http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots?hl=en
alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* the 800 pound topic in the room. - 15 messages, 7 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/74e530812d356602?hl=en
* RIP Dandy Don. - 9 messages, 6 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/ed5dcd6d2e1e0747?hl=en
* OT Palin - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/144fcd4a38e244ee?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: the 800 pound topic in the room.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/74e530812d356602?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 15 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 5 2010 9:56 pm
From: "Ray O'Hara"
well later today is the big game.
maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
predictions been flying.
I expect either a close game or a blowout
.
both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
attacks.
I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
Pats 28-17.
== 2 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 5:57 am
From: John C TX
X-No-Archive: Yes
> well later today is the big game.
> maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
> neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
> predictions been flying.
>
> I expect either a close game or a blowout
> .
> both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
> attacks.
> I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
> Pats 28-17.
I don't make predictions but my gut tells me we lose a close one or
beat you by 14+. I think you may be overvaluing your defense.
== 3 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 7:05 am
From: Michael
On Dec 6, 8:57 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > well later today is the big game.
> > maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
> > neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
> > predictions been flying.
>
> > I expect either a close game or a blowout
> > .
> > both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
> > attacks.
> > I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
> > Pats 28-17.
>
> I don't make predictions but my gut tells me we lose a close one or
> beat you by 14+. I think you may be overvaluing your defense.
The Pats are flawed defensively and their offense can be stymied by
means of pre-post snap confusion. The Jets are underachieving on
offense, lack a bona fied pass rusher and have issues at the safely
position. What does that mean ??? IMHO, the game wont be decided by
the two talked about units; the Pats offense and the Jets defense.
The Jets offense will be the surprise of the game. I expect them to
leave their Sominex back home in Schotty's office.
Jets 30 Pats 27
*Bonus prediction... If the Jets dont wait for the playoff's to do
it... We may just see Brad Smith throw a pass out of the Wild Cat
tonight.
== 4 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 7:08 am
From: Harlan Lachman
In article <idhtu5$19g$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
"Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara@hotmail.com> wrote:
> well later today is the big game.
> maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
> neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
> predictions been flying.
>
> I expect either a close game or a blowout
> .
> both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
> attacks.
> I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
> Pats 28-17.
Thanks Ray, I feel the same way. You and Mark and some blasts from the
past from this NG will be the only reason I will not be completely
depressed if we don't dominate and win.
Harlan
== 5 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 7:10 am
From: Harlan Lachman
In article
<3438351a-1a3a-47af-8e76-c6259795776d@a28g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
John C TX <johnctxjets@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> > well later today is the big game.
> > maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
> > neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
> > predictions been flying.
> >
> > I expect either a close game or a blowout
> > .
> > both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
> > attacks.
> > I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
> > Pats 28-17.
>
> I don't make predictions but my gut tells me we lose a close one or
> beat you by 14+. I think you may be overvaluing your defense.
John, I think it goes opposite. I think we win a close game of 10 points
or less and risk being blown out if Rex/Shott cannot get the offense
going. No way we can take out four receivers all game against this team.
h
== 6 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 8:01 am
From: Tutor
On Dec 6, 10:08 am, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> In article <idhtu5$19...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > well later today is the big game.
> > maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
> > neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
> > predictions been flying.
>
> > I expect either a close game or a blowout
> > .
> > both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
> > attacks.
> > I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
> > Pats 28-17.
>
> Thanks Ray, I feel the same way. You and Mark and some blasts from the
> past from this NG will be the only reason I will not be completely
> depressed if we don't dominate and win.
>
> Harlan
"Dominate?" I'll be very disappointed if the Jets don't win. But I
have no delusions that the Jets will dominate. That's just
unrealistic. The Patriots are a very good team that bends but doesn't
often break on defense.
== 7 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 8:24 am
From: John C TX
X-No-Archive: Yes
> John, I think it goes opposite. I think we win a close game of 10 points
> or less and risk being blown out if Rex/Shott cannot get the offense
> going. No way we can take out four receivers all game against this team.
>
> h
H, I am as nervous as a cat in a sack so anything I say is BS.
Leonard's injury didn't help.
Like I said it was just a gut feeling. Brady is a big time
performer. As a buddy from RSA would call it he has BMT for big match
temperament. If we can get some pressure -- I doubt we will throw the
kitchen sink at him too often-- but enough to stymie him on 3rd down
and Sanchez can play solid then we could do what the Browns did.
The one upside to Leonard's injury is that we could get a game breaker
as a punt returner. We also could fumble.
== 8 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 8:48 am
From: Michael
On Dec 6, 11:24 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > John, I think it goes opposite. I think we win a close game of 10 points
> > or less and risk being blown out if Rex/Shott cannot get the offense
> > going. No way we can take out four receivers all game against this team.
>
> > h
>
> H, I am as nervous as a cat in a sack so anything I say is BS.
> Leonard's injury didn't help.
>
> Like I said it was just a gut feeling. Brady is a big time
> performer. As a buddy from RSA would call it he has BMT for big match
> temperament. If we can get some pressure -- I doubt we will throw the
> kitchen sink at him too often-- but enough to stymie him on 3rd down
> and Sanchez can play solid then we could do what the Browns did.
>
> The one upside to Leonard's injury is that we could get a game breaker
> as a punt returner. We also could fumble.
my spider sense is acting up again... i have a feeling that there
will be a bright silver lining to the leonhard injury... may be a big
play by e. smith or as you say... a big play by the punt returner
filling in for jimmy.
== 9 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 8:48 am
From: "Ray O'Hara"
"Tutor" <dcat4434@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a3119a6d-a4cf-4a1b-8c0c-5139d5ee6036@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 6, 10:08 am, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> In article <idhtu5$19...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > well later today is the big game.
> > maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
> > neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
> > predictions been flying.
>
> > I expect either a close game or a blowout
> > .
> > both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
> > attacks.
> > I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
> > Pats 28-17.
>
> Thanks Ray, I feel the same way. You and Mark and some blasts from the
> past from this NG will be the only reason I will not be completely
> depressed if we don't dominate and win.
>
> Harlan
"Dominate?" I'll be very disappointed if the Jets don't win. But I
have no delusions that the Jets will dominate. That's just
unrealistic. The Patriots are a very good team that bends but doesn't
often break on defense.
=====================================================================================
anybody who bets this game is crazed.
== 10 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 9:15 am
From: Mattu
On Dec 5, 9:56 pm, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> well later today is the big game.
> maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
> neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
> predictions been flying.
>
> I expect either a close game or a blowout
> .
> both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
> attacks.
> I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
> Pats 28-17.
Being one of the elder statesman here:
Patriots 63
Jestards 0
== 11 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 9:41 am
From: John C TX
X-No-Archive: Yes
> =====================================================================================
>
> anybody who bets this game is crazed.
Ray, anyone who bets any game is crazed.
I have buddies I watch football with on Sunday. They bet 500-1000 each
week. Every year I make the same offer place your bet with me & I
will give you back 90% of your money at the end of the year.
One wise guy who bets $1-5,000 makes a crack how about me. I told him
I would give him back 95% as I would make it up in volume.
== 12 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 10:35 am
From: "Ray O'Hara"
"John C TX" <johnctxjets@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:015e17e0-826d-4ff2-ba25-f981f8767bf3@q12g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>> =====================================================================================
>>
>> anybody who bets this game is crazed.
>
> Ray, anyone who bets any game is crazed.
>
> I have buddies I watch football with on Sunday. They bet 500-1000 each
> week. Every year I make the same offer place your bet with me & I
> will give you back 90% of your money at the end of the year.
>
> One wise guy who bets $1-5,000 makes a crack how about me. I told him
> I would give him back 95% as I would make it up in volume.
yup
all I ever needed to see was the odds on the "card" if you can pick just 4
winners they pay off at 10-1
picking 4 winners from all the pro and major college games looks easy.
yet the Mob rakes in millions every week.
== 13 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 11:00 am
From: Michael
On Dec 6, 1:35 pm, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "John C TX" <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:015e17e0-826d-4ff2-ba25-f981f8767bf3@q12g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> > X-No-Archive: Yes
> >> =====================================================================================
>
> >> anybody who bets this game is crazed.
>
> > Ray, anyone who bets any game is crazed.
>
> > I have buddies I watch football with on Sunday. They bet 500-1000 each
> > week. Every year I make the same offer place your bet with me & I
> > will give you back 90% of your money at the end of the year.
>
> > One wise guy who bets $1-5,000 makes a crack how about me. I told him
> > I would give him back 95% as I would make it up in volume.
>
> yup
>
> all I ever needed to see was the odds on the "card" if you can pick just 4
> winners they pay off at 10-1
> picking 4 winners from all the pro and major college games looks easy.
> yet the Mob rakes in millions every week.
i only saw fit to bet on one game this year... my five star pick...
not saying that i did bet, mind you... only that i saw it fit to do
so.... i saw it fit to bet 100 bucks on the cowboys beating the giants
the week after gatter took over... and some one saw it fit to give me
some money after the game for some strange reason
== 14 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 2:49 pm
From: cloud dreamer
On 06/12/2010 1:45 PM, Mattu wrote:
> On Dec 5, 9:56 pm, "Ray O'Hara"<raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> well later today is the big game.
>> maybe the biggest game between the Pats and Jets.
>> neither group has been mentioning it much nor has the trash talk or
>> predictions been flying.
>>
>> I expect either a close game or a blowout
>> .
>> both teams have been finding ways to win while giving their fans heart
>> attacks.
>> I'd wish the Jets good luck but I wouldn't mean it/
>> Pats 28-17.
>
> Being one of the elder statesman here:
>
> Patriots 63
> Jestards 0
LOL
Pats 48
Jets 24
Jets have only beaten one winning team this season - the Pats - and won
a lot of close games over really bad teams. They're overrated.
Pats have beaten 4 teams .500 or better and are a better team then they
were in September.
And the Jets still have to get by Chicago and Pitts - both who will be
playing hard to stay on top of their division.
This is the Pat's game to lose. The Jets only win if the Pats don't come
to play, but after 11 days of prep, I can't see that.
Barring injuries of course.
I did leave my fingernails long...so that I'll have something to chew
off tonight....lol
..
== 15 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 3:07 pm
From: Harlan Lachman
In article
<830be3b5-bfa8-4c67-a125-44beeca9adf4@a17g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
John C TX <johnctxjets@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> > John, I think it goes opposite. I think we win a close game of 10 points
> > or less and risk being blown out if Rex/Shott cannot get the offense
> > going. No way we can take out four receivers all game against this team.
> >
> > h
>
> H, I am as nervous as a cat in a sack so anything I say is BS.
> Leonard's injury didn't help.
>
> Like I said it was just a gut feeling. Brady is a big time
> performer. As a buddy from RSA would call it he has BMT for big match
> temperament. If we can get some pressure -- I doubt we will throw the
> kitchen sink at him too often-- but enough to stymie him on 3rd down
> and Sanchez can play solid then we could do what the Browns did.
>
> The one upside to Leonard's injury is that we could get a game breaker
> as a punt returner. We also could fumble.
And, as I posted earlier, I think Smith goes into the Box to replace
Leonhard where is is a little less of a liability.
H
==============================================================================
TOPIC: RIP Dandy Don.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/ed5dcd6d2e1e0747?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 7:36 am
From: "Ray O'Hara"
he died last nite from a brain hemorage.
he was a 1st rate QB and he endeared himself to America by calling out
Cosell on his bullshit.
When Lennon was murdered Cosell was against mentioning such a trivial thing
on the air during a game.
Meredith insisted it was big news and had to be mentioned, after a few
minutes arguing Meredith carried the argument and Cosell read the
announcement.
it became the biggest story Cosell ever broke and he ever after took full
"credit" for thr the story.
a leaked tape of the off-air debate in the booth showed it was Dandy Don and
Frank Gifford who wanted it mentioned.
RIP dandy Don.
== 2 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 7:59 am
From: "junter522@123.net"
On 12/6/2010 10:36 AM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
> he died last nite from a brain hemorage.
> he was a 1st rate QB and he endeared himself to America by calling out
> Cosell on his bullshit.
> When Lennon was murdered Cosell was against mentioning such a trivial thing
> on the air during a game.
> Meredith insisted it was big news and had to be mentioned, after a few
> minutes arguing Meredith carried the argument and Cosell read the
> announcement.
> it became the biggest story Cosell ever broke and he ever after took full
> "credit" for thr the story.
> a leaked tape of the off-air debate in the booth showed it was Dandy Don and
> Frank Gifford who wanted it mentioned.
>
> RIP dandy Don.
>
>
Howard had a God complex.SOB.John &Don had love and peace in their
hearts.R.I.P.Don
== 3 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 9:22 am
From: Neil X
Turn out the lights, the party's over.
Always entertaining, seldom perspicacious, beloved by millions. 21st
Century networks could use more announcers like him.
http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=5890812
Peace,
Neil X.
== 4 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 9:49 am
From: yoker
One of my favorites, too.
> > RIP dandy Don
:_(
== 5 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 11:08 am
From: the felonious kidd
On Dec 6, 9:22 am, Neil X <nei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Always entertaining, seldom perspicacious, beloved by millions. 21st
> Century networks could use more announcers like him.
"Perspicacious". So does that mean you are or are not in favor of
bringing back Dennis Miller to Monday Night Football?
Adios Don. I won't hold the fact that you were a Dallas Cowboy against
you.
== 6 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 12:32 pm
From: "JKConey"
Unlike many I loved Cosell, and Don as well. The guy I could ever stand was
Gifford. He was often lost on what was happening, and was a shill for the
network.
--
== 7 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 12:38 pm
From: "Ray O'Hara"
"the felonious kidd" <bob_aran@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8318766f-8d4e-4f5e-af8a-f9ab80b379c0@o23g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 6, 9:22 am, Neil X <nei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Always entertaining, seldom perspicacious, beloved by millions. 21st
> Century networks could use more announcers like him.
"Perspicacious". So does that mean you are or are not in favor of
bringing back Dennis Miller to Monday Night Football?
Adios Don. I won't hold the fact that you were a Dallas Cowboy against
you
=========================================================================
why is it when commedians come out as Republicans any hint of humour deserts
them?
Miller, P.J.O'Rourke, Ben Stein, well not Stein he was never funny.
but connedservatives seems to be humouristically challenged.
and the jokes wingnuts post to the usenet would embarrass a 12 year old with
their lamosity.
== 8 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 12:39 pm
From: "Ray O'Hara"
"JKConey" <jkconey@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:idjh85$eba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Unlike many I loved Cosell, and Don as well. The guy I could ever stand
> was Gifford. He was often lost on what was happening, and was a shill for
> the network.
>
>
> --
>
> www.myconeyislandmemories.com
the Giff was a great player. before the AFL and the Pats existed the Giants
were the "home" team for New England.
the Giff was cool and one of my heros.
yeah he sucked in the booth.
== 9 of 9 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 12:44 pm
From: "JKConey"
"Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:idjhmp$gt3$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JKConey" <jkconey@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:idjh85$eba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Unlike many I loved Cosell, and Don as well. The guy I could ever stand
>> was Gifford. He was often lost on what was happening, and was a shill for
>> the network.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> www.myconeyislandmemories.com
>
> the Giff was a great player. before the AFL and the Pats existed the
> Giants were the "home" team for New England.
> the Giff was cool and one of my heros.
> yeah he sucked in the booth.
>
Yes he was the Lance Allworth of his time. Saw him drop a key YA Tittle
pass in a champ game. He hated any of the old AFL teams he had to cover.
That smug NFL attitude was what turned me into a Giant hater.
--
==============================================================================
TOPIC: OT Palin
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/144fcd4a38e244ee?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Dec 6 2010 1:48 pm
From: Dewey
MuahMan <muahman@gmail.com> wrote in
news:62473f12-9fa4-432e-89d8-ce0a57d0befe@30g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
> On Dec 4, 12:13�pm, Dewey <dewey3kNOS...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Eddie Haskell" <jhjh...@sasasqq.com> wrote in news:NVUJo.55999
>> $rp3.31...@unlimited.newshosting.com:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Dewey" <dewey3kNOS...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:Xns9E4184F2D29E5dewey3kNOSPAMgmailco@130.133.4.11...
>> >> MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:1c13720a-0532-4d99-b560-
>>
>> 7886b85c7...@i32g2000pri.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>> On Nov 29, 4:41 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <jhjh...@sasasqq.com> wrote:
>> >>>> "MuahMan" <muah...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>>> news:3001e588-9b14-4187-a9e0-3855a63a7404
>> >> @r16g2000prh.googlegroups.com
>> >>>> ... On Nov 29, 2:00 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Profile."
>>
>> >>>> <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> > On Nov 26, 2:27 pm, N...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >>>> > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:51:09 -0800 (PST), "O'Neil's Faggy
>> >>>> > > Prostate - Loves me some HOT STOVE!"
>> >>>> > > <oneilsprost...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>> > > >On Nov 24, 11:46 pm, N...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>>> > > >>http://www.smh.com.au/world/sarah-palin-confused-on-
koreas-
>> >> 20101
>> >>>> > > >>125
>> >>> -1...
>>
>> >>>> > > >Unemployment under The Won is nearly 10%, and this is what
>> >>>> > > >you choos
>> >>> e
>> >>>> > > >to bitch about?
>>
>> >>>> > > >AMAZING!!!
>> >>>> > > >:D
>>
>> >>>> > > Never mind that unemployment is so high even with Wall
>> >>>> > > Street making record profits, the republicans drove the
>> >>>> > > economy off
>> the
>> >>>> > > cliff, and the republicans want you to drop dead unless
>> >>>> > > you're
>> a
>> >>>> > > multi millionaire.
>>
>> >>>> > > When does the greed end?
>>
>> >>>> > Voting for Palin may be the ONLY HOPE for our country! Here
>> >>>> > are
>> 10
>> >>>> > reasons to vote for Sarah Palin in 2012:
>>
>> >>>> > * Unemployment will come down
>> >>>> > * Employment will go up
>> >>>> > * Lower taxes for EVERYONE
>> >>>> > * LOWER SPENDING (get it yet, Democrats?)
>> >>>> > * More HIRING will occur
>> >>>> > * STRONGER military PREVAILS
>> >>>> > * U.S. Debt will go DOWN
>> >>>> > * More U.S. companies will be willing to HIRE people
>> >>>> > * People will be PROUD to call themselves AMERICAN again
>>
>> >>>> > "America, the Beautiful" (2012)
>> >>>> > :D
>> >>>> > Fuck That! We need another Civil War.
>> >>>> > Wooooohoooooooooooooooooo Lets put this Democrat vs Republican
>> >>>> > shit to bed forever. Fight
>> it
>> >>>> > out.
>>
>> >>>> Good idea. We republicans have the guns and the military.
>>
>> >>>> -Eddie Haskell
>>
>> >>> and the money, and the jobs, and the work ethic.
>>
>> >>> They do have the unemployed, the homosexuals, and the hippies
>> though!!
>> >>> Frightening! ;)
>>
>> >> OFP, Pratt, "Ricky Bobby" and Haskell all in one thread. Usenet's
>> >> 4 biggest dunderheads finally meet..
>>
>> > ..you, the chief dunderhead.
>>
>> ARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! Pierced once again by your
>> rapier-like wit.
>>
>> --
>> If I were a cactus, I wouldn't need so much water.
>
> Go spend your WIC stamps.
>
There's that clever Brian Pratt wit that I've missed so much. S'matter?
Can't get any attention in asbnyy anymore? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
--
If I were a cactus, I wouldn't need so much water.
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
