alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=enalt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Kudos to the D, & to whoever... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/bdb60567f3425646?hl=en
* Phew! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/449f9c5247dcc073?hl=en
* Congrats Jets Fans - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/07630a1a0566fcd0?hl=en
* Holmes or Braylon? - 5 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a582ad9b8bd60c4c?hl=en
* Great game - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/cd828c993441013c?hl=en
* That was sensational! - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/696750f4e4b9bda1?hl=en
* This Game Is on the Offense - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/73323aba8f641a54?hl=en
* pats will slaughter the jets - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/81d9cea1741f306d?hl=en
* Kill the head and the body dies... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/f4a476a3222399dc?hl=en
* Braylon Edwards....the real deal - 4 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/cc5d70af8225bb37?hl=en
* How to neutralize Schott - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/da217484e4678c20?hl=en
* No Excuses - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/855261fc2e433103?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Kudos to the D, & to whoever...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/bdb60567f3425646?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:36 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 23:24:33 -0500, "Ravnsfan�����" <the.steroid.curtain@70s.steelers.rip>
wrote:
>
>"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>news:0ucii6pfnuaq0k729vmrmgar33vkfbaj1a@4ax.com...
>> ... whoever woke up in the 2nd half, and understood the way to win the
>> game, on offense...
>> keeping the ball out of Manning's hands, rushing the ball, & wasting the
>> clock.
>>
>> And a special kudos to Nick Folk, & Brodney, who played a great game
>> (except for one
>> play).
>
>Don't forget to thank the Colts #10 for running into the punter. That also
>took time out of Mannings hands ...in the end. That penalty was totally
>uncharacteristic of a Colts team but, ...who really gives a flying ____
>anyway !
Hey, shat happens in pressure situations. But, the Refs had a good game, just letting the
teams play. A nice surprise ;)
>
>Amazing that there wasn't a single holding call on either side, nor any
>block in the back penalties on punts and kickoffs. At least when millions
>more folks are watching the refs can find a way to get the calls right. I
>swore they were going to over-turn the catch that was fumbled and recovered
>back on that last drive.
>
>~Drew
>
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Phew!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/449f9c5247dcc073?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:37 pm
From: buRford
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:22:53 +0000, Percy Flage <percy.flage_REM@OVE_ianwhitephoto.co.uk>
wrote:
>On 09/01/2011 04:12, buRford wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:04:58 +0000, Percy Flage<percy.flage_REM@OVE_ianwhitephoto.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> *Much* better 2nd half there.
>>
>>
>> Didn't you say beforehand, that the Colts D sucks against the run, so Schott would pass?
>> Prescient weren't you.
>> I suspect it was Rex who set Schott straight in the 2nd-half.
>> That was the way it should've been done from the outset.
>>
>> And a good mornin' to ya, Ian ;)
>
>Yeah, I had a bad feeling after the first half, but *someone* was torn a
>new one at the half and they took advantage of a crap run D.
>
>It limited Manning to 3 possessions for the 2nd half and 12 mins total.
>That's the way to do it.
>
>And I can't sleep just yet. I managed about 1 1/2 hours before the game,
>that's enough on a night like this. ;)
And ya don't have work in the mornin'... nitey nite ;)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Congrats Jets Fans
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/07630a1a0566fcd0?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:39 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 23:14:31 -0500, "Ravnsfan�����" <the.steroid.curtain@70s.steelers.rip>
wrote:
>Nice hard fought win. Jets could have made it a laugher if not for Sanchez'
>shoulder.
>
>Hope the Ravens do as well tomorrow. Would love to go back to Pittsburgh and
>kick Benji's ass while the Jets beat the Pats so Rex can match up against
>the Ravens in our house. Fingers X
>
>~Drew
>
It'll be nice to see you guys in the Champeenship game.
Full-circle from the first game of the season.
Good luck tomorrow ;)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Holmes or Braylon?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a582ad9b8bd60c4c?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:35 pm
From: "Ravnsfan²°¹¹®"
"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:t3eii6lv9bo362rsfgn2r9n8i8mstk5kuf@4ax.com...
> I'll tell ya, just judging from this game, if I'm given the choice, I'm
> keeping Braylon.
>
> He's been so big this season. And while Holmes has played well, he has
> dropped some key
> passes, and generally, he just has a lackadaisical attitude.
> Of course, I suspect they'll keep Holmes, & let Braylon go, but I think
> this would be a
> mistake. And if ya remember, I've been very critical of Edwards... but,
> he's changed my
> mind.
Based on watching Edwards during his career in Cleveland I'd thank him for a
good season, if it ends that way, keeping Holmes (whom I watched while he
played for Pittsburgh) and whom has more upside IMO. Braylon has had more
bad seasons than good ones. It is more likely than not that next year you
will not feel the same way. Holmes already has a SB ring...
~Drew
== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:46 pm
From: Harlan Lachman
In article
<94869792-9735-4b75-b9ab-c7b68d60bea3@f20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 11:28�pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> > I'll tell ya, just judging from this game, if I'm given the choice, I'm
> > keeping Braylon.
> >
> > He's been so big this season. �And while Holmes has played well, he has
> > dropped some key
> > passes, and generally, he just has a lackadaisical attitude.
> > Of course, I suspect they'll keep Holmes, & let Braylon go, but I think
> > this would be a
> > mistake. �And if ya remember, I've been very critical of Edwards... but,
> > he's changed my
> > mind.
>
> He is a perfect complement to Cotchery, the team was actually playing
> better before Holmes started playing. I also think the three wide
> set, somehow doesn't work for the Jets. A better student of the game
> can show why it is so with the Jets. My vote goes for Braylon Edwards.
If only for his outstanding run blocking.
h
== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:50 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 20:32:49 -0800 (PST), cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
>On Jan 8, 11:28�pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> I'll tell ya, just judging from this game, if I'm given the choice, I'm keeping Braylon.
>>
>> He's been so big this season. �And while Holmes has played well, he has dropped some key
>> passes, and generally, he just has a lackadaisical attitude.
>> Of course, I suspect they'll keep Holmes, & let Braylon go, but I think this would be a
>> mistake. �And if ya remember, I've been very critical of Edwards... but, he's changed my
>> mind.
>
>He is a perfect complement to Cotchery, the team was actually playing
>better before Holmes started playing. I also think the three wide
>set, somehow doesn't work for the Jets. A better student of the game
>can show why it is so with the Jets. My vote goes for Braylon Edwards.
The 3-wide set doesn't work, because most of the time, they run from it.
Schott doesn't know how to coordinate his talent.
Notice, whenever there's more focus on Keller, Holmes is quiet... & visa versa.
== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:52 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 23:35:35 -0500, "Ravnsfan�����" <the.steroid.curtain@70s.steelers.rip>
wrote:
>
>"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>news:t3eii6lv9bo362rsfgn2r9n8i8mstk5kuf@4ax.com...
>> I'll tell ya, just judging from this game, if I'm given the choice, I'm
>> keeping Braylon.
>>
>> He's been so big this season. And while Holmes has played well, he has
>> dropped some key
>> passes, and generally, he just has a lackadaisical attitude.
>> Of course, I suspect they'll keep Holmes, & let Braylon go, but I think
>> this would be a
>> mistake. And if ya remember, I've been very critical of Edwards... but,
>> he's changed my
>> mind.
>
>Based on watching Edwards during his career in Cleveland I'd thank him for a
>good season, if it ends that way, keeping Holmes (whom I watched while he
>played for Pittsburgh) and whom has more upside IMO. Braylon has had more
>bad seasons than good ones. It is more likely than not that next year you
>will not feel the same way. Holmes already has a SB ring...
>
>~Drew
>
Braylon seems to be growing up, though.
I may be wrong, but I think he's turned a corner. He's become very serious.
He's been focused, and dropped maybe two passes this season.
We'll see.
== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:58 pm
From: "Ravnsfan²°¹¹®"
"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:nkfii65vbseg6bkjll339pf2h4s85mkt4t@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 23:35:35 -0500, "Ravnsfan²°¹¹®"
> <the.steroid.curtain@70s.steelers.rip>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>>news:t3eii6lv9bo362rsfgn2r9n8i8mstk5kuf@4ax.com...
>>> I'll tell ya, just judging from this game, if I'm given the choice, I'm
>>> keeping Braylon.
>>>
>>> He's been so big this season. And while Holmes has played well, he has
>>> dropped some key
>>> passes, and generally, he just has a lackadaisical attitude.
>>> Of course, I suspect they'll keep Holmes, & let Braylon go, but I think
>>> this would be a
>>> mistake. And if ya remember, I've been very critical of Edwards... but,
>>> he's changed my
>>> mind.
>>
>>Based on watching Edwards during his career in Cleveland I'd thank him for
>>a
>>good season, if it ends that way, keeping Holmes (whom I watched while he
>>played for Pittsburgh) and whom has more upside IMO. Braylon has had more
>>bad seasons than good ones. It is more likely than not that next year you
>>will not feel the same way. Holmes already has a SB ring...
>>
>>~Drew
>>
>
> Braylon seems to be growing up, though.
> I may be wrong, but I think he's turned a corner. He's become very
> serious.
> He's been focused, and dropped maybe two passes this season.
> We'll see.
Not a wet blanket attempt I assure you. I easily recall Browns fans saying
the same thing after one of Edwards' earlier good to great NFL seasons. For
the Jets sake hopefully he's turned the corner to NFL caliber consistency.
That said... I'll take Holmes.
~Drew
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Great game
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/cd828c993441013c?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:39 pm
From: "RickyBobby"
It took the Jets all sixty minutes to beat the Colts but it was worth it.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: That was sensational!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/696750f4e4b9bda1?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:40 pm
From: Still Roper
Loved it...
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:44 pm
From: "Phillip Briganti"
Wait till next week the Patriots will make you cry.
"Still Roper" <mark_edwards_2000@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:be4f4ade-d274-46ad-9db8-dee46614a9fd@d7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
> Loved it...
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:54 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 23:44:40 -0500, "Phillip Briganti" <scorsese@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>Wait till next week the Patriots will make you cry.
Yup, should be fun.
>"Still Roper" <mark_edwards_2000@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
>news:be4f4ade-d274-46ad-9db8-dee46614a9fd@d7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
>> Loved it...
>
>
>
>--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
==============================================================================
TOPIC: This Game Is on the Offense
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/73323aba8f641a54?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:41 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:19:20 -0500, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote:
>In article
><6c39d83f-ea36-41ba-9dd5-25f945d97a39@z19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> JetsLife <JetsLife@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Whether this Jets defense was the '85 Bears or the unit it actually
>> is, I'd still say tonight's game is on the offense.
>>
>> The defense carried the Jets all of last season in to the AFC title
>> game, and performed solidly if not great this year. Sure allowing 45
>> and 38 to NE and Chicago is unacceptable, but where the fuck was the
>> offense in that NE game? Or in home losses to Baltimore, GB and Miami?
>> If the offense shows up even just a smidgeon in those games the Jets
>> are 14-2.
>>
>> Today's game rests on the offense. The defense will do its best with
>> what it has. The offense has no excuses. It's gotta put up points and
>> lead the way. And if necessary carry the entire team.
>
>I would argue that one has to credit the specials: Cromartie's two great
>returns, Folk's clutch FG, not giving the Colts any yardage on returns,
Those returns, especially his last one, were huge.
Good night for the Specials.
Hopefully, Brad will be OK for next week.
>
>A D that prevented Peyton from scoring in the first quarter while Shott
>figured out how to call running plays to Shonn up the middle and LT off
>the edge and get the OL blocking, and then did not give up a TD at the
>end after Shott unnecessarily gave the ball back to the Colts.
>
>And an offense that ate up most of the second half running and passing
>the ball up and down the field versus the Colts, eating the clock, and
>then with a minute left, got the team to the ten yard line to win it.
>
>All three phases of the game, as one would expect.
>
>h
>
>PS. Thank the Colts HC for his time management, leaving us plenty of
>time and Rex not screwing it up at the end.
Yeah, Rex had a good night coaching tonight. Played the clock well for once.
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:46 pm
From: cd
On Jan 8, 11:41 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:19:20 -0500, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> >In article
> ><6c39d83f-ea36-41ba-9dd5-25f945d97...@z19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> > JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> Whether this Jets defense was the '85 Bears or the unit it actually
> >> is, I'd still say tonight's game is on the offense.
>
> >> The defense carried the Jets all of last season in to the AFC title
> >> game, and performed solidly if not great this year. Sure allowing 45
> >> and 38 to NE and Chicago is unacceptable, but where the fuck was the
> >> offense in that NE game? Or in home losses to Baltimore, GB and Miami?
> >> If the offense shows up even just a smidgeon in those games the Jets
> >> are 14-2.
>
> >> Today's game rests on the offense. The defense will do its best with
> >> what it has. The offense has no excuses. It's gotta put up points and
> >> lead the way. And if necessary carry the entire team.
>
> >I would argue that one has to credit the specials: Cromartie's two great
> >returns, Folk's clutch FG, not giving the Colts any yardage on returns,
>
> Those returns, especially his last one, were huge.
> Good night for the Specials.
> Hopefully, Brad will be OK for next week.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >A D that prevented Peyton from scoring in the first quarter while Shott
> >figured out how to call running plays to Shonn up the middle and LT off
> >the edge and get the OL blocking, and then did not give up a TD at the
> >end after Shott unnecessarily gave the ball back to the Colts.
>
> >And an offense that ate up most of the second half running and passing
> >the ball up and down the field versus the Colts, eating the clock, and
> >then with a minute left, got the team to the ten yard line to win it.
>
> >All three phases of the game, as one would expect.
>
> >h
>
> >PS. Thank the Colts HC for his time management, leaving us plenty of
> >time and Rex not screwing it up at the end.
>
> Yeah, Rex had a good night coaching tonight. Played the clock well for once.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Particularly not wasting a timeout to freeze Vinatieri.
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:55 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 20:46:17 -0800 (PST), cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
>On Jan 8, 11:41 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:19:20 -0500, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
>> >In article
>> ><6c39d83f-ea36-41ba-9dd5-25f945d97...@z19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
>> > JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> Whether this Jets defense was the '85 Bears or the unit it actually
>> >> is, I'd still say tonight's game is on the offense.
>>
>> >> The defense carried the Jets all of last season in to the AFC title
>> >> game, and performed solidly if not great this year. Sure allowing 45
>> >> and 38 to NE and Chicago is unacceptable, but where the fuck was the
>> >> offense in that NE game? Or in home losses to Baltimore, GB and Miami?
>> >> If the offense shows up even just a smidgeon in those games the Jets
>> >> are 14-2.
>>
>> >> Today's game rests on the offense. The defense will do its best with
>> >> what it has. The offense has no excuses. It's gotta put up points and
>> >> lead the way. And if necessary carry the entire team.
>>
>> >I would argue that one has to credit the specials: Cromartie's two great
>> >returns, Folk's clutch FG, not giving the Colts any yardage on returns,
>>
>> Those returns, especially his last one, were huge.
>> Good night for the Specials.
>> Hopefully, Brad will be OK for next week.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >A D that prevented Peyton from scoring in the first quarter while Shott
>> >figured out how to call running plays to Shonn up the middle and LT off
>> >the edge and get the OL blocking, and then did not give up a TD at the
>> >end after Shott unnecessarily gave the ball back to the Colts.
>>
>> >And an offense that ate up most of the second half running and passing
>> >the ball up and down the field versus the Colts, eating the clock, and
>> >then with a minute left, got the team to the ten yard line to win it.
>>
>> >All three phases of the game, as one would expect.
>>
>> >h
>>
>> >PS. Thank the Colts HC for his time management, leaving us plenty of
>> >time and Rex not screwing it up at the end.
>>
>> Yeah, Rex had a good night coaching tonight. Played the clock well for once.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Particularly not wasting a timeout to freeze Vinatieri.
LOL. Yup, had me scared for a second there ;)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: pats will slaughter the jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/81d9cea1741f306d?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:42 pm
From: Still Roper
On Jan 8, 11:21 pm, TJM <T...@webtv.net> wrote:
> what a bunch of weak bitches the jets are.
> Lube up your asses and put your palms on the ground
Your daddy dropping by?
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:48 pm
From: "Ravnsfan�����"
"TJM" <TJM@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:igbd41$ghf$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> what a bunch of weak bitches the jets are.
> Lube up your asses and put your palms on the ground
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Kill the head and the body dies...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/f4a476a3222399dc?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:43 pm
From: Still Roper
See Peyton Manning's red melon....
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Braylon Edwards....the real deal
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/cc5d70af8225bb37?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:43 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 23:20:28 -0500, "papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>Not only does he make the catches, the hard ones...he blocks and makes a
>huge difference out there. Without that last catch, Nick does not get the
>chance to win it.....I love the way he plays. I also loved watching Peyton
>so frustrated. Now...if Rex chewed out some guys (Cromartie) at half
>time...I hope he does the same thing to whoever's idea it was to go for a
>bomb on third and six in a situation that could win the game. That kind of
>stuff with a QB who was obviously having serious shoulder issues was flat
>out stupid. Still, even Sanchez's less than great play got it done when
>needed. Very exciting game to watch, IMHO. Papa Carl
>
Yup, I agree about Braylon, as you see from my post after yours (which I didn't see).
Sanchez finally had some time, in the 2nd half, after they focused more on rushing.
I'll tell ya, it's so clear to me that this is the wrong O for Sanchez - - the offense
that Schott opted for to start the game.
Enjoy the win, hombre!
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:54 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:32:06 -0500, Harlan Lachman <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote:
>In article <1-qdnfoXy-sQqrTQnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Not only does he make the catches, the hard ones...he blocks and makes a
>> huge difference out there. Without that last catch, Nick does not get the
>> chance to win it.....I love the way he plays. I also loved watching Peyton
>> so frustrated. Now...if Rex chewed out some guys (Cromartie) at half
>> time...I hope he does the same thing to whoever's idea it was to go for a
>> bomb on third and six in a situation that could win the game. That kind of
>> stuff with a QB who was obviously having serious shoulder issues was flat
>> out stupid. Still, even Sanchez's less than great play got it done when
>> needed. Very exciting game to watch, IMHO. Papa Carl
>
>Ditto on the entire excellent post.
>
>Enjoy the week Papa (et. al.). Our season ain't over. By Sunday night,
>24 teams' seasons will be.
>
>harlan
I mentioned yesterday, I'm not ready for the season to end.
We'll be in the champeenship game... then we'll see ;)
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 9:04 pm
From: "papa.carl44"
"Harlan Lachman" <harlan@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-987B56.23315308012011@news60.forteinc.com...
> In article <1-qdnfoXy-sQqrTQnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "papa.carl44" <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Not only does he make the catches, the hard ones...he blocks and makes a
>> huge difference out there. Without that last catch, Nick does not get
>> the
>> chance to win it.....I love the way he plays. I also loved watching
>> Peyton
>> so frustrated. Now...if Rex chewed out some guys (Cromartie) at half
>> time...I hope he does the same thing to whoever's idea it was to go for a
>> bomb on third and six in a situation that could win the game. That kind
>> of
>> stuff with a QB who was obviously having serious shoulder issues was flat
>> out stupid. Still, even Sanchez's less than great play got it done when
>> needed. Very exciting game to watch, IMHO. Papa Carl
>
> Ditto on the entire excellent post.
>
> Enjoy the week Papa (et. al.). Our season ain't over. By Sunday night,
> 24 teams' seasons will be.
>
> harlan
It just feels good to root for a team that wins :-) I have never strayed,
always been a Jets fan since they became the Jets, even before Namath. I
never knew why either, I was a North Jersey kid who grew up, into high
school, rooting for the Giants. In high school the new league attracted my
attention. I used to watch Titans games with my next door neighbor who was
one of my football coaches in high school. When I went to college they
became the Jets and I was in a location where there were tons of Eagles and
Steelers fans...they hated NY'ers it seemed. So I started to follow the
Jets. Then my old coach pointed out to me when I came home after the season
that the "new league" did a much better job of playing defense (in his
opinion). And that the offense was wide open...the way he liked it but
could never run it at the high school :-) So...all those years. Then on
the day Namath won the thing, my wife was in the hospital, she had emergency
appendix surgery early in the morning. I spent time with her, and then went
home to clean up and get ready to go back, while at home I watched the Jets
beat the Colts...came to the hospital and she wondered why I was so happy.
At that point she had NO clue about the game at all, tonight she was
pointing out things to me and very accurately too. So...after a long, long
time with season's tickets after I quit coaching too, it is just nice to
see them win a meaningful game. Rex's D was very well designed
tonight...and I hope somebody recognizes that Eric Smith played really well,
along with Poole too. They may actually have found a position for Smith
that works for him, his reads on Manning inside were very good. Revis was
outstanding...and those others guys did a pretty good job inside. Cromartie
has some issues....but we have to give him some slack for that KO return to
set up the win. He does bring it when it counts. I am not counting them
out for next week either. This could be very interesting.
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 9:05 pm
From: "papa.carl44"
"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:v3fii6hoaq6rfq4a5ejmus1nijfptt7ocs@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 23:20:28 -0500, "papa.carl44"
> <papadotcarl@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
>>Not only does he make the catches, the hard ones...he blocks and makes a
>>huge difference out there. Without that last catch, Nick does not get the
>>chance to win it.....I love the way he plays. I also loved watching
>>Peyton
>>so frustrated. Now...if Rex chewed out some guys (Cromartie) at half
>>time...I hope he does the same thing to whoever's idea it was to go for a
>>bomb on third and six in a situation that could win the game. That kind
>>of
>>stuff with a QB who was obviously having serious shoulder issues was flat
>>out stupid. Still, even Sanchez's less than great play got it done when
>>needed. Very exciting game to watch, IMHO. Papa Carl
>>
>
> Yup, I agree about Braylon, as you see from my post after yours (which I
> didn't see).
> Sanchez finally had some time, in the 2nd half, after they focused more on
> rushing.
> I'll tell ya, it's so clear to me that this is the wrong O for Sanchez - -
> the offense
> that Schott opted for to start the game.
>
> Enjoy the win, hombre!
I think you could hear Jean screaming from way down the street at the
end...the dog ran and hid :-)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: How to neutralize Schott
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/da217484e4678c20?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:46 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 20:25:06 -0800 (PST), cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
>When there is no time left on the clock, Schott is no longer a
>factor. What I mean by that is he is no longer cute, there is
>purpose. Schott seems very unfocused, the more time left on the clock
>or closer the point differential, the worse his play calling. Rex and
>Schott are not a good pair, they are both unpredictable and that is a
>lethal combination for the Jets.
Actually, I think Schott & Schott is the lethal combo.
When Rex gets involved, the O always seems to settle down.
I never saw Rex so focused on the O, when they had the ball in the 2nd half.
Seeing him on the sidelines, there were times I thought he was calling the plays ;)
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:53 pm
From: "Ravnsfan�����"
"buRford" <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:s9fii6t2f9rr839jv5lkp44hp4vq3tad03@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 20:25:06 -0800 (PST), cd <cd2k@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>When there is no time left on the clock, Schott is no longer a
>>factor. What I mean by that is he is no longer cute, there is
>>purpose. Schott seems very unfocused, the more time left on the clock
>>or closer the point differential, the worse his play calling. Rex and
>>Schott are not a good pair, they are both unpredictable and that is a
>>lethal combination for the Jets.
>
> Actually, I think Schott & Schott is the lethal combo.
> When Rex gets involved, the O always seems to settle down.
> I never saw Rex so focused on the O, when they had the ball in the 2nd
> half.
> Seeing him on the sidelines, there were times I thought he was calling the
> plays ;)
I noticed that as well. He was certainly talking to someone through his head
set when the offense was on the field.
~Drew
==============================================================================
TOPIC: No Excuses
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/855261fc2e433103?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 8:57 pm
From: buRford
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:32:12 -0500, buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 01:20:47 +0100 (CET), Copp <cr79879@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>They're playing in a dome so Sanchez has no
>>excuses, can't blame the cold and I don't want
>>to hear any bs about Schott if they lose.
>>This game depends on the Jets D stopping
>>or at least slowing down Manning.
>>
>
>I've never heard any excuses from anyone.
>Actually, the game depends on the D, & the O... go figure.
As you see, the D took care of business.
And it took 'til the 2nd half, for Schott to actually try to win the game.
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 8 2011 9:05 pm
From: cd
On Jan 8, 11:57 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:32:12 -0500, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> >On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 01:20:47 +0100 (CET), Copp <cr79...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>They're playing in a dome so Sanchez has no
> >>excuses, can't blame the cold and I don't want
> >>to hear any bs about Schott if they lose.
> >>This game depends on the Jets D stopping
> >>or at least slowing down Manning.
>
> >I've never heard any excuses from anyone.
> >Actually, the game depends on the D, & the O... go figure.
>
> As you see, the D took care of business.
> And it took 'til the 2nd half, for Schott to actually try to win the game.
I can't agree, the drive where the Jets had to get a first down, and
with two chances, gifted by the Colts, they failed. I don't recall a
single instance when the game was on the line and they had to convert,
to keep the opponent off the field, them doing it to close it out.
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
Posts
