alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=enalt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Anyone have a clue?? - 6 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b345d0d82a483247?hl=en
* What time is the parade? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/0ee78e6a6676c366?hl=en
* THE FAT FUCK BIG MOUTHS GO HOME LIKE CRYBABIES - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/23d2f82efd2981fc?hl=en
* Fat Bastard chokes on pigs feet !!! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a2df2514dcac4ec1?hl=en
* Schott single-handedly destroyed that drive... - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/fac4844e6c596c0d?hl=en
* Poser Fat Bastard n team chokes yet again !!!! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/97b504b954c7397f?hl=en
* I Love Sanchez - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/94eaf30793d49407?hl=en
* Namath drunk again - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/cbe70533b3797bc0?hl=en
* 42 years and only one ... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/9954d99b021c2269?hl=en
* Reverting? - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/1b213f8d8e4107ee?hl=en
* A group prayer... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/33d7b1b722a0fcc7?hl=en
* 49ers better then Jets and we pick higher - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/33032502aa057bfd?hl=en
* Thanks so much to all you scum bag trolls... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7821c8c6dc75e1ad?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Anyone have a clue??
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/b345d0d82a483247?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 6:57 am
From: EGK
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:14:44 -0500, buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>The Jets as a team, have shown a lot of heart.
>They play tough, and have shown resiliency.
>
>That said, what the f**k happened yesterday, in the first half?
>How could they come out flat, as they did?
>As bad as the D was at points during the season, they never missed tackles like that, and
>were pushed around as they were. As Revis said, *we didn't show up.*
>And when asked about it, none of the players had a clue why.
>How could a team not show up for a Title game?
>As for the O, while I always hope, I never expect anything for obvious reasons (OC).
>
>My only explanation, is that they were too involved with all the hype.
>You had all the Media interviews... I mean, players were being interviewed non-stop.
>And ya had two *pep* rallies.
>
>Other than that, it's baffling.
>If I were Rex, I'd cut back on player interviews before big games. Let's say that after
>the Thursday before a game, the Jets don't grant Media access to players... only coaches.
Maybe it's just hard to switch gears for the style of teams you're facing.
Both the Colts and the Pats are more finesse type teams while the Steelers
are smash-mouth. The Steelers had to play that same physical game in their
playoff victory over the Ravens. The Jets got to be the bully in their
games.
You could be right that all the hype surrounding the Jets affected how they
prepared. They just weren't ready to face another physical team again.
== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:15 am
From: John C TX
X-No-Archive: Yes
> Maybe it's just hard to switch gears for the style of teams you're facing.
> Both the Colts and the Pats are more finesse type teams while the Steelers
> are smash-mouth. The Steelers had to play that same physical game in their
> playoff victory over the Ravens. The Jets got to be the bully in their
> games.
>
> You could be right that all the hype surrounding the Jets affected how they
> prepared. They just weren't ready to face another physical team again.
Our DL sucks. DeVito & Pouha wouldn't start on most teams. Ellis was
limping the entire game.
== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:22 am
From: Michael
On Jan 24, 10:15 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > Maybe it's just hard to switch gears for the style of teams you're facing.
> > Both the Colts and the Pats are more finesse type teams while the Steelers
> > are smash-mouth. The Steelers had to play that same physical game in their
> > playoff victory over the Ravens. The Jets got to be the bully in their
> > games.
>
> > You could be right that all the hype surrounding the Jets affected how they
> > prepared. They just weren't ready to face another physical team again.
>
> Our DL sucks. DeVito & Pouha wouldn't start on most teams. Ellis was
> limping the entire game.
i dont agree with you. pouha and devito make a nice first down line.
they were not the guys trying to make arm tackles yesterday. the jets
problem on in general defense is they dont have a good pass rushing
sub package to put in. they have plenty of db's and a good run
stuffing set. none of their defenders are very good pass rushers.
pace has had trouble getting off blocks, ellis only got sacks after
brady held the ball for seven seconds, jason taylor is no longer jason
taylor... their real problem yesterday on defense was just horrible
fundamentals and lack of focus and effort.
== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:23 am
From: Tutor
On Jan 24, 10:15 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > Maybe it's just hard to switch gears for the style of teams you're facing.
> > Both the Colts and the Pats are more finesse type teams while the Steelers
> > are smash-mouth. The Steelers had to play that same physical game in their
> > playoff victory over the Ravens. The Jets got to be the bully in their
> > games.
>
> > You could be right that all the hype surrounding the Jets affected how they
> > prepared. They just weren't ready to face another physical team again.
>
> Our DL sucks. DeVito & Pouha wouldn't start on most teams. Ellis was
> limping the entire game.
well if that's the case then why the fuck did Rex defer on the coin
toss? Sorry, but that decision was flat out wrong for this game.
Sure, let's get this travel worn defense tired against a real rushing
threat (unlike the Pats or the Colts)before it was necessary. Yeah...
that's a great fucking idea on the road in the playoffs. Neither the
Pats nor the Colts challenged the middle with a running threat.
Pittsburgh with Mendenhall sure did and that's what killed them in the
first half.
I really think that all the travel wore them down. Need home field
next time.
FInally, with all that said, this team lost the game for two reasons:
a tired and undermanned defense that was forced to be on the field way
too long in the first half, partially by Rex's stupid decision to
defer and because Schottenheimer is an idiot and has no idea what to
do out there.
== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:30 am
From: Hammer
On Jan 24, 10:23 am, Tutor <dcat4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 10:15 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > > Maybe it's just hard to switch gears for the style of teams you're facing.
> > > Both the Colts and the Pats are more finesse type teams while the Steelers
> > > are smash-mouth. The Steelers had to play that same physical game in their
> > > playoff victory over the Ravens. The Jets got to be the bully in their
> > > games.
>
> > > You could be right that all the hype surrounding the Jets affected how they
> > > prepared. They just weren't ready to face another physical team again.
>
> > Our DL sucks. DeVito & Pouha wouldn't start on most teams. Ellis was
> > limping the entire game.
>
> well if that's the case then why the fuck did Rex defer on the coin
> toss? Sorry, but that decision was flat out wrong for this game.
> Sure, let's get this travel worn defense tired against a real rushing
> threat (unlike the Pats or the Colts)before it was necessary. Yeah...
> that's a great fucking idea on the road in the playoffs. Neither the
> Pats nor the Colts challenged the middle with a running threat.
> Pittsburgh with Mendenhall sure did and that's what killed them in the
> first half.
>
> I really think that all the travel wore them down. Need home field
> next time.
>
> FInally, with all that said, this team lost the game for two reasons:
> a tired and undermanned defense that was forced to be on the field way
> too long in the first half, partially by Rex's stupid decision to
> defer and because Schottenheimer is an idiot and has no idea what to
> do out there.
What's the other reason? :)
== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:50 am
From: John C TX
X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > > Maybe it's just hard to switch gears for the style of teams you're facing.
> > > Both the Colts and the Pats are more finesse type teams while the Steelers
> > > are smash-mouth. The Steelers had to play that same physical game in their
> > > playoff victory over the Ravens. The Jets got to be the bully in their
> > > games.
>
> > > You could be right that all the hype surrounding the Jets affected how they
> > > prepared. They just weren't ready to face another physical team again.
>
> > Our DL sucks. DeVito & Pouha wouldn't start on most teams. Ellis was
> > limping the entire game.
>
> well if that's the case then why the fuck did Rex defer on the coin
> toss? Sorry, but that decision was flat out wrong for this game.
> Sure, let's get this travel worn defense tired against a real rushing
> threat (unlike the Pats or the Colts)before it was necessary. Yeah...
> that's a great fucking idea on the road in the playoffs. Neither the
> Pats nor the Colts challenged the middle with a running threat.
> Pittsburgh with Mendenhall sure did and that's what killed them in the
> first half.
>
> I really think that all the travel wore them down. Need home field
> next time.
If they start winning at home I will agree but we struggled all week.
>
> FInally, with all that said, this team lost the game for two reasons:
> a tired and undermanned defense that was forced to be on the field way
> too long in the first half, partially by Rex's stupid decision to
> defer and because Schottenheimer is an idiot and has no idea what to
> do out there.
You might be right but Sanchez has some work to do as well. If this
is what I thought we would get I would be very pleased two years ago
but he has to improve his accuracy & he has to see the field better.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: What time is the parade?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/0ee78e6a6676c366?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:10 am
From: Drumrboy
Bwaaaahahahahaaa!
==============================================================================
TOPIC: THE FAT FUCK BIG MOUTHS GO HOME LIKE CRYBABIES
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/23d2f82efd2981fc?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:17 am
From: Drumrboy
On Jan 24, 8:59 am, "Craig Cartoon Is A Cunt" <carton...@jewkike.com>
wrote:
> what a great news conference by that fat pig ryan. the loser jets go
> back home where they belong. the string of lucky breaks runs out and
> the delusional asshole big mouths can now go home and jerkoff to
> namath pictures and superbowl iii highlights.
>
> now they concentrate on how to harass women reporters, getting dui's,
> tripping opposing players on the sidelines and all the other low class
> behaviors this mickey mouse franchise specializes in.
Yup, it couldn't have happened to a bigger bunch of obnoxious assholes.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Fat Bastard chokes on pigs feet !!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/a2df2514dcac4ec1?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:21 am
From: DIet Plan <1of9@kaxy.com>
.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Schott single-handedly destroyed that drive...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/fac4844e6c596c0d?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:34 am
From: Michael
On Jan 24, 9:40 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:22:45 -0500, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
> > >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> > >news:7lopj6dtd77rnnb3s5p22j5phvl822jcvv@4ax.com...
> > >> First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
> > >> Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
> > >> Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the
> > >> two, until 4th
> > >> down.
>
> > >> I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB
> > >> imploring the OC
> > >> for a play.
>
> > >Can't communicate...can't call a timely play...he can't think ahead...it is
> > >always his quick decision...a good OC is always two to three plays ahead
> > >based on various outcomes....Rex has got to go to Woody and tell him he
> > >needs a real OC.
>
> > Sanchez said the communications were out, when he went to the sidelines, near the endzone.
> > A conspiracy minded person might think hanky-panky... but that aside, that drive was a
> > killer. It wasted so much time (where was the hurryup), and why LT was in there, after
> > Greene was rushing well? Why the passes?
> > LT had a weak game, yet Schott continued to go with him.
>
> > Just baffling.
>
> The play calling at the goal line was puzzling. I just read about
> both radios going out which explains the confusion.
>
> All year LT is their choice near the goal line. Maybe because he is
> the best at diving over the line or maybe the like him but for some
> reason he is their choice near the goal line.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
i think they may be worried about green putting the ball on the ground
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:28 am
From: buRford
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:40:17 -0800 (PST), John C TX <johnctxjets@gmail.com> wrote:
>buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:22:45 -0500, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>> >news:7lopj6dtd77rnnb3s5p22j5phvl822jcvv@4ax.com...
>> >> First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
>> >> Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
>> >> Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the
>> >> two, until 4th
>> >> down.
>>
>> >> I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB
>> >> imploring the OC
>> >> for a play.
>>
>> >Can't communicate...can't call a timely play...he can't think ahead...it is
>> >always his quick decision...a good OC is always two to three plays ahead
>> >based on various outcomes....Rex has got to go to Woody and tell him he
>> >needs a real OC.
>>
>> Sanchez said the communications were out, when he went to the sidelines, near the endzone.
>> A conspiracy minded person might think hanky-panky... but that aside, that drive was a
>> killer. �It wasted so much time (where was the hurryup), and why LT was in there, after
>> Greene was rushing well? �Why the passes?
>> LT had a weak game, yet Schott continued to go with him.
>>
>> Just baffling.
>
>The play calling at the goal line was puzzling. I just read about
>both radios going out which explains the confusion.
To me, having worked in a field that used similar communications, it's very troubling that
it happened at that moment. It's the home team that is responsible for communications.
A system & the backup going out at once, makes one wonder ;)
>
>All year LT is their choice near the goal line. Maybe because he is
>the best at diving over the line or maybe the like him but for some
>reason he is their choice near the goal line.
And that, too... LT didn't even go over the top.
9 carries for 15 yards, or 9 carries for 50... Schott chose the former, at a critical
time.
For you, you're ok with Schott. But for me, and a lot of others, it's the same nonsense
every game. And I try to keep an open mind, I couldn't have thought we'd win yesterday,
if I didn't. But it's impossible to, especially knowing that in the end, the wrong play
will be called... using the wrong player... at the wrong time.
The bottom line... when an offense cannot score a TD in the first quarter, for 13 or 14
straight games, is it on the players... or might there be a problem with the OC?
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:29 am
From: buRford
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:34:57 -0800 (PST), Michael <mjd1966@verizon.net> wrote:
>On Jan 24, 9:40�am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:22:45 -0500, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> > >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
>> > >news:7lopj6dtd77rnnb3s5p22j5phvl822jcvv@4ax.com...
>> > >> First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
>> > >> Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
>> > >> Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the
>> > >> two, until 4th
>> > >> down.
>>
>> > >> I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB
>> > >> imploring the OC
>> > >> for a play.
>>
>> > >Can't communicate...can't call a timely play...he can't think ahead...it is
>> > >always his quick decision...a good OC is always two to three plays ahead
>> > >based on various outcomes....Rex has got to go to Woody and tell him he
>> > >needs a real OC.
>>
>> > Sanchez said the communications were out, when he went to the sidelines, near the endzone.
>> > A conspiracy minded person might think hanky-panky... but that aside, that drive was a
>> > killer. �It wasted so much time (where was the hurryup), and why LT was in there, after
>> > Greene was rushing well? �Why the passes?
>> > LT had a weak game, yet Schott continued to go with him.
>>
>> > Just baffling.
>>
>> The play calling at the goal line was puzzling. �I just read about
>> both radios going out which explains the confusion.
>>
>> All year LT is their choice near the goal line. Maybe because he is
>> the best at diving over the line or maybe the like him but for some
>> reason he is their choice near the goal line.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>i think they may be worried about green putting the ball on the ground
People keep saying that... yet, how many times has he fumbed this season?
To me, it's about Schott's history with LT... and LT being LT.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Poser Fat Bastard n team chokes yet again !!!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/97b504b954c7397f?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:39 am
From: DIet Plan <1of9@kaxy.com>
.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: I Love Sanchez
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/94eaf30793d49407?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:43 am
From: John C TX
X-No-Archive: Yes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKGu2n6914M&NR=1
Something made me laugh.
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:15 am
From: Beiselbub©
On Jan 24, 8:43 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKGu2n6914M&NR=1
>
> Something made me laugh.
I saw that and laughed. At him, mostly.
(Can you imagine Brady doing that when another team is about to score
a touchdown in an AFC championship game? Or Manning? Even
Roethlisberger, who is basically an overgrown frat boy, has more pride
in his craft than Sanchez. Sanchez is one of the many things that
separates the two teams. Class, maturity, focus, dignity,
professionalism.)
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:20 am
From: Drumrboy
On Jan 24, 10:43 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKGu2n6914M&NR=1
>
> Something made me laugh.
Yup, all class. His parents must be so proud...
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:25 am
From: John C TX
X-No-Archive: Yes
> I saw that and laughed. At him, mostly.
You think that's funny? Look down when you pee.
>
> (Can you imagine Brady doing that when another team is about to score
> a touchdown in an AFC championship game? Or Manning? Even
> Roethlisberger, who is basically an overgrown frat boy, has more pride
> in his craft than Sanchez. Sanchez is one of the many things that
> separates the two teams. Class, maturity, focus, dignity,
> professionalism.)
You gather all that from a guy wiping a booger on another. You are an
idiot.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Namath drunk again
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/cbe70533b3797bc0?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:54 am
From: DIet Plan <1of9@kaxy.com>
tells rex`s ho...i wanna kizz you !
==============================================================================
TOPIC: 42 years and only one ...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/9954d99b021c2269?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 7:55 am
From: Wabenzi Prince
On 1/24/2011 8:32 AM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
> "Tipper Dan"<tipperdan@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:26534-4D3D7A86-2562@storefull-3111.bay.webtv.net...
>> 42 years and only one lonely division banner (1998). WOW!
>>
>
> missed superbowl 3?
>
>
do a little research ray, dahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Reverting?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/1b213f8d8e4107ee?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:03 am
From: Beiselbub©
On Jan 23, 5:34 pm, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "cd" <c...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> news:68d1ad4d-d8d9-4c35-9416-f10d6d95972d@e4g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Guess, winning the toss and choosing to defer is the start. Thought
> > getting Sanchez a chance to get comfortable would've been good. I
> > don't know what to say about the Jet D.
>
> defering is a fad that 9 minute opening drives will end.
Very true, Ray. (If you remember, Rex talked tough all week about
deferring a week earlier when they played the Pats, but in the end, he
took the ball.)
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:10 am
From: Coach Lon
Deferring is highly over rated. You would think he could have read his own guys before the game - Mark certainly would have been fine, but not after sitting on the bench for near 18 minutes of real time. It was the worst possible way for the game to start yesterday, with an outcome that seemed obvious. The fact that they made it a game in the end shows how wrong it was to go that route. Here's hoping Rex changes his mind next season on this issue.
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:22 am
From: Beiselbub©
On Jan 24, 9:10 am, Coach Lon <coach...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Deferring is highly over rated. You would think he could have read his own guys before the game - Mark certainly would have been fine, but not after sitting on the bench for near 18 minutes of real time. It was the worst possible way for the game to start yesterday, with an outcome that seemed obvious. The fact that they made it a game in the end shows how wrong it was to go that route. Here's hoping Rex changes his mind next season on this issue.
I think that opening drive took any life that the Jets had right out
of them. Still, the Jets are a defensive team, and as such, you have
to make stops. It's not like they weren't on the field. They couldn't
make a stop in the first half. They are a team that relies on
emotion, and they spent all they had the week before against the
Pats. I'm not sure it would have made any difference if they got the
ball first, to be honest.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: A group prayer...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/33d7b1b722a0fcc7?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:04 am
From: Beiselbub©
On Jan 23, 3:29 pm, buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> Watchin' the NFC game... I'm not impressed.
That's how I felt about the Jets all year.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: 49ers better then Jets and we pick higher
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/33032502aa057bfd?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:12 am
From: "RävNsfän ®"
"Husky" <cynsguy@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7c6bfbac-057b-4710-b88f-6870f8710cb5@s5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 23, 11:02 pm, Swami <swamiti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey, asshole Jet fans how did that Rex Ryan bus Superbowl thing work
> our for ya? Once again a fat assed Ryan has failed. LOOOOOOOSERS!!!
> Go niners 5 time Superbowl champions..
> Just where are the fucking 49ers going, you fucking moron? Back to
my fag bar, pussy.
>
>
Q- How did husky the lardass find out his dad is gay?
A- He tasted shit on his dick.
~ Drew
"Talk is cheap, ...lets go play"
Johnny Unitas - Baltimore Colts
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Thanks so much to all you scum bag trolls...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/7821c8c6dc75e1ad?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 8:27 am
From: TJM
On 1/24/2011 5:28 AM, Percy Flage wrote:
> On Jan 24, 4:53 am, Johnny Morongo
> <j.mireh...@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote:
>> I needed to laugh at something tonight, and your inspired posts are so
>> ridiculously stupid that we Jet fans have to laugh. So please do keep
>> it up.
>
> Troll ratio is directly proportional to team success. Enjoy it!
>
> --
> Percy Flage
my dick is too short to worry about trolls.
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en