Monday, February 14, 2011

Medarticles need an article

Buzz It
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7641708

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

home gyms | Home Gym - the Best Alternative You Can Get

Buzz It

Buy home gyms in our shop.



Home Gym - the Best Alternative You Can Get In order to build muscle and reach fitness goals with home gym, you'll find comprehensive training programs based on your individual home gym fitness goals and access to strength training equipment in your home gym. These programs can be found online videos or DVDs. You can also download the home gym training to your mobile phone or MP3 player.

Many
Read more here

Source: http://buyallonline.com/

Re: Medarticles book need

Buzz It
Dear Ms. S. Priya,

that book was not available.

suggesting an alternative.

Pharmacognosy and Pharmaco-biotechnology, Second Revised and Expanded Edition


by:  Ashutosh Kar

http://ifile.it/w3fi1r5/_a7cE6uSj.7z
archive password: gigapedia.com

hope it may help.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:25 AM, selva priya <selvidec_7@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
hi can anyone get me the following book

Textbook of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry  By Biren Shah

thanks in advance

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.



--
Best wishes and regards,

pvk

---------  ---------  ---------
Parijat Kanetkar
Senior Research Fellow (Biotechnology)
Food Engineering & Technology Dept. (FETD)
Institute of Chemical Technology (ICT) (formerly UDCT)
Matunga
Mumbai - 400 019
Tel. No. (Lab)    +91-22-3361 2530
             ( Cell)   +91-93222 40599
Email - parijatkanetkar@gmail.com
           ft06pv.kanetkar@ictmumbai.edu.in
           http://twitter.com/parijatvk

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

Medarticles book need

Buzz It
hi can anyone get me the following book

Textbook of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry  By Biren Shah

thanks in advance

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

Re: Medarticles need an article

Buzz It
thank u so much

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:18 AM, anandkumarreddy <anandkumarreddy@gmail.com> wrote:
Your ovid article enclos


On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Dinesh Tiwari <dtri2005@gmail.com> wrote:
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=20216837

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.

http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe

You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

--
You can edit your Group Email settings by visiting the following link.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/medarticles/subscribe
 
You can choose abridged email or digest email so that you will receive only one email per day.

[socialactionfoundationforequity:13341 India: Judicial harassment against Mr. Julfikar Ali of MASUM

Buzz It
Friend
Please support the appeal.
Kirity

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Observatory urgent appeals <Appeals@fidh-omct.org>
Date: 14 February 2011 22:32
Subject: The Observatory: India: Judicial harassment against Mr. Julfikar Ali
To: Inde - MASUM - Kirity Roy <kirityroy@gmail.com>


URGENT APPEAL - THE OBSERVATORY

 

IND 001 / 0211 / OBS 018

Judicial harassment

India

February 14, 2011

 

The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a joint programme of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), requests your urgent intervention in the following situation in India.

 

Description of the situation:

 

The Observatory has been informed by Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM) about the judicial harassment against Mr. Julfikar Ali, a District Human Rights Monitor of MASUM in the Murshidabad District.

 

According to the information received, the Murshidabad District Court heard today Mr. Julfikar Ali's petition for anticipatory bail[1] for a case filed against him on February 16, 2008 (see footnote). At the hearing, the District & Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail on condition of a bond of 5,000 Indian Rupees (about 82 euros).

 

On February 11, 2011, the District Court granted another anticipatory bail to Mr. Ali with a bond of 3,000 Indian Rupees (about 49 euros) for another case filed against him on January 12, 2008.

 

The two criminal cases filed against him had been registered early 2008 by senior officials of the Border Security Force (BSF) Officers at Raninagar Police Station. Mr. Julfikar Ali has been subjected to continuous acts of harassment, intimidation and persecution by the Border Security Force (BSF), as consequence of his reports describing acts of torture and firings by BSF.

 

On 2 January 2011, around 10 a.m., an unidentified policeman in plain clothes arrived at Mr. Julfikar Ali's house and told his family members present in the house that an arrest warrant was pending against him, accusing him, among other things, of "rioting", "unlawful assembly" and "attempt to murder". His family continued to receive visits of policemen, asking for the whereabouts of Mr. Julfikar Ali. The visits reportedly increased considerably after Mr. Julfikar Ali's met with the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders, on 13 January 2011, during her country visit to India. Under pressure of the aforementioned visits of policemen, Mr. Ali surrendered himself to the District Court on February 11, 2011 with the petitions for the anticipatory bail that were granted on February 11 and then on February 14, regarding the two cases filed against him.

 

The Observatory condemns the judicial harassment against Mr. Julfikar Ali which seems to merely aim at sanctioning his human rights activities and urges the Indian authorities to guarantee in all circumstances his physical and psychological integrity and to put an immediate end to the judicial harassment against him by dismissing the charges that are still pending in the framework of the two criminal cases mentioned above. The Observatory recalls that cooperation of individuals and groups with the United Nations human rights mechanisms shall not be followed by any kind of reprisals[2].

 

Actions requested:

 

Please write to the authorities of India, urging them to:

 

i.      Guarantee in all circumstances the physical and psychological integrity of Mr. Julfikar Ali, as well as of all human rights defenders in India;

 

ii.     Put an end to any acts of harassment - including at the judicial level - against Mr. Julfikar Ali, and more generally against all human rights defenders in India so that they are able to carry out their work without hindrances and fear of reprisals;

 

iii.    Comply with all the provisions of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, in particular with its:

·         Article 1, which provides that "everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to promote and to strive for the protection and realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels"

·         Article 6(b), which establishes that "everyone has the right, individually or in association with others, as provided for in human rights and other applicable international instruments, freely to publish, impart or disseminate to others, views, information and knowledge on all human rights and fundamental freedoms"

·         Article 12.2 ("the State shall take all necessary measures to ensure the protection by the competent authorities of everyone, individually and in association with others, against any violence, threats, retaliation, de facto or de jure adverse discrimination, pressure or any other arbitrary action as a consequence of his or her legitimate exercise of the rights referred to in the present Declaration");

 

iv.    More generally, ensure in all circumstances the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in accordance with in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international and regional human rights instruments ratified by India.

 

Addresses:

 

·         Shri Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, Prime Minister's Office, Room number 152, South Block, New Delhi, Fax: + 91 11 2301 6857 E-mal: pmosb@pmo.nic.in

·         Dr. P. Chidambaram, Union Minister of Home Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, 104-107 North Block, New Delhi 110 001 India, Fax: +91 11 2309 2979. hm@nic.in

·         Justice Kapadia, Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court, Tilak Marg, New Delhi -1, Fax: +91 11 233 83792, Email: supremecourt@nic.in

·         Justice K. G. Balkrishnan, Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission of India, Faridkot House, Copernicus Marg, New Delhi 110 001, Tel: +91 11 230 74448, Fax: +91 11 2334 0016, Email: covdnhrc@nic.in ; ionhrc@nic.in

·         Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative to the United Nations (Geneva), Rue du Valais 9, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland. Tel: +41 22 906 86 86, Fax: +41 22 906 86 96, Email: mission.india@ties.itu.int

·         Embassy of India in Brussels, 217 Chaussée de Vleurgat, 1050 Brussels, Belgium, Fax: +32 (0)2 6489638 or +32 (0)2 6451869

 

Please also write to the diplomatic representations of India in your respective countries.

 

***

Geneva-Paris, February 14, 2011

 

Kindly inform us of any action undertaken quoting the code of this appeal in your reply.

 

The Observatory, a FIDH and OMCT venture, is dedicated to the protection of Human Rights Defenders and aims to offer them concrete support in their time of need.

 

To contact the Observatory, call the emergency line:

· Email: Appeals@fidh-omct.org

· Tel and fax FIDH: +33 (0) 1 43 55 25 18 / 01 43 55 18 80

·Tel and fax OMCT: + 41 22 809 49 39 / 41 22 809 49 29

 

 



[1] Under Indian criminal law, there is a provision for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. When any person has reason to believe that s/he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence, s/he may apply to the High Court or the Court of Session for a direction under this section, and that Court may direct that in the event of such arrest s/he shall be released on bail.

[2] See the Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on the cooperation with the United Nations, its representatives and mechanisms in the field of human rights, A/HRC/RES/12/2, October 12, 2009.




--
Kirity Roy
Secretary
Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha
(MASUM)
&
National Convenor (PACTI)
Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity
40A, Barabagan Lane (4th Floor)
Balaji Place
Shibtala
Srirampur
Hooghly
PIN- 712203
Fax - +91-33-26220843
Phone- +91-33-26220844 / 0845
e. mail : kirityroy@gmail.com
Web: www.masum.org.in

--
Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to his own view of truth. - Mohandas Gandhi
 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SAFE - Social Action Foundation for Equity" group.
To post to this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
socialactionfoundationforequity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/socialactionfoundationforequity?hl=en?hl=en-GB

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets - 25 new messages in 6 topics - digest

Buzz It
alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Follow Up On Sanchez and Girl - 16 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/84193efd0e4baf87?hl=en
* Sanchez and Underaged Girll - 4 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e181700afafd27fa?hl=en
* Callahan Denied - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e1c8bfae1782d6b7?hl=en
* Leonhard? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6224fe9ec186cae0?hl=en
* Didn't waste my evening watching but - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/dff436c2c842b30c?hl=en
* Yippie!!! NY STATE LAW!!!! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/19b2d6c7d75a9484?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Follow Up On Sanchez and Girl
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/84193efd0e4baf87?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 2:59 pm
From: marcman


On Feb 14, 3:43 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> marcman wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 8:32 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 8, 8:25 pm, marcman <marcmanstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 8, 6:47 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 8, 6:22 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 8, 5:45 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > She is of legal age of consent, that's all that
> > > > > > > > > > matters.
>
> > > > > > > > > Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old
> > > > > > > > > daughter.
>
> > > > > > > > My wife and I have no children, never liked them never
> > > > > > > > will. But all the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez. The
> > > > > > > > girl has her share of blame/ responsibility also. Her
> > > > > > > > parents are also to be held accountable in their failure
> > > > > > > > to teach her proper values.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Her parents must also be proud to have a slut for a
> > > > > > > > > > daughter. I would have said whore but whores get paid.
>
> > > > > > > > > Right, blame the High School student not the 24 year
> > > > > > > > > old ADULT.  Gotcha
>
> > > > > > > > Both are at fault genius. Him for making a poor choice
> > > > > > > > and her for being a slut.
>
> > > > > > > You conveniently leave out the fact that this is the SECOND
> > > > > > > time this creepy fuck has been accused of a sexual
> > > > > > > "misunderstanding".
>
> > > > > > > See a pattern here, Dick? She's a CHILD, you fucking dolt.
> > > > > > > She doesn't know better. You sticking up for a 24 year old
> > > > > > > man fucking a high school senior is fucking sad. Thank God
> > > > > > > you don't have kids. If that was my daughter that fuck
> > > > > > > would be picking up his teeth at best, dead, if he dared
> > > > > > > put up a fight.
>
> > > > > > > Where there's smoke there's fire. And calling a high
> > > > > > > schooler a "slut" doesn't make your boy any less creepy.
> > > > > > > Can't the creepy fuck find some his own age?
>
> > > > > > > Maybe an adult is smart enough to stay away from this
> > > > > > > douche.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > Listen you complete and total idiot, I agree that Sanchez has
> > > > > > a problem but he did nothing wrong according to the law. In
> > > > > > NYS a person can give sexual consent at the age of 17. It
> > > > > > doesn't matter if he or she has sex with a 24 or a 60 year
> > > > > > old, no law was broken. She is NOT a child under the laws of
> > > > > > NYS. I hate when people use that excuse! At 17 even 16 a
> > > > > > person knows right from wrong, stupid from smart and should
> > > > > > be held accountable for their own actions. As a retired
> > > > > > police officer I dealt with a whole bunch of "children" that
> > > > > > people said "oh they are just kids" and later on have been
> > > > > > arrested for assault, robbery, prostitution and so on. These
> > > > > > "children" will only learn when they along with their parents
> > > > > > are held  accountable for their actions and pay the hefty
> > > > > > price. Bottom line is she is NOT a child, no law was broken
> > > > > > and there is nothing you can do to dispute that.
>
> > > > > So, legally, can she vote? Drink alcoholic beverages? Buy
> > > > > cigatettes?  Gamble in a casino? Enter into legal binding
> > > > > contact, like financing a car?
>
> > > > > What? No, she can't you say?
>
> > > > > Why do you think that is, jackass?
>
> > > > You forgot about having sex. Legally, she can have sex with
> > > > anybody she chooses. (Not to even mention that she didn't have
> > > > sex with Sanchez). I'm not so sure exactly what you're so up in
> > > > arms about, but if anybody's at fault here, it's the young
> > > > woman's parents.
>
> > > > I'll now leave you so you can back to your very entertaining
> > > > Internet psycho meltdown.
>
> > > LOL!!!
>
> > You're threats of physical violence is the smoke behind the fire of
> > your insanity.
>
> > Just sayin' . . .
>
> You scumbags who think it's cool that Sanchez took advantage of a
> teenager,

Take it up with your Congressman, she's a consenting adult.

> well you're just lucky you can safely post this bullshit from
> behind a keyboard. If you all that are condoning this bullshit by
> Sanchez said these things in a room full of REAL MEN, you'd get the
> beatdown you all deserve. Fucking creeps.
>
> --

LOL! Says the Internet tough guy!


== 2 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:09 pm
From: Michael


On Feb 14, 3:49 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > On Feb 11, 3:48 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 8, 8:38 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Sanchez is not 65 years old.  Like it or not, there is not a huge
> > > > maturaty gap between a 17-19 year old girl and a 24 year old man.
>
> > > Uh yes there is a giant difference between 24 and 17. Seven years
> > > is a large fraction of your lifetime at that age. Look at the words
> > > you described the people with - man and girl.
>
> > > At 17 I was a High School student just fooling around. By the time I
> > > was 24 I had a Master's degree, a wife, and was working on a PhD.
>
> > "I was " " I was" "I was"
>
> > Yeah... That's you.
>
> > The girl is legally an ADULT.
>
> Fucking creep.
>
> There is a practical five year
>
> > difference between Sanchez and the girl. So what? May people are
> > mature sooner than others.
>
> Wow! Is this how you tell yourself that child rape is ok?
> She wanted it.
>
> What a fucking creep you are.
>
>  Although you may not have figured out how
>
> > to take a pair of panties off of a girl until you had your Masters
> > degree, others are not that far behind the curve.
>
> He's in the limelight asshole. You'd think he'd be smart enough to date
> a WOMAN, over the age of 21. But those don't appeal to him. Underage
> girls do. Like they surely must with you, pedophile.
>
>  We don't have
>
> > temple law here or sharia law.
>
> No, fucktard. We have the law of the land. And the law of the land says
> this is creepy.
>
>  People died to make sure screw balls
>
> > could not foist there view of morality on to others.
>
> OMG. People died so that Sanchez could take advantage of a teenager.
> Do you even realize how creepy that sounds?
>
>   I do a lot of
>
> > freelance advertising work along with my regular day job.   One of the
> > creative directors for an ad agency I do some work for has an 18 y/o
> > daughter.  She is starting her first year at NYU.  She is a model.
> > She show's herself off for money.  Her father is far from violent
> > about it.  He is very proud of her and respects her.
>
> Wow! So you and him are both creeps. Way to make your point, creepy.
>
> Fucking idiots. Morons like you can;t let children be children. You
> can't let them have their childhood. You have to take it away like it
> was taken from you. There's LEGAL and then there's RIGHT and JUST.
>
> you're a PORNOGRAPHER. Period.
>
> --- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

you wont find the help that you need here


== 3 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:10 pm
From: Drumrboy


On Feb 14, 3:36 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> Ritchie wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > She is of legal age of consent, that's all that matters.
>
> > > Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old daughter.
>
> > My wife and I have no children, never liked them never will. But all
> > the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez. The girl has her share of blame/
> > responsibility also.
>
> The whole concept of someone older and wiser taking advantage of
> someone who is not... is completely LOST on you.
>
> Thank fucking David Koresh that you and your butt ugly wife never
> procreated.

Who cares, maybe we can get Dirty Harry to post a picture of his
wife's fake tits.

After all, any one who stoops to fake tits must be a slut and would
want us all to see them anyway.


== 4 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:12 pm
From: Drumrboy


On Feb 14, 3:38 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> Ritchie wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 8, 6:47 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 8, 6:22 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 8, 5:45 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > She is of legal age of consent, that's all that matters.
>
> > > > > > > Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old daughter.
>
> > > > > > My wife and I have no children, never liked them never will.
> > > > > > But all the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez. The girl has
> > > > > > her share of blame/ responsibility also. Her parents are also
> > > > > > to be held accountable in their failure to teach her proper
> > > > > > values.
>
> > > > > > > > Her parents must also be proud to have a slut for a
> > > > > > > > daughter. I would have said whore but whores get paid.
>
> > > > > > > Right, blame the High School student not the 24 year old
> > > > > > > ADULT.  Gotcha
>
> > > > > > Both are at fault genius. Him for making a poor choice and
> > > > > > her for being a slut.
>
> > > > > You conveniently leave out the fact that this is the SECOND
> > > > > time this creepy fuck has been accused of a sexual
> > > > > "misunderstanding".
>
> > > > > See a pattern here, Dick? She's a CHILD, you fucking dolt. She
> > > > > doesn't know better. You sticking up for a 24 year old man
> > > > > fucking a high school senior is fucking sad. Thank God you
> > > > > don't have kids. If that was my daughter that fuck would be
> > > > > picking up his teeth at best, dead, if he dared put up a fight.
>
> > > > > Where there's smoke there's fire. And calling a high schooler a
> > > > > "slut" doesn't make your boy any less creepy. Can't the creepy
> > > > > fuck find some his own age?
>
> > > > > Maybe an adult is smart enough to stay away from this douche.-
> > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > Listen you complete and total idiot, I agree that Sanchez has a
> > > > problem but he did nothing wrong according to the law. In NYS a
> > > > person can give sexual consent at the age of 17. It doesn't
> > > > matter if he or she has sex with a 24 or a 60 year old, no law
> > > > was broken. She is NOT a child under the laws of NYS. I hate when
> > > > people use that excuse! At 17 even 16 a person knows right from
> > > > wrong, stupid from smart and should be held accountable for their
> > > > own actions. As a retired police officer I dealt with a whole
> > > > bunch of "children" that people said "oh they are just kids" and
> > > > later on have been arrested for assault, robbery, prostitution
> > > > and so on. These "children" will only learn when they along with
> > > > their parents are held  accountable for their actions and pay the
> > > > hefty price. Bottom line is she is NOT a child, no law was broken
> > > > and there is nothing you can do to dispute that.
>
> > > So, legally, can she vote? Drink alcoholic beverages? Buy
> > > cigatettes?  Gamble in a casino? Enter into legal binding contact,
> > > like financing a car?
>
> > > What? No, she can't you say?
>
> > > Why do you think that is, jackass?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > She can still give consent moron and that's the bottom line jerk off,
> > goodbye.
>
> Nah. The bottom line is that you're a fucking creep and an excuse maker
> for rapists and pedophiles.
>
Don't forget a douche that brags about his "murders".


== 5 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:17 pm
From: Drumrboy


On Feb 14, 3:49 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > On Feb 11, 3:48 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 8, 8:38 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Sanchez is not 65 years old.  Like it or not, there is not a huge
> > > > maturaty gap between a 17-19 year old girl and a 24 year old man.
>
> > > Uh yes there is a giant difference between 24 and 17. Seven years
> > > is a large fraction of your lifetime at that age. Look at the words
> > > you described the people with - man and girl.
>
> > > At 17 I was a High School student just fooling around. By the time I
> > > was 24 I had a Master's degree, a wife, and was working on a PhD.
>
> > "I was " " I was" "I was"
>
> > Yeah... That's you.
>
> > The girl is legally an ADULT.
>
> Fucking creep.
>
> There is a practical five year
>
> > difference between Sanchez and the girl. So what? May people are
> > mature sooner than others.
>
> Wow! Is this how you tell yourself that child rape is ok?
> She wanted it.
>
> What a fucking creep you are.
>
>  Although you may not have figured out how
>
> > to take a pair of panties off of a girl until you had your Masters
> > degree, others are not that far behind the curve.
>
> He's in the limelight asshole. You'd think he'd be smart enough to date
> a WOMAN, over the age of 21. But those don't appeal to him. Underage
> girls do. Like they surely must with you, pedophile.
>
>  We don't have
>
> > temple law here or sharia law.
>
> No, fucktard. We have the law of the land. And the law of the land says
> this is creepy.
>
>  People died to make sure screw balls
>
> > could not foist there view of morality on to others.
>
> OMG. People died so that Sanchez could take advantage of a teenager.
> Do you even realize how creepy that sounds?
>
>   I do a lot of
>
> > freelance advertising work along with my regular day job.   One of the
> > creative directors for an ad agency I do some work for has an 18 y/o
> > daughter.  She is starting her first year at NYU.  She is a model.
> > She show's herself off for money.  Her father is far from violent
> > about it.  He is very proud of her and respects her.
>
> Wow! So you and him are both creeps. Way to make your point, creepy.
>
> Fucking idiots. Morons like you can;t let children be children. You
> can't let them have their childhood. You have to take it away like it
> was taken from you. There's LEGAL and then there's RIGHT and JUST.
>
> you're a PORNOGRAPHER. Period.
>
These are the same creepy fucks that said Rothlessnessburger did
anything wrong.


== 6 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 4:59 pm
From: Deadmeat


On 2/14/2011 5:59 PM, marcman wrote:
> On Feb 14, 3:40 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
>> marcman wrote:
>>> On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 8, 6:47 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Feb 8, 6:22 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On Feb 8, 5:45 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> She is of legal age of consent, that's all that matters.
>>
>>>>>>>> Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old daughter.
>>
>>>>>>> My wife and I have no children, never liked them never will.
>>>>>>> But all the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez. The girl has
>>>>>>> her share of blame/ responsibility also. Her parents are also
>>>>>>> to be held accountable in their failure to teach her proper
>>>>>>> values.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Her parents must also be proud to have a slut for a
>>>>>>>>> daughter. I would have said whore but whores get paid.
>>
>>>>>>>> Right, blame the High School student not the 24 year old
>>>>>>>> ADULT. Gotcha
>>
>>>>>>> Both are at fault genius. Him for making a poor choice and
>>>>>>> her for being a slut.
>>
>>>>>> You conveniently leave out the fact that this is the SECOND
>>>>>> time this creepy fuck has been accused of a sexual
>>>>>> "misunderstanding".
>>
>>>>>> See a pattern here, Dick? She's a CHILD, you fucking dolt. She
>>>>>> doesn't know better. You sticking up for a 24 year old man
>>>>>> fucking a high school senior is fucking sad. Thank God you
>>>>>> don't have kids. If that was my daughter that fuck would be
>>>>>> picking up his teeth at best, dead, if he dared put up a fight.
>>
>>>>>> Where there's smoke there's fire. And calling a high schooler a
>>>>>> "slut" doesn't make your boy any less creepy. Can't the creepy
>>>>>> fuck find some his own age?
>>
>>>>>> Maybe an adult is smart enough to stay away from this douche.-
>>>>>> Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>>>> Listen you complete and total idiot, I agree that Sanchez has a
>>>>> problem but he did nothing wrong according to the law. In NYS a
>>>>> person can give sexual consent at the age of 17. It doesn't
>>>>> matter if he or she has sex with a 24 or a 60 year old, no law
>>>>> was broken. She is NOT a child under the laws of NYS. I hate when
>>>>> people use that excuse! At 17 even 16 a person knows right from
>>>>> wrong, stupid from smart and should be held accountable for their
>>>>> own actions. As a retired police officer I dealt with a whole
>>>>> bunch of "children" that people said "oh they are just kids" and
>>>>> later on have been arrested for assault, robbery, prostitution
>>>>> and so on. These "children" will only learn when they along with
>>>>> their parents are held accountable for their actions and pay the
>>>>> hefty price. Bottom line is she is NOT a child, no law was broken
>>>>> and there is nothing you can do to dispute that.
>>
>>>> So, legally, can she vote? Drink alcoholic beverages? Buy
>>>> cigatettes? Gamble in a casino? Enter into legal binding contact,
>>>> like financing a car?
>>
>>>> What? No, she can't you say?
>>
>>>> Why do you think that is, jackass?
>>
>>> You forgot about having sex. Legally, she can have sex with anybody
>>> she chooses. (Not to even mention that she didn't have sex with
>>> Sanchez). I'm not so sure exactly what you're so up in arms about, but
>>> if anybody's at fault here, it's the young woman's parents.
>>
>>> I'll now leave you so you can back to your very entertaining Internet
>>> psycho meltdown.
>>
>> Bullshit. You fucking creeps with your selective morality and your
>> excuse making for horrible behavior. And blame HER parents? That's a
>> hoot. Is it any wonder why our country is circling the drain, with
>> idiots like you and your scumbag buddies making excuses for a fellow
>> scumbag like Sanchez?
>>
>> --
>
> No excuses need be made, he did nothing wrong.


I don't know why you bother to deal with these idiots. If it wasn't a
jet QB, and believe me I hate the jets as well, they wouldn't give two
shits about the case.

You're right, he didn't do anything wrong.


== 7 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 6:20 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


Deadmeat wrote:

> On 2/14/2011 5:59 PM, marcman wrote:
> > On Feb 14, 3:40 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> ><doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > > marcman wrote:
> >>>On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>On Feb 8, 6:47 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >>>>>On Feb 8, 6:22 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >>>>>>On Feb 8, 5:45 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >>>>>>>On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > She is of legal age of consent, that's all that
> > > > > > > > > > matters.
> > >
> > > > > > > > > Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old
> > > > > > > > > daughter.
> > >
> > > > > > > > My wife and I have no children, never liked them never
> > > > > > > > will. But all the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez.
> > > > > > > > The girl has her share of blame/ responsibility also.
> > > > > > > > Her parents are also to be held accountable in their
> > > > > > > > failure to teach her proper values.
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > Her parents must also be proud to have a slut for a
> > > > > > > > > > daughter. I would have said whore but whores get
> > > > > > > > > > paid.
> > >
> > > > > > > > > Right, blame the High School student not the 24 year
> > > > > > > > > old ADULT. Gotcha
> > >
> > > > > > > > Both are at fault genius. Him for making a poor choice
> > > > > > > > and her for being a slut.
> > >
> > > > > > > You conveniently leave out the fact that this is the
> > > > > > > SECOND time this creepy fuck has been accused of a sexual
> > > > > > > "misunderstanding".
> > >
> > > > > > > See a pattern here, Dick? She's a CHILD, you fucking
> > > > > > > dolt. She doesn't know better. You sticking up for a 24
> > > > > > > year old man fucking a high school senior is fucking sad.
> > > > > > > Thank God you don't have kids. If that was my daughter
> > > > > > > that fuck would be picking up his teeth at best, dead, if
> > > > > > > he dared put up a fight.
> > >
> > > > > > > Where there's smoke there's fire. And calling a high
> > > > > > > schooler a "slut" doesn't make your boy any less creepy.
> > > > > > > Can't the creepy fuck find some his own age?
> > >
> > > > > > > Maybe an adult is smart enough to stay away from this
> > > > > > > douche.- Hide quoted text -
> > >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> > >
> > > > > > Listen you complete and total idiot, I agree that Sanchez
> > > > > > has a problem but he did nothing wrong according to the
> > > > > > law. In NYS a person can give sexual consent at the age of
> > > > > > 17. It doesn't matter if he or she has sex with a 24 or a
> > > > > > 60 year old, no law was broken. She is NOT a child under
> > > > > > the laws of NYS. I hate when people use that excuse! At 17
> > > > > > even 16 a person knows right from wrong, stupid from smart
> > > > > > and should be held accountable for their own actions. As a
> > > > > > retired police officer I dealt with a whole bunch of
> > > > > > "children" that people said "oh they are just kids" and
> > > > > > later on have been arrested for assault, robbery,
> > > > > > prostitution and so on. These "children" will only learn
> > > > > > when they along with their parents are held accountable
> > > > > > for their actions and pay the hefty price. Bottom line is
> > > > > > she is NOT a child, no law was broken and there is nothing
> > > > > > you can do to dispute that.
> > >
> > > > > So, legally, can she vote? Drink alcoholic beverages? Buy
> > > > > cigatettes? Gamble in a casino? Enter into legal binding
> > > > > contact, like financing a car?
> > >
> > > > > What? No, she can't you say?
> > >
> > > > > Why do you think that is, jackass?
> > >
> > > > You forgot about having sex. Legally, she can have sex with
> > > > anybody she chooses. (Not to even mention that she didn't have
> > > > sex with Sanchez). I'm not so sure exactly what you're so up in
> > > > arms about, but if anybody's at fault here, it's the young
> > > > woman's parents.
> > >
> > > > I'll now leave you so you can back to your very entertaining
> > > > Internet psycho meltdown.
> > >
> > > Bullshit. You fucking creeps with your selective morality and your
> > > excuse making for horrible behavior. And blame HER parents?
> > > That's a hoot. Is it any wonder why our country is circling the
> > > drain, with idiots like you and your scumbag buddies making
> > > excuses for a fellow scumbag like Sanchez?
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > No excuses need be made, he did nothing wrong.
>
>
> I don't know why you bother to deal with these idiots. If it wasn't
> a jet QB, and believe me I hate the jets as well, they wouldn't give
> two shits about the case.
>
> You're right, he didn't do anything wrong.

Right. So your hatred of the Jets makes baby rape ok? Asshole.

It's cool. There are many men out there like you I'm sure, ready to
excuse this sort of thing because in the end run, you're a fucking pedo
as well. Fucking creep.

--

== 8 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 6:21 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


marcman wrote:

> On Feb 14, 3:43 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > marcman wrote:
> > > On Feb 8, 8:32 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 8, 8:25 pm, marcman <marcmanstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Feb 8, 6:47 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Feb 8, 6:22 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 5:45 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > She is of legal age of consent, that's all that
> > > > > > > > > > > matters.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old
> > > > > > > > > > daughter.
> >
> > > > > > > > > My wife and I have no children, never liked them never
> > > > > > > > > will. But all the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez.
> > > > > > > > > The girl has her share of blame/ responsibility also.
> > > > > > > > > Her parents are also to be held accountable in their
> > > > > > > > > failure to teach her proper values.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Her parents must also be proud to have a slut for
> > > > > > > > > > > a daughter. I would have said whore but whores
> > > > > > > > > > > get paid.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Right, blame the High School student not the 24 year
> > > > > > > > > > old ADULT.  Gotcha
> >
> > > > > > > > > Both are at fault genius. Him for making a poor choice
> > > > > > > > > and her for being a slut.
> >
> > > > > > > > You conveniently leave out the fact that this is the
> > > > > > > > SECOND time this creepy fuck has been accused of a
> > > > > > > > sexual "misunderstanding".
> >
> > > > > > > > See a pattern here, Dick? She's a CHILD, you fucking
> > > > > > > > dolt. She doesn't know better. You sticking up for a
> > > > > > > > 24 year old man fucking a high school senior is fucking
> > > > > > > > sad. Thank God you don't have kids. If that was my
> > > > > > > > daughter that fuck would be picking up his teeth at
> > > > > > > > best, dead, if he dared put up a fight.
> >
> > > > > > > > Where there's smoke there's fire. And calling a high
> > > > > > > > schooler a "slut" doesn't make your boy any less creepy.
> > > > > > > > Can't the creepy fuck find some his own age?
> >
> > > > > > > > Maybe an adult is smart enough to stay away from this
> > > > > > > > douche.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > Listen you complete and total idiot, I agree that Sanchez
> > > > > > > has a problem but he did nothing wrong according to the
> > > > > > > law. In NYS a person can give sexual consent at the age
> > > > > > > of 17. It doesn't matter if he or she has sex with a 24
> > > > > > > or a 60 year old, no law was broken. She is NOT a child
> > > > > > > under the laws of NYS. I hate when people use that
> > > > > > > excuse! At 17 even 16 a person knows right from wrong,
> > > > > > > stupid from smart and should be held accountable for
> > > > > > > their own actions. As a retired police officer I dealt
> > > > > > > with a whole bunch of "children" that people said "oh
> > > > > > > they are just kids" and later on have been arrested for
> > > > > > > assault, robbery, prostitution and so on. These
> > > > > > > "children" will only learn when they along with their
> > > > > > > parents are held  accountable for their actions and pay
> > > > > > > the hefty price. Bottom line is she is NOT a child, no
> > > > > > > law was broken and there is nothing you can do to dispute
> > > > > > > that.
> >
> > > > > > So, legally, can she vote? Drink alcoholic beverages? Buy
> > > > > > cigatettes?  Gamble in a casino? Enter into legal binding
> > > > > > contact, like financing a car?
> >
> > > > > > What? No, she can't you say?
> >
> > > > > > Why do you think that is, jackass?
> >
> > > > > You forgot about having sex. Legally, she can have sex with
> > > > > anybody she chooses. (Not to even mention that she didn't have
> > > > > sex with Sanchez). I'm not so sure exactly what you're so up
> > > > > in arms about, but if anybody's at fault here, it's the young
> > > > > woman's parents.
> >
> > > > > I'll now leave you so you can back to your very entertaining
> > > > > Internet psycho meltdown.
> >
> > > > LOL!!!
> >
> > > You're threats of physical violence is the smoke behind the fire
> > > of your insanity.
> >
> > > Just sayin' . . .
> >
> > You scumbags who think it's cool that Sanchez took advantage of a
> > teenager,
>
> Take it up with your Congressman, she's a consenting adult.

More scumbag talk.

>
> > well you're just lucky you can safely post this bullshit from
> > behind a keyboard. If you all that are condoning this bullshit by
> > Sanchez said these things in a room full of REAL MEN, you'd get the
> > beatdown you all deserve. Fucking creeps.
> >
> > --
>
> LOL! Says the Internet tough guy!

lol! It's not about me asshole. Obviously, the point was lost on you
because you have NO IDEA what it mean to be an adult, to be a real man.

--

== 9 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 6:23 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


Michael wrote:

> On Feb 14, 3:49 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > Michael wrote:
> > > On Feb 11, 3:48 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 8, 8:38 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Sanchez is not 65 years old.  Like it or not, there is not a
> > > > > huge maturaty gap between a 17-19 year old girl and a 24 year
> > > > > old man.
> >
> > > > Uh yes there is a giant difference between 24 and 17. Seven
> > > > years is a large fraction of your lifetime at that age. Look at
> > > > the words you described the people with - man and girl.
> >
> > > > At 17 I was a High School student just fooling around. By the
> > > > time I was 24 I had a Master's degree, a wife, and was working
> > > > on a PhD.
> >
> > > "I was " " I was" "I was"
> >
> > > Yeah... That's you.
> >
> > > The girl is legally an ADULT.
> >
> > Fucking creep.
> >
> > There is a practical five year
> >
> > > difference between Sanchez and the girl. So what? May people are
> > > mature sooner than others.
> >
> > Wow! Is this how you tell yourself that child rape is ok?
> > She wanted it.
> >
> > What a fucking creep you are.
> >
> >  Although you may not have figured out how
> >
> > > to take a pair of panties off of a girl until you had your Masters
> > > degree, others are not that far behind the curve.
> >
> > He's in the limelight asshole. You'd think he'd be smart enough to
> > date a WOMAN, over the age of 21. But those don't appeal to him.
> > Underage girls do. Like they surely must with you, pedophile.
> >
> >  We don't have
> >
> > > temple law here or sharia law.
> >
> > No, fucktard. We have the law of the land. And the law of the land
> > says this is creepy.
> >
> >  People died to make sure screw balls
> >
> > > could not foist there view of morality on to others.
> >
> > OMG. People died so that Sanchez could take advantage of a teenager.
> > Do you even realize how creepy that sounds?
> >
> >   I do a lot of
> >
> > > freelance advertising work along with my regular day job.   One
> > > of the creative directors for an ad agency I do some work for has
> > > an 18 y/o daughter.  She is starting her first year at NYU.  She
> > > is a model. She show's herself off for money.  Her father is far
> > > from violent about it.  He is very proud of her and respects her.
> >
> > Wow! So you and him are both creeps. Way to make your point, creepy.
> >
> > Fucking idiots. Morons like you can;t let children be children. You
> > can't let them have their childhood. You have to take it away like
> > it was taken from you. There's LEGAL and then there's RIGHT and
> > JUST.
> >
> > you're a PORNOGRAPHER. Period.
> >
> > --- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> you wont find the help that you need here

Save your shithead psychoanalysis for someone who gives a fuck about
what a lowlife scumbag like you thinks.

--

== 10 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 6:35 pm
From: marcman


On Feb 14, 7:59 pm, Deadmeat <no...@home.com> wrote:
> On 2/14/2011 5:59 PM, marcman wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 14, 3:40 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com>  wrote:
> >> marcman wrote:
> >>> On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 8, 6:47 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Feb 8, 6:22 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Feb 8, 5:45 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> She is of legal age of consent, that's all that matters.
>
> >>>>>>>> Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old daughter.
>
> >>>>>>> My wife and I have no children, never liked them never will.
> >>>>>>> But all the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez. The girl has
> >>>>>>> her share of blame/ responsibility also. Her parents are also
> >>>>>>> to be held accountable in their failure to teach her proper
> >>>>>>> values.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Her parents must also be proud to have a slut for a
> >>>>>>>>> daughter. I would have said whore but whores get paid.
>
> >>>>>>>> Right, blame the High School student not the 24 year old
> >>>>>>>> ADULT.  Gotcha
>
> >>>>>>> Both are at fault genius. Him for making a poor choice and
> >>>>>>> her for being a slut.
>
> >>>>>> You conveniently leave out the fact that this is the SECOND
> >>>>>> time this creepy fuck has been accused of a sexual
> >>>>>> "misunderstanding".
>
> >>>>>> See a pattern here, Dick? She's a CHILD, you fucking dolt. She
> >>>>>> doesn't know better. You sticking up for a 24 year old man
> >>>>>> fucking a high school senior is fucking sad. Thank God you
> >>>>>> don't have kids. If that was my daughter that fuck would be
> >>>>>> picking up his teeth at best, dead, if he dared put up a fight.
>
> >>>>>> Where there's smoke there's fire. And calling a high schooler a
> >>>>>> "slut" doesn't make your boy any less creepy. Can't the creepy
> >>>>>> fuck find some his own age?
>
> >>>>>> Maybe an adult is smart enough to stay away from this douche.-
> >>>>>> Hide quoted text -
>
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >>>>> Listen you complete and total idiot, I agree that Sanchez has a
> >>>>> problem but he did nothing wrong according to the law. In NYS a
> >>>>> person can give sexual consent at the age of 17. It doesn't
> >>>>> matter if he or she has sex with a 24 or a 60 year old, no law
> >>>>> was broken. She is NOT a child under the laws of NYS. I hate when
> >>>>> people use that excuse! At 17 even 16 a person knows right from
> >>>>> wrong, stupid from smart and should be held accountable for their
> >>>>> own actions. As a retired police officer I dealt with a whole
> >>>>> bunch of "children" that people said "oh they are just kids" and
> >>>>> later on have been arrested for assault, robbery, prostitution
> >>>>> and so on. These "children" will only learn when they along with
> >>>>> their parents are held  accountable for their actions and pay the
> >>>>> hefty price. Bottom line is she is NOT a child, no law was broken
> >>>>> and there is nothing you can do to dispute that.
>
> >>>> So, legally, can she vote? Drink alcoholic beverages? Buy
> >>>> cigatettes?  Gamble in a casino? Enter into legal binding contact,
> >>>> like financing a car?
>
> >>>> What? No, she can't you say?
>
> >>>> Why do you think that is, jackass?
>
> >>> You forgot about having sex. Legally, she can have sex with anybody
> >>> she chooses. (Not to even mention that she didn't have sex with
> >>> Sanchez). I'm not so sure exactly what you're so up in arms about, but
> >>> if anybody's at fault here, it's the young woman's parents.
>
> >>> I'll now leave you so you can back to your very entertaining Internet
> >>> psycho meltdown.
>
> >> Bullshit. You fucking creeps with your selective morality and your
> >> excuse making for horrible behavior. And blame HER parents? That's a
> >> hoot. Is it any wonder why our country is circling the drain, with
> >> idiots like you and your scumbag buddies making excuses for a fellow
> >> scumbag like Sanchez?
>
> >> --
>
> > No excuses need be made, he did nothing wrong.
>
> I don't know why you bother to deal with these idiots.

I said my piece, I seriously doubt I'll engage either of these lame
asses again.

>  If it wasn't a
> jet QB, and believe me I hate the jets as well, they wouldn't give two
> shits about the case.
>
> You're right, he didn't do anything wrong.

Well . . . there's the issue of maybe the leader of our team could
maybe make better decisions in general, but as far as the yelling and
screaming these assholes are doing, with all the trigger words like
rape and child, etc., no, he didn't do anything wrong.


== 11 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 6:48 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


marcman wrote:

> On Feb 14, 7:59 pm, Deadmeat <no...@home.com> wrote:
> > On 2/14/2011 5:59 PM, marcman wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 14, 3:40 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com>  wrote:
> > >> marcman wrote:
> > >>> On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > >>>> On Feb 8, 6:47 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> On Feb 8, 6:22 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>> On Feb 8, 5:45 pm, Ritchie<ritchie1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>> On Feb 8, 4:44 pm, Drumrboy<joecsn...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> She is of legal age of consent, that's all that matters.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Really? Apparently you don't have a 17 year old daughter.
> >
> > >>>>>>> My wife and I have no children, never liked them never will.
> > >>>>>>> But all the balm,e cannot be put and Sanchez. The girl has
> > >>>>>>> her share of blame/ responsibility also. Her parents are
> > also >>>>>>> to be held accountable in their failure to teach her
> > proper >>>>>>> values.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> Her parents must also be proud to have a slut for a
> > >>>>>>>>> daughter. I would have said whore but whores get paid.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Right, blame the High School student not the 24 year old
> > >>>>>>>> ADULT.  Gotcha
> >
> > >>>>>>> Both are at fault genius. Him for making a poor choice and
> > >>>>>>> her for being a slut.
> >
> > >>>>>> You conveniently leave out the fact that this is the SECOND
> > >>>>>> time this creepy fuck has been accused of a sexual
> > >>>>>> "misunderstanding".
> >
> > >>>>>> See a pattern here, Dick? She's a CHILD, you fucking dolt.
> > She >>>>>> doesn't know better. You sticking up for a 24 year old
> > man >>>>>> fucking a high school senior is fucking sad. Thank God
> > you >>>>>> don't have kids. If that was my daughter that fuck would
> > be >>>>>> picking up his teeth at best, dead, if he dared put up a
> > fight.
> >
> > >>>>>> Where there's smoke there's fire. And calling a high
> > schooler a >>>>>> "slut" doesn't make your boy any less creepy.
> > Can't the creepy >>>>>> fuck find some his own age?
> >
> > >>>>>> Maybe an adult is smart enough to stay away from this
> > douche.- >>>>>> Hide quoted text -
> >
> > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >
> > >>>>> Listen you complete and total idiot, I agree that Sanchez has
> > a >>>>> problem but he did nothing wrong according to the law. In
> > NYS a >>>>> person can give sexual consent at the age of 17. It
> > doesn't >>>>> matter if he or she has sex with a 24 or a 60 year
> > old, no law >>>>> was broken. She is NOT a child under the laws of
> > NYS. I hate when >>>>> people use that excuse! At 17 even 16 a
> > person knows right from >>>>> wrong, stupid from smart and should
> > be held accountable for their >>>>> own actions. As a retired
> > police officer I dealt with a whole >>>>> bunch of "children" that
> > people said "oh they are just kids" and >>>>> later on have been
> > arrested for assault, robbery, prostitution >>>>> and so on. These
> > "children" will only learn when they along with >>>>> their parents
> > are held  accountable for their actions and pay the >>>>> hefty
> > price. Bottom line is she is NOT a child, no law was broken >>>>>
> > and there is nothing you can do to dispute that.
> >
> > >>>> So, legally, can she vote? Drink alcoholic beverages? Buy
> > >>>> cigatettes?  Gamble in a casino? Enter into legal binding
> > contact, >>>> like financing a car?
> >
> > >>>> What? No, she can't you say?
> >
> > >>>> Why do you think that is, jackass?
> >
> > >>> You forgot about having sex. Legally, she can have sex with
> > anybody >>> she chooses. (Not to even mention that she didn't have
> > sex with >>> Sanchez). I'm not so sure exactly what you're so up in
> > arms about, but >>> if anybody's at fault here, it's the young
> > woman's parents.
> >
> > >>> I'll now leave you so you can back to your very entertaining
> > Internet >>> psycho meltdown.
> >
> > >> Bullshit. You fucking creeps with your selective morality and
> > your >> excuse making for horrible behavior. And blame HER parents?
> > That's a >> hoot. Is it any wonder why our country is circling the
> > drain, with >> idiots like you and your scumbag buddies making
> > excuses for a fellow >> scumbag like Sanchez?
> >
> > >> --
> >
> > > No excuses need be made, he did nothing wrong.
> >
> > I don't know why you bother to deal with these idiots.
>
> I said my piece, I seriously doubt I'll engage either of these lame
> asses again.
>
> >  If it wasn't a
> > jet QB, and believe me I hate the jets as well, they wouldn't give
> > two shits about the case.
> >
> > You're right, he didn't do anything wrong.
>
> Well . . . there's the issue of maybe the leader of our team could
> maybe make better decisions in general, but as far as the yelling and
> screaming these assholes are doing, with all the trigger words like
> rape and child, etc., no, he didn't do anything wrong.

Bullshit. He should date AN ADULT, not a child. THAT is the bottom line.
Fucking excuse makers, the lot of you.

--

== 12 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 6:58 pm
From: Michael


On Feb 14, 9:23 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > On Feb 14, 3:49 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > > Michael wrote:
> > > > On Feb 11, 3:48 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 8, 8:38 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Sanchez is not 65 years old.  Like it or not, there is not a
> > > > > > huge maturaty gap between a 17-19 year old girl and a 24 year
> > > > > > old man.
>
> > > > > Uh yes there is a giant difference between 24 and 17. Seven
> > > > > years is a large fraction of your lifetime at that age. Look at
> > > > > the words you described the people with - man and girl.
>
> > > > > At 17 I was a High School student just fooling around. By the
> > > > > time I was 24 I had a Master's degree, a wife, and was working
> > > > > on a PhD.
>
> > > > "I was " " I was" "I was"
>
> > > > Yeah... That's you.
>
> > > > The girl is legally an ADULT.
>
> > > Fucking creep.
>
> > > There is a practical five year
>
> > > > difference between Sanchez and the girl. So what? May people are
> > > > mature sooner than others.
>
> > > Wow! Is this how you tell yourself that child rape is ok?
> > > She wanted it.
>
> > > What a fucking creep you are.
>
> > >  Although you may not have figured out how
>
> > > > to take a pair of panties off of a girl until you had your Masters
> > > > degree, others are not that far behind the curve.
>
> > > He's in the limelight asshole. You'd think he'd be smart enough to
> > > date a WOMAN, over the age of 21. But those don't appeal to him.
> > > Underage girls do. Like they surely must with you, pedophile.
>
> > >  We don't have
>
> > > > temple law here or sharia law.
>
> > > No, fucktard. We have the law of the land. And the law of the land
> > > says this is creepy.
>
> > >  People died to make sure screw balls
>
> > > > could not foist there view of morality on to others.
>
> > > OMG. People died so that Sanchez could take advantage of a teenager.
> > > Do you even realize how creepy that sounds?
>
> > >   I do a lot of
>
> > > > freelance advertising work along with my regular day job.   One
> > > > of the creative directors for an ad agency I do some work for has
> > > > an 18 y/o daughter.  She is starting her first year at NYU.  She
> > > > is a model.  She show's herself off for money.  Her father is far
> > > > from violent about it.  He is very proud of her and respects her.
>
> > > Wow! So you and him are both creeps. Way to make your point, creepy.
>
> > > Fucking idiots. Morons like you can;t let children be children. You
> > > can't let them have their childhood. You have to take it away like
> > > it was taken from you. There's LEGAL and then there's RIGHT and
> > > JUST.
>
> > > you're a PORNOGRAPHER. Period.
>
> > > --- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > you wont find the help that you need here
>
> Save your shithead psychoanalysis for someone who gives a fuck about
> what a lowlife scumbag like you thinks.
>
> --- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

the psychoanalysis would be for a professional to help you with.


== 13 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 7:20 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


Michael wrote:

> On Feb 14, 9:23 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > Michael wrote:
> > > On Feb 14, 3:49 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > > > Michael wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 11, 3:48 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Feb 8, 8:38 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Sanchez is not 65 years old.  Like it or not, there is
> > > > > > > not a huge maturaty gap between a 17-19 year old girl and
> > > > > > > a 24 year old man.
> >
> > > > > > Uh yes there is a giant difference between 24 and 17. Seven
> > > > > > years is a large fraction of your lifetime at that age.
> > > > > > Look at the words you described the people with - man and
> > > > > > girl.
> >
> > > > > > At 17 I was a High School student just fooling around. By
> > > > > > the time I was 24 I had a Master's degree, a wife, and was
> > > > > > working on a PhD.
> >
> > > > > "I was " " I was" "I was"
> >
> > > > > Yeah... That's you.
> >
> > > > > The girl is legally an ADULT.
> >
> > > > Fucking creep.
> >
> > > > There is a practical five year
> >
> > > > > difference between Sanchez and the girl. So what? May people
> > > > > are mature sooner than others.
> >
> > > > Wow! Is this how you tell yourself that child rape is ok?
> > > > She wanted it.
> >
> > > > What a fucking creep you are.
> >
> > > >  Although you may not have figured out how
> >
> > > > > to take a pair of panties off of a girl until you had your
> > > > > Masters degree, others are not that far behind the curve.
> >
> > > > He's in the limelight asshole. You'd think he'd be smart enough
> > > > to date a WOMAN, over the age of 21. But those don't appeal to
> > > > him. Underage girls do. Like they surely must with you,
> > > > pedophile.
> >
> > > >  We don't have
> >
> > > > > temple law here or sharia law.
> >
> > > > No, fucktard. We have the law of the land. And the law of the
> > > > land says this is creepy.
> >
> > > >  People died to make sure screw balls
> >
> > > > > could not foist there view of morality on to others.
> >
> > > > OMG. People died so that Sanchez could take advantage of a
> > > > teenager. Do you even realize how creepy that sounds?
> >
> > > >   I do a lot of
> >
> > > > > freelance advertising work along with my regular day job.  
> > > > > One of the creative directors for an ad agency I do some work
> > > > > for has an 18 y/o daughter.  She is starting her first year
> > > > > at NYU.  She is a model.  She show's herself off for money.
> > > > >  Her father is far from violent about it.  He is very proud
> > > > > of her and respects her.
> >
> > > > Wow! So you and him are both creeps. Way to make your point,
> > > > creepy.
> >
> > > > Fucking idiots. Morons like you can;t let children be children.
> > > > You can't let them have their childhood. You have to take it
> > > > away like it was taken from you. There's LEGAL and then there's
> > > > RIGHT and JUST.
> >
> > > > you're a PORNOGRAPHER. Period.
> >
> > > > --- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > you wont find the help that you need here
> >
> > Save your shithead psychoanalysis for someone who gives a fuck about
> > what a lowlife scumbag like you thinks.
> >
> > --- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> the psychoanalysis would be for a professional to help you with.

You're an excuse maker for a child rapist and *I* have the problem?

Go ahead, justify yourself and the creepy things you've written within
the context of Sanchez and his child lover. Fucking creeps. I bet you
think NAMBLA has a 'right' to exist too.

--

== 14 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 8:30 pm
From: Michael


On Feb 14, 10:20 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > On Feb 14, 9:23 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > > Michael wrote:
> > > > On Feb 14, 3:49 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > > > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > > > > Michael wrote:
> > > > > > On Feb 11, 3:48 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Feb 8, 8:38 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Sanchez is not 65 years old.  Like it or not, there is
> > > > > > > > not a huge maturaty gap between a 17-19 year old girl and
> > > > > > > > a 24 year old man.
>
> > > > > > > Uh yes there is a giant difference between 24 and 17. Seven
> > > > > > > years is a large fraction of your lifetime at that age.
> > > > > > > Look at the words you described the people with - man and
> > > > > > > girl.
>
> > > > > > > At 17 I was a High School student just fooling around. By
> > > > > > > the time I was 24 I had a Master's degree, a wife, and was
> > > > > > > working on a PhD.
>
> > > > > > "I was " " I was" "I was"
>
> > > > > > Yeah... That's you.
>
> > > > > > The girl is legally an ADULT.
>
> > > > > Fucking creep.
>
> > > > > There is a practical five year
>
> > > > > > difference between Sanchez and the girl. So what? May people
> > > > > > are mature sooner than others.
>
> > > > > Wow! Is this how you tell yourself that child rape is ok?
> > > > > She wanted it.
>
> > > > > What a fucking creep you are.
>
> > > > >  Although you may not have figured out how
>
> > > > > > to take a pair of panties off of a girl until you had your
> > > > > > Masters degree, others are not that far behind the curve.
>
> > > > > He's in the limelight asshole. You'd think he'd be smart enough
> > > > > to date a WOMAN, over the age of 21. But those don't appeal to
> > > > > him.  Underage girls do. Like they surely must with you,
> > > > > pedophile.
>
> > > > >  We don't have
>
> > > > > > temple law here or sharia law.
>
> > > > > No, fucktard. We have the law of the land. And the law of the
> > > > > land says this is creepy.
>
> > > > >  People died to make sure screw balls
>
> > > > > > could not foist there view of morality on to others.
>
> > > > > OMG. People died so that Sanchez could take advantage of a
> > > > > teenager.  Do you even realize how creepy that sounds?
>
> > > > >   I do a lot of
>
> > > > > > freelance advertising work along with my regular day job.  
> > > > > > One of the creative directors for an ad agency I do some work
> > > > > > for has an 18 y/o daughter.  She is starting her first year
> > > > > > at NYU.  She is a model.  She show's herself off for money.
> > > > > >  Her father is far from violent about it.  He is very proud
> > > > > > of her and respects her.
>
> > > > > Wow! So you and him are both creeps. Way to make your point,
> > > > > creepy.
>
> > > > > Fucking idiots. Morons like you can;t let children be children.
> > > > > You can't let them have their childhood. You have to take it
> > > > > away like it was taken from you. There's LEGAL and then there's
> > > > > RIGHT and JUST.
>
> > > > > you're a PORNOGRAPHER. Period.
>
> > > > > --- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > you wont find the help that you need here
>
> > > Save your shithead psychoanalysis for someone who gives a fuck about
> > > what a lowlife scumbag like you thinks.
>
> > > --- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > the psychoanalysis would be for a professional to help you with.
>
> You're an excuse maker for a child rapist and *I* have the problem?
>
> Go ahead, justify yourself and the creepy things you've written within
> the context of Sanchez and his child lover. Fucking creeps. I bet you
> think NAMBLA has a 'right' to exist too.
>
> --- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

if you feel so strongly about the things you have written, why dont
you file a complaint with the police. show your face at a police
station and tell the duty officer that you have knowledge of a "child
rapist" at large. calling Sanchez a "child rapist" in a public forum
is libelist. i'm sure you have some idea of the legal paper you would
be sunk in if you came out of the woodwork with your "complaint". you
would do better to show up at your local community mental heath center
and explain to them that you have decided it is your special province
to viloently crusade against men that date younger women. tell them
that you are compelled to see that such people get the "beat down"
that you have judged that they deserve.


== 15 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 8:59 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


Michael wrote:

> On Feb 14, 10:20 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > Michael wrote:
> > > On Feb 14, 9:23 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > > > Michael wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 14, 3:49 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
> > > > > <doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Michael wrote:
> > > > > > > On Feb 11, 3:48 pm, eric <warth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 8:38 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Sanchez is not 65 years old.  Like it or not, there is
> > > > > > > > > not a huge maturaty gap between a 17-19 year old girl
> > > > > > > > > and a 24 year old man.
> >
> > > > > > > > Uh yes there is a giant difference between 24 and 17.
> > > > > > > > Seven years is a large fraction of your lifetime at
> > > > > > > > that age. Look at the words you described the people
> > > > > > > > with - man and girl.
> >
> > > > > > > > At 17 I was a High School student just fooling around.
> > > > > > > > By the time I was 24 I had a Master's degree, a wife,
> > > > > > > > and was working on a PhD.
> >
> > > > > > > "I was " " I was" "I was"
> >
> > > > > > > Yeah... That's you.
> >
> > > > > > > The girl is legally an ADULT.
> >
> > > > > > Fucking creep.
> >
> > > > > > There is a practical five year
> >
> > > > > > > difference between Sanchez and the girl. So what? May
> > > > > > > people are mature sooner than others.
> >
> > > > > > Wow! Is this how you tell yourself that child rape is ok?
> > > > > > She wanted it.
> >
> > > > > > What a fucking creep you are.
> >
> > > > > >  Although you may not have figured out how
> >
> > > > > > > to take a pair of panties off of a girl until you had your
> > > > > > > Masters degree, others are not that far behind the curve.
> >
> > > > > > He's in the limelight asshole. You'd think he'd be smart
> > > > > > enough to date a WOMAN, over the age of 21. But those don't
> > > > > > appeal to him.  Underage girls do. Like they surely must
> > > > > > with you, pedophile.
> >
> > > > > >  We don't have
> >
> > > > > > > temple law here or sharia law.
> >
> > > > > > No, fucktard. We have the law of the land. And the law of
> > > > > > the land says this is creepy.
> >
> > > > > >  People died to make sure screw balls
> >
> > > > > > > could not foist there view of morality on to others.
> >
> > > > > > OMG. People died so that Sanchez could take advantage of a
> > > > > > teenager.  Do you even realize how creepy that sounds?
> >
> > > > > >   I do a lot of
> >
> > > > > > > freelance advertising work along with my regular day job.
> > > > > > >   One of the creative directors for an ad agency I do
> > > > > > > some work for has an 18 y/o daughter.  She is starting
> > > > > > > her first year at NYU.  She is a model.  She show's
> > > > > > > herself off for money.  Her father is far from violent
> > > > > > > about it.  He is very proud of her and respects her.
> >
> > > > > > Wow! So you and him are both creeps. Way to make your point,
> > > > > > creepy.
> >
> > > > > > Fucking idiots. Morons like you can;t let children be
> > > > > > children. You can't let them have their childhood. You
> > > > > > have to take it away like it was taken from you. There's
> > > > > > LEGAL and then there's RIGHT and JUST.
> >
> > > > > > you're a PORNOGRAPHER. Period.
> >
> > > > > > --- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > you wont find the help that you need here
> >
> > > > Save your shithead psychoanalysis for someone who gives a fuck
> > > > about what a lowlife scumbag like you thinks.
> >
> > > > --- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > the psychoanalysis would be for a professional to help you with.
> >
> > You're an excuse maker for a child rapist and I have the problem?
> >
> > Go ahead, justify yourself and the creepy things you've written
> > within the context of Sanchez and his child lover. Fucking creeps.
> > I bet you think NAMBLA has a 'right' to exist too.
> >
> > --- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> if you feel so strongly about the things you have written, why dont
> you file a complaint with the police. show your face at a police
> station and tell the duty officer that you have knowledge of a "child
> rapist" at large. calling Sanchez a "child rapist" in a public forum
> is libelist. i'm sure you have some idea of the legal paper you

Mark "Dirty" Sanchez is a child rapist. There, I said it clearly, so
that can be no doubt. He's a public figure, dipshit.

Think about that while you're wiping his cum off of your chin, excuse
maker.

What are you gonna do, call the FBI on me??? You and Frod Reject should
get a room.

"legal paper" lmao!!! @ YOU!


== 16 of 16 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 9:09 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


JetsLife wrote:

> On Feb 9, 6:16�pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > On Feb 9, 1:18�pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 9, 12:18�pm, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > <01001338-f2dd-4903-b2bc-1851d577c...@o10g2000vbg.googlegroups.c
> > > > om>,
> >
> > > > �Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 8, 10:33 am, Drumrboy <joecsn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Feb 7, 9:04 am, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Basically it happened in NY so she is of legal age of
> > > > > > > consent, nothing illegal committed. Here is the article:
> >
> > > > > > > fromwww.nydailynews.com-
> >
> > > > > > > A sports blog taking aim at Mark Sanchez says there's
> > > > > > > nothing salacious about the photos taken by a 17-year-old
> > > > > > > girl who says she went home with the Jets quarterback.
> >
> > > > > > > Deadspin.com says it is waiting until Tuesday to post
> > > > > > > pics that the girl took inside Sanchez's bedroom after
> > > > > > > they met on New Year's Eve.
> >
> > > > > > > Blog editor A.J. Daulerio says the photos aren't graphic
> > > > > > > and there wouldn't be anything illegal about the hook-up
> > > > > > > because the teen was of legal age.
> >
> > > > > > > The photos show an unmade bed that the she says is
> > > > > > > Sanchez's and a picture on the bedroom wall that depicts
> > > > > > > Sanchez and his nephew, Daulerio said Sunday.
> >
> > > > > > > The high school senior who contacted the website, claims
> > > > > > > she slept with Sanchez, 24, at his home in the New York
> > > > > > > area.
> >
> > > > > > > She later got cold feet about dishing on the hunky
> > > > > > > quarterback and hired a lawyer, who wrote Deadspin
> > > > > > > warning it not to publish the photos or any details of
> > > > > > > the alleged affair.
> >
> > > > > > > "(The teen) has not engaged in any improper conduct,"
> > > > > > > wrote lawyer Richard Kendall, who warned of further legal
> > > > > > > action.
> >
> > > > > > > The site promptly posted Kendall's letter online, along
> > > > > > > with a promise to reveal more details tomorrow. The Jets
> > > > > > > refused comment on the story and Sanchez couldn't be
> > > > > > > reached.
> >
> > > > > > > Deadspin is the same site that broke the story that Brett
> > > > > > > Favre texted photos of his private parts to Jets hostess
> > > > > > > Jenn Sterger. It also published foot fetish pictures that
> > > > > > > bore a striking resemblance to the wife of Jets Coach Rex
> > > > > > > Ryan.
> >
> > > > > > A high school senior? Sorry, that's fucking creepy. He's 24
> > > > > > years old! His parents must be so proud.- Hide quoted text
> > > > > > -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > She is of legal age of consent, that's all that matters. Her
> > > > > parents must also be proud to have a slut for a daughter. I
> > > > > would have said whore but whores get paid.
> >
> > > > Ritchie, a 17 year old girl who wants to have sex with a
> > > > celebrity who is interested in her may be many things but one
> > > > of them is not necessarily a slut.
> >
> > > > It is a different world out there and having a teenage
> > > > daughter, I find that characterization a reflection of a time
> > > > that I for one am glad is long gone.
> >
> > > > h
> >
> > > Not for me it isn't. To me she is a slut and her parents are
> > > failures in the role. My cousins daughter got pregnant at the age
> > > of 16 and to me that's what she is. I told them not to expect me
> > > to congratulate her or help her in any way. All she and her baby
> > > are now is another welfare slut and her tax payer supported rat.
> > > Parents always say kids make mistakes and my response to that is,
> > > OK but their mistakes shouldn't become a burden on others that
> > > had nothing to do with their mistake. Make the parents take
> > > responsibility for failure to properly raise their child and for
> > > their child's actions.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > why is the girl a slut ??? is any legal adult that has consentual
> > sex out of wedlock a slut ??? the only shame here is the disgusting
> > contemporary pop culure style in which peoples personal information
> > is offerd up to the public as entertinment. �the filth that makes
> > money or garners attention off that crap is the only slut here,
> > IMHO. i'm a bit of an off ball, though... i think breast
> > augmentation is mutaliation and it should be oulawed. �i think
> > tabloid media of any kind is putrid. �sitcoms make me sick to my
> > stomach and so do about 99 % of all the prime time network dramas
> > ever aired on tv. �especially lawyer and cop shows- Hide quoted
> > text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Yet you're feeding the frenzy by paying attention to/discussing the
> story in here.

Yes, it's so much better if we just ignore it and let it go away. Right?


Creepy = YOU.

--


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Sanchez and Underaged Girll
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e181700afafd27fa?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:22 pm
From: Drumrboy


On Feb 14, 3:29 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> JetsLife wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 8:17 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 6:15 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm 1,000% not condoning Sanchez or anyone having sex with a girl
> > > > under 18, but mistakes can happen. If a woman looks older than 18
> > > > and insists she is, in the heat of the moment it may not be a
> > > > guy's first instinct to ask for her ID. Even then it could be a
> > > > fake ID.
>
> > > 18 is not the legal age of consent in a lot of states. In NY it is
> > > 17 and NJ 16. There are other states with different ages of
> > > consent. The real question is where did it occur? I agree with you
> > > on a girl misrepresenting her age but there isn't much a person can
> > > do about that. If she says she is 18 and she is really 15 or 16 the
> > > guy is pretty much screwed even though she lied.
>
> > > > Again I ain't condoning, you gotta be extra careful with young
> > > > women, but mistakes can occur. It's not like Sanchez is some
> > > > 60-yr old scumbag creeping on under-age girls, he's only 24
> > > > himself.
>
> > > > All this said it's Sanchez's responsibility to be careful about
> > > > his behavior. And if he slept with a minor he deserves to be
> > > > prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
>
> > > I agree with this
>
> > > > Regarding the rape charge, it sounds bad. This said, IINM
> > > > practically any female with an axe to grind or whatever can
> > > > accuse someone they've slept with of rape? The lack of evidence
> > > > seems to indicate it was consensual between Sanchez and the girl.
>
> > > Agree with this also
>
> > > > I agree about the circus atmosphere. I don't mind per se if the
> > > > circus stuff is harmless/legal, but anything illegal ain't cool
>
> > > Ditto
>
> > Then we agree.
>
> > If Sanchez knowingly took advantage of a minor he should pay the
> > price.
>
> > Honor is all that matters. The Jets mean nothing
>
> Nah, you wrote "BUT", which cancels out anything else you might want us
> to believe about your selective morals.
>
> Sanchez is a rapist and a pedophile. Geez, foot fetishes and child
> rapists. No wonder the Jets couldn't advance any further, with all of
> those "distractions" huh?
>
You forgot about Cromardies 25 bastard kids.


== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:30 pm
From: Drumrboy


On Feb 7, 3:08 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 1:30 am, Beiselbub© <yank_ees_s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 6, 4:15 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > I'm 1,000% not condoning Sanchez or anyone having sex with a girl
> > > under 18, but mistakes can happen. If a woman looks older than 18 and
> > > insists she is, in the heat of the moment it may not be a guy's first
> > > instinct to ask for her ID. Even then it could be a fake ID.
>
> > > Again I ain't condoning
>
> > LMAO.  That's exactly what you're doing, and the qualifying statement
> > proves it.
>
> No dummy. My post was self explanatory. I said mistakes can occur, and
> that if Sanchez made an illegal mistake he should be prosecuted to the
> fullest extent of the law.

It's not about being "illegal", creepy jackass. Try "immoral".

If this creepy fuck was on any other team, your retarded trolls would
be all over it, so fuck you, you root for a classless organization.
Deal with it.


== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:32 pm
From: Drumrboy


On Feb 14, 3:30 pm, "The Inconvenient Truth"
<doandroidsdr...@electricsheep.com> wrote:
> JetsLife wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 1:30 am, Beiselbub© <yank_ees_s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 4:15 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm 1,000% not condoning Sanchez or anyone having sex with a girl
> > > > under 18, but mistakes can happen. If a woman looks older than 18
> > > > and insists she is, in the heat of the moment it may not be a
> > > > guy's first instinct to ask for her ID. Even then it could be a
> > > > fake ID.
>
> > > > Again I ain't condoning
>
> > > LMAO.  That's exactly what you're doing, and the qualifying
> > > statement proves it.
>
> > No dummy. My post was self explanatory. I said mistakes can occur, and
> > that if Sanchez made an illegal mistake he should be prosecuted to the
> > fullest extent of the law.
>
> Mistakes? Bullshit.
>
> You should mistakenly put a bullet in your head and end the misery.
>
I'm pretty sure this retard DID put a bullet in his head.


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 6:25 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


Drumrboy wrote:

> On Feb 7, 3:08 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 1:30 am, Beiselbub© <yank_ees_s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 6, 4:15 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm 1,000% not condoning Sanchez or anyone having sex with a
> > > > girl under 18, but mistakes can happen. If a woman looks older
> > > > than 18 and insists she is, in the heat of the moment it may
> > > > not be a guy's first instinct to ask for her ID. Even then it
> > > > could be a fake ID.
> >
> > > > Again I ain't condoning
> >
> > > LMAO.  That's exactly what you're doing, and the qualifying
> > > statement proves it.
> >
> > No dummy. My post was self explanatory. I said mistakes can occur,
> > and that if Sanchez made an illegal mistake he should be prosecuted
> > to the fullest extent of the law.
>
> It's not about being "illegal", creepy jackass. Try "immoral".
>
> If this creepy fuck was on any other team, your retarded trolls would
> be all over it, so fuck you, you root for a classless organization.
> Deal with it.

These so-called MEN in here, they are too busy watching kiddie and
beastiality porn to be bothered.

Fucking creeps. All of them.

--


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Callahan Denied
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/e1c8bfae1782d6b7?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 3:55 pm
From: cd


On Feb 14, 4:16 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2:26 pm, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > > I thought it was well known that Schotty was pals with Woody.  That is
> > > where the problem lies.  That is why Schotty was recommended to Rex.
> > > If Rex had the all clear, he would have picked a new OC when he came
> > > to the Jets
>
> > So well know you can't find it when you search?  Could it possibly be
> > so well known because someone assumed it & ran with at a bunch Jet
> > sites? It could also be true.
>
> > Schott was already here when Ryan came in and I don't buy that Schott
> > was crammed down his throat.  If it was a low cost or desperate for a
> > job coach like Mangini, maybe, but Ryan was getting a job that year.
>
> i'm not sure "crammed" is the right word.  more like "recommended".  i
> dont think rex knew that schotty was  going to be a problem.  rex
> probably did not see any reason to object.  that is what i think.  you
> can also figure in that rex is a defensive minded coach and he
> probably saw it as a huge pluss to keep continuity on the offensive
> side of the ball. rex has come to know what jet fans have known.
> schotty is not a very good OC.  at the very least, schotty's offense
> is far from an ideal for sanchez and far from an ideal for a team that
> wants to run... or says it wants to run a no frills running game.
> just my two cents

I took the loss to the Steelers pretty bad, thought this was the most
talented offensive team I could recall. Couldn't even bring myself up
to reading any posts, until the word crossed the wires that Callahan
was denied. There was finally hope, of a Schott free Jets. I think
competence can't be faked and Callahan has shown he can do it, as HC
and was able to swallow his pride to become a line coach. I wonder if
the Ryan twin conveyed something positive about Callahan from the
Raiders staff.

I heard that around the leage, Gruden wasn't thought to be brains of
the offense with Raiders or at Tampa; coordinators ran the show and
that is why Gruden is not getting calls for HC coaching positions.


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 5:16 pm
From: Michael


On Feb 14, 6:55 pm, cd <c...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Feb 14, 4:16 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 14, 2:26 pm, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > > > I thought it was well known that Schotty was pals with Woody.  That is
> > > > where the problem lies.  That is why Schotty was recommended to Rex.
> > > > If Rex had the all clear, he would have picked a new OC when he came
> > > > to the Jets
>
> > > So well know you can't find it when you search?  Could it possibly be
> > > so well known because someone assumed it & ran with at a bunch Jet
> > > sites? It could also be true.
>
> > > Schott was already here when Ryan came in and I don't buy that Schott
> > > was crammed down his throat.  If it was a low cost or desperate for a
> > > job coach like Mangini, maybe, but Ryan was getting a job that year.
>
> > i'm not sure "crammed" is the right word.  more like "recommended".  i
> > dont think rex knew that schotty was  going to be a problem.  rex
> > probably did not see any reason to object.  that is what i think.  you
> > can also figure in that rex is a defensive minded coach and he
> > probably saw it as a huge pluss to keep continuity on the offensive
> > side of the ball. rex has come to know what jet fans have known.
> > schotty is not a very good OC.  at the very least, schotty's offense
> > is far from an ideal for sanchez and far from an ideal for a team that
> > wants to run... or says it wants to run a no frills running game.
> > just my two cents
>
> I took the loss to the Steelers pretty bad, thought this was the most
> talented offensive team I could recall.  Couldn't even bring myself up
> to reading any posts, until the word crossed the wires that Callahan
> was denied.  There was finally hope, of a Schott free Jets.  I think
> competence can't be faked and Callahan has shown he can do it, as HC
> and was able to swallow his pride to become a line coach.  I wonder if
> the Ryan twin conveyed something positive about Callahan from the
> Raiders staff.
>
> I heard that around the leage, Gruden wasn't thought to be brains of
> the offense with Raiders or at Tampa; coordinators ran the show and
> that is why Gruden is not getting calls for HC coaching positions.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I cant say I know much about Gruden, but Callahan has gotten great
results from the Jets O-line. I'd love to see him take over the Jets
offense.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Leonhard?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/6224fe9ec186cae0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 4:04 pm
From: cd


On Feb 13, 5:00 pm, MZ <for...@mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 3:53 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 10, 1:52 pm, MZ <for...@mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 10, 10:58 am, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 3, 9:13 pm, MZ <for...@mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 3, 1:56 pm, JetsLife <JetsL...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 2, 2:24 pm, MZ <for...@mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 2, 11:22 am, "JKConey" <jkco...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >   Anyone think that his loss may have been a lot more important than just
> > > > > > > > another slow, white DB?
>
> > > > > > > > --
>
> > > > > > > >www.myconeyislandmemories.com
>
> > > > > > > Not just because he's a good player, but also because the backups at
> > > > > > > the position were terrible.  This has been one of the issues with the
> > > > > > > Jets as a team the past couple seasons.  They put together a great
> > > > > > > starting lineup, but there have always been depth concerns.  I think
> > > > > > > we all knew that if the injury bug hit there would probably be
> > > > > > > issues.  Tannenbaum needs to stop trading picks away, because they
> > > > > > > need to start putting together a full roster of 53 guys, not 22.
>
> > > > > > Is that so? Facts disprove your assertions.
>
> > > > > > Once Smith & Pool were coached up and settled in as the new starting
> > > > > > tandem, they performed well enough. See their performance in the
> > > > > > playoffs where the pass defense frustrated/slowed down Manning, Brady
> > > > > > and Rberger. If anything, the back-up safeties *were a reason why* the
> > > > > > Jets were in position to make the Super Bowl. Not to mention their
> > > > > > solid play the final few regular season games save Chicago.
>
> > > > > > Regarding your depth assertion, it falls in to a myth perpetuated in
> > > > > > here by some folks. They say depth is a problem, it rebounds around
> > > > > > the echo chamber in here and voila, it's an actual problem. When
> > > > > > factually, it isn't.
>
> > > > > > Depth has not been a problem the past two years: Pouha both years, the
> > > > > > safeties this year, Clemens last year, Slauson last year, Hunter this
> > > > > > year, and other back ups have filled in fairly well thank you very
> > > > > > much.
>
> > > > > > A team doesn't go as far as the Jets have the past two years without
> > > > > > some decent depth. So we see, in point of fact, the Jets depth has
> > > > > > served the team during this time period.
>
> > > > > "A team doesn't go as far as the Jets have the past two years without
> > > > > some decent depth."
>
> > > > > They do if they don't get nailed by injuries.  
>
> > > > Inaccurate. Perhaps no two teams were nailed more by injuries than
> > > > Green Bay and Pittsburgh, in order, and we all know where they ended
> > > > up.
>
> > > That's because they were deep teams.
>
> > Right, and the small piece of actual evidence indicates the Jets have
> > had some degree of quality team the past two years. The few back ups
> > performed well enough to help the Jets get to the AFC Championship two
> > years in a row. (And not that that's impressive. Winning it all one or
> > both years would make it impressive).
>
> > As for GB and Pitts, I suspect most folks including yourself were
> > unaware just how deep those teams were until starters started going
> > down.
>
> > > > Mostly incorrent:
>
> > > > Yes on Jenkins's position.
>
> > > > But less so on Leonhard's position. As several games went by the
> > > > safety position more than solidified. Just ask Manning, Brady and
> > > > Rberger in the playoffs.
>
> > > > Even less so on Woody's position. Hunter was very solid in the regular
> > > > season and the playoffs.
>
> > > We'll agree to disagree.  I thought the safety position remained poor,
> > > even through to the New England game.
>
> > > Hunter was ok, but Woody's performance had already fallen off a lot.
> > > Woody should have been replaced long before he was.  But, like I
> > > mentioned previously, the Jets built pretty good depth on the OL, so
> > > that supports my point more than anything.
>
> > Hmm. Operative word here in your safety statement is "thought." I'm
> > trying to evaluate strictly on results/performance, not what I think.
> > Based on actual performance, the safety position held up way more than
> > fine in the playoffs. Without its solid play the Jets likely don't get
> > by Indy or NE.
>
> > Again, incorrect - regarding Woody. You gotta get your facts straight.
> > Woody was good the past two years. He was an anchor on the right side
> > along with Moore, helping to pave the way for prodigious rushing
> > totals and providing solid pass protection. He certainly wasn't
> > perfect, but he was very solid.
>
> > Then also, your sweeping statement "Woody should have been replaced
> > long before he was" makes your incorrection that much starker.
>
> > > > > They wouldn't be able to withstand injuries at most other positions as
> > > > > well as a lot of other teams.
>
> > > > How do you know this? This is all hypothetical.
>
> > > Of course it's hypothetical.  So is about 90% of what we talk about in
> > > here.
>
> > Indeed. So it makes your sweeping conclusion-making here - that the
> > Jets "wouldn't be able to withstand injuries at most other positions
> > as well as a lot of other teams" - and overall that much more
> > ridiculous.
>
> > No one knows how a team's back ups will perform until they get the
> > chance. A team appearing deep on paper turns out not to be deep; and
> > vice versa.
>
> > The small sample of evidence from the past two years demonstrates the
> > Jets had some degree of quality depth. To what extent you nor I will
> > ever know. So for you to conclude the Jets haven't had a deep roster
> > the past two years is ridiculous.
>
> This is why I mostly just lurk here now.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I think Hunder and Slauson did well, as did Devito and Pouha last year
for Jenkins. The safeties were also ok, but the secondary and the
LB's are slower than the competition. I couldn't get over, how slow
they were. Leonard has adequate speed, and is great overall, but his
height was a limitation and it was exploited often by the TE
position. The Jets if they are to do better, need speed at defense
and more a 3-4 pash rusher, desperately. Tired of seeing DE in
coverage, that tells me they are not good enough to be get to the QB
on a consistent basis.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Didn't waste my evening watching but
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/dff436c2c842b30c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 4:09 pm
From: cd


On Feb 9, 12:08 pm, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> In article
> <e2183179-6d28-4c38-be67-28d7a35cb...@o1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
>  John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > > Clearly for a fan of football, it will. As a Jet fan, almost any thing
> > > including reading a book seemed like a better use of my time.
>
> > > h
>
> > H, I watched but fell asleep during the last drive.
>
> LOL,
>
> h

The prospect of not having any more football games to watch, compelled
me to watch the SB, even if without the Jets. It is the one sport, I
can't say no to.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Yippie!!! NY STATE LAW!!!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/t/19b2d6c7d75a9484?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Feb 14 2011 9:02 pm
From: "The Inconvenient Truth"


NY state law sez it's cool for adults to be going after CHILDREN, that
are under 18 years of age!!! Break out the 40 ouncers, the inbreds will
be breeding tonight!

Fucking creeps.

--

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

gsk

https://secure.shareit.com/shareit/checkout.html?PRODUCT[300429992]=1&languageid=1&stylefrom=300429992&backlink=http%3A%2F%2Fforexguide.blogspot.com&cookies=1¤cies=USD&pts=VISA,MASTERCARD,AMEX,DC