Friday, December 17, 2010

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Industry captains pledge by ethical business practices

Buzz It
Industry captains pledge by ethical business practices
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Industry-captains-pledge-by-ethical-business-practices/articleshow/7114528.cms

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Kamat inspects work on 4-laning at Navelim

Buzz It
Kamat inspects work on 4-laning at Navelim
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Kamat-inspects-work-on-4-laning-at-Navelim/articleshow/7119993.cms

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Subsidy of 25,000 from state to SHGs

Buzz It
Subsidy of 25,000 from state to SHGs
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Subsidy-of-25000-from-state-to-SHGs/articleshow/7114560.cms

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Intl Arbitration Centre in Jan 2011

Buzz It
Intl Arbitration Centre in Jan 2011
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Intl-Arbitration-Centre-in-Jan-2011/articleshow/7115254.cms

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 '182 mines close to rivers, nullahs'

Buzz It
'182 mines close to rivers, nullahs'
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/182-mines-close-to-rivers-nullahs/articleshow/7114552.cms

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Cabinet nod to health insurance scheme

Buzz It
Cabinet nod to health insurance scheme
http://www.navhindtimes.in/goa-news/cabinet-nod-health-insurance-scheme

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Time to Abolish the Rajya Sabha

Buzz It
Time to Abolish the Rajya Sabha
http://www.navhindtimes.in/opinion/time-abolish-rajya-sabha

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Obama signs tax bill, praises bipartisan spirit

Buzz It
Obama signs tax bill, praises bipartisan spirit
http://in.news.yahoo.com/obama-signs-tax-bill-law-20101217-133535-457.html

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Bhopal tragedy: Fresh compensation to be given from Dec 19

Buzz It
Bhopal tragedy: Fresh compensation to be given from Dec 19
http://in.news.yahoo.com/bhopal-tragedy-fresh-compensation-given-dec-19-20101217-081300-809.html

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Inmates flee prison in Mexico; bomb targets police

Buzz It
Inmates flee prison in Mexico; bomb targets police
http://in.news.yahoo.com/car-explodes-outside-mexican-police-station-report-20101217-143305-375.html

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Nicollette Sheridan drops abuse claims in lawsuit

Buzz It
Nicollette Sheridan drops abuse claims in lawsuit
http://in.news.yahoo.com/nicollette-sheridan-drops-abuse-claims-lawsuit-20101217-164717-892.html

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 Uma Thurman stalker jailed in New York

Buzz It
Uma Thurman stalker jailed in New York
http://in.news.yahoo.com/uma-thurman-stalker-jailed-york-20101217-150401-943.html

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11004 'ISI blew CIA station chief's cover in retaliation to Mumbai massacre implication'

Buzz It
'ISI blew CIA station chief's cover in retaliation to Mumbai massacre
implication'
http://in.news.yahoo.com/isi-blew-cia-station-chiefs-cover-retaliation-mumbai-20101217-211824-599.html

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots - 25 new messages in 9 topics - digest

Buzz It
alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots?hl=en

alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Dear Santa (a letter from my 5 year old nephew - a MUST READ!!!) - 4
messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/4917c6117df4cab5?hl=en
* Cooking With Bill - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/56408588aa123ae2?hl=en
* there will be a new rule coming - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/60a5d017a979471e?hl=en
* Sissy white boy Tom Brady wants deal with 49ers - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/e9a3599989c12771?hl=en
* A1247@gmail is a moron - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/cb3c658a34fbe6bd?hl=en
* We Had To Do What He Said, He Might Cut Us - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/e2edd457fec7b7cd?hl=en
* Mitt Rommey is a MAN OF ACTION, and will SAVE OUR COUNTRY!!! - 6 messages, 2
authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/7cf866f300e63798?hl=en
* To My Jew Friends In Here - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/baa20621d0aa6464?hl=en
* If George W. Bush Was Alive Today... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/fe581378b4a8f634?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Dear Santa (a letter from my 5 year old nephew - a MUST READ!!!)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/4917c6117df4cab5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 12:00 pm
From: PETER SHORTS


On Dec 17, 2:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
<accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2:22 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 1:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
> > <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dear Santa -
>
> > > I am a 5 year old boy living in the Boston area. We are in the Great
> > > Recession and my mom and dad do not have jobs, thanks to Obama. We
> > > need a new president who will give my mom and dad jobs. A new
> > > president that will also do the following:
> > > * lower everyone's taxes
> > > * build up our Army so that we don't get invaded by mean people in the
> > > world
> > > * lower unemployment
> > > * get rid of Obamacare (are you listening, Democrats?)
> > > * reduce the National Debt so that I won't have to pay for it when I
> > > am an adult
>
> > > Santa, I think the person that can do all of this is Mitt Rommey - can
> > > you PLEASE let him to be our new president? That would be the best
> > > Christmas present EVER!
>
> > > Thank you -
>
> > > Timmy
>
> > > "Way to go nephew Timmy! You are on the RIGHT TRACK!!! - TAKE AMERICA
> > > BACK!!!"
> > > :D
>
> > must be a liberal, blaming obama for mom and dad's laziness.  no
> > backbone, just wants the government to do this and that for him.
> > pathetic.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> You starting shit with my 5 year old nephew?
>
> BIG OF YA!
> :D

tell him to go back to school and to stop blaming his shortcomings on
others. he has to learn to stand on his own and not expect the
government to fix his problems. and that goes double for his parents.


== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 12:42 pm
From: "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"


On Dec 17, 3:00 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
>
>
>
>
> <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 2:22 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 17, 1:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
> > > <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Dear Santa -
>
> > > > I am a 5 year old boy living in the Boston area. We are in the Great
> > > > Recession and my mom and dad do not have jobs, thanks to Obama. We
> > > > need a new president who will give my mom and dad jobs. A new
> > > > president that will also do the following:
> > > > * lower everyone's taxes
> > > > * build up our Army so that we don't get invaded by mean people in the
> > > > world
> > > > * lower unemployment
> > > > * get rid of Obamacare (are you listening, Democrats?)
> > > > * reduce the National Debt so that I won't have to pay for it when I
> > > > am an adult
>
> > > > Santa, I think the person that can do all of this is Mitt Rommey - can
> > > > you PLEASE let him to be our new president? That would be the best
> > > > Christmas present EVER!
>
> > > > Thank you -
>
> > > > Timmy
>
> > > > "Way to go nephew Timmy! You are on the RIGHT TRACK!!! - TAKE AMERICA
> > > > BACK!!!"
> > > > :D
>
> > > must be a liberal, blaming obama for mom and dad's laziness.  no
> > > backbone, just wants the government to do this and that for him.
> > > pathetic.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > You starting shit with my 5 year old nephew?
>
> > BIG OF YA!
> > :D
>
> tell him to go back to school and to stop blaming his shortcomings on
> others.  he has to learn to stand on his own and  not expect the
> government to fix his problems.  and that goes double for his parents.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

so your admitting you a BLEEDING HEART LIBERAL!!

LIBERALISM IS DEAD 2012!!
:D


== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 12:52 pm
From: PETER SHORTS


On Dec 17, 3:42 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
<accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 3:00 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 2:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
> > <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Dec 17, 2:22 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 17, 1:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
> > > > <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Dear Santa -
>
> > > > > I am a 5 year old boy living in the Boston area. We are in the Great
> > > > > Recession and my mom and dad do not have jobs, thanks to Obama. We
> > > > > need a new president who will give my mom and dad jobs. A new
> > > > > president that will also do the following:
> > > > > * lower everyone's taxes
> > > > > * build up our Army so that we don't get invaded by mean people in the
> > > > > world
> > > > > * lower unemployment
> > > > > * get rid of Obamacare (are you listening, Democrats?)
> > > > > * reduce the National Debt so that I won't have to pay for it when I
> > > > > am an adult
>
> > > > > Santa, I think the person that can do all of this is Mitt Rommey - can
> > > > > you PLEASE let him to be our new president? That would be the best
> > > > > Christmas present EVER!
>
> > > > > Thank you -
>
> > > > > Timmy
>
> > > > > "Way to go nephew Timmy! You are on the RIGHT TRACK!!! - TAKE AMERICA
> > > > > BACK!!!"
> > > > > :D
>
> > > > must be a liberal, blaming obama for mom and dad's laziness.  no
> > > > backbone, just wants the government to do this and that for him.
> > > > pathetic.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > You starting shit with my 5 year old nephew?
>
> > > BIG OF YA!
> > > :D
>
> > tell him to go back to school and to stop blaming his shortcomings on
> > others.  he has to learn to stand on his own and  not expect the
> > government to fix his problems.  and that goes double for his parents.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> so your admitting you a BLEEDING HEART LIBERAL!!
>
> LIBERALISM IS DEAD 2012!!
> :D

get a grip, i'm saying that this kid and his parents are liberal. the
problem with your style of 'logic' is that it always leads to the same
conclusion, whether correct or not.


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 2:22 pm
From: "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"


On Dec 17, 2:52 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 3:42 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
>
>
>
>
> <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 3:00 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 17, 2:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
> > > <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 17, 2:22 pm, PETER SHORTS <petersh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 17, 1:37 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - FULL OF WIN!!! :D"
>
> > > > > <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Santa -
>
> > > > > > I am a 5 year old boy living in the Boston area. We are in the Great
> > > > > > Recession and my mom and dad do not have jobs, thanks to Obama. We
> > > > > > need a new president who will give my mom and dad jobs. A new
> > > > > > president that will also do the following:
> > > > > > * lower everyone's taxes
> > > > > > * build up our Army so that we don't get invaded by mean people in the
> > > > > > world
> > > > > > * lower unemployment
> > > > > > * get rid of Obamacare (are you listening, Democrats?)
> > > > > > * reduce the National Debt so that I won't have to pay for it when I
> > > > > > am an adult
>
> > > > > > Santa, I think the person that can do all of this is Mitt Rommey - can
> > > > > > you PLEASE let him to be our new president? That would be the best
> > > > > > Christmas present EVER!
>
> > > > > > Thank you -
>
> > > > > > Timmy
>
> > > > > > "Way to go nephew Timmy! You are on the RIGHT TRACK!!! - TAKE AMERICA
> > > > > > BACK!!!"
> > > > > > :D
>
> > > > > must be a liberal, blaming obama for mom and dad's laziness.  no
> > > > > backbone, just wants the government to do this and that for him.
> > > > > pathetic.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > You starting shit with my 5 year old nephew?
>
> > > > BIG OF YA!
> > > > :D
>
> > > tell him to go back to school and to stop blaming his shortcomings on
> > > others.  he has to learn to stand on his own and  not expect the
> > > government to fix his problems.  and that goes double for his parents.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > so your admitting you a BLEEDING HEART LIBERAL!!
>
> > LIBERALISM IS DEAD 2012!!
> > :D
>
> get a grip, i'm saying that this kid and his parents are liberal.  the
> problem with your style of 'logic' is that it always leads to the same
> conclusion, whether correct or not.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Wow.

SO MUCH WIN FOR MY EVIL TWIN!!!
:D

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Cooking With Bill
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/56408588aa123ae2?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 2:26 pm
From: Polarhound


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOaGkPXn9LQ


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:41 pm
From: "Ray O'Hara"

"Polarhound" <polarhound@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XsROo.59641$wf4.40305@newsfe05.iad...
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOaGkPXn9LQ

damn, je's just a kid.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: there will be a new rule coming
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/60a5d017a979471e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 2:38 pm
From: "yoyodog"

"Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iedi3s$6tu$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Call it the Rex Rule.
> it will regulate where you can stand.
> and heavily penalize pick plays like the wall.
> the wall seems smart, but now realizing that the Jest blockers were trying
> to run the gunner into it seems downright dirty.
> Chuck Knoll/John Madden dirty.
>
>
>

Simple solution:

Line the field with hockey boards. Arena football for stadiums. No more
line of players. No more issue about two feet needing to be inbounds.
Plenty of spectacular crashes. Every Sunday will be like a demolition derby
:-)


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:38 pm
From: Deadmeat


On 12/17/2010 10:44 AM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
> "Ritchie"<ritchie1965@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dabda32e-be3e-4c36-aa09-178870bdc9bd@j3g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 16, 12:26 pm, "Ray O'Hara"<raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Call it the Rex Rule.
>> it will regulate where you can stand.
>> and heavily penalize pick plays like the wall.
>> the wall seems smart, but now realizing that the Jest blockers were trying
>> to run the gunner into it seems downright dirty.
>> Chuck Knoll/John Madden dirty.
>
> Such a rule already exists, they are just going to enforce it now.
>
>
> =========================================================================
>
> I'm talking about the fact the Jest were trying to deliberately force
> defenders into the wall.
> in effect adding blockers, it doesn't matter who is standing there. or that
> the coach was legally there.
> the issue is the blockers using the wall to pick gunners.
>
>


So now the jets were trying to force runners into the wall? A few days
ago it was the Dolphins that were cheating. Make up your fucking mind.
That is, after you find it.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 7:09 pm
From: Tutor


On Dec 16, 12:26 pm, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Call it the Rex Rule.
>  it will regulate where you can stand.
> and heavily penalize pick plays like the wall.
> the wall seems smart, but now realizing that the Jest blockers were trying
> to run the gunner into it seems downright dirty.
> Chuck Knoll/John Madden dirty.

Dude,

the Pats have been using the Wall all season. Why would it be called
a Rex rule. Rex probably learned it from watching tapes of the Pats.

http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/12/16/are-patriots-also-guilty-of-lining-sideline-on-punt-coverage/?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl4%7Csec3_lnk2%7C190513

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Sissy white boy Tom Brady wants deal with 49ers
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/e9a3599989c12771?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 3:09 pm
From: "skepticl1@aol.com"


He's rich and good looking. Shit *I'd* fuck Tom Brady.


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 5:15 pm
From: The Inconvenient Truth


skepticl1@aol.com wrote:

> He's rich and good looking. Shit *I'd* fuck Tom Brady.


you're cheap.
--
"Dropping my pants. Looking at the film. Moving on from here."

- Mike Singleminded


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 6:22 pm
From: Romo The Man Slut


On 17 Dec 2010, The Inconvenient Truth <doandroidsdream@electricsheep.com>
posted some news:ieh1v4$9pd$1@news.albasani.net:

> skepticl1@aol.com wrote:
>
>> He's rich and good looking. Shit *I'd* fuck Tom Brady.
>
>
> you're cheap.

Easy too. He said the same thing about Singlefairy.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: A1247@gmail is a moron
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/cb3c658a34fbe6bd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:35 pm
From: "D/"

"cloud dreamer" <Save@Resources.now> wrote in message
news:KOidnXdi785M-JbQnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@supernews.com...
> On 17/12/2010 2:40 AM, extremeone wrote:
>> On 12/15/2010 4:27 PM, A1247@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:57:18 -0800 (PST), "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate -
>> > Rommey Beats Obama in Latest Poll!!"<account_t@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Have you guys seen the latest poll numbers? GOOD NEWS!!! Mitt Rommey
>> >> leads Obama! If the election were held today, ROMMEY WOULD WIN AND BE
>> >> OUR NEXT PRESEIDENT!
>> >>
>> >> LETS GO ROMMEY, ROMMEY LETS GO!!!!
>> >>
>> >> Psyched for 2012!!!!!!
>> >> :D
>> > Except Romney being a mormom means he has no chance of getting the
>> > nomination.
>> >
>> > The nominee for the republicans will a christian.
>> >
>> you liberal moron piece of shit
>> a Mormon is a christian!!!! Dahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
>> time for empty vessels like you to get an education
>> in the very basic elements of the world before you go making your
>> idiotic statements.Turn off Rachel Madcow and Keith Olberfag and educate
>> yourself you wimpish little pillow biter.
>
>
> Ummm. No. Mormons are not Christians. They worship a different JC - not
> the one from the bible.
>
> I think you're the one in need of the education.
>
> <plonk>

The official name of the Mormon church is The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints. Joseph Smith explained that Jesus Christ is the central
figure in the doctrine of the Mormon Church:
"The fundamental principles of our religion are the testimony of the
Apostles and Prophets, concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried,
and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven; and all other things
which pertain to our religion are only appendages to it" (TPJS, p. 121).

Sure sounds like the Bible guy.

Were you thinking of the Bill Cosby "Jesus Christ!"?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: We Had To Do What He Said, He Might Cut Us
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/e2edd457fec7b7cd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:48 pm
From: "mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu"


On Dec 17, 1:34 pm, euphy <e phem...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 8:31 AM, Dano wrote:


> You know what chump...  <plonk> is right up there with LOL and
> BAAAWHAHAHA among the most juvenile and vapid devices that children find
> amusing and original as replies.


LOL!!!!!!

mr dude (BAAAWHAHAHA)

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 6:32 pm
From: "Valravn"


"Dano" wrote in message news:iegav8$i2d$1@news.eternal-september.org...


"euphy" <e�phemism@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:4ad00p.mvu.17.1@news.alt.net...
> On 12/17/2010 8:31 AM, Dano wrote:
>>
>> "Tutor" <dcat4434@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:bbaf2c9a-4192-446f-b1e6-7b24821c807e@w17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Belichick's vacation retreat:
>>>
>>> http://www.cheatlaketoday.com/
>>
>> I'm sure you think that was fucking hilarious...but I don't click on
>> shit like that from turds like you.
>>
>> <PLONK>
>
>
> You know what chump... <plonk> is right up there with LOL and BAAAWHAHAHA
> among the most juvenile and vapid devices that children find amusing and
> original as replies.
>
>

Why? I should waste my time reading asinine, inane and juvenile comments
from shitheels like YOU?

I don't fucking think so. Life is too short. So I won't say it. I usually
don't. You must be a Dolphin fan. So...

<SPLASH> Better?

Me too, me too! Please <PLONK> me too.

Valravn


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Mitt Rommey is a MAN OF ACTION, and will SAVE OUR COUNTRY!!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/7cf866f300e63798?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 6:37 pm
From: "Jane_Galt"


Romney is a socialist. Phhtttt!

--
- Jane Galt

"Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus 'property
rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since material
goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are needed
to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to turn men
into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to treat
human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand

== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 6:38 pm
From: "Jane_Galt"


"O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Rommey Beats Obama in Latest Poll!!"
<account_t@rocketmail.com> wrote :

> Now that Mitt Rommey leads all challengers in the latest polls, who
> else here feels as giddy as I do? Excited about a return to NORMALCY!!
> Rommey will FIGHT FOR US, so we can return to:
>
> * Lower taxes
> * Elimination of Obamacare (are you listening, Democrats?)

Uh wait, didn't he give ObamaCare to MA before Obama was even elected, and
bankrupt them with it? Phhtttt!


--
- Jane Galt

"Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus 'property
rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since material
goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are needed
to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to turn men
into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to treat
human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand

== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 7:12 pm
From: "bmoore@nyx.net"


On Dec 17, 6:38 pm, "Jane_Galt" <Jane__G...@GaltsGulch.xyy> wrote:
> "Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus 'property
> rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since material
> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are needed
> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
> effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to turn men
> into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
> 'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to treat
> human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand

If I may, and I know it's not good netiquette to respond to a .sig,
but

> Since material
> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are needed
> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
> effort, he does not own his life.

is the philosophical mistake in Rand's argument. In particular, the
part that says

> if the producer does not own the result of his
> effort, he does not own his life.

BTW, I am not against property rights. I am in favor of them. But this
is nonetheless a flaw in Rand's argument. I would enjoy discussing
this with anyone who can follow a philosphical argument. I'm guessing
maybe 1 or 2 of you can.


== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 8:33 pm
From: "Jane_Galt"


"bmoore@nyx.net" <bmoore@nyx.net> wrote :

> On Dec 17, 6:38�pm, "Jane_Galt" <Jane__G...@GaltsGulch.xyy> wrote:
>> "Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus
'prope
> rty
>> rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since
materia
> l
>> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are
need
> ed
>> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
>> effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to turn
m
> en
>> into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
>> 'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to
t
> reat
>> human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand
>
> If I may, and I know it's not good netiquette to respond to a .sig,
> but
>
>> Since material
>> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are
need
> ed
>> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
>> effort, he does not own his life.
>
> is the philosophical mistake in Rand's argument. In particular, the
> part that says
>
>> if the producer does not own the result of his
>> effort, he does not own his life.
>
> BTW, I am not against property rights. I am in favor of them. But this
> is nonetheless a flaw in Rand's argument. I would enjoy discussing
> this with anyone who can follow a philosphical argument. I'm guessing
> maybe 1 or 2 of you can.
>

How is it a mistake?

If you own your life, why would you not own what you spend your life to
produce?


--
- Jane Galt

"Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus
'property rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since
material goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and
are needed to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result
of his effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to
turn men into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to
treat human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand

== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 9:15 pm
From: "bmoore@nyx.net"


On Dec 17, 8:33 pm, "Jane_Galt" <Jane__G...@GaltsGulch.xyy> wrote:
> "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net>  wrote :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 6:38 pm, "Jane_Galt" <Jane__G...@GaltsGulch.xyy> wrote:
> >> "Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus
> 'prope
> > rty
> >> rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since
> materia
> > l
> >> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are
> need
> > ed
> >> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
> >> effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to turn
> m
> > en
> >> into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
> >> 'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to
> t
> > reat
> >> human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand
>
> > If I may, and I know it's not good netiquette to respond to a .sig,
> > but
>
> >> Since material
> >> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are
> need
> > ed
> >> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his
> >> effort, he does not own his life.
>
> > is the philosophical mistake in Rand's argument. In particular, the
> > part that says
>
> >> if the producer does not own the result of his
> >> effort, he does not own his life.
>
> > BTW, I am not against property rights. I am in favor of them. But this
> > is nonetheless a flaw in Rand's argument. I would enjoy discussing
> > this with anyone who can follow a philosphical argument. I'm guessing
> > maybe 1 or 2 of you can.
>
> How is it a mistake?
>
> If you own your life, why would you not own what you spend your life to
> produce?

Because you can own your life without necessarily owning all of what
you produce. There is more that defines our identity. It is not simply
what we produce, nor is owning all that we produce sufficient or (and
this is the controversial part) even necessary for us to own our
lives.

P = owning all one produces

L = owning ones life

(P -> L) is false

(L -> P) is false

It is even possible for a slave to own his life. Not that I favor
slavery :-)


== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 10:22 pm
From: "Jane_Galt"


"bmoore@nyx.net" <bmoore@nyx.net> wrote :

> On Dec 17, 8:33 pm, "Jane_Galt" <Jane__G...@GaltsGulch.xyy> wrote:
>> "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net>  wrote :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 17, 6:38 pm, "Jane_Galt" <Jane__G...@GaltsGulch.xyy> wrote:
>> >> "Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus
>> 'prope
>> > rty
>> >> rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since
>> materia
>> > l
>> >> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are
>> need
>> > ed
>> >> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of
his
>> >> effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to
tur
> n
>> m
>> > en
>> >> into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
>> >> 'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right'
t
> o
>> t
>> > reat
>> >> human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand
>>
>> > If I may, and I know it's not good netiquette to respond to a .sig,
>> > but
>>
>> >> Since material
>> >> goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are
>> need
>> > ed
>> >> to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of
his
>> >> effort, he does not own his life.
>>
>> > is the philosophical mistake in Rand's argument. In particular, the
>> > part that says
>>
>> >> if the producer does not own the result of his
>> >> effort, he does not own his life.
>>
>> > BTW, I am not against property rights. I am in favor of them. But this
>> > is nonetheless a flaw in Rand's argument. I would enjoy discussing
>> > this with anyone who can follow a philosphical argument. I'm guessing
>> > maybe 1 or 2 of you can.
>>
>> How is it a mistake?
>>
>> If you own your life, why would you not own what you spend your life to
>> produce?
>
> Because you can own your life without necessarily owning all of what
> you produce.

Why not though? Isnt it a right to own what you spend your life to produce?
Assuming you own your life?

Look, your life is the highest thing of value that you own. If you spend it
to work for 2 hours and earn, say $40, why would you NOT own that $40?

> There is more that defines our identity.

That should be up to each of us, eh?

> It is not simply
> what we produce, nor is owning all that we produce sufficient or (and
> this is the controversial part) even necessary for us to own our
> lives.
>
> P = owning all one produces
>
> L = owning ones life
>
> (P -> L) is false
>
> (L -> P) is false
>
> It is even possible for a slave to own his life. Not that I favor
> slavery :-)

Not really, no. A slave's life is owned by his master, he is considered
property. The people of North Korea, for example, are considered property
of the state. They dont own their lives and they dont own what they spend
their lives to produce.

In a theoretically free country, you would own both.


--
- Jane Galt

"Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus
'property rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since
material goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and
are needed to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result
of his effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to
turn men into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to
treat human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand


==============================================================================
TOPIC: To My Jew Friends In Here
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/baa20621d0aa6464?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 7:59 pm
From: "mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu"


Thank you for killing my Lord and personal savior Jesus Christ!!

I am sure He rewarded you by letting you control the banks, media and
Hollywood!!

mr dude (just kidding, my Flying Spaghetti Monster God thinks you are
all fucked!!! He prefers the Buddhists!!)


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 8:07 pm
From: ZZH770@yahoo.com


On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:59:19 -0800 (PST), "mr
dude@harvarduniversity.edu" <fosterfla@gmail.com> wrote:

>Thank you for killing my Lord and personal savior Jesus Christ!!
That was the Romans. Go read your history.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 9:14 pm
From: "mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu"


On Dec 17, 11:07 pm, ZZH...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:59:19 -0800 (PST), "mr
>
> d...@harvarduniversity.edu" <foster...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Thank you for killing my Lord and personal savior Jesus Christ!!
>
> That was the Romans.  Go read your history.

Liar!!!

The Romans invented the noodles that I eat every day!!

I could not survive in this economy without Roman noodles!!!!

It is like one dollar for six packages!!!

mr dude (starving!)

==============================================================================
TOPIC: If George W. Bush Was Alive Today...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/fe581378b4a8f634?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 9:46 pm
From: CalC


On Dec 17, 2:44 pm, z...@zz.com wrote:
> >Re: If George W. Bush Was Alive Today...
>
> You do realize he is still alive?

Obviously you're new here


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11003 UNHCR seasonal 3 part series: Omar's story

Buzz It

--- On Fri, 17/12/10, UN refugee agency <season_appeal@news.supportunhcr.org> wrote:

From: UN refugee agency <season_appeal@news.supportunhcr.org>
Subject: UNHCR seasonal 3 part series: Omar's story
To: avnishjolly@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, 17 December, 2010, 21:38

</
Please forward this on to any friends or colleagues who will find it interesting!   |   Share this via social media
UNHCR website   |   Donate
 
"I could not be happier to be in school; I finally get a chance to learn and study" - Omar, Iraq 
 
young children in school 
For Iraqi refugee children, like these little ones, attending school is the best way to overcome the trauma of exile. UNHCR / J. Wreford
this festive season

Omar's story

Getting an education is not just about access to knowledge. For refugee children it is also often the best way to recover from a traumatic past and create a better future for themselves and their community.

DID YOU KNOW?

More than 27 million children and youth affected by armed conflict, do not have access to formal education...

...This is more than the population of Australia

That is why UNHCR is working towards making sure every refugee child has full access to education in their host country.

Education allows kids to find different and creative ways to learn and to take their future into their own hands. One such boy is the young Iraqi Omar.

Stories of hope

Omar

Omar*, a 13-year-old refugee living in Jordan, endured some hard and painful lessons about life at an early age. The nightmare started when his father, a policeman in Baghdad, was shot dead by militiamen. "At that moment, we knew that staying in Baghdad was no longer possible," the boy recalled.

Together with his uncle, brothers and sisters he left for Amman. Unfortunately he remains separated from his mother, who lives in the UK, as his passport and identification documents were left behind in the dash from Iraq.

Amid all these difficulties, there has been one very important positive development for Omar: getting back to school. Many young people forced to flee Iraq in recent years have had their education disrupted – some did not have the right documents, while others could not afford private schools. That was the case for Omar who was unable to enroll in school on his arrival in Amman because he did not have legal residency.

But things soon changed. In 2007, public schooling was opened to Iraqi children regardless of their legal status. Omar is now enrolled in a primary school in eastern Amman: "I could not be happier to be in school; I finally get a chance to learn and study," he said proudly.

Others have noticed the difference in the young Iraqi. "Omar has changed considerably since he enrolled in school," said his uncle. "On a personal level, he has friends now – both Iraqi and Jordanian."

Omar now has two wishes: to be reunited with his mother, and to see his younger siblings enroll in school and have the chance to improve themselves.

* name changed for protection reasons

With your Help

We could provide children like Omar with the opportunity for a better life this holiday.

Here are some examples of what your gift could provide:

sanitary pads
$15 can buy a girl in a camp sanitary pads for a year. (Lack of sanitary materials can cause girls to miss up to a quarter of their school year)
 
 
 
 
 
 
a child's education
$32 can provide education for a child, including fees, uniform and educational supplies.
 
 
 
 
 
educational packs
$50 can provide 2 educational packs including backpacks, books, educational supplies, toothpaste,  water bottles and soap.
 
 
 
 
 
teachers salary
$100 can pay a teacher's salary for 2 month.
 
 
 
 
 

entire school's supplies
$550 can provide educational supplies to an entire school.

 
 
 
 
 

donate now

refugee-news email footer

To unsubscribe from UNHCR online communications, please email unsubscribe@news.supportunhcr.org.
If you have any comments or queries, please email donors@unhcr.org.


--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi
 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

Medarticles Request an artcle

Buzz It
Hi medarticles.. Could u help me to find this article...
Artosimmin-a potential anticancer lead compound from artocarpus odoratissimus.
Gwendoline C.L.Ee, Siow H.Teo, Mawardi Rahmani, Chan K. Lim, Yang M. Lim, Choon F. J. Bong
Article first published online: 2 SEP 2010
DOI: 10.2010/chin.201039216
ChemInform
Volume 41, Issues 39, page no, September 28, 2010
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chin.201039216/abstract?systemMessage=Due+to+essential+maintenance%2C+access+to+Wiley+Online+Library+will+be+disrupted+on+Sunday%2C+19th+Dec+between+10%3A00-12%3A00+GMT

Thanks in advance


--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets - 26 new messages in 12 topics - digest

Buzz It
alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Jets should acquire Cam Newton - 7 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/d2544289fa82731f?hl=en
* there will be a new rule coming - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/60a5d017a979471e?hl=en
* Dwight Lowery at Safety - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/84a18defef0dd131?hl=en
* Alosi learned it from Belichick - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/0ee8972284802317?hl=en
* Tripgate! - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6603e8c2c3ce4076?hl=en
* One good thing about injuries - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e0754e826f044b33?hl=en
* NFL Playbook video on Jets O in Mia game. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/1a8650901ed9691b?hl=en
* We Had To Do What He Said, He Might Cut Us - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e2edd457fec7b7cd?hl=en
* Glad its Pittsburgh and - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/05daac4b9f2ab0f0?hl=en
* More proof that Schott is a football half-wit. - 2 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/5e3a9399d9a4929e?hl=en
* This Is What I Have Been Waiting For All Season Long............. - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/441b1bec1f9c43d0?hl=en
* FOers rates the Henne-Sanchez duet. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/73d83074d2ed5fd3?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Jets should acquire Cam Newton
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/d2544289fa82731f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 2:35 pm
From: Keith Keller


On 2010-12-17, RickyBobby <nascar42@cox.net> wrote:
> I do not see Mark Sanchez getting any better.

Here's Sanchez' year so far (from wikipedia):

12 games, 201 for 364, 55.2% completion rate, 2472 yards, 16 TD, 8 INT,
80.0 rating

Whose second-year line is this?

15 games, 176 for 273, 64.5% completion rate, 1795 yards, 15 TD, 9 INT,
87.8 rating (was the starter for about half the season)

Answer below!

............

............

............

...Joe Montana, 1980 (also from wikipedia)


Will Sanchez be the next Montana? Almost certainly not. But it's only
been two years, in a less than ideal offense. Certainly a new rookie QB
is not going to solve the Jets' problems.

--keith

--
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information

== 2 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 2:39 pm
From: "RickyBobby"


"MuahMan" wrote in message
news:0c4fccf8-5edd-45a0-ba9e-f21b54f6b17b@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 17, 3:57 pm, "RickyBobby" <nasca...@cox.net> wrote:
> I do not see Mark Sanchez getting any better.

Why ruin Cam Newtons career? The New York Jets are where QB's go to
die. (See: Brett Farve, Chad Pennington)


The Jets have endured about a forty year losing streak at the quarterback
position. But all losing streaks end just the same as all winning streaks
end.

Look at the facts. There are still three games left in the regular season
and most of the teams do not have their original starting quarterback
available due to injury. Some teams are down to the third stringer and some
are looking for retired guys to sign. So how is this going to work if the
NFL goes to an eighteen game season soon?

A team needs a quarterback who runs like Vick and throws like Brady.
Usually the Jets get it the wrong way around.

It looks like Cam Newton can run like Vick and throw like Brady and he is
the guy to have.

== 3 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 3:40 pm
From: Deadmeat


On 12/17/2010 4:07 PM, Michael wrote:
> On Dec 17, 3:57 pm, "RickyBobby"<nasca...@cox.net> wrote:
>> I do not see Mark Sanchez getting any better.
>
> what i think the jets should do is get a qualified OC and draft the
> best pass rusher available next year... that will go a long way...


I wouldn't take any advice from someone who once said that a left tackle
isn't that important.


== 4 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 3:52 pm
From: "RickyBobby"


"Deadmeat" wrote in message
news:4d0bf4f0$0$24018$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com...

On 12/17/2010 4:07 PM, Michael wrote:
> On Dec 17, 3:57 pm, "RickyBobby"<nasca...@cox.net> wrote:
>> I do not see Mark Sanchez getting any better.
>
> what i think the jets should do is get a qualified OC and draft the
> best pass rusher available next year... that will go a long way...


I wouldn't take any advice from someone who once said that a left tackle
isn't that important.


He protects the quarterback from what he doesn't see. He protects his blind
side. Every housewife knows that the first check she writes in for the
mortgage and the second check she writes is for the left tackle.

== 5 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:36 pm
From: Deadmeat


On 12/17/2010 6:52 PM, RickyBobby wrote:
>
>
> "Deadmeat" wrote in message
> news:4d0bf4f0$0$24018$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com...
>
> On 12/17/2010 4:07 PM, Michael wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 3:57 pm, "RickyBobby"<nasca...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> I do not see Mark Sanchez getting any better.
>>
>> what i think the jets should do is get a qualified OC and draft the
>> best pass rusher available next year... that will go a long way...
>
>
> I wouldn't take any advice from someone who once said that a left tackle
> isn't that important.
>
>
> He protects the quarterback from what he doesn't see. He protects his
> blind side. Every housewife knows that the first check she writes in for
> the mortgage and the second check she writes is for the left tackle.


Right. You were the one that once said that a left tackle wasn't
important. You really need to remember the shit that you spew.


== 6 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:44 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Keith Keller" <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote in message
news:b75tt7xngf.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us...
> On 2010-12-17, RickyBobby <nascar42@cox.net> wrote:
>> I do not see Mark Sanchez getting any better.
>
> Here's Sanchez' year so far (from wikipedia):
>
> 12 games, 201 for 364, 55.2% completion rate, 2472 yards, 16 TD, 8 INT,
> 80.0 rating
>
> Whose second-year line is this?
>
> 15 games, 176 for 273, 64.5% completion rate, 1795 yards, 15 TD, 9 INT,
> 87.8 rating (was the starter for about half the season)
>
> Answer below!
>
> ............
>
> ............
>
> ............
>
> ...Joe Montana, 1980 (also from wikipedia)
>
>
> Will Sanchez be the next Montana? Almost certainly not. But it's only
> been two years, in a less than ideal offense. Certainly a new rookie QB
> is not going to solve the Jets' problems.
>
> --keith

Keith...GREAT observation...and well put.


== 7 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 6:01 pm
From: Michael


On Dec 17, 6:40 pm, Deadmeat <no...@home.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 4:07 PM, Michael wrote:
>
> > On Dec 17, 3:57 pm, "RickyBobby"<nasca...@cox.net>  wrote:
> >> I do not see Mark Sanchez getting any better.
>
> > what i think the jets should do is get a qualified OC and draft the
> > best pass rusher available next year... that will go a long way...
>
> I wouldn't take any advice from someone who once said that a left tackle
> isn't that important.

when did i ever say that ??? show me the post and i will come to miami
and kiss your ass after i was and wax your car and shine your shoes.
I am on record here.. MANY times... saying that the offensive line is
the most important unit on a pro team. the LT is the most important
part of the o-line. i think you have me confused with another poster

==============================================================================
TOPIC: there will be a new rule coming
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/60a5d017a979471e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 2:38 pm
From: "yoyodog"

"Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iedi3s$6tu$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Call it the Rex Rule.
> it will regulate where you can stand.
> and heavily penalize pick plays like the wall.
> the wall seems smart, but now realizing that the Jest blockers were trying
> to run the gunner into it seems downright dirty.
> Chuck Knoll/John Madden dirty.
>
>
>

Simple solution:

Line the field with hockey boards. Arena football for stadiums. No more
line of players. No more issue about two feet needing to be inbounds.
Plenty of spectacular crashes. Every Sunday will be like a demolition derby
:-)


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:38 pm
From: Deadmeat


On 12/17/2010 10:44 AM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
> "Ritchie"<ritchie1965@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dabda32e-be3e-4c36-aa09-178870bdc9bd@j3g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 16, 12:26 pm, "Ray O'Hara"<raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Call it the Rex Rule.
>> it will regulate where you can stand.
>> and heavily penalize pick plays like the wall.
>> the wall seems smart, but now realizing that the Jest blockers were trying
>> to run the gunner into it seems downright dirty.
>> Chuck Knoll/John Madden dirty.
>
> Such a rule already exists, they are just going to enforce it now.
>
>
> =========================================================================
>
> I'm talking about the fact the Jest were trying to deliberately force
> defenders into the wall.
> in effect adding blockers, it doesn't matter who is standing there. or that
> the coach was legally there.
> the issue is the blockers using the wall to pick gunners.
>
>


So now the jets were trying to force runners into the wall? A few days
ago it was the Dolphins that were cheating. Make up your fucking mind.
That is, after you find it.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Dwight Lowery at Safety
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/84a18defef0dd131?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 3:19 pm
From: JetsLife


Intrigued to see how a corner performs at safety. Aside from size/
tackling, always wondered why traditional corners aren't used at
safety more for their cover skills. I know coverage demands are
different but it's still defending pass receivers after all ...


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:47 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"JetsLife" <JetsLife@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e3041909-e27e-42bb-8714-5ac46f5db110@y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> Intrigued to see how a corner performs at safety. Aside from size/
> tackling, always wondered why traditional corners aren't used at
> safety more for their cover skills. I know coverage demands are
> different but it's still defending pass receivers after all ...

The differences are the type of coverage, where you funnel the receivers, if
you take an inside out stance or try to keep them on the sideline. A safety
is often in an under or over coverage much more frequently too...and the
size...and that depends on the scheme, how much gap responsibility will he
have.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 5:58 pm
From: Michael


On Dec 17, 7:47 pm, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
wrote:
> "JetsLife" <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:e3041909-e27e-42bb-8714-5ac46f5db110@y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Intrigued to see how a corner performs at safety. Aside from size/
> > tackling, always wondered why traditional corners aren't used at
> > safety more for their cover skills. I know coverage demands are
> > different but it's still defending pass receivers after all ...
>
> The differences are the type of coverage, where you funnel the receivers, if
> you take an inside out stance or try to keep them on the sideline.  A safety
> is often in an under or over coverage much more frequently too...and the
> size...and that depends on the scheme, how much gap responsibility will he
> have.

in my unqualified armchair football mind, i always think that the FS
in the jets style of system should be a 3rd CB any way and the SS
should be more like a very fast LB.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Alosi learned it from Belichick
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/0ee8972284802317?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 3:29 pm
From: John McSorley


On Dec 17, 8:29 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 6:30 am, John McSorley <tutesc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 1:23 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 17, 12:57 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Long before The Great Wall of East Rutherford, Bill Belichick tried to
> > > > trip Marvin Harrison on the sidelines.  Proving once again the he is
> > > > the king of all cheats in pro sports.  The only difference was that he
> > > > was so uncoordinated, he missed!
>
> > > > So for the Pats fans who are feebly attempting to turn the tables...
> > > > Bwahahahahaha  Your team will live in infamy as the all-time cheats.
> > > > * * *
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h42kTrO8ZA4
>
> > > > :)  I predicct no fewer than a dozen replies from Pats fans and Jets
> > > > haters distinguishing this from that.  Be my guest.  But Belicheat
> > > > tripped first.  Was and still is the biggest douche in the NFL.
>
> > > Come on Pats** fans.  You've spent almost a whole week trying to exact
> > > revenge after having had three championships tarnished and diminished
> > > due to the cheating culture of the Pats organization....  I need
> > > amusement!  I want to hear you try to justify BB trying to trip a
> > > player in an AFC Championship game no less.
>
> > > Pats are, and will always be under Bill Belichick, the king of sports
> > > cheats.
>
> > SOJ, Tutor...live with it.
>
> * tainted
> * tarnished
> * dismissed

Hey, you should be thanking me for obliging you! I'm here to help the
ASPFNYJ denizens
forget about the last two weeks. If reading & answering your sour
grapes helps, whine away!

BTW, speaking only as a bystander, isn't it clear that this
organization has *institutional*
problems? Like, somewhere between and including Woody Johnson and Rex
Ryan?

JM


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:48 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"John McSorley" <tutescrew@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:40d5d8da-027f-4735-8bca-d18aa12ecedb@i18g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 17, 8:29 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 6:30 am, John McSorley <tutesc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 1:23 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 17, 12:57 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Long before The Great Wall of East Rutherford, Bill Belichick tried
> > > > to
> > > > trip Marvin Harrison on the sidelines. Proving once again the he is
> > > > the king of all cheats in pro sports. The only difference was that
> > > > he
> > > > was so uncoordinated, he missed!
>
> > > > So for the Pats fans who are feebly attempting to turn the tables...
> > > > Bwahahahahaha Your team will live in infamy as the all-time cheats.
> > > > * * *
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h42kTrO8ZA4
>
> > > > :) I predicct no fewer than a dozen replies from Pats fans and Jets
> > > > haters distinguishing this from that. Be my guest. But Belicheat
> > > > tripped first. Was and still is the biggest douche in the NFL.
>
> > > Come on Pats** fans. You've spent almost a whole week trying to exact
> > > revenge after having had three championships tarnished and diminished
> > > due to the cheating culture of the Pats organization.... I need
> > > amusement! I want to hear you try to justify BB trying to trip a
> > > player in an AFC Championship game no less.
>
> > > Pats are, and will always be under Bill Belichick, the king of sports
> > > cheats.
>
> > SOJ, Tutor...live with it.
>
> * tainted
> * tarnished
> * dismissed

Hey, you should be thanking me for obliging you! I'm here to help the
ASPFNYJ denizens
forget about the last two weeks. If reading & answering your sour
grapes helps, whine away!

BTW, speaking only as a bystander, isn't it clear that this
organization has *institutional*
problems? Like, somewhere between and including Woody Johnson and Rex
Ryan?

JM

Hell Yes !


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:50 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Michael" <mjd1966@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:e5bac3b4-9b11-427d-a08c-fa5c43161a68@o23g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 17, 12:57 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Long before The Great Wall of East Rutherford, Bill Belichick tried to
> trip Marvin Harrison on the sidelines. Proving once again the he is
> the king of all cheats in pro sports. The only difference was that he
> was so uncoordinated, he missed!
>
> So for the Pats fans who are feebly attempting to turn the tables...
> Bwahahahahaha Your team will live in infamy as the all-time cheats.
> * * *
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h42kTrO8ZA4
>
> :) I predicct no fewer than a dozen replies from Pats fans and Jets
> haters distinguishing this from that. Be my guest. But Belicheat
> tripped first. Was and still is the biggest douche in the NFL.

as much football smarts that belichick has, when you take a look at
bb's history and the few things we know about him personally, he
appears to be a sad excuse of a person. i'd rather have kotie or herm
as the jets coach that that dreary thing.

You are very depressed...go get some Prozac or Zoloft or just a
drink....NEVER enter the Kotite Zone again !

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Tripgate!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6603e8c2c3ce4076?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 3:40 pm
From: Glenn Greenstein


On Dec 17, 5:10 pm, MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 3:44 pm, Keith Keller <kkeller-use...@wombat.san-
>
>
>
> francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> > On 2010-12-17, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > all the jets fans are agreeing 100 % that we dont like it.   no fans
> > > are sticking up for any of the jet coaches or the buffoon who tripped
> > > the gunner... it was a scumbag thing to do.
>
> > Now, now...you're trying to talk sense.  Of course everything the Jets
> > have ever done and will ever do reflect on all Jets fans, no matter
> > whether we approve of the Jets' actions or not.  Good luck to all of us
> > getting a job!  Once employers find out we're Jets fans, that Kotite
> > hiring will be hanging on our necks like an albatross, and there goes
> > our chance at getting the job.
>
> > For the same reason, never hire a Patriots fan for anything--you know
> > they will give themselves an unfair advantage, just like the Pats did
> > when they got the snowblower to clear the field of snow where their
> > holder would place the ball for an important field goal attempt.
> > SCUMBAGS!
>
> > --keith
>
> > --
> > kkeller-use...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
> > (try just my userid to email me)
> > AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
> > see X- headers for PGP signature information
>
> No no no. We've been hearing from Jets fans that they cheer for a
> squeaky clean team. Doesn't seem the case though as last week I saw
> the Miami player rolling around on the ground in agony after being
> tripped by a wall of shitty Jet players.
>
> They also tried to cheat twice by fielding 9 defenders when the rules
> clearly call for 11.

Cheating doesn't bother me. It's the American way.


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 3:50 pm
From: MuahMan


On Dec 17, 6:40 pm, Glenn Greenstein <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 5:10 pm, MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 3:44 pm, Keith Keller <kkeller-use...@wombat.san-
>
> > francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> > > On 2010-12-17, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > > all the jets fans are agreeing 100 % that we dont like it.   no fans
> > > > are sticking up for any of the jet coaches or the buffoon who tripped
> > > > the gunner... it was a scumbag thing to do.
>
> > > Now, now...you're trying to talk sense.  Of course everything the Jets
> > > have ever done and will ever do reflect on all Jets fans, no matter
> > > whether we approve of the Jets' actions or not.  Good luck to all of us
> > > getting a job!  Once employers find out we're Jets fans, that Kotite
> > > hiring will be hanging on our necks like an albatross, and there goes
> > > our chance at getting the job.
>
> > > For the same reason, never hire a Patriots fan for anything--you know
> > > they will give themselves an unfair advantage, just like the Pats did
> > > when they got the snowblower to clear the field of snow where their
> > > holder would place the ball for an important field goal attempt.
> > > SCUMBAGS!
>
> > > --keith
>
> > > --
> > > kkeller-use...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
> > > (try just my userid to email me)
> > > AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
> > > see X- headers for PGP signature information
>
> > No no no. We've been hearing from Jets fans that they cheer for a
> > squeaky clean team. Doesn't seem the case though as last week I saw
> > the Miami player rolling around on the ground in agony after being
> > tripped by a wall of shitty Jet players.
>
> > They also tried to cheat twice by fielding 9 defenders when the rules
> > clearly call for 11.
>
> Cheating doesn't bother me. It's the American way.

Hell yeah dude. Bernie Madoff for El Presidente.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: One good thing about injuries
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e0754e826f044b33?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:43 pm
From: Harlan Lachman


In article
<4ab93f13-b5cb-4517-9f18-b965b71bbe5c@j3g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
marcman <marcmanstudios@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 16, 6:34�pm, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> > �Eric Smith is out.
> >
> > I wished he had been out earlier in the year when Ihedigbo could have
> > subbed for him or at least been depth to Poole and Lowery.
> >
> > I wished he could have had his head knocked before a game we had more
> > chance of winning.
> >
> > But, every cloud has a silver lining.
> >
> > Enjoy this one. I know I will.
> >
> > harlan
>
> Has his family contacted you yet? It appears this happened because you
> wished it on him . . .

If so, I really wished I had been quicker on the draw. Pretty much Katie
bar the door...

I guarantee you two things, one bad, one good.

The bad, Eric won't win the game on specials.

Eric Smith won't be beat long on pass plays and get late to sacks.

harlan

==============================================================================
TOPIC: NFL Playbook video on Jets O in Mia game.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/1a8650901ed9691b?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:43 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Grinch" <oldnasty@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:135f1e41-5612-4c42-a195-32187e437557@g26g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-playbook/09000d5d81ce91ab/Playbook-Sanchize-hurting-franchise
>
> Plenty of blame to go around, believe me.
>
> But at the core: "At the end of the day, if you are going to be a
> playoff team your QB has to play better than Mark Sanchez ... Those
> were four plays [Sanchez messed up] there are another eight we left on
> the cutting room floor due to lack of time."

OK...here is the thing....some folks seem to think it is all one thing or
all the other. It isn't. Sanchez did NOT play well at all, but the reality
is, his coaches made a decision to have him be the man so somebody felt he
was ready and they never made any attempt to go find a veteran replacement
that was actually better. AND...how Sanchez plays has nothing to do with
the OC...and further than that, his problems and issues with poor play could
very well be amplified by poor coaching and poor design of the offense.
This is not a matter of someone "hating" Schott, it is an observation of the
game of football. I don't think Sanchez is playing well, even after he
showed some signs of progress and at times made some very good plays. That
fact has nothing to do with how I view the overall scheme of the offense. A
good decision would have been to let the kid develop before making him the
starter, I'd love to know whose decision that was because that would tell us
a Hell of a lot more about what really is happening.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: We Had To Do What He Said, He Might Cut Us
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e2edd457fec7b7cd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:48 pm
From: "mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu"


On Dec 17, 1:34 pm, euphy <e phem...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 8:31 AM, Dano wrote:


> You know what chump...  <plonk> is right up there with LOL and
> BAAAWHAHAHA among the most juvenile and vapid devices that children find
> amusing and original as replies.


LOL!!!!!!

mr dude (BAAAWHAHAHA)


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Glad its Pittsburgh and
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/05daac4b9f2ab0f0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:49 pm
From: Harlan Lachman


then Chicago.

No way we back into these playoffs.

Pittsburgh needs to win to ensure it gets in. So do we. Chicago has to
win too. So do we.

If we cannot beat these two playoff caliber teams, who cares.

Good scheduling NFL.

While I would not have minded clinching a berth by sweeping Miami and
then the Jills, since the Jets screwed the pooch against the Fish, I
like the hard way better this year.

Depressing to be a Jets fan. Be that as it may, I hope everyone gets to
spend time with their families and loved ones (and that for most of you
they are the same) and has a safe, healthy and joyous XMas (or birthday
if you are like me and mine).

harlan


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 6:00 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Harlan Lachman" <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-EB1B16.19490817122010@news60.forteinc.com...
> then Chicago.
>
> No way we back into these playoffs.
>
> Pittsburgh needs to win to ensure it gets in. So do we. Chicago has to
> win too. So do we.
>
> If we cannot beat these two playoff caliber teams, who cares.
>
> Good scheduling NFL.
>
> While I would not have minded clinching a berth by sweeping Miami and
> then the Jills, since the Jets screwed the pooch against the Fish, I
> like the hard way better this year.
>
> Depressing to be a Jets fan. Be that as it may, I hope everyone gets to
> spend time with their families and loved ones (and that for most of you
> they are the same) and has a safe, healthy and joyous XMas (or birthday
> if you are like me and mine).
>
> harlan

I like the hard way because it may embarrass Woody enough to do
something....and maybe listen to someone who can give him good information
about what he needs to do.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: More proof that Schott is a football half-wit.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/5e3a9399d9a4929e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:56 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Grinch" <oldnasty@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:1fe703e0-3ce7-4608-b2cd-756b5641ea72@n2g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 15, 7:11 pm, cd <c...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 10:56 am, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>
> >

> > >About time they started writing Shotty up. Three years late is better
> > >than never. I was beginning to wonder what the hell was taking so
> > >long. A ray of hope. If they can his ass it will make me VERY happy
> > >and it will make the Jets a much better team with one swift stroke...

"One swift stroke" ... it's so easy ... the dream is so beautiful....

> > >Get his ass outa there now.
>
> > With one caveat... who does Rex bring in?
> > I'll be happy when Schott goes, and I don't think it would be possible
> > to bring anyone
> > worse in, unless they hired John C ;)
>
> > But, who Rex brings in is big. In view of what seems to be his managing
> > style, he needs
> > to bring in a guy with a solid resume - - someone who can take over the
> > mess, and quickly
> > turn it into something coherent.
>
> I think it is as simple as Bill Callahan, think he took a Raider team
> to the SB. Even now, only tweak of the offense is enough and Callahan
> knows the current playbook better than Schottenheimer.

This is the same Callahan who so helped Sanchez in the Mia game by
having his O-line give up six sacks to the mighty Fins D.

I'd say he has his own mess to clean up.

Oh, wait -- the OL is Schott's fault! :-)


Grinch or Old Nasty...you really aren't interested in dialogue or discussion
are you? It's all about starting an argument, revving it up right? Does it
make you feel good? Why don't you just give supportive reasons for what the
current OC has done well?


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 4:57 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Michael" <mjd1966@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ba76495c-c01f-4457-bca7-a10902fee826@fm22g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 16, 7:23 pm, Grinch <oldna...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 11:37 am, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >...
> > Remember... If all the jets had was just a smidgeon of offensive
> > ability at their QB position, they win Ravens, GB and Miami and no one
> > is pointing to us as a laughing stock.
>
> Fixed it for you. :-)

and if not for some amazing qb play, the jets lose cleveland, detroit
and houston...

Amen....all him. The same guy who took the Jets to the playoffs the same
year Pennington took the Fins there...but Pennington had a real OC to help
him for a change.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: This Is What I Have Been Waiting For All Season Long.............
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/441b1bec1f9c43d0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 5:00 pm
From: Harlan Lachman


In article
<be47e517-d4b6-461e-bf50-9db75a5ae74a@i17g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>,
JetsLife <JetsLife@aol.com> wrote:

> And no one, and I mean no one could've predicted the Jets might
> struggle against a Super-Bowl contender like NE on the road, or that
> the Jets QB and offense could struggle against a solid Miami defense.

Life, I will give you the first one.

The second is a sick joke you should apologize for. We scored fewer
points than any of Miami's previous opponents. Any of them

In fact, in their last eleven games, no opponent has failed to score a
TD (in fact in all of their games, their opponents have scored a TD) and
only one scored fewer than 16 points (and that one won).

Our offense helped give up points and only scored 6. It was a disgrace
that every Jet fan should acknowledge and declare unacceptable.

Whether they replace Shott or Rex, changes need to be made because such
performances are unacceptable with so much money and talent invested in
the OL and skill positions.

harlan

==============================================================================
TOPIC: FOers rates the Henne-Sanchez duet.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/73d83074d2ed5fd3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Dec 17 2010 5:59 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Grinch" <oldnasty@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:67e11a9e-7209-4a40-ba43-f37f0081d2ad@g26g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
Advance NFL Stats now rates weekly performance:

http://wp.advancednflstats.com/playerstatsWeek.php?week=14&pos=QB

Uh, oh .... FOers was kind.

This gives both QBs enough negative credit to lose the average game
each all by his own self.

Well, I guess that's why we use competition to sort these things
out. :-(

Henne has played poorly enough now, not even showing a hint of something
good to come, he should be done I would guess....I would like to have seen
how Pennington would have finished their season for them.

==========
On Dec 14, 3:32 pm, Grinch <oldna...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> QB performances of the week rated and ranked:
>
> http://www.footballoutsiders.com/quick-reads/2010/week-14-quick-reads
>
> [rank, name, yards produced compared to the number expected from a
> replacement-level quality QB]
> ....
>
> #28 Chad Henne, -105.
>
> Henne did a wonderful job of keeping the Jets in the game on Sunday.
> After throwing a touchdown pass to Brandon Marshall, Henne threw an
> incomplete pass and then had a five-yard completion. He followed that
> with three consecutive sacks, including one lost fumble. He completed
> a pass for 28 yards to Anthony Fasano, then lost the ball again on an
> aborted snap.
>
> Obviously frustrated by the whole endeavor, he threw seven straight
> incompletions, took a sack, had another incompletion, and was sacked
> again to finish the day.
>
> It's not like he was throwing bombs, either; outside of a 36-yard
> incompletion to Marshall, each of those eight incompletions at the end
> traveled eight yards or less.
>
> #29 Mark Sanchez, -108
>
> On one hand, you have Santonio Holmes dropping a perfectly reasonable
> pass in the end zone in the second quarter. Unlucky. On the other
> hand, the Jets recovered three of Sanchez's four fumbles on sacks,
> including both of his fumbles on the final drive.
>
> He ended up with just one interception on the day, a testament to the
> trickiness of catching footballs when you're not paid to do so. Sean
> Smith could have had three picks alone.
>
> Through the first ten weeks of charting, Sanchez had 10 dropped
> interceptions, more than anyone in the league (the other 31 teams
> averaged 3.5 dropped picks). If he can play as poorly as he did today
> and still be lucky, how bad is it going to be if he plays like this
> and isn't lucky?
>
> It's not that Sanchez is incompetent, because he's perfectly capable
> of making great throws. It's that his variance is downright
> incredible; he can look like the best quarterback in the league on one
> play and look like a college freshman on the very next one.
> ~~~~~
>
> FWIW


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

gsk

https://secure.shareit.com/shareit/checkout.html?PRODUCT[300429992]=1&languageid=1&stylefrom=300429992&backlink=http%3A%2F%2Fforexguide.blogspot.com&cookies=1¤cies=USD&pts=VISA,MASTERCARD,AMEX,DC