alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=enalt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Dungy & Harrison: Jets Haters and Much Worse - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7024bed92d48f868?hl=en
* For Papa and BuRf... - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b2fc766cd9c1e794?hl=en
* Slauson... Jets line... - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/191dcb4e75a42199?hl=en
* Papa's Jam... this Sunday... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/8688621645960d5d?hl=en
* Rex's wife... - 7 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/08015de0a0c18597?hl=en
* Coleman to start at the corner - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/be757aabb8718410?hl=en
* TV Viewing recommendations in NY/CT area. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/2636bdf1f3617b9a?hl=en
* Pats D: How Bad Is It? - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/1134943a98a05971?hl=en
* "The Herminator" - 4 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/ef3e262d3d965eb2?hl=en
* 35 yr old Pryce signed by Jets - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/43c59b7fd33b56ee?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Dungy & Harrison: Jets Haters and Much Worse
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7024bed92d48f868?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Sep 29 2010 11:25 pm
From: Johnny Morongo
On Sep 29, 1:35 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 1:18 am, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > They clearly have no love for the Jets.
>
> > But what's even more damning is their non-stop love for their former
> > teams/team owners/the league. It's laughable how much they are company
> > men. And thus they have no honor.
>
> > NBC should be ashamed of themselves for running out such biased studio
> > announcers. These NFL shills have never criticized the league. And
> > Dungy coddles the the Mike Vicks of the world; and together play their
> > part as the NFL shills they are. What cowards they are on air. Just
> > like Herm all they care about is promoting/protecting their own image,
> > and the NFL shield.
>
> > Alas it's all about $. Always has been always will be. I assume
> > because Dungy is such a moral christian he gives most of his money to
> > charity in the manner of Jesus. I used to respect Dungy -- I've come
> > to see he is a fraud christian.
>
> it is the on-the-filed shills dressed in black and white stripes that
> bother me. like the ones that show up for steelers games. im bracing
> myself for jets @ steelers week 15.
That one's a SURE loss. And you know who will see to it that it is.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: For Papa and BuRf...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b2fc766cd9c1e794?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 5:54 am
From: buRford
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:22:28 -0400, "papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
>"Johnny Morongo" <j.mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote in message
>news:ee914235-d3a1-4b91-b01e-28b78667bcf5@l32g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>On Sep 28, 7:19 am, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
>wrote:
>> "buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:0gj3a65e44o72p8m5io4ca6bnqdnra2lf6@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:30:42 -0400, "papa.carl44"
>> > <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:2pj2a6541ii43sf7dsa0jl7elid73i3m6h@4ax.com...
>> >>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:39:30 -0400, "papa.carl44"
>> >>> <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>news:bcs1a6d7rnvp1h2f00ov97rr1hv03tm2rh@4ax.com...
>> >>>>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:58:39 -0400, "papa.carl44"
>> >>>>> <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>"Johnny Morongo" <j.mireh...@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote in
>> >>>>>>message
>> >>>>>>news:b7b4ad5a-afcf-45f7-bd9c-9daa85c380ff@g21g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>> >>>>>>> who get a woody for Henning. Why didn't he call that last pass to
>> >>>>>>> Marshal? Considering how badly he owned us all night, doesn't
>> >>>>>>> anyone
>> >>>>>>> else think that Marshal should have been targeted on that pass?
>> >>>>>>> Dumb
>> >>>>>>> call by the genius.
>>
>> >>>>>>Could be....but then we don't ever now what gets called and what
>> >>>>>>gets
>> >>>>>>executed. In the Red Zone Cromartie did a good job on Marshal most
>> >>>>>>of
>> >>>>>>the
>> >>>>>>time too....I think they are in the game of guessing where the most
>> >>>>>>resources will go and try and stay away from that. It wasn't just
>> >>>>>>Marshal
>> >>>>>>who had a good night remember. And to be clear, my admiration for
>> >>>>>>Henning
>> >>>>>>is how he can take a much lesser talent and bring them beyond what
>> >>>>>>anyone
>> >>>>>>thought they could do, that and his overall control of the game. I
>> >>>>>>think
>> >>>>>>it
>> >>>>>>was Henning with Rex's ticket last night...the "best defense in the
>> >>>>>>NFL"
>> >>>>>>did
>> >>>>>>not look so potent and even got blasted on the run more than a few
>> >>>>>>times.
>> >>>>>>Hennning uses what he has more efficiently than any other OC in the
>> >>>>>>game
>> >>>>>>today. Did people expect Henne to look this good?
>>
>> >>>>> It's funny, I actually did expect Henne to look good. He always does
>> >>>>> against us.
>>
>> >>>>You know, with all the rivalries etc. I just like to see good football
>> >>>>and
>> >>>>can even appreciate a hated rivalry when they play well. I'd rather
>> >>>>see
>> >>>>an
>> >>>>opponent play well than beat up on some loser. That's how I pick and
>> >>>>choose
>> >>>>what other games I watch too...how well I enjoy a particular offense
>> >>>>or
>> >>>>defense as far as watching them goes.
>>
>> >>> Yeah, but now & then I'd like to see any easy win ;)
>> >>> It'll never ceases to amaze me, how tense we fans get. I mean, I'm
>> >>> normally pretty
>> >>> mild-mannered at this stage in my life. Yet, if anyone comes near me,
>> >>> or
>> >>> talks to me
>> >>> during a 4th quarter like last night, it's the guillotine for them ;)
>>
>> >>Guess who texted me in the fourth quarter.....hint, she sings, she's
>> >>blonde
>> >>and she was watching the game from New Orleans.....I was watching the
>> >>game
>> >>in the bedroom, my wife fell asleep.
>>
>> > Oh, the scandal ;)
>>
>> Jean gets up at 5 AM....a couple of hours after I go to sleep :-) She
>> knows
>> Lisa too well, trusts her, not me :-)
>
>Smart gal, Jean.
>
>She doesn't have to worry...not a bit. I'm way too old. :-)
>
Today we're ALL old. The Flintstones are 50 yrs old today.
Wilma' still hot, though ;)
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 6:17 am
From: John C TX
> Yeah...everybody thinks Jean is Lisa's mother, they look a lot alike. I
> know when I've got a good thing.
So they are both blind?
:)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Slauson... Jets line...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/191dcb4e75a42199?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 6:19 am
From: John C TX
On Sep 30, 1:23 am, Johnny Morongo
<j.mireh...@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 5:03 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:15:18 -0700 (PDT), Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >I watch the Jets-Fish game on NFL Replay last night. I concentrated
> > >on watching the line... Woody looked a lot better than he did in the
> > >preseason. Good news that he's not sliding as a lot of people
> > >thought. Mangold and Moore did a good job of it too. As far as
> > >Slauson... So long as he's locked up on his guy, he does a nice job on
> > >both run blocking and pass blocking. He also seems to have solves any
> > >problems of hand placement that he had in college. His problems come
> > >when he has to make any adjustments. His feet are not very fast and
> > >he looks awkward trying to get himself reset. Once he gets into open
> > >space or squares up to run and pull he's not too bad off. I'm not
> > >sure if his problems at adjusting his position can be fixed or not.
> > >It is serious, because in pass protection he's going to face dt's that
> > >will cause big problems if he cant recover and reset fast/clean
> > >enough.
>
> > I thought Woody had a really good game, pretty much nullifying Wake.
> > Yeah, Slauson's feet are a problem. In the end, I suspect he'll become a really solid
> > backup.
>
> Good that you three, at least, have caught on to Slauson's lack of
> foot dexterity. Beat yas to it by three weeks. Nah nah nah na nah.
Giant pre-season game
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 6:22 am
From: buRford
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:23:23 -0700 (PDT), Johnny Morongo
<j.mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote:
>On Sep 29, 5:03 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:15:18 -0700 (PDT), Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >I watch the Jets-Fish game on NFL Replay last night. I concentrated
>> >on watching the line... Woody looked a lot better than he did in the
>> >preseason. Good news that he's not sliding as a lot of people
>> >thought. Mangold and Moore did a good job of it too. As far as
>> >Slauson... So long as he's locked up on his guy, he does a nice job on
>> >both run blocking and pass blocking. He also seems to have solves any
>> >problems of hand placement that he had in college. His problems come
>> >when he has to make any adjustments. His feet are not very fast and
>> >he looks awkward trying to get himself reset. Once he gets into open
>> >space or squares up to run and pull he's not too bad off. I'm not
>> >sure if his problems at adjusting his position can be fixed or not.
>> >It is serious, because in pass protection he's going to face dt's that
>> >will cause big problems if he cant recover and reset fast/clean
>> >enough.
>>
>> I thought Woody had a really good game, pretty much nullifying Wake.
>> Yeah, Slauson's feet are a problem. In the end, I suspect he'll become a really solid
>> backup.
>
>Good that you three, at least, have caught on to Slauson's lack of
>foot dexterity. Beat yas to it by three weeks. Nah nah nah na nah.
Always sad to see a senior suffer the ravages of senility ;)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Papa's Jam... this Sunday...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/8688621645960d5d?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 6:19 am
From: buRford
Hey Peeps in the NY area...
Sunday is PapaCarl's *Jam for Life,* in Trenton.
http://www.jamforlifefoundation.com/
There's a good chance Carl wouldn't be here posting, if not for his transplants.
So, we've all been blessed by the miracle of transplants.
I'm going this year, and was wondering if any of y'all would care to join me?
It's a good cause, & will give us a chance to actually meet - finally... also, we'll be
able to put to rest the rumor that we're all preprogrammed bots, and find out we're all
actually people! I've often wondered this deep mystery ;)
There'll be 2 stages, one outside, one inside.
Carl will be playing at 3:20 outside... and 4:10 inside. And the virgin Connie Swayle, I
mean Lisa Bouchelle, will be playing at 4:40.
Worked out that we're just playing the Bills (not that it's a trap game), but I suspect
there may be some TVs around, so we can check the score.
And if ya can't make it, you can donate to this great cause, on his website.
So ya can lump out on your sofa, watching the game... or listen to some good music, &
support a great cause... and solve one of the great mysteries of life (are we bots?) ;)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Rex's wife...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/08015de0a0c18597?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 6:20 am
From: buRford
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:17:50 -0400, "papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
>"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>news:0jk7a69qr5anlrpnhlq222uv9dtvh2indq@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT), Ritchie <ritchie1965@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sep 29, 11:59 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>>>> It's always interesting to see people's choice of partner in life.
>>>> Rex did well, but I bet he aint on top much ;)
>>>>
>>>> http://bit.ly/dnQ1CS
>>>>
>>>> Rex Ryan's wife, Michelle, is part of the new NFL "Fit For You" product
>>>> line and ad
>>>> campaign designed to make wearing women's favorite team logoed apparel
>>>> more appealing to
>>>> the growing number of female fans of the NFL.
>>>>
>>>> http://bit.ly/bUzZlR
>>>
>>>They use a suspension harness to make sure there is a gap between
>>>them :)
>>
>> Probably never should've mentioned that.
>> These images that gray & you created... well, I'm joining the clergy ;)
>
>I feel for Rex....when people see my wife they can't figure it out either
>:-) I haven't figured it out for the last 41 years either...but I keep my
>mouth shut and don't question it. :-)
>
I'm sure Jean figured it out, that's why she be next to you ;)
== 2 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:24 am
From: Tutor
On Sep 30, 9:20 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:17:50 -0400, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
> >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> >news:0jk7a69qr5anlrpnhlq222uv9dtvh2indq@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT), Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>On Sep 29, 11:59 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >>>> It's always interesting to see people's choice of partner in life.
> >>>> Rex did well, but I bet he aint on top much ;)
>
> >>>>http://bit.ly/dnQ1CS
>
> >>>> Rex Ryan's wife, Michelle, is part of the new NFL "Fit For You" product
> >>>> line and ad
> >>>> campaign designed to make wearing women's favorite team logoed apparel
> >>>> more appealing to
> >>>> the growing number of female fans of the NFL.
>
> >>>>http://bit.ly/bUzZlR
>
> >>>They use a suspension harness to make sure there is a gap between
> >>>them :)
>
> >> Probably never should've mentioned that.
> >> These images that gray & you created... well, I'm joining the clergy ;)
>
> >I feel for Rex....when people see my wife they can't figure it out either
> >:-) I haven't figured it out for the last 41 years either...but I keep my
> >mouth shut and don't question it. :-)
>
> I'm sure Jean figured it out, that's why she be next to you ;)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I'm in the same camp as papa and Rex. Only the good Lord knows why my
beautiful partner has been with me for 24 years. Whatever it is, I am
a happy man.
== 3 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:27 am
From: buRford
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT), Tutor <dcat4434@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Sep 30, 9:20 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:17:50 -0400, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>> >news:0jk7a69qr5anlrpnhlq222uv9dtvh2indq@4ax.com...
>> >> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT), Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >>>On Sep 29, 11:59 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> >>>> It's always interesting to see people's choice of partner in life.
>> >>>> Rex did well, but I bet he aint on top much ;)
>>
>> >>>>http://bit.ly/dnQ1CS
>>
>> >>>> Rex Ryan's wife, Michelle, is part of the new NFL "Fit For You" product
>> >>>> line and ad
>> >>>> campaign designed to make wearing women's favorite team logoed apparel
>> >>>> more appealing to
>> >>>> the growing number of female fans of the NFL.
>>
>> >>>>http://bit.ly/bUzZlR
>>
>> >>>They use a suspension harness to make sure there is a gap between
>> >>>them :)
>>
>> >> Probably never should've mentioned that.
>> >> These images that gray & you created... well, I'm joining the clergy ;)
>>
>> >I feel for Rex....when people see my wife they can't figure it out either
>> >:-) I haven't figured it out for the last 41 years either...but I keep my
>> >mouth shut and don't question it. :-)
>>
>> I'm sure Jean figured it out, that's why she be next to you ;)- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I'm in the same camp as papa and Rex. Only the good Lord knows why my
>beautiful partner has been with me for 24 years. Whatever it is, I am
>a happy man.
You must really love her, judging by how often you've been impersonating her lately ;)
== 4 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:31 am
From: MZ
On 9/30/2010 10:27 AM, buRford wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT), Tutor<dcat4434@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 30, 9:20 am, buRford<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:17:50 -0400, "papa.carl44"<papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "buRford"<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:0jk7a69qr5anlrpnhlq222uv9dtvh2indq@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT), Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 29, 11:59 am, buRford<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> It's always interesting to see people's choice of partner in life.
>>>>>>> Rex did well, but I bet he aint on top much ;)
>>>
>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/dnQ1CS
>>>
>>>>>>> Rex Ryan's wife, Michelle, is part of the new NFL "Fit For You" product
>>>>>>> line and ad
>>>>>>> campaign designed to make wearing women's favorite team logoed apparel
>>>>>>> more appealing to
>>>>>>> the growing number of female fans of the NFL.
>>>
>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/bUzZlR
>>>
>>>>>> They use a suspension harness to make sure there is a gap between
>>>>>> them :)
>>>
>>>>> Probably never should've mentioned that.
>>>>> These images that gray& you created... well, I'm joining the clergy ;)
>>>
>>>> I feel for Rex....when people see my wife they can't figure it out either
>>>> :-) I haven't figured it out for the last 41 years either...but I keep my
>>>> mouth shut and don't question it. :-)
>>>
>>> I'm sure Jean figured it out, that's why she be next to you ;)- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> I'm in the same camp as papa and Rex. Only the good Lord knows why my
>> beautiful partner has been with me for 24 years. Whatever it is, I am
>> a happy man.
>
> You must really love her, judging by how often you've been impersonating her lately ;)
Let's just hope he's not also raiding her wardrobe when she's away.
This newsgroup doesn't need any J Edgar Hoovers.
== 5 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:32 am
From: Tutor
On Sep 30, 10:27 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT), Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 30, 9:20 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:17:50 -0400, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
> >> >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:0jk7a69qr5anlrpnhlq222uv9dtvh2indq@4ax.com...
> >> >> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT), Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >>>On Sep 29, 11:59 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> It's always interesting to see people's choice of partner in life.
> >> >>>> Rex did well, but I bet he aint on top much ;)
>
> >> >>>>http://bit.ly/dnQ1CS
>
> >> >>>> Rex Ryan's wife, Michelle, is part of the new NFL "Fit For You" product
> >> >>>> line and ad
> >> >>>> campaign designed to make wearing women's favorite team logoed apparel
> >> >>>> more appealing to
> >> >>>> the growing number of female fans of the NFL.
>
> >> >>>>http://bit.ly/bUzZlR
>
> >> >>>They use a suspension harness to make sure there is a gap between
> >> >>>them :)
>
> >> >> Probably never should've mentioned that.
> >> >> These images that gray & you created... well, I'm joining the clergy ;)
>
> >> >I feel for Rex....when people see my wife they can't figure it out either
> >> >:-) I haven't figured it out for the last 41 years either...but I keep my
> >> >mouth shut and don't question it. :-)
>
> >> I'm sure Jean figured it out, that's why she be next to you ;)- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >I'm in the same camp as papa and Rex. Only the good Lord knows why my
> >beautiful partner has been with me for 24 years. Whatever it is, I am
> >a happy man.
>
> You must really love her, judging by how often you've been impersonating her lately ;)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I forget the downstairs PC defaults to her google account. I am
trying to stick with my laptop when posting here. Any other way to
post/read this group other than google? For free, that is.
== 6 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:34 am
From: Tutor
On Sep 30, 10:31 am, MZ <m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> On 9/30/2010 10:27 AM, buRford wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT), Tutor<dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Sep 30, 9:20 am, buRford<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:17:50 -0400, "papa.carl44"<papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> "buRford"<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:0jk7a69qr5anlrpnhlq222uv9dtvh2indq@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT), Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Sep 29, 11:59 am, buRford<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> It's always interesting to see people's choice of partner in life.
> >>>>>>> Rex did well, but I bet he aint on top much ;)
>
> >>>>>>>http://bit.ly/dnQ1CS
>
> >>>>>>> Rex Ryan's wife, Michelle, is part of the new NFL "Fit For You" product
> >>>>>>> line and ad
> >>>>>>> campaign designed to make wearing women's favorite team logoed apparel
> >>>>>>> more appealing to
> >>>>>>> the growing number of female fans of the NFL.
>
> >>>>>>>http://bit.ly/bUzZlR
>
> >>>>>> They use a suspension harness to make sure there is a gap between
> >>>>>> them :)
>
> >>>>> Probably never should've mentioned that.
> >>>>> These images that gray& you created... well, I'm joining the clergy ;)
>
> >>>> I feel for Rex....when people see my wife they can't figure it out either
> >>>> :-) I haven't figured it out for the last 41 years either...but I keep my
> >>>> mouth shut and don't question it. :-)
>
> >>> I'm sure Jean figured it out, that's why she be next to you ;)- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> I'm in the same camp as papa and Rex. Only the good Lord knows why my
> >> beautiful partner has been with me for 24 years. Whatever it is, I am
> >> a happy man.
>
> > You must really love her, judging by how often you've been impersonating her lately ;)
>
> Let's just hope he's not also raiding her wardrobe when she's away.
> This newsgroup doesn't need any J Edgar Hoovers.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I don't let her go away. I'm not dumb.
== 7 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 8:48 am
From: Johnny Morongo
On Sep 30, 7:34 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 10:31 am, MZ <m...@nospam.void> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 9/30/2010 10:27 AM, buRford wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT), Tutor<dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >> On Sep 30, 9:20 am, buRford<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:17:50 -0400, "papa.carl44"<papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
> > >>>> "buRford"<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:0jk7a69qr5anlrpnhlq222uv9dtvh2indq@4ax.com...
> > >>>>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT), Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> On Sep 29, 11:59 am, buRford<buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> It's always interesting to see people's choice of partner in life.
> > >>>>>>> Rex did well, but I bet he aint on top much ;)
>
> > >>>>>>>http://bit.ly/dnQ1CS
>
> > >>>>>>> Rex Ryan's wife, Michelle, is part of the new NFL "Fit For You" product
> > >>>>>>> line and ad
> > >>>>>>> campaign designed to make wearing women's favorite team logoed apparel
> > >>>>>>> more appealing to
> > >>>>>>> the growing number of female fans of the NFL.
>
> > >>>>>>>http://bit.ly/bUzZlR
>
> > >>>>>> They use a suspension harness to make sure there is a gap between
> > >>>>>> them :)
>
> > >>>>> Probably never should've mentioned that.
> > >>>>> These images that gray& you created... well, I'm joining the clergy ;)
>
> > >>>> I feel for Rex....when people see my wife they can't figure it out either
> > >>>> :-) I haven't figured it out for the last 41 years either...but I keep my
> > >>>> mouth shut and don't question it. :-)
>
> > >>> I'm sure Jean figured it out, that's why she be next to you ;)- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >>> - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> I'm in the same camp as papa and Rex. Only the good Lord knows why my
> > >> beautiful partner has been with me for 24 years. Whatever it is, I am
> > >> a happy man.
>
> > > You must really love her, judging by how often you've been impersonating her lately ;)
>
> > Let's just hope he's not also raiding her wardrobe when she's away.
> > This newsgroup doesn't need any J Edgar Hoovers.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I don't let her go away. I'm not dumb.
There's got to be some other explanation. ;)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Coleman to start at the corner
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/be757aabb8718410?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 6:27 am
From: John C TX
Don't all cry but he can't be worse than Wilson right now. Reading
the piece on the jets web site with Leonhard & communication makes me
think that having 2 DB's that know the offense is probably not a bad
thing.
Coleman could replace Wilson for Jets
By BART HUBBUCH
Last Updated: 9:16 AM, September 30, 2010
Posted: 3:31 AM, September 30, 2010
Kyle Wilson's nightmarish debut as a starting NFL cornerback last
Sunday appears to have earned the rookie first-round pick a quick
demotion.
Wilson and coach Rex Ryan both indicated yesterday that Wilson will go
back inside to the nickel (third) cornerback spot this weekend at
Buffalo and be replaced on the outside by Drew Coleman.
Wilson was pressed into starting duty against the Dolphins last Sunday
by All-Pro corner Darrelle Revis' hamstring injury. A review of the
film from the Jets' 31-23 win at Miami showed the Dolphins threw at
Wilson 11 times, completing seven for 107 yards. He also was flagged
27 yards for pass interference.
BACK PAGE: WOODHEAD A HERO
As a result, the veteran Coleman got some work with the starters in
place of Wilson in practice yesterday and appears likely to get a lot
more in the coming days.
"Kyle's struggling a little bit, without question, but I think Drew
has earned it," Ryan said. "Both of those guys will play a bunch,
[but] we as coaches think that [Coleman] deserves a shot."
Wilson, meanwhile, said late yesterday that he expects to be the
nickel back against the Bills.
"I've just got to look back and learn from it and become a smarter
player," Wilson said of his play against the Dolphins.
*
Ryan said the Jets put in a waiver claim on former Bills quarterback
Trent Edwards in part so they could "pick his brain" about Buffalo
going into Sunday's game.
The Jets' plans were foiled when Edwards was awarded to the Jaguars,
to the relief of third-string quarterback Kellen Clemens.
Clemens, though, said he wasn't offended by the Jets' interest in
Edwards because Ryan had come to him beforehand and said the team
wouldn't make the claim if Clemens objected.
"[Making a claim on Edwards] had nothing to do with replacing me,"
Clemens said yesterday.
Bills coach Chan Gailey, meanwhile, poked fun at the Jets' obvious
gamesmanship in claiming Edwards.
"That was an amazing coincidence that they needed another quarterback
this week," Gailey said yesterday.
*
LB Jamaal Westerman denied Internet-fueled accusations that he faked a
hamstring injury late in the fourth quarter Sunday to help the Jets
strategically.
Westerman didn't practice at all yesterday and is questionable against
the Bills because of ankle and hamstring injuries, which would seem to
credence to his case.
"Wouldn't it have been more strategic for the offensive guy to fake an
injury?" Westerman told The Post yesterday. "It looked kind of funny,
but it definitely was a cramp."
*
Revis did not practice yesterday and remains likely to miss his second
consecutive game Sunday.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: TV Viewing recommendations in NY/CT area.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/2636bdf1f3617b9a?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 6:31 am
From: Harlan Lachman
In article <rdk7a692ne8cm7p9ke8e706opiq2nnbjoh@4ax.com>,
buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:54:23 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> <spuorgelgoog@ianwhitephoto.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >On Sep 29, 1:56 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:10:52 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> >> <spuorgelg...@ianwhitephoto.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >Ok, so I've finally got my SlingBox installed ...
> >>
> >> >What's the best channels/times/days to watch in the NY/CT area to :-
> >>
> >> >catch up on NYJ football?
> >> >catch upon football in general (NFL and college)
> >>
> >> >Any other viewing recommendations?
> >>
> >> >Cheers
> >>
> >> Go tohttp://web.sny.tv/teams/index.jsp?oid=36122. Or for their
> >> schedule...http://web.sny.tv/schedule/index.jsp
> >> They have the most TV coverage on the Jets.
> >> They do a full post-game with the full player pressers, and have daily
> >> shows & pressers.
> >> Also, if ya just want to listen ever, 1050-ESPN radio in NY, covers the
> >> Jets. You can
> >> stream it online.
> >> http://espn.go.com/new-york/radio/story?page=new-york/listenlive
> >> There's a couple of hours pregame, and usually at least 3 hours post game.
> >> Also, Mondays
> >> around 5pm (local - probably 23 hrs your time) Rex is on live, Sanchez is
> >> on Tuesdays, and
> >> Namath on Thursdays.
> >> As for Jets games themselves, CBS-Ch2 covers most of their games (they
> >> cover the AFC).
> >> Sundays at 11:30am (local), they have a half-hour, "Jets Flight Plan"
> >> program on the
> >> upcoming game.
> >> On the Jets website, the team schedule has what channel a game will be on.
> >>
> >> Other than that, it's just general sports programming in NY.
> >> Hope this helps ya, hombre...
> >
> >Thanks John, Glenn and BuRf,
> >
> >That's pretty much what I'd got fast tuned in to the Slingbox :- SNY,
> >ESPN 1 & 2.
> >
> >Of course the time difference makes some programs difficult to watch,
> >and I thought SNY was the Mets personal channel, the amount they were
> >on, but that's only down to what time I watch.
> >
> >Cheers all,
>
>
> Once the Mets season ends, it's Football, and mainly Jets.
> Then, the local NBA, & NHL teams.
What do you mean, "Once the Mets' season ends..."? If it ever started,
it ended a long time ago.
harlan
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Pats D: How Bad Is It?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/1134943a98a05971?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:07 am
From: Michael
On Sep 29, 11:32 pm, MZ <m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> On 9/29/2010 11:02 PM, Michael wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 9:46 pm, MZ<m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> >> On 9/29/2010 7:49 PM, Copp wrote:
>
> >>> In article<x_2dnQ8jgsQOzT7RnZ2dnUVZ_jSdn...@giganews.com>
> >>> MZ<m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> >>>>> Nope, they've given up 82 points. 82/3=27.3. Good
> >>>>> for 28th in the league.
>
> >>>> I think you're counting special teams TDs. We're talking about the defense.
>
> >>> Well, unless you're going to subtract the points
> >>> given up by other teams special teams it won't be useful
> >>> for comparison.
>
> >> That doesn't make any sen
> > se at all.
>
> >>> The point is: the Pats defense sucks.
> >>> They may get better, but right now they stink.
>
> >> They've got some problems, no question, but let's keep it in
> >> perspective. The Pats D played one really bad game, one pretty good
> >> game, and one somewhere in between. It'll be interesting to see where
> >> they go from here.
>
> > again... they will do good against miami... at least better than the
> > jets d. did....
>
> > to introduce somthing new here regarding styles... i made my
> > predictions about the jets win/loss record this season in here not too
> > long ago. thus far, i'm correct on the first three... soon to be
> > four. i had them at 12-4 with losses to Ravens, GB, NE at home and
> > Pittsburg... I'm going to change my mind about GB... I think the Jets
> > will beat them. GB is too one dimentional on offense. Teams that do
> > not have a ballanced offense are going to lose to the Jets. I did not
> > know that GB had an absolute hollow running game, nor did I know that
> > their o-line was such a problem.
>
> > Here is my revised predictions:
>
> > 1. Raves: L * (I knew rthey would not yet be ready to start the season
> > with an agressive offense)
> > 2. Pats W* (i expected them to be up for this at home. superbowl II )
> > 3. Fish: W *( sweeeep part I)
> > 4. Buf: W* (no chance unless jets forget to show up)
> > 5. Vikes: W (favre missing on all cylinders. no rice, vike o-line an
> > issue, some of the jets team wants to show favre up)
> > 6: Denver: W (this could be a jet loss despite half the denver team
> > being in IR. Denver plays with ballance)
> > 7.GB: W (im changing this. I had it as a L. they are to unbalanced
> > on offense. the jets d will have a qb feeding frenzy)
> > 8:Det: W (they just not there yet.. suh is scarey... gotta make sure
> > he does not go one on one or we could have sanchez soup)
> > 9.Clev:W (mangini wants this game badly and will make hiself known to
> > the team, but that wont be good enough. they just lacking in
> > manpower)
> > 10.HOU:W (running game does not scare me)
> > 11.CIN:W (if palmer wakes up, this could be a loss for the jets. as of
> > now, i cant call them ballanced with palmer playing the way he is)
> > 12.NE: L (pats defense should improve by this time)
> > 13.MIA: W. (it will only be harder for the Fish with the Jets at home
> > and their db's up and running)
> > 14. Steelers; L (as much as I want this game, they are very well
> > ballanced on offense and great on d. This team is ideal to beat the
> > Jets. No to mention the Steeler Shill refs count for 14 points in
> > their favor)
> > 15: Chicago: W (Martz vs Rex... Bears will need to find a ground
> > attack or else)
> > 16.Buf: W
>
> > Final record (best case but possible) 13-3
>
> > *Note... Houston, Denver and Cin could all give them trouble.. I'm
> > going to say that they will probably fall to one or two of those
> > teams...
>
> > Final record (probable) 11-5
>
> > Injuries not withstanding
>
> Looks pretty good to me. I had predicted 10-6 I think. I don't
> remember. I think 10-6 or 11-5 looks likely to me. I can see a 3-way
> tie in the division.
>
> I don't think you can underestimate Minnesota. They've got a good
> defense, and who the hell knows which Brett will show up. Peterson is
> always a threat to take it to the house, and as good as the Jets D is,
> I'm not yet convinced that they can keep the play in front of them all
> the time. I'm also still not sure about Sanchez/Schott, despite their
> being able to put points on the board the last two weeks.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
agree with all of your points... also... one team on the list
including the jets may blow a few games or they may have some amazing
production that was unexpected. the mob of nfl public opinion and
bandwagoneers changes week to week. my worry with the jets has alwas
been schott. the ravens game seemed to prove it but then the past two
games blew my assessment out of the water. going into the season,
with cromartie and wilson added on, i figured the jets defensive backs
would be the pearl of the team... they would go from number one
against the pass to the sublime. and look what has been happening....
like jim mora said in one of his melt-downs...
"You don't know. You just don't know. You may think you know, but you
don't know. And you never will."
that about sums it up, but i still plan to keep at it :-)
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:35 am
From: John C TX
On Sep 29, 10:02 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 9:46 pm, MZ <m...@nospam.void> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 9/29/2010 7:49 PM, Copp wrote:
>
> > > In article<x_2dnQ8jgsQOzT7RnZ2dnUVZ_jSdn...@giganews.com>
> > > MZ<m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> > >>> Nope, they've given up 82 points. 82/3=27.3. Good
> > >>> for 28th in the league.
>
> > >> I think you're counting special teams TDs. We're talking about the defense.
>
> > > Well, unless you're going to subtract the points
> > > given up by other teams special teams it won't be useful
> > > for comparison.
>
> > That doesn't make any sen
> se at all.
>
> > > The point is: the Pats defense sucks.
> > > They may get better, but right now they stink.
>
> > They've got some problems, no question, but let's keep it in
> > perspective. The Pats D played one really bad game, one pretty good
> > game, and one somewhere in between. It'll be interesting to see where
> > they go from here.
>
> again... they will do good against miami... at least better than the
> jets d. did....
>
> to introduce somthing new here regarding styles... i made my
> predictions about the jets win/loss record this season in here not too
> long ago. thus far, i'm correct on the first three... soon to be
> four. i had them at 12-4 with losses to Ravens, GB, NE at home and
> Pittsburg... I'm going to change my mind about GB... I think the Jets
> will beat them. GB is too one dimentional on offense. Teams that do
> not have a ballanced offense are going to lose to the Jets. I did not
> know that GB had an absolute hollow running game, nor did I know that
> their o-line was such a problem.
>
> Here is my revised predictions:
>
> 1. Raves: L * (I knew rthey would not yet be ready to start the season
> with an agressive offense)
> 2. Pats W* (i expected them to be up for this at home. superbowl II )
> 3. Fish: W *( sweeeep part I)
> 4. Buf: W* (no chance unless jets forget to show up)
> 5. Vikes: W (favre missing on all cylinders. no rice, vike o-line an
> issue, some of the jets team wants to show favre up)
> 6: Denver: W (this could be a jet loss despite half the denver team
> being in IR. Denver plays with ballance)
> 7.GB: W (im changing this. I had it as a L. they are to unbalanced
> on offense. the jets d will have a qb feeding frenzy)
> 8:Det: W (they just not there yet.. suh is scarey... gotta make sure
> he does not go one on one or we could have sanchez soup)
> 9.Clev:W (mangini wants this game badly and will make hiself known to
> the team, but that wont be good enough. they just lacking in
> manpower)
> 10.HOU:W (running game does not scare me)
> 11.CIN:W (if palmer wakes up, this could be a loss for the jets. as of
> now, i cant call them ballanced with palmer playing the way he is)
> 12.NE: L (pats defense should improve by this time)
> 13.MIA: W. (it will only be harder for the Fish with the Jets at home
> and their db's up and running)
> 14. Steelers; L (as much as I want this game, they are very well
> ballanced on offense and great on d. This team is ideal to beat the
> Jets. No to mention the Steeler Shill refs count for 14 points in
> their favor)
> 15: Chicago: W (Martz vs Rex... Bears will need to find a ground
> attack or else)
> 16.Buf: W
>
> Final record (best case but possible) 13-3
>
> *Note... Houston, Denver and Cin could all give them trouble.. I'm
> going to say that they will probably fall to one or two of those
> teams...
>
> Final record (probable) 11-5
>
> Injuries not withstanding
Michael, before the season started I thought 11-5 after opening with
two losses. This is the NFL where upsets are a part of life & we have
a young QB.
I am not that worried about Houston 3/4 DB's would not start on most
teams. They also have trouble picking up the pass rush vs. a good
3-4. Denver is tough at home
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 8:14 am
From: Michael
On Sep 30, 10:35 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 10:02 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 9:46 pm, MZ <m...@nospam.void> wrote:
>
> > > On 9/29/2010 7:49 PM, Copp wrote:
>
> > > > In article<x_2dnQ8jgsQOzT7RnZ2dnUVZ_jSdn...@giganews.com>
> > > > MZ<m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> > > >>> Nope, they've given up 82 points. 82/3=27.3. Good
> > > >>> for 28th in the league.
>
> > > >> I think you're counting special teams TDs. We're talking about the defense.
>
> > > > Well, unless you're going to subtract the points
> > > > given up by other teams special teams it won't be useful
> > > > for comparison.
>
> > > That doesn't make any sen
> > se at all.
>
> > > > The point is: the Pats defense sucks.
> > > > They may get better, but right now they stink.
>
> > > They've got some problems, no question, but let's keep it in
> > > perspective. The Pats D played one really bad game, one pretty good
> > > game, and one somewhere in between. It'll be interesting to see where
> > > they go from here.
>
> > again... they will do good against miami... at least better than the
> > jets d. did....
>
> > to introduce somthing new here regarding styles... i made my
> > predictions about the jets win/loss record this season in here not too
> > long ago. thus far, i'm correct on the first three... soon to be
> > four. i had them at 12-4 with losses to Ravens, GB, NE at home and
> > Pittsburg... I'm going to change my mind about GB... I think the Jets
> > will beat them. GB is too one dimentional on offense. Teams that do
> > not have a ballanced offense are going to lose to the Jets. I did not
> > know that GB had an absolute hollow running game, nor did I know that
> > their o-line was such a problem.
>
> > Here is my revised predictions:
>
> > 1. Raves: L * (I knew rthey would not yet be ready to start the season
> > with an agressive offense)
> > 2. Pats W* (i expected them to be up for this at home. superbowl II )
> > 3. Fish: W *( sweeeep part I)
> > 4. Buf: W* (no chance unless jets forget to show up)
> > 5. Vikes: W (favre missing on all cylinders. no rice, vike o-line an
> > issue, some of the jets team wants to show favre up)
> > 6: Denver: W (this could be a jet loss despite half the denver team
> > being in IR. Denver plays with ballance)
> > 7.GB: W (im changing this. I had it as a L. they are to unbalanced
> > on offense. the jets d will have a qb feeding frenzy)
> > 8:Det: W (they just not there yet.. suh is scarey... gotta make sure
> > he does not go one on one or we could have sanchez soup)
> > 9.Clev:W (mangini wants this game badly and will make hiself known to
> > the team, but that wont be good enough. they just lacking in
> > manpower)
> > 10.HOU:W (running game does not scare me)
> > 11.CIN:W (if palmer wakes up, this could be a loss for the jets. as of
> > now, i cant call them ballanced with palmer playing the way he is)
> > 12.NE: L (pats defense should improve by this time)
> > 13.MIA: W. (it will only be harder for the Fish with the Jets at home
> > and their db's up and running)
> > 14. Steelers; L (as much as I want this game, they are very well
> > ballanced on offense and great on d. This team is ideal to beat the
> > Jets. No to mention the Steeler Shill refs count for 14 points in
> > their favor)
> > 15: Chicago: W (Martz vs Rex... Bears will need to find a ground
> > attack or else)
> > 16.Buf: W
>
> > Final record (best case but possible) 13-3
>
> > *Note... Houston, Denver and Cin could all give them trouble.. I'm
> > going to say that they will probably fall to one or two of those
> > teams...
>
> > Final record (probable) 11-5
>
> > Injuries not withstanding
>
> Michael, before the season started I thought 11-5 after opening with
> two losses. This is the NFL where upsets are a part of life & we have
> a young QB.
>
> I am not that worried about Houston 3/4 DB's would not start on most
> teams. They also have trouble picking up the pass rush vs. a good
> 3-4. Denver is tough at home- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
did you see the bears-packers game ??? what do you think about the
bears ??? they could give the jets trouble too. i like martz a
lot... even more than henning... i had a strong feeling he'd work out
with cutler. lets see how they do against the giants this weekend.
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 8:57 am
From: je.s.te.r@hehxduhmp.org
In alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots MZ <mark@nospam.void> wrote:
> enough) and Seymour, who they just drafted.
Even seymour took some flack because he wasn't david terrell or whatever
that dude's name was.
> Sometimes they peak in their first year. Mayo and Wilhite are two guys
> that come to mind. Or Vilma with the Jets.
Or 'Eugene "My Man" Wilson' as I had unfortunately taken to calling him
when he was good.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: "The Herminator"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/ef3e262d3d965eb2?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:21 am
From: Tutor
Was this man really the HC of the NY Jets? OMG. I am so embarrassed
for him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGXoSvrnx7k
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 7:26 am
From: buRford
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:21:39 -0700 (PDT), Tutor <dcat4434@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Was this man really the HC of the NY Jets? OMG. I am so embarrassed
>for him:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGXoSvrnx7k
Yeah, I saw that on JetsBlog... the guy is an imbecile, always has been & will be.
And our *Terminator* is on our team, because of him ;)
(We got Leon for him, and Connor for Leon)
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 8:08 am
From: Michael
On Sep 30, 10:26 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:21:39 -0700 (PDT), Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Was this man really the HC of the NY Jets? OMG. I am so embarrassed
> >for him:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGXoSvrnx7k
>
> Yeah, I saw that on JetsBlog... the guy is an imbecile, always has been & will be.
> And our *Terminator* is on our team, because of him ;)
> (We got Leon for him, and Connor for Leon)
lolz... im sure the producers came up with the idea and herm was good
enough to play along... herm had some good qualities. he was a good
player too. just not a great game time coach. i also like him as a
commentator... i cant think of anything bad to say about him other
than he was not a great hc. he'd probably be a good db coach
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 10:16 am
From: Harlan Lachman
In article
<38ece0e9-f0d9-42c5-9cf2-d2a800065177@i13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Tutor <dcat4434@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Was this man really the HC of the NY Jets? OMG. I am so embarrassed
> for him:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGXoSvrnx7k
He embarrassed himself more as pretending to be an NFL head coach. And
he had the audacity to do it to us.
Harlan
==============================================================================
TOPIC: 35 yr old Pryce signed by Jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/43c59b7fd33b56ee?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 8:46 am
From: Tutor
The New York Jets have intercepted the Ravens' plans to re-sign
defensive end Trevor Pryce, who Baltimore waived on Wednesday.
New York has agreed to a contract with Pryce, a league source told
ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter. Jets head coach Rex Ryan coached Pryce
when he was an assistant in Baltimore.
Pryce ranks third in sacks among active players but has only one
tackle this season. The 35-year-old has not started any of Baltimore's
three games.
Ravens coach John Harbaugh said Wednesday that there was a "high
possibility" that Pryce would return.
Pryce was waived to make room for safety Ken Hamlin, who was released
by Baltimore last week. Hamlin will probably contribute on special
teams in this Sunday's game against the Pittsburgh Steelers.
"You've got roster issues that you deal with. It's not something we
wanted to do," Harbaugh said of the move. "Trevor is a big part of
what we're doing here, and we anticipate getting him back. It's just
what we had to do for now."
Harbaugh insisted that Hamlin was simply a better fit on the roster
for this week.
"We're going to put the 45 best guys out there," he said. "I would
rather have Trevor here this week playing, but we're not able to do
that. We just have a numbers situation."
Pryce's locker had not been cleared out at the Ravens' facility
Wednesday.
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Sep 30 2010 8:53 am
From: MZ
On 9/30/2010 11:46 AM, Tutor wrote:
> The New York Jets have intercepted the Ravens' plans to re-sign
> defensive end Trevor Pryce, who Baltimore waived on Wednesday.
>
> New York has agreed to a contract with Pryce, a league source told
> ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter. Jets head coach Rex Ryan coached Pryce
> when he was an assistant in Baltimore.
>
> Pryce ranks third in sacks among active players but has only one
> tackle this season. The 35-year-old has not started any of Baltimore's
> three games.
>
> Ravens coach John Harbaugh said Wednesday that there was a "high
> possibility" that Pryce would return.
>
> Pryce was waived to make room for safety Ken Hamlin, who was released
> by Baltimore last week. Hamlin will probably contribute on special
> teams in this Sunday's game against the Pittsburgh Steelers.
>
> "You've got roster issues that you deal with. It's not something we
> wanted to do," Harbaugh said of the move. "Trevor is a big part of
> what we're doing here, and we anticipate getting him back. It's just
> what we had to do for now."
>
> Harbaugh insisted that Hamlin was simply a better fit on the roster
> for this week.
>
> "We're going to put the 45 best guys out there," he said. "I would
> rather have Trevor here this week playing, but we're not able to do
> that. We just have a numbers situation."
>
> Pryce's locker had not been cleared out at the Ravens' facility
> Wednesday.
Interesting. He was always one of my favorite defensive linemen.
Pretty stout against the run but a beast in the passing game. Can get
around guys and can bull rush. He has a real good build for DE in the
3-4. On passing downs, they can use him on the interior, so that they
can rotate Ellis and Devito there. Or they could line him up outside.
He's pretty versatile.
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
Posts
