Sunday, December 26, 2010

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11444 Message for the day & Soul Sustenance

Buzz It
----------------------------------------------------------
Message for the day 26-12-2010
----------------------------------------------------------
There is magic in each day for those who have the eyes to see.

Projection: The ones who are happy, always find something new. Even in
the most ordinary and routine situations, they are able to find
something interesting. So they are able to use everything that is with
them in the best possible way. They are the ones who bring newness
with enthusiasm and make the best use of the resources available.

Solution: When I have the eyes to see the magic of each day, I have
the ability to appreciate even small beautiful things of life. I
constantly find myself content with whatever is happening and whatever
I attain in my life. My contentment also brings creativity and I am
able to experience progress by making use of all that is with me.

----------------------------------------------------------
Soul Sustenance 26-12-2010
----------------------------------------------------------

Experiencing Freedom From The Dependency On Novelty Or Newness
(cont.)

In the market, there always appears the novelty (newness) of the same
product wrapped differently. There always seems to be a new soft
drink, a new kind of chocolate, but they are really the same products
as always. The only thing that changes is the packaging and their
image. Some children, whenever they go to the supermarket, want the
new kinds of biscuits, cakes, etc. They always want new things that
then stay in the fridge. We encourage this by telling little children
that happiness is stimulation, the new is stimulating, and comes from
the outside or you get it from the outside. We create an addiction to
the new; in this case, to the newness of the packaging. What kind of
newness is that!

When, in order to be happy, you need to go shopping, you try to fill
yourself with something that isn't you. You try to find wholeness by
filling your life with material things. A soul who is spiritually
awake knows that they are already complete and they do not need to
depend on the purchase of something new regularly for feeling full
internally. The only effort is in remembering and reconnecting with
their whole self, their complete self; reconnecting with their inner
treasures of spiritual knowledge, virtues and powers.


In Spiritual Service,
Brahma Kumaris

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

[socialactionfoundationforequity:11431 Mexican Soldiers Kill US Citizen; Plant Assault Rifle in his hands | Scotty Starnes's Blog

Buzz It
Mexican Soldiers Kill US Citizen; Plant Assault Rifle in his hands |
Scotty Starnes's Blog
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2010/12/26/mexican-soldiers-kill-us-citizen-plant-assault-rifle-in-his-hands/

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets - 25 new messages in 14 topics - digest

Buzz It
alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Jets-Bears... Game thoughts... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6bd97b08461081b0?hl=en
* We're in the playoffs... - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b0de5bf1fa4644db?hl=en
* My second "five star pick" of the season - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/57875512b2e5c930?hl=en
* The Verdict is in... - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e0f25e165d8f4e60?hl=en
* I Am No Longer A Jtes Fan!! - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/11a9579a4996c53b?hl=en
* 3 Reasons Why This Team Did Not Deserve Victory - 5 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a250c415727e1e11?hl=en
* free shipping PAYPAL payment wholesale brand WATCH online (ROLEX,OMEGA,
CHANEL,LV,CARTIER,IWC,GUCCI,RADO AND SO ON) http://www.24hour-buy.com/ - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/ba39bfaf3c4d577e?hl=en
* Gholston - 1 tackle, 0 sacks - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a02fc1195fc31b9f?hl=en
* Jets had only 10 men on defense on Hester TD catch. - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/aaa96a7bc8297802?hl=en
* Congratulations New England Patriots..AFC East Champions 2011 - 1 messages,
1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/9a683959ffa40a96?hl=en
* The NFL really dodged a weather bullet. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a3140e55faee8023?hl=en
* Best team in NFL DESTROYING Buffalo 24-3 - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/eaa964f7365fe498?hl=en
* No rush etc etc - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/c54f663a6eed2abe?hl=en
* suck ass Jests lick Obammy balls - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7f159e43a3dc8e8d?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Jets-Bears... Game thoughts...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6bd97b08461081b0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:25 pm
From: Michael


I'm gonna get flamed for this one, but for me, it was an encouraging
loss. The offense did a few things to make me belive they can
actually be productive. When Smith dropped the fake and Keller
dropped the TD, I cant blame it on the offensive game plan or play
calling this time. I like when they did a lot. They produced points
and yardage. They produced enough points to win. I dont blame
Sanchez for his last interception so much either. You cant win in the
last minute of the game with no time outs all the time. Defensers
knew the circumstances and they had that rout covered as a matter of
course.

IMHO, what killed them today was a lack of a pass rush. Even when the
send six guys, they dont have a single high quality pass rusher that
needs to be doubles. The DB's were asked to contain receivers too
long for too often.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: We're in the playoffs...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b0de5bf1fa4644db?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:34 pm
From: Michael


On Dec 26, 7:08 pm, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
wrote:
> "Keith Keller" <kkeller-use...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote in message
>
> news:onqku7xirn.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us...
>
> > On 2010-12-26, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >> Ho hum.
>
> > As a long-time Rangers fan, I can sympathize with this perspective.  But
> > in a glass half-full moment, I am glad that Sanchez is getting another
> > chance at the playoffs.  The only way to learn how to win in the
> > playoffs is to lose in them, and Sanchez will get another opportunity to
> > feel that pain again this season.  (And, just maybe, Ryan and staff will
> > learn what it takes, too.)
>
> > --keith
>
> They need to learn about some depth on the team...quality subs....I keep
> wondering how things might be if they got rid of McNothing and had Woodhead
> still here to relieve some of the pressure...I would rather have seen him
> spelling Shonn today for sure.  Still....they NEED some D linemen who can
> rush.

if woodhead was on the jets, he'd be pulling his pud. the pats
offense can get value from him. the jets can not even get value from
green


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 6:29 pm
From: Beiselbub©


On Dec 26, 2:22 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> Ho hum.


Congrats on backing in. ;)

==============================================================================
TOPIC: My second "five star pick" of the season
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/57875512b2e5c930?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:46 pm
From: MuahMan


On Dec 25, 10:09 am, "yoyodog" <NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:if32kh$bv4$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "yoyodog" <NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:if2kg8$c8l$1@news.datemas.de...
>
> >> "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:if2hgn$mec$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> >>> "yoyodog" <NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:if29uv$2dk$1@news.datemas.de...
>
> >>>> "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:if04p3$v8q$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> >>>>> "Michael" <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:46001c58-0c0a-43d1-82cf-8222f8c46dd2@j25g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>> Thus far I have only had one of my "five star picks" as far as upsets
> >>>>>> go this season.  That was for Dallas to beat the G-Men the week after
> >>>>>> Garret took over...
>
> >>>>>> Here is my second five star upset.
>
> >>>>>> The Bills beat the Pats.
>
> >>>>> bet the house, homeless NYers are funny.
>
> >>>> Since when did you become Pratt, Ray?
>
> >>> when fools start makimng iron clad predictions it bears comment.
> >>> would you bet the house of the Jills?
> >>> but neither do I sell the Buffaloons short, they are a dangerous team,
> >>> they're at home and this is their superbowl.
> >>> the Pats had best be ready.
> >>> I expect the Pats to win but I'm not betting the house on it.
> >>> now the upcoming game with the Fish should be a rout. the Fish's season
> >>> is over, they will be on the road in the frigid Foxboro and they'll be
> >>> wanting to make that tuesday tee time .
>
> >> I was referring to the "homeless NY'ers" comment.  What's next, racist
> >> drivle?
>
> > how is homeless racist. what race does it disparage.
> > are you claiming the homeless are an ethnic group?
> > are you claiming only one race is homeless, that is racist.
> > normasl people realize homelessness gome in all flavors.
> > you clearly see homeless and picture a certain type.
> > no, you are the racist and you've exposed it.
> > thanks for playing. feel free to try again.
>
> , I'm claiming that Pratt is the king of being a nasty a-hole who makes
> generalities and who doesn't know he's doing it.  You name the topic,
> racism, homelessness, poverty, all things New York, all things that aren't
> in agreement with his ignorant narrow point-of-view.  He doesn't come close
> to understanding the concept of equality for all.
>
> And your comment "homeless NYers are funny" reminded of the type of
> generally ignorant drivle Pratt might use.  So I was comparing your
> statement to that thus asking "what's next, racism?"
>
> Have a very Happy Holiday Ray.

Suck my cock you nigger jew NYshithead!

like that?


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 6:22 pm
From: Beiselbub©


On Dec 23, 11:35 am, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Michael" <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
>
> > Here is my second five star upset.
>
> > The Bills beat the Pats.
>
> bet the house, homeless NYers are funny.

Five star comeback.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Verdict is in...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e0f25e165d8f4e60?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:46 pm
From: John C TX


On Dec 26, 5:33 pm, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> In article <amdfh6hutss30cgqssc50lnv52414h1...@4ax.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:36:12 -0500, "yoyodog" <NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> > >news:tlbfh6ta12rds1cd4ngjh8sctjsr4sq5oj@4ax.com...
> > >> The SOJ lives.
> > >> An undermanned D, with Rex' scheme figured out by OCs.
> > >> Poor ST play.
> > >> And an O game plan devised in some other universe.
>
> > >> I realize the usual suspects will say the O wasn't a problem, but a smart
> > >> game plan
> > >> would've taken advantage of Shonn Greene, slowed the game down & kept
> > >> Cutler off the
> > >> field.  Too much passing & too much LT, played into the Bears' hands.
> > >> And that last play to Holmes... I knew it was coming, since we've done it
> > >> all year.  So, I
> > >> suspect the Bears did.  It was a great pass by MS, but the Bears were
> > >> ready for it.
> > >> They had the lead, & the ball entering the 2nd half.  LT was in for no
> > >> reason, and the O
> > >> did nothing.  Then, of course, Rex stepped in with the fake point.
> > >> But, if they actually moved the ball to start the 2nd half, it might've
> > >> been different.
> > >> Just too much passing, & LT... dumb.
>
> > >> Oh well... hopefully, there'll be some pass rushers in the draft.
> > >> And we'll have a new OC.
> > >> As for the playoffs, at this point I could care less.
> > >> This was the game to win, they didn't.
>
> > >Generally agreed but it wasn't that bad.  This game was lost with that
> > >stupid fake and failed 4th down
>
> > Everyone's going to say that, but to me it's what led to that decision... an
> > impotent
> > first series of the 2nd half.
>
> What about Holmes and Keller's key drops? What about being pussies and
> playing not to lose by punting with less than 6 minutes left, inside
> their forty (we never got that close again)?
>
> The fake punt as poorly designed as it was and offering a horrific risk
> reward equation (we were winning, we were at our 40 and not theirs so
> even if we made it were like 40 yards from a FG), was not the reasons
> this team lost.
Kicking with the wind that play was not smart.

All year we punt at 4th and short inside the other teams 50 but the
play worked if Smith catches the ball.
> A failure of preparation, strategy, use of personnel and poor execution
> all conspired to waste Jets fans' time on this (and other) Sundays.
> Besides which, we have some major personnel weaknesses before the Jets
> can be taken seriously.
We played a good team and lost.

What poor personnel are you talking about? Maybe you get more Greene
but maybe he was effective because of his use. He and LT were in there
at the same time on many plays.

We entered the season thin at DL and that has gotten thinner.
> h

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 6:13 pm
From: Grinch


On Dec 26, 7:05 pm, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
wrote:
> "buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3gkfh61vqq9edc3vd6aijq8qsntibo1ha3@4ax.com...
>
> > On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:57:00 -0800 (PST), Glenn Greenstein
> > <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Dec 26, 4:52 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:48:32 -0800 (PST), Glenn Greenstein
> >>> <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >On Dec 26, 4:18 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >>> >> The SOJ lives.
> >>> >> An undermanned D, with Rex' scheme figured out by OCs.
> >>> >> Poor ST play.
> >>> >> And an O game plan devised in some other universe.
>
> >>> >> I realize the usual suspects will say the O wasn't a problem, but a
> >>> >> smart game plan
> >>> >> would've taken advantage of Shonn Greene, slowed the game down & kept
> >>> >> Cutler off the
> >>> >> field. Too much passing & too much LT, played into the Bears' hands.
> >>> >> And that last play to Holmes... I knew it was coming, since we've
> >>> >> done it all year. So, I
> >>> >> suspect the Bears did. It was a great pass by MS, but the Bears were
> >>> >> ready for it.
> >>> >> They had the lead, & the ball entering the 2nd half. LT was in for no
> >>> >> reason, and the O
> >>> >> did nothing. Then, of course, Rex stepped in with the fake point.
> >>> >> But, if they actually moved the ball to start the 2nd half, it
> >>> >> might've been different.
> >>> >> Just too much passing, & LT... dumb.
>
> >>> >> Oh well... hopefully, there'll be some pass rushers in the draft.
> >>> >> And we'll have a new OC.
> >>> >> As for the playoffs, at this point I could care less.
> >>> >> This was the game to win, they didn't.
>
> >>> >O scores 27 point and add a TD by the D and it's still on the O.
> >>> >I really think I've had it with this place.
>
> >>> Just go already, Glenn.
> >>> Stop the melodrama ;)
>
> >>OK Burf, if that's how you want it.
>
> > Glenn... if you see this... everything is melodrama, lately here.
> > People have different opinions, so stay & except them, or go.
> > That's all.
> > But staying, & always putting people down for having differing views, or
> > threatening to
> > leave, come on.
>
> > You look at the score and say the O wasn't the problem.
> > I look at the team the Jets are, the weather, the opponent, the Jets D,
> > and the weather
> > conditions.
> > All those suggests, to me, that the O gameplan was suicide.
> > Ball control... slow the game down... limit Cutler touches, keep the D off
> > the field, give
> > the ball to Shonn... and just play football (ie: limit the cuteness).
>
> Burf, I gotta disagree with you here.  They had no way of stopping Cutler
> and Rex knew it...

Right. The defense has to hold the other team to less than 38 to win.
Any defense does. You give up 38, you lose. No O game plan can be
expected to save that,

But especially the defense of a team specifically built to win with
"the best defense in the league" and a ground and pound control
offense.

This was yet another game where the D gave up just a 50% completion
rate to the opposing QB, which on its face is very good -- except the
completions are *huge*. The opposing OCs clearly have figured out how
to get big gains against Rex's schemes.

> with NO pass rush and being out schemed by Martz Rex did
> the only thing left...let the O score, and Sanchez played better than he has
> maybe all season...

Agreed, over the last two weeks he's played his best ever, like a real
QB for the first time.

It looks like he's finally grapsed the idea of throwing passes he can
complete. And maybe they're giving him more of those.

> the O scheme was a Hell of a lot better, it had some
> purpose to it.  I would still criticize them for looking to get something
> out of LT, who looks old and definitely a step slower than even a month ago,
> and a couple bad probably Rex decisions.  I even think they ran the wildcat
> much better....Smith didn't screw up on that pass...receivers need to
> complete the play...a lot of them don't, they seem to slow down prematurely
> if it doesn't develop as fast as they think...at any rate, letting him throw
> at that point was a good decision, but I'd have done it from the basic
> wildcat setup, him in shotgun....

The only big problem I had was the 4th down pass at the start of the
second half (and it should have worked, Smith dropped it).

If from the film they thought that play might work, good, they should
have been ready to use it. But not *there*. It's inherently a high
risk-reward play. Use it up 8 on the other team's 35 and the payoff
is big -- at best you can put the game away right there, at worst you
should win anyhow. Use it as they did on your own 35 with the other
team within one score and then at best you get not much, at worst you
hand control of the game over to the other team. Which is what they
did. Really bad call, IMHO.

> the D was totally confused and lost...they
> have no scheme to make up for no pass rusher, and offenses have figured them
> out...

Yup.

> they took Revis and Cromartie out of the game.  With a good rusher,
> someone good on the inside and a really good coverage LB like Urlacher and
> they have something going again.  Leonhard not being there hurts too I
> think, he may have been soft at times, but when he hit a guy they knew they
> were hit.  OMHO.  Papa Carl- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

All agreed.

But this was a close, tough game between two good playoff-quality
teams on the other team's field that could have gone either way. A
credible performance, not a dog one like a couple of the worst losses
(or worst victories). Nothing to be ashamed of here.

And they made the playoffs with a week to spare.

So overall, in spite of the ups and downs and all the imperfections,
not a bad year!


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:06 pm
From: Harlan Lachman


In article
<b820c9b4-4325-4a59-9da8-75ffaa175c70@z19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
John C TX <johnctxjets@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Besides which, we have some major personnel weaknesses before the Jets
> > can be taken seriously.
> We played a good team and lost.
>
> What poor personnel are you talking about? Maybe you get more Greene
> but maybe he was effective because of his use. He and LT were in there
> at the same time on many plays.
>
> We entered the season thin at DL and that has gotten thinner.

John, the personnel weaknesses I am talking about are a DL that has no
penetrator except for an older NT who has missed most of two seasons and
two OLB who generate little or no pass rush. And, the fact that Eric
Smith got any PT at safety, tells me we have a major problem there too.

One could blame TE also. But I blame the use of Mulligan and Hartsock,
especially as eligible receivers on whichever idiot is really
responsible for the offense. There is no excuse for their being on
passing plays with all the talented receivers on this team.

h

==============================================================================
TOPIC: I Am No Longer A Jtes Fan!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/11a9579a4996c53b?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:56 pm
From: "mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu"


As long as Chico is the QB!

I am turning in my official Jtes Fan card and will never post here
again!!!!!!

mr dude


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:07 pm
From: graybeard


On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 17:56:31 -0800 (PST) "mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu"
<fosterfla@gmail.com> wrote:

>As long as Chico is the QB!
>
>I am turning in my official Jtes Fan card and will never post here
>again!!!!!!
>
>mr dude

We can only hope.
--
graybeard

==============================================================================
TOPIC: 3 Reasons Why This Team Did Not Deserve Victory
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a250c415727e1e11?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 6:57 pm
From: Harlan Lachman


In article
<e56ca4d0-f882-46d2-9909-ae836be1fa9c@c39g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:

> 4. Revis. I'm in the minority here, but I would've traded Revis for a
> young pass rusher or chance to draft one. That much money for a
> player, when opposing QB's have an eternity to pick apart everyone
> else in the secondary.

When he hold out again after next season ensures he gets this two years
at 16 million per, you are going to look prescient.

h


== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:16 pm
From: "Ray O'Hara"

"papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote in message
news:tJ6dneUP79O1RorQnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> news:9bkfh6l1hnfkhekuhpr6e85sgk1t7l8jlc@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:00:35 -0500, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other than
>>>a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
>>>again. When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
>>>like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.
>>
>> Shonn had 2 touches in the 4th quarter... nuf said.
>
> HORRENDOUS decision....I wonder what a Greene, Woodhead tandem would have
> been like at this point in the season....no, we have McLost on the team.
>
>

Woodhead would never have gotten a chance on the Jets.
you had Sconn and LT.
or on most teams, he's small and most teams hate little guys
BB isn't a sizist.
but have Kevin Faulk go down was probably his big break.
the kid can play he just needed the break to show it.
needless to say he's becoming a folk hero up here.

== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:44 pm
From: graybeard


On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:16:27 -0500 "Ray O'Hara"
<raymond-ohara@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote in message
>news:tJ6dneUP79O1RorQnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> "buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>> news:9bkfh6l1hnfkhekuhpr6e85sgk1t7l8jlc@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:00:35 -0500, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other than
>>>>a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
>>>>again. When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
>>>>like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.
>>>
>>> Shonn had 2 touches in the 4th quarter... nuf said.
>>
>> HORRENDOUS decision....I wonder what a Greene, Woodhead tandem would have
>> been like at this point in the season....no, we have McLost on the team.
>>
>>
>
>Woodhead would never have gotten a chance on the Jets.
>you had Sconn and LT.
>or on most teams, he's small and most teams hate little guys
>BB isn't a sizist.
>but have Kevin Faulk go down was probably his big break.
>the kid can play he just needed the break to show it.
>needless to say he's becoming a folk hero up here.

Not surprising. He was a folk hero among Jets fans as well. I think
everyone appreciates an over-achiever, especially if he's a hell of a
good guy as well. If he were now contributing to a team in another
division, we would be cheering at his success instead of crying in our
beer.
--
graybeard


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 8:00 pm
From: "JKConey"

"Harlan Lachman" <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-7F9E8C.18003526122010@news60.forteinc.com...
> 1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other than
> a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
> again. When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
> like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.
>
> 2) Brain dead coaching strategy: Why Kick off to the Bears when the
> strategy was working? Why, down four points with 6 minutes to go and 4th
> and 6th inside the other team's 40, would anyone with a brain not take
> an extra chance for a win (especially since the team will need a TD and
> maybe two scores if the other team scores)? Why run a punt fake with
> Sanchez on the field (is the idea to give away the call?
>
> 3) A failure to execute in the clutch: Keller's TD drop and Smith's fake
> punt drop, and Holmes' pussy drop, and guys falling over themselves on
> the field.
>
> Burf said earlier, and I agreed, that a win would mean no SOJ. Frankly,
> this team's leadership is so stupid and the players so not clutch that
> they don't deserve SOJ status. Neither are good enough to be worth
> rooting for; they certainly do not not merit disappointment. The only
> disappointment is the time wasted by morons watching this crappy team. I
> guess the old age is really kicking in.
>
> harlan


I have to agree. Condemn the leadership of this team.

--

www.myconeyislandmemories.com

== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 8:26 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"graybeard" <graybeard@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:nk2gh658lo9oqndmp5a5v0hb3vsikc7b7l@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:16:27 -0500 "Ray O'Hara"
> <raymond-ohara@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote in message
>>news:tJ6dneUP79O1RorQnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> "buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>>> news:9bkfh6l1hnfkhekuhpr6e85sgk1t7l8jlc@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:00:35 -0500, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other
>>>>>than
>>>>>a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
>>>>>again. When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
>>>>>like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.
>>>>
>>>> Shonn had 2 touches in the 4th quarter... nuf said.
>>>
>>> HORRENDOUS decision....I wonder what a Greene, Woodhead tandem would
>>> have
>>> been like at this point in the season....no, we have McLost on the team.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Woodhead would never have gotten a chance on the Jets.
>>you had Sconn and LT.
>>or on most teams, he's small and most teams hate little guys
>>BB isn't a sizist.
>>but have Kevin Faulk go down was probably his big break.
>>the kid can play he just needed the break to show it.
>>needless to say he's becoming a folk hero up here.
>
> Not surprising. He was a folk hero among Jets fans as well. I think
> everyone appreciates an over-achiever, especially if he's a hell of a
> good guy as well. If he were now contributing to a team in another
> division, we would be cheering at his success instead of crying in our
> beer.
> --
> graybeard

My only point was he actually did something....he showed he had some degree
of talent....they DID keep a third RB on the team, McKnight, and he is
useless. Not only would Woodhead have been a better RB available to use, but
he could help in other areas if asked too....McKnight does little of
anything.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: free shipping PAYPAL payment wholesale brand WATCH online (ROLEX,OMEGA,
CHANEL,LV,CARTIER,IWC,GUCCI,RADO AND SO ON) http://www.24hour-buy.com/
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/ba39bfaf3c4d577e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:03 pm
From: world-trade


Ebel Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Bape Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Bell&Ross Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Breit Ling Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Burberry Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Cartier Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Chopard Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
D&G Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Givenchy Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Jacob&Co Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Kappa Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Prada Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Tissot Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Titoni Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
U-BOAT Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Zenith Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
A.Lange&Sohne Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Audemars Piguet Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Baume&Mercier Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Blancpain Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Breguet Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
BRM Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Bvlgari Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Chanel Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Concord Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Corum Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Dewitt Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Ferrari Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Franck Muller Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Girard Perregaux Watch <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Glashutte Watch <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Graham Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
GUCCI Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
GUESS Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Hamilton Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Hermes Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Hublot Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
IWC Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Jaeger Le Coultre Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Longines Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
LV Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Montblanc Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Movado Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Omega Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Oris Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Paket Philippe Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Panerai Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Parmigiani Fleurier Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Piaget Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Porsche Design Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Rolex Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Romain Jerome Titanic-Dna Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal
payment>(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Tag Heuer Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Tudor Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Vach.Constantine Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
Armani Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)
RADO Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment>
(http://www.24hour-buy.com/)

Rolex Watch wholesale <free shipping paypal payment> (http://www.
24hour-buy.com/) and also other brand watches

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Gholston - 1 tackle, 0 sacks
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a02fc1195fc31b9f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:08 pm
From: Harlan Lachman


In article <9blfh6tde5q17f91k8kerft4do47f8hk8v@4ax.com>,
graybeard <graybeard@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:37:29 -0500 Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Frankly, if they sign him to the minimum, I would not mind if he remains
> >on the roster.
>
> To do what? Take up a spot that could be used for a more productive
> player?

While he was not out a lot, he actually makes plays as a position player
and ST player. Just not sacks or pressures.

h


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:12 pm
From: graybeard


On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:08:39 -0500 Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
wrote:

>In article <9blfh6tde5q17f91k8kerft4do47f8hk8v@4ax.com>,
> graybeard <graybeard@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:37:29 -0500 Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Frankly, if they sign him to the minimum, I would not mind if he remains
>> >on the roster.
>>
>> To do what? Take up a spot that could be used for a more productive
>> player?
>
>While he was not out a lot, he actually makes plays as a position player
>and ST player. Just not sacks or pressures.
>
>h

Well, whatever plays you are referring to, they are obviously not the
kind that help win games.
--
graybeard

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Jets had only 10 men on defense on Hester TD catch.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/aaa96a7bc8297802?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:10 pm
From: graybeard


As being reported by Newsday. This crap has gone on too often and too
long. In my mind it is a persistent coaching problem.
--
graybeard


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 8:29 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"graybeard" <graybeard@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3p0gh6595j4jv0f9j4mv49hqo41he942ro@4ax.com...
> As being reported by Newsday. This crap has gone on too often and too
> long. In my mind it is a persistent coaching problem.
> --
> graybeard

And I would say your mind is correct. That is absolutely inexcusable!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Congratulations New England Patriots..AFC East Champions 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/9a683959ffa40a96?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:21 pm
From: jdawson


On 12/26/2010 4:17 PM, WaterBoy wrote:
>
> "MuahMan" <muahman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:04c84e1f-dbbc-431e-9c98-f38ac233d111@g26g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>> Bill turnovers today: 8
>>
>> Patriots turnovers for the SEASON:8
>>
>> LOLz
>>
>
> No arguments here. Good win on a good season. Damn Woodhead decision had
> to be the worst one I've seen in a long time. Maybe we can trade for
> Woodhead back. Lets offer Clowney, oh wait, we can't. Clowney was
> brought in, Woodhead cut, then clowney was cut shortly after. Great move...
>
> Patriots are playing at a high level. Belicheat must of found another
> clever way to cheat or (Massage the rules)....
>
> WaterBoy
shut up you filthy fagot

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The NFL really dodged a weather bullet.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a3140e55faee8023?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 7:48 pm
From: graybeard


Well, I am about to go out into my garage to get reacquainted with my
snow-thrower, a task I will have to repeat at least once more before the
break of day, and a couple of times after that.

With the blizzard causing the game at Philadelphia to be rescheduled to
Tuesday night, the league hit a lottery jackpot with the schedule for
the rest of the teams that could have also been affected.

Here was the rest of today's schedule for the Northeast teams:

Jets @ Chicago
Giants @ Green Bay
Patriots @ Buffalo
Baltimore @ Cleveland
Washington @ Jacksonville

Note that it is very unusual for both the Jets and the Giants to be at
away at the same time.

Consider what chaos would have arisen if the storm had hit next weekend
instead:

Buffalo @ Jets
Giants @ Washington
Miami @ Patriots
Cincinatti @ Baltimore
Dallas @ Philadelphia

Every venue that could have been affected would have been affected.

I wonder if the powers that be in the NFL are left pondering the wisdom
of scheduling a Super Bowl at an outdoor stadium in New Jersey in early
February.
--
graybeard

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Best team in NFL DESTROYING Buffalo 24-3
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/eaa964f7365fe498?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 8:03 pm
From: "JKConey"

"DIet Plan" <1of9@kaxy.com> wrote in message
news:4089a3cf-923d-49ea-9eef-46c1adf969ad@y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> nuff said


So why in the world can't you be happy with it? Why the need to post
here? Does it make you feel like a real man or something to kick bad teams
when they're down?


--

www.myconeyislandmemories.com


==============================================================================
TOPIC: No rush etc etc
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/c54f663a6eed2abe?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 8:08 pm
From: "JKConey"


No rush. Really bad field position strategy due to kicking away from
Hester. No rush. Cutler is a different QB when he gets hit. They just
stopped blitzing when they had the lead. No rush. Why doesn't this team EVER
make halftime adjustments? The leadership is lacking folks. I think these
players are better than what I see from week to week.

--

www.myconeyislandmemories.com


==============================================================================
TOPIC: suck ass Jests lick Obammy balls
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7f159e43a3dc8e8d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 8:10 pm
From: "JKConey"

"DIet Plan" <1of9@kaxy.com> wrote in message
news:5d08be09-2494-4c8c-9d42-fe1f69933c3d@j25g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> .


OK you win. By far the worst troll in history! Childish, racist,
homophobic, one liners is all you got kid? Back to the fry cooker for you.
LOL

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

Google Alert - south korea

Buzz It
News6 new results for south korea
 
S. Korea president says nation's survival depends on unity
CNN International
By the CNN Wire Staff South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak called for South Koreans not to back down to Pyongyang's threats or actions. ...
See all stories on this topic »
Korea Won Steady as Derivatives Curbs Counter Recovery Optimism
BusinessWeek
27 (Bloomberg) -- The South Korean won was little changed as concern currency derivatives rules will be tightened countered optimism the global economic ...
See all stories on this topic »
S.Korea battles spread of foot-and-mouth disease
AFP
SEOUL — South Korea Monday confirmed three new cases of foot-and-mouth disease, bringing the total to 56 since the country's worst outbreak began a month ...
See all stories on this topic »
Our view on commerce: Trade deal with South Korea deserves rapid ratification
USA Today
Only this time — with a pact struck this month between the United States and South Korea— at least one major union, the United Autoworkers, has decided to ...
See all stories on this topic »

USA Today
S.Korea frees three Chinese crewmembers
Global Times
By Jia Cheng Chinese fishermen were released Saturday after a week-long detention by South Korean authorities. The move aimed at averting a diplomatic row ...
See all stories on this topic »
S. Korean banks' takeover moves to be lukewarm next year
Yonhap News
27 (Yonhap) -- The South Korean banking sector is likely to undergo a lethargic year in 2011 as the heat for bank takeovers will likely cool down due to a ...
See all stories on this topic »

Yonhap News


Tip: Use a minus sign (-) in front of terms in your query that you want to exclude. Learn more.

Remove this alert.
Create another alert.
Manage your alerts.

Google Alert - skype down

Buzz It
Realtime1 new result for skype down
 
kncharuk: Wayne Grayson : Skype down for majority of users - Tuscaloosa News (subscription) (blog)
http://uxp.in/24933067
Twitter - 19 seconds ago


Tip: Use site restrict in your query to search within a site (site:nytimes.com or site:.edu). Learn more.

Remove this alert.
Create another alert.
Manage your alerts.

Google Alert - skype down

Buzz It
Realtime1 new result for skype down
 
alinvasilas: @PeterSmeets I'm glad that Skype was down for only a few hours, happy service again :)
Twitter - 9 seconds ago


Tip: Use quotes ("like this") around a set of words in your query to match them exactly. Learn more.

Remove this alert.
Create another alert.
Manage your alerts.

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets - 25 new messages in 11 topics - digest

Buzz It
alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* 3 Reasons Why This Team Did Not Deserve Victory - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a250c415727e1e11?hl=en
* Cotch - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/07775594924d7b68?hl=en
* The Verdict is in... - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e0f25e165d8f4e60?hl=en
* A great "win" today... - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/3eb9548b2afee3d4?hl=en
* Gholston - 1 tackle, 0 sacks - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a02fc1195fc31b9f?hl=en
* We're in the playoffs... - 2 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b0de5bf1fa4644db?hl=en
* suck ass Jests lick Obammy balls - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7f159e43a3dc8e8d?hl=en
* Im sorry, but putting Jason Taylor in coverage - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/841ebcbf549a9d5d?hl=en
* bad decision Rex - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/492bcd2544b6d63c?hl=en
* My second "five star pick" of the season - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/57875512b2e5c930?hl=en
* Jets-Bears... Game thoughts... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6bd97b08461081b0?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: 3 Reasons Why This Team Did Not Deserve Victory
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a250c415727e1e11?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 3:37 pm
From: buRford


On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:00:35 -0500, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote:

>1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other than
>a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
>again. When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
>like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.

Shonn had 2 touches in the 4th quarter... nuf said.

>
>2) Brain dead coaching strategy: Why Kick off to the Bears when the
>strategy was working? Why, down four points with 6 minutes to go and 4th
>and 6th inside the other team's 40, would anyone with a brain not take
>an extra chance for a win (especially since the team will need a TD and
>maybe two scores if the other team scores)? Why run a punt fake with
>Sanchez on the field (is the idea to give away the call?

As bad a call as it was, it worked... Smith just dropped it.

>
>3) A failure to execute in the clutch: Keller's TD drop and Smith's fake
>punt drop, and Holmes' pussy drop, and guys falling over themselves on
>the field.
>
>Burf said earlier, and I agreed, that a win would mean no SOJ. Frankly,
>this team's leadership is so stupid and the players so not clutch that
>they don't deserve SOJ status. Neither are good enough to be worth
>rooting for; they certainly do not not merit disappointment. The only
>disappointment is the time wasted by morons watching this crappy team. I
>guess the old age is really kicking in.
>
>harlan


== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:16 pm
From: cd


On Dec 26, 6:00 pm, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> 1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other than
> a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
> again.  When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
> like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.
>
> 2) Brain dead coaching strategy: Why Kick off to the Bears when the
> strategy was working? Why, down four points with 6 minutes to go and 4th
> and 6th inside the other team's 40, would anyone with a brain not take
> an extra chance for a win (especially since the team will need a TD and
> maybe two scores if the other team scores)? Why run a punt fake with
> Sanchez on the field (is the idea to give away the call?
>
> 3) A failure to execute in the clutch: Keller's TD drop and Smith's fake
> punt drop, and Holmes' pussy drop, and guys falling over themselves on
> the field.
>
> Burf said earlier, and I agreed, that a win would mean no SOJ. Frankly,
> this team's leadership is so stupid and the players so not clutch that
> they don't deserve SOJ status. Neither are good enough to be worth
> rooting for; they certainly do not not merit disappointment. The only
> disappointment is the time wasted by morons watching this crappy team. I
> guess the old age is really kicking in.
>
> harlan

The lack of clutch or consistency speaks to the new order. Say what
you will, Mangini absent a solid OC and the reach for Favre, is a
better coach. So we go from solid contributor to the sexy pick, I
mean look at the additions.

1. Trade for Holmes. I was turned off to it, after reading somewhere
that Holmes has more drops than Edwards, and Edwards constatnly gets
ripped for it. I wish the trade was for Peppers.
2. Woodhead and Leon for Joe McKnight. Not that I believe that
woodhead would have ever gotten a chance, but a coach that picked an
undersized guy to lead his secondary, at a very physical position and
paid all the praise in pre-season releases him only to help the
enemy. At least Belichick thinks Ryan is a good talent evaluator.
3. Feely. I still don't understand it. Let's see if it works out.
4. Revis. I'm in the minority here, but I would've traded Revis for a
young pass rusher or chance to draft one. That much money for a
player, when opposing QB's have an eternity to pick apart everyone
else in the secondary.
5. This really gets me. I think Scott really hasn't been as good as
Lewis, even at his age. I think Scott is way overrated and makes
noise with penalties.


== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:16 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Harlan Lachman" <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-7F9E8C.18003526122010@news60.forteinc.com...
> 1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other than
> a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
> again. When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
> like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.
>
> 2) Brain dead coaching strategy: Why Kick off to the Bears when the
> strategy was working? Why, down four points with 6 minutes to go and 4th
> and 6th inside the other team's 40, would anyone with a brain not take
> an extra chance for a win (especially since the team will need a TD and
> maybe two scores if the other team scores)? Why run a punt fake with
> Sanchez on the field (is the idea to give away the call?
>
> 3) A failure to execute in the clutch: Keller's TD drop and Smith's fake
> punt drop, and Holmes' pussy drop, and guys falling over themselves on
> the field.
>
> Burf said earlier, and I agreed, that a win would mean no SOJ. Frankly,
> this team's leadership is so stupid and the players so not clutch that
> they don't deserve SOJ status. Neither are good enough to be worth
> rooting for; they certainly do not not merit disappointment. The only
> disappointment is the time wasted by morons watching this crappy team. I
> guess the old age is really kicking in.
>
> harlan

What really gets to me is not the players as much as coaching...the stuff
that happens is to me, a sign of coaching....sloppy play by guys in clutch
situations...you HAVE to make that TD catch....it wins the freakin
game....Rex has to be too easy, they like him way too much and they are not
crisp or sharp....compare this attitude to a Tuna or BB team...or any other
coach with some discipline. Rex guesses WAY too much, and I'd love to know
how much practice time they put into these gadget plays and fakes.


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:17 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:9bkfh6l1hnfkhekuhpr6e85sgk1t7l8jlc@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:00:35 -0500, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
> wrote:
>
>>1) Why the coach (whoever is responsible) uses LT as anything other than
>>a third down back is a waste of Personnel. Shonn Greene was running
>>again. When he was not on the bench, which was most of the time. Its
>>like playing a game with one hand tied behind one's back.
>
> Shonn had 2 touches in the 4th quarter... nuf said.

HORRENDOUS decision....I wonder what a Greene, Woodhead tandem would have
been like at this point in the season....no, we have McLost on the team.


>
>>
>>2) Brain dead coaching strategy: Why Kick off to the Bears when the
>>strategy was working? Why, down four points with 6 minutes to go and 4th
>>and 6th inside the other team's 40, would anyone with a brain not take
>>an extra chance for a win (especially since the team will need a TD and
>>maybe two scores if the other team scores)? Why run a punt fake with
>>Sanchez on the field (is the idea to give away the call?
>
> As bad a call as it was, it worked... Smith just dropped it.
>
>>
>>3) A failure to execute in the clutch: Keller's TD drop and Smith's fake
>>punt drop, and Holmes' pussy drop, and guys falling over themselves on
>>the field.
>>
>>Burf said earlier, and I agreed, that a win would mean no SOJ. Frankly,
>>this team's leadership is so stupid and the players so not clutch that
>>they don't deserve SOJ status. Neither are good enough to be worth
>>rooting for; they certainly do not not merit disappointment. The only
>>disappointment is the time wasted by morons watching this crappy team. I
>>guess the old age is really kicking in.
>>
>>harlan

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Cotch
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/07775594924d7b68?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 3:44 pm
From: cd


On Dec 26, 4:51 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:23:19 -0500, graybeard <graybe...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:20:13 -0800 (PST) cd <c...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >>On Dec 26, 3:57 pm, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> what ever happened to those sure hands on slants?
>
> >>Ever since Holmes started, Cotchery has lost something.  I think the
> >>team is better with Edwards and Cotchery, than any other WR
> >>combination with the Jet running game.  Holmes has one play and that
> >>is the slant, he is otherwise a risk; so many fumbles at his hand.
>
> >Holmes also doesn't seem to have nearly the speed that I thought he
> >would. There have been several passes this year, including one today,
> >where he couldn't catch up to a pass where MS led him by a couple of
> >yards.
>
> I think Holmes is overrated.
> To me, if given the choice, and this is a serious leap for me, I'd keep Braylon.
> I think he has 1, maybe 2 drops this season.
> Whoever the Jets WR coach is, he's done a great job with Braylon... & he's obvious done a
> lot of work, too.

Edwards is a physical receiver with speed, blocks well, goes over the
middle, and still young. He'll also be cheaper, hopefully than
Holmes. Yeah, I think there is more upside to Edwards in this offense
than Holmes, if the organization is forced to choose.


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:32 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"graybeard" <graybeard@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:9ecfh655jg5ock25ualjiibtrh0ngjro6a@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:20:13 -0800 (PST) cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 26, 3:57 pm, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> what ever happened to those sure hands on slants?
>>
>>Ever since Holmes started, Cotchery has lost something. I think the
>>team is better with Edwards and Cotchery, than any other WR
>>combination with the Jet running game. Holmes has one play and that
>>is the slant, he is otherwise a risk; so many fumbles at his hand.
>
> Holmes also doesn't seem to have nearly the speed that I thought he
> would. There have been several passes this year, including one today,
> where he couldn't catch up to a pass where MS led him by a couple of
> yards.
> --
> graybeard

To me...it looks like most Jets receivers give up on stuff...do not finish
the play so to speak too often....sometimes it is like they don't expect to
get the ball so they are half hearted or something.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:33 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:l0efh69bio8ht0e7640dqef1o4cua66fbe@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:23:19 -0500, graybeard <graybeard@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:20:13 -0800 (PST) cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Dec 26, 3:57 pm, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> what ever happened to those sure hands on slants?
>>>
>>>Ever since Holmes started, Cotchery has lost something. I think the
>>>team is better with Edwards and Cotchery, than any other WR
>>>combination with the Jet running game. Holmes has one play and that
>>>is the slant, he is otherwise a risk; so many fumbles at his hand.
>>
>>Holmes also doesn't seem to have nearly the speed that I thought he
>>would. There have been several passes this year, including one today,
>>where he couldn't catch up to a pass where MS led him by a couple of
>>yards.
>
> I think Holmes is overrated.
> To me, if given the choice, and this is a serious leap for me, I'd keep
> Braylon.
> I think he has 1, maybe 2 drops this season.
> Whoever the Jets WR coach is, he's done a great job with Braylon... & he's
> obvious done a
> lot of work, too.

Braylon looks tough in traffic too....not so much the rest.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Verdict is in...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e0f25e165d8f4e60?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 3:48 pm
From: buRford


On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:57:00 -0800 (PST), Glenn Greenstein <lexa695@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 26, 4:52�pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:48:32 -0800 (PST), Glenn Greenstein <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Dec 26, 4:18 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> >> The SOJ lives.
>> >> An undermanned D, with Rex' scheme figured out by OCs.
>> >> Poor ST play.
>> >> And an O game plan devised in some other universe.
>>
>> >> I realize the usual suspects will say the O wasn't a problem, but a smart game plan
>> >> would've taken advantage of Shonn Greene, slowed the game down & kept Cutler off the
>> >> field. Too much passing & too much LT, played into the Bears' hands.
>> >> And that last play to Holmes... I knew it was coming, since we've done it all year. So, I
>> >> suspect the Bears did. It was a great pass by MS, but the Bears were ready for it.
>> >> They had the lead, & the ball entering the 2nd half. LT was in for no reason, and the O
>> >> did nothing. Then, of course, Rex stepped in with the fake point.
>> >> But, if they actually moved the ball to start the 2nd half, it might've been different.
>> >> Just too much passing, & LT... dumb.
>>
>> >> Oh well... hopefully, there'll be some pass rushers in the draft.
>> >> And we'll have a new OC.
>> >> As for the playoffs, at this point I could care less.
>> >> This was the game to win, they didn't.
>>
>> >O scores 27 point and add a TD by the D and it's still on the O.
>> >I really think I've had it with this place.
>>
>> Just go already, Glenn.
>> Stop the melodrama �;)
>
>OK Burf, if that's how you want it.

Glenn... if you see this... everything is melodrama, lately here.
People have different opinions, so stay & except them, or go.
That's all.
But staying, & always putting people down for having differing views, or threatening to
leave, come on.

You look at the score and say the O wasn't the problem.
I look at the team the Jets are, the weather, the opponent, the Jets D, and the weather
conditions.
All those suggests, to me, that the O gameplan was suicide.
Ball control... slow the game down... limit Cutler touches, keep the D off the field, give
the ball to Shonn... and just play football (ie: limit the cuteness).

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 3:56 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:tlbfh6ta12rds1cd4ngjh8sctjsr4sq5oj@4ax.com...
> The SOJ lives.
> An undermanned D, with Rex' scheme figured out by OCs.
> Poor ST play.
> And an O game plan devised in some other universe.
>
> I realize the usual suspects will say the O wasn't a problem, but a smart
> game plan
> would've taken advantage of Shonn Greene, slowed the game down & kept
> Cutler off the
> field. Too much passing & too much LT, played into the Bears' hands.
> And that last play to Holmes... I knew it was coming, since we've done it
> all year. So, I
> suspect the Bears did. It was a great pass by MS, but the Bears were
> ready for it.
> They had the lead, & the ball entering the 2nd half. LT was in for no
> reason, and the O
> did nothing. Then, of course, Rex stepped in with the fake point.
> But, if they actually moved the ball to start the 2nd half, it might've
> been different.
> Just too much passing, & LT... dumb.
>
> Oh well... hopefully, there'll be some pass rushers in the draft.
> And we'll have a new OC.
> As for the playoffs, at this point I could care less.
> This was the game to win, they didn't.

Sanchez threw very well...the Bears are good against the run...which should
have really limited LT...he just does not have the pop now. Overall, the O
scheme was far superior to most of the season...really good at some times.
A dumb decision by Rex, and a dropped ball made the difference
today...albeit, a defense that is in serious trouble with no pass rush and
apparently no way to develop one. If the O decides to work the middle of
the field both deep and short it takes a lot of the stuff Rex does out of
the equation, puts LB's into coverage and they have NO rush whatsoever.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:05 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:3gkfh61vqq9edc3vd6aijq8qsntibo1ha3@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:57:00 -0800 (PST), Glenn Greenstein
> <lexa695@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 26, 4:52 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:48:32 -0800 (PST), Glenn Greenstein
>>> <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> >On Dec 26, 4:18 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>>> >> The SOJ lives.
>>> >> An undermanned D, with Rex' scheme figured out by OCs.
>>> >> Poor ST play.
>>> >> And an O game plan devised in some other universe.
>>>
>>> >> I realize the usual suspects will say the O wasn't a problem, but a
>>> >> smart game plan
>>> >> would've taken advantage of Shonn Greene, slowed the game down & kept
>>> >> Cutler off the
>>> >> field. Too much passing & too much LT, played into the Bears' hands.
>>> >> And that last play to Holmes... I knew it was coming, since we've
>>> >> done it all year. So, I
>>> >> suspect the Bears did. It was a great pass by MS, but the Bears were
>>> >> ready for it.
>>> >> They had the lead, & the ball entering the 2nd half. LT was in for no
>>> >> reason, and the O
>>> >> did nothing. Then, of course, Rex stepped in with the fake point.
>>> >> But, if they actually moved the ball to start the 2nd half, it
>>> >> might've been different.
>>> >> Just too much passing, & LT... dumb.
>>>
>>> >> Oh well... hopefully, there'll be some pass rushers in the draft.
>>> >> And we'll have a new OC.
>>> >> As for the playoffs, at this point I could care less.
>>> >> This was the game to win, they didn't.
>>>
>>> >O scores 27 point and add a TD by the D and it's still on the O.
>>> >I really think I've had it with this place.
>>>
>>> Just go already, Glenn.
>>> Stop the melodrama ;)
>>
>>OK Burf, if that's how you want it.
>
> Glenn... if you see this... everything is melodrama, lately here.
> People have different opinions, so stay & except them, or go.
> That's all.
> But staying, & always putting people down for having differing views, or
> threatening to
> leave, come on.
>
> You look at the score and say the O wasn't the problem.
> I look at the team the Jets are, the weather, the opponent, the Jets D,
> and the weather
> conditions.
> All those suggests, to me, that the O gameplan was suicide.
> Ball control... slow the game down... limit Cutler touches, keep the D off
> the field, give
> the ball to Shonn... and just play football (ie: limit the cuteness).

Burf, I gotta disagree with you here. They had no way of stopping Cutler
and Rex knew it...with NO pass rush and being out schemed by Martz Rex did
the only thing left...let the O score, and Sanchez played better than he has
maybe all season...the O scheme was a Hell of a lot better, it had some
purpose to it. I would still criticize them for looking to get something
out of LT, who looks old and definitely a step slower than even a month ago,
and a couple bad probably Rex decisions. I even think they ran the wildcat
much better....Smith didn't screw up on that pass...receivers need to
complete the play...a lot of them don't, they seem to slow down prematurely
if it doesn't develop as fast as they think...at any rate, letting him throw
at that point was a good decision, but I'd have done it from the basic
wildcat setup, him in shotgun....the D was totally confused and lost...they
have no scheme to make up for no pass rusher, and offenses have figured them
out...they took Revis and Cromartie out of the game. With a good rusher,
someone good on the inside and a really good coverage LB like Urlacher and
they have something going again. Leonhard not being there hurts too I
think, he may have been soft at times, but when he hit a guy they knew they
were hit. OMHO. Papa Carl

==============================================================================
TOPIC: A great "win" today...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/3eb9548b2afee3d4?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 3:53 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Glenn Greenstein" <lexa695@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f51d5b4f-8564-45ac-a6ac-5b3f5bdc3a8d@30g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 26, 4:46 pm, Saycoda <frank.io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 4:44 pm, Glenn Greenstein <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 26, 4:36 pm, montygraham <monty1...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
> > > ...because Sanchez demonstrated he can win in bad, cold weather.
> > > Also, it's clear that the defense has huge problems, so hopefully they
> > > can figure some things out before the playoffs and stop kidding
> > > themselves that they have a "great" defensive unit. Obviously,
> > > "backing into" the playoffs is a nice gift.
>
> > How do you back in with a week left in the season?
>
> You didn't win to get, someone lost, hence "backed in"

We won 10 games and there is a week left in the season. All things
considered, that was enough to get in. Would you feel better if the
Jets had 9 wins this week and win against the Bills to get in? You
back in the last week of the regular season, not before then.

Absolutely correct. They Jets can only play for themselves and are not
responsible for what other teams do at all...hence you look at the
record...they are IN the playoffs, no backing in crap.


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:12 pm
From: Keith Keller


On 2010-12-26, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote:
>
> Glenn this is an excellent point and clear and compelling logic. Thanks
> for the pick me up.

If you want further cheering up, recall that they got the win last week
in Pittsburgh, which made this game a lot less crucial. (I wonder if
there was a bit of a letdown after such an emotional victory.)

--keith

--
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Gholston - 1 tackle, 0 sacks
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a02fc1195fc31b9f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 3:53 pm
From: graybeard


On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:37:29 -0500 Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com>
wrote:

>Frankly, if they sign him to the minimum, I would not mind if he remains
>on the roster.

To do what? Take up a spot that could be used for a more productive
player?
--
graybeard


== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:11 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"graybeard" <graybeard@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:h9dfh61alsqr25ne5t81qcq345cutd8m86@4ax.com...
> That gives him 6 solo tackles, 0 sacks, 0 passes defended, and 0 forced
> fumbles for the year. If this waste of space isn't gone next year, I for
> one am going to be really pissed.
> --
> graybeard

ABSOLUTELY...and another wasted roster spot...what might have been with that
space open?


== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:13 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Harlan Lachman" <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-7C9802.18372926122010@news60.forteinc.com...
> In article <07efh6ldnahkppfendtv68697gp90u7suv@4ax.com>,
> buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:38:11 -0500, graybeard <graybeard@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >That gives him 6 solo tackles, 0 sacks, 0 passes defended, and 0 forced
>> >fumbles for the year. If this waste of space isn't gone next year, I for
>> >one am going to be really pissed.
>>
>> Come on, gray, he's doing a great job... I heard Rex say that recently.
>
> Guys, lets just hope he does not get sack in the last meaningless game,
> triggering a huge bonus.
>
> Frankly, if they sign him to the minimum, I would not mind if he remains
> on the roster.
>
> h

H...he is taking up space, and with the rules as they are...he needs to
go...some aggressive rookie will do better and may even contribute on
special teams...which seem to have developed some issues on coverage. Think
of all the wasted spaces on this team....that simply will not make it
happen.


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:16 pm
From: MuahMan


If the Patriots picked this guy up. Belicheck would mold him into a
annual pro-bowler.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: We're in the playoffs...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b0de5bf1fa4644db?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:08 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Keith Keller" <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote in message
news:onqku7xirn.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us...
> On 2010-12-26, buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> Ho hum.
>
> As a long-time Rangers fan, I can sympathize with this perspective. But
> in a glass half-full moment, I am glad that Sanchez is getting another
> chance at the playoffs. The only way to learn how to win in the
> playoffs is to lose in them, and Sanchez will get another opportunity to
> feel that pain again this season. (And, just maybe, Ryan and staff will
> learn what it takes, too.)
>
> --keith

They need to learn about some depth on the team...quality subs....I keep
wondering how things might be if they got rid of McNothing and had Woodhead
still here to relieve some of the pressure...I would rather have seen him
spelling Shonn today for sure. Still....they NEED some D linemen who can
rush.


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:11 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:dnffh6db775jqttda6kckn3t7o16tgj8m7@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:04:08 -0800, Keith Keller
> <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
>
>>On 2010-12-26, buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>>> Ho hum.
>>
>>As a long-time Rangers fan, I can sympathize with this perspective. But
>>in a glass half-full moment, I am glad that Sanchez is getting another
>>chance at the playoffs. The only way to learn how to win in the
>>playoffs is to lose in them, and Sanchez will get another opportunity to
>>feel that pain again this season. (And, just maybe, Ryan and staff will
>>learn what it takes, too.)
>>
>>--keith
>
> Your point is well-taken, but the playoffs get old, without getting to the
> Supe.
> Ever since Parcells was here, the Jets've generally been a competitive
> team.
> It be time to take the next step.
> I didn't think it would be this year, like many did, but...
> My problem is that at least on offense, they don't learn.
> It's the same ol' same ol'.
> I mention Shonn Greene a lot. He had 12 touches today.
> If he'd have had double those touches, we'd have won.
> There was no reason for a shootout. If the D is overmatched, as they are
> against any good
> OC, or QB, you wanna keep the ball away from the opposing O, especially on
> a terrible
> field. Ball-control was key. So, why all the passing?
> Why all the LT? Why can't the O score in the first quarter, or coming out
> of the locker
> room, in the 3rd quarter?
> And what will everyone talk about? Rex's decison to go for it (was a good
> pass, Smith
> dropped), and how bad the D is. The whole point missed.
> So, can they learn?
> I'm not so sure, without a Media or fanbase that get it, to pressure them
> & guide the
> narrative.

I don't disagree, but this is a much different NFl...they no doubt will
change the way they send teams to the playoffs, go best records and not by
division etc...but right now...the Jets did enough to be there, and a kid
like Sanchez gets a valuable opportunity to play against the best...that I
like. Still, I have very little hope for them with that defense in terms of
personnel.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: suck ass Jests lick Obammy balls
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7f159e43a3dc8e8d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:25 pm
From: DIet Plan <1of9@kaxy.com>


.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Im sorry, but putting Jason Taylor in coverage
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/841ebcbf549a9d5d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:26 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Harlan Lachman" <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-A474CF.18091826122010@news60.forteinc.com...
> In article
> <47b4e3ae-14b4-4ccc-a770-89584a0a4291@n29g2000vby.googlegroups.com>,
> Tutor <dcat4434@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 26, 2:17 pm, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > is just moronic. #99 drops back into coverage about 50% of the time.
>> > Thats ridiculous
>>
>> to add to that... I've had just about enough of Bryan Thomas.
>
> Papa, you coached and designed D. Isn't it possible to have one
> passrushing and run stopping LB by design? Isn't this just a product of
> Rex' refusal to tailor his system to his personnel.?
>
> I cannot imagine a single reason that JT would be out in coverage on any
> play unless Cro, Revis, Dig, Lowery and Quice were injured and he were
> lined up at CB or S.
>
> harlan

Yes...it is also part of his belief he can out think the offensive
coordinator by who he puts in at various times, then if the O is wise to his
personell schemes they do something way different. Still....I was always
used to using a "designated" pass rusher, and some great players, guys who
always looked good just couldn't do both deals from OLB especially or even
dropping a D end into coverage. I saw some kids who could play D end and
also drop to limited coverage and look great...some just can't...so use them
the way they can be most effective. I don't ever remember JT being a
coverage guy....Urlacher, Lawrence Taylor in hiis day....they are a rare
breed....Farrior is really good at it.
....I hear what you are saying...I don't know the answer..but it looks like
they still have Revis and Cro committed outside and are having confusion
issues inside...at any rate, O coordinators have figured out Rex's D and
taken Revis and Cro out of the game...IF....a huge IF he had any decent
outside coverage LB's on short outside stuff...he could put them in limited
schemes and stack the inside with D linemen....to me, it looks like the huge
gap is in the D line...they still need help on run and Rex can't move LB's
out to support stuff and let the safeties take over primary inside coverage,
OR outside coverage and let Revis and Cro play inside...it's called a type
of invert...I don't think they can do it because they can be soft up front
without LB's right there. I would love to see good film...not TV type
coverage, but really get to see the whole thing and study the scheme....but,
he just doesn't seem to have an answer to things that happen. Hope that
makes sense.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: bad decision Rex
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/492bcd2544b6d63c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 4:27 pm
From: "papa.carl44"

"Harlan Lachman" <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-D75E7E.18110226122010@news60.forteinc.com...
> In article
> <1d4eec18-d838-4d8c-afab-bdfa5359d524@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 26, 2:49 pm, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > On Dec 26, 2:47 pm, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > come on Rex, you have a 7 pt lead. Really dumb.
>> >
>> > and we pay the price. This one's on Rex. 100% on Rex and no one
>> > else. Very stupid.
>>
>>
>> Cannot believe the drive to start the half, the decision to go for
>> it. Completely reversed momentum and gave Cutler confidence.
>> STUPID !!
>
> What was stupid was giving away the fake by having Sanchez on the field.
>
> What was stupid was being brave with the lead and no reason to do this
> and being a coward in the 4th period inside the Bears' 40 on 4th and 6th
> and punting.
>
> That is what is stupid.
>
> h

Well said about how they think during game time decisions.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: My second "five star pick" of the season
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/57875512b2e5c930?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:14 pm
From: Michael


On Dec 26, 3:28 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 23, 9:45 am, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > Thus far I have only had one of my "five star picks" as far as upsets
> > go this season.  That was for Dallas to beat the G-Men the week after
> > Garret took over...
>
> > Here is my second five star upset.
>
> > The Bills beat the Pats.
>
> Your best post this year.

it got ray on the hook, did it not ???


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:21 pm
From: marcman


On Dec 23, 9:45 am, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Thus far I have only had one of my "five star picks" as far as upsets
> go this season.  That was for Dallas to beat the G-Men the week after
> Garret took over...
>
> Here is my second five star upset.
>
> The Bills beat the Pats.

Close . . .


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:22 pm
From: marcman


On Dec 23, 8:24 pm, Rotalius Jephersun <RR...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And Belichick will accomplish this monumental feet without
> any toe-licking.
>
> RJ

You sell Belichick way too short. He's a terrific toe licker. Just not
his wife's toes . . .

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Jets-Bears... Game thoughts...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6bd97b08461081b0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 26 2010 5:25 pm
From: Michael


I'm gonna get flamed for this one, but for me, it was an encouraging
loss. The offense did a few things to make me belive they can
actually be productive. When Smith dropped the fake and Keller
dropped the TD, I cant blame it on the offensive game plan or play
calling this time. I like when they did a lot. They produced points
and yardage. They produced enough points to win. I dont blame
Sanchez for his last interception so much either. You cant win in the
last minute of the game with no time outs all the time. Defensers
knew the circumstances and they had that rout covered as a matter of
course.

IMHO, what killed them today was a lack of a pass rush. Even when the
send six guys, they dont have a single high quality pass rusher that
needs to be doubles. The DB's were asked to contain receivers too
long for too often.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

gsk

https://secure.shareit.com/shareit/checkout.html?PRODUCT[300429992]=1&languageid=1&stylefrom=300429992&backlink=http%3A%2F%2Fforexguide.blogspot.com&cookies=1¤cies=USD&pts=VISA,MASTERCARD,AMEX,DC