the sake of the athletes' health and to
ensure fair competition," the IOC said in a statement.

The CAS panel said it accepted the IOC's claim that Jones was possibly
not the only U.S. runner doping in Sydney, and it was mindful that
Gaines later served a doping ban for cheating in 2002-03 with the same
designer steroid— known as "the clear"—that Jones used.

However, CAS warned that judging an athlete based on suspicion could
"deliver a fatal blow to any serious fight against doping and the
CAS's reputation."

The case involving the sprinters was heard over two days in Lausanne,
Switzerland, in May, when the relay runners' legal team argued they
should not be punished for cheating by Jones.

The panel agreed unanimously Friday that the IAAF's rule in 2000 was
the decisive point.

The court also confirmed its own precedent set five years ago in a
previous doping case involving U.S. relay runners at the Sydney
Olympics. That panel determined that teammates of Jerome Young should
not lose their 4x400 gold medals after he received a retroactive ban
from 1999-2001—meaning he was technically ineligible to compete in
Sydney.

Young's relay partners—Michael Johnson, Antonio Pettigrew, Angelo
Taylor, Alvin Harrison and Calvin Harrison—won their appeal to CAS
after the IAAF annulled their result.

However, the IOC ended up stripping the entire team of the medals in
2008 following the admission of doping by Pettigrew. The IAAF amended
its rules in 2003 so that relay teams could then be disqualified if
one member was caught doping.

The ruling Friday dashed the hopes of Jamaica's team of being upgraded
from silver to gold in the 4x400 relay. Russia finished third and
Nigeria out of the medals in fourth. In the 4x100, the U.S. edged
France out of the medals.

* if he were still alive.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Farrar
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a0c82fd693db60b1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:08 pm
From: Uncle Dave


Why didn't you tell me he was riding with a fractured wrist? You let
me slag the guy off and all the while he's being some kind of hero in
rapidly changing geeky lenses. What is the matter with you people?!
Have you no shame?

UD


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 3:01 pm
From: Betty


Uncle Dave wrote:
> Why didn't you tell me he was riding with a fractured wrist? You let
> me slag the guy off and all the while he's being some kind of hero in
> rapidly changing geeky lenses. What is the matter with you people?!
> Have you no shame?

That was news last week.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 3:56 pm
From: thirty-six


On 16 July, 22:08, Uncle Dave <davidco...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Why didn't you tell me he was riding with a fractured wrist?  You let
> me slag the guy off and all the while he's being some kind of hero in
> rapidly changing geeky lenses.  What is the matter with you people?!
> Have you no shame?
>
> UD

Two days ago he said he was feeling better. Steroids, opiates along
with er, would that be called cheating?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Washington Post --More Details of Armstrong Investigation
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/faedac5e31ba3c86?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:29 pm
From: "B. Lafferty"


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/16/AR2010071603512.html

==============================================================================
TOPIC: New Road ID commercial - idiot Bob Roll discusses crashing in a forest.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/bd6b539824584935?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jul 16 2010 2:56 pm
From: Betty


Anton Berlin wrote:
>>> I dated an ER nurse for nearly a decade.

Betty wrote:
>> What was her BMI ?

Anton Berlin wrote:
> That crazy bitch stole all sorts of drugs from the hospital and
> injected herself with speed, anti-psychotics and who knows what else.
> She mainly ate a diet of peanut butter cups, coffee and my jizz. the
> combo of all of the above kept her pretty thin.

Must have been Jizz lite.


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.bicycles.racing"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.bicycles.racing+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

publishers clearing house

Buzz It
GOOD DAY WE ARE FROM THE PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE (PCH) AND YOUR EMAIL
ADDRESS JUST WON YOU ONE MILLION US DOLLARS($1,000,000.00 USD) IN THIS
WEEK PCH LOTTERY,WINNER YOU ARE TO CONTACT OUR FIDUCIARY.PLEASE NOTE,IF
YOU ARE NOT THE RIGHT FULL OWNER OF THIS EMAIL,DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS MAIL
THANKS.

AGENT: Christopher L. Irving
EMAIL: publishersclearinghouse1@qatar.io

YOU ARE REQUIRE TO SEND THE INFORMATION BELOW TO PROCESS YOUR CLAIMS
FULL NAME:
ADDRESS:
SEX:
NATIONALITY:
AGE:
OCCUPATION:
PHONE NUMBER:
PRESENT COUNTRY:

SINCERELY,
MRS.REYNA CRUZ.
ONLINE CO-ORDINATOR.

Medarticles article urgent

Buzz It
i need this article very urgent please


child's nervous systems
ahead of print

Magnetic resonance imaging of childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome.

thanks very much

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

[socialactionfoundationforequity:3478 How Pak media is reporting Indo-Pak talks

Buzz It
How Pak media is reporting Indo-Pak talks
http://www.navhindtimes.in/world-news/how-pak-media-reporting-indo-pak-talks

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:3478 Educational Uplift of Dhangars

Buzz It
Educational Uplift of Dhangars
http://www.navhindtimes.in/opinion/educational-uplift-dhangars

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:3477 US disagrees with France over the ban on veils

Buzz It
US disagrees with France over the ban on veils
http://www.navhindtimes.in/world-news/us-disagrees-france-over-ban-veils

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:3477 Unfinished Issues from Kargil War

Buzz It
Unfinished Issues from Kargil War
http://www.navhindtimes.in/opinion/unfinished-issues-kargil-war

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

gsk

https://secure.shareit.com/shareit/checkout.html?PRODUCT[300429992]=1&languageid=1&stylefrom=300429992&backlink=http%3A%2F%2Fforexguide.blogspot.com&cookies=1¤cies=USD&pts=VISA,MASTERCARD,AMEX,DC