rec.bicycles.racing
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=enrec.bicycles.racing@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* More Proof Lance Armstrong Is a Liar - Posted by Jeanne Sager on May 20,
2011 at 10:38 AM - 8 messages, 7 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/5c2b21c880fa806b?hl=en
* Is Damon Kluck Really so Anonymous? - 6 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/976cae4627e678ae?hl=en
* Fabiani--Dumb and Dumber - 5 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f78932074670ef38?hl=en
* Lance Armstrong Doping History - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a32e82f2f9db2a39?hl=en
* Cancer research could be the big loser in Lance Armstrong dopping
investigation - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/8a2852b8548e993f?hl=en
* Excessive EPO use leads to disfiguring facial deformities ! - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/eeaf0945d8f013f5?hl=en
* Lance Is Selling One Of His Houses To Pay For Attorneys - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/e6e82895b72a5da6?hl=en
* Youtube Video of Lance Testing Positive!!!! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/361f36c18ae42518?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: More Proof Lance Armstrong Is a Liar - Posted by Jeanne Sager on May 20,
2011 at 10:38 AM
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/5c2b21c880fa806b?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 8 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 4 2011 11:09 pm
From: "Mike Jacoubowsky"
> Now let's flip the coin. If we can't trust Hamilton because he's used
> drugs and wants to make some money with a book deal, how can we trust
> Armstrong himself? He's got a handful of books on the shelves. AND
> it's looking more and more like he is himself a junkie, a doper, a
> drug addict ... the sort of person he doesn't want us to trust. By his
> own rubric, he's a liar, liar pants on fire!
Wow, what a revelation. We live in a world inhabited by people whom we
find difficult to trust because they all have their own agendas and/or
are actively covering up their tracks and trying to lay groundwork
for... not trusting someone else, because that is somehow supposed to
make us believe their own story.
It is disgusting that there is so little real investigative journalism
in all of this. Everything we read or see is based around an
"exclusive'" interview with someone "in a position to know" what "really
happened" and it's "reported" verbatim instead of having the allegations
looked into. 5 years from now when this might all finally be over, Lance
could be thinking about the inept job done by the press (and those
claiming to be members of the press) and how their sloppiness kept the
truth from the light of day for a good many years.
--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
"Zenon" <zenon_jaskula@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:83ac6829-a5f2-4a3e-8ed9-9f2995ff29d9@18g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Source:
> http://thestir.cafemom.com/sports/120621/more_proof_lance_armstrong_is
>
> If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
> to brush up on his excuses. To answer allegations on 60 Minutes from
> former teammate Tyler Hamilton that he saw Armstrong giving himself
> injections of red-cell boosting drug EPO, Lance has his attorneys out
> there doing damage control with gems like, "Most people will see this
> for exactly what it is: More washed-up cyclists talking trash for
> cash."
>
> We've heard this one on the playground, haven't we? Although it
> sounded a bit more like "I know you are, but what am I?" In fact,
> Armstrong's entire "Facts 4 Lance" site, a blog he tweeted about last
> night, reads like an attempt not to clear up the allegations that have
> been floating around for years, but to smear the people who dare voice
> their concerns about Armstrong's activities.
>
> Hamilton, whose interview with 60 Minutes is part of the CBS news
> show's six-month investigation into allegations about doping in
> cycling, gets his own page dubbed simply "Hamilton Is Not Credible."
> I'll save you the trouble of skimming it with this summation: the way
> Armstrong's camp tells it, Hamilton can't be trusted because he's
> doped himself and he's writing a book.
>
> But let's consider this. A host of other people have made allegations
> about Armstrong. People like Stephen Swart, a teammate of Armstrong's
> in the '90s who claims Lance instigated EPO use by the whole team.
> People like cyclist Floyd Landis, who claims Lance used private planes
> to bypass customs with his illegal substances. People like Mike
> Anderson, a bike mechanic who alleges he saw "andro" in Armstrong's
> home (referring to androstene, a steroid). That's just the tip of the
> iceberg, begging the question -- are they all former dopers writing
> books too?
>
> Now let's flip the coin. If we can't trust Hamilton because he's used
> drugs and wants to make some money with a book deal, how can we trust
> Armstrong himself? He's got a handful of books on the shelves. AND
> it's looking more and more like he is himself a junkie, a doper, a
> drug addict ... the sort of person he doesn't want us to trust. By his
> own rubric, he's a liar, liar pants on fire!
>
> Who do you believe? Is Armstrong innocent or lying?
>
== 2 of 8 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 5:24 am
From: ilan
On Jun 5, 6:46 am, Zenon <zenon_jask...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Source:http://thestir.cafemom.com/sports/120621/more_proof_lance_armstrong_is
>
> If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
> to brush up on his excuses.
Armstrong doesn't have to convince anyone he doesn't dope. In fact,
proving you don't dope is impossible. The burden of proof is on his
accusers.
-ilan
== 3 of 8 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 5:43 am
From: Simply Fred
Zenon wrote:
>> If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
>> to brush up on his excuses.
ilan wrote:
> Armstrong doesn't have to convince anyone he doesn't dope. In fact,
> proving you don't dope is impossible. The burden of proof is on his
> accusers.
Saddam never tested positive.
== 4 of 8 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 8:59 am
From: Anton Berlin
On Jun 5, 1:09 am, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <Mi...@ChainReaction.com> wrote:
> > Now let's flip the coin. If we can't trust Hamilton because he's used
> > drugs and wants to make some money with a book deal, how can we trust
> > Armstrong himself? He's got a handful of books on the shelves. AND
> > it's looking more and more like he is himself a junkie, a doper, a
> > drug addict ... the sort of person he doesn't want us to trust. By his
> > own rubric, he's a liar, liar pants on fire!
>
> Wow, what a revelation. We live in a world inhabited by people whom we
> find difficult to trust because they all have their own agendas and/or
> are actively covering up their tracks and trying to lay groundwork
> for... not trusting someone else, because that is somehow supposed to
> make us believe their own story.
>
> It is disgusting that there is so little real investigative journalism
> in all of this. Everything we read or see is based around an
> "exclusive'" interview with someone "in a position to know" what "really
> happened" and it's "reported" verbatim instead of having the allegations
> looked into. 5 years from now when this might all finally be over, Lance
> could be thinking about the inept job done by the press (and those
> claiming to be members of the press) and how their sloppiness kept the
> truth from the light of day for a good many years.
>
> --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com
>
> "Zenon" <zenon_jask...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:83ac6829-a5f2-4a3e-8ed9-9f2995ff29d9@18g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Source:
> >http://thestir.cafemom.com/sports/120621/more_proof_lance_armstrong_is
>
> > If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
> > to brush up on his excuses. To answer allegations on 60 Minutes from
> > former teammate Tyler Hamilton that he saw Armstrong giving himself
> > injections of red-cell boosting drug EPO, Lance has his attorneys out
> > there doing damage control with gems like, "Most people will see this
> > for exactly what it is: More washed-up cyclists talking trash for
> > cash."
>
> > We've heard this one on the playground, haven't we? Although it
> > sounded a bit more like "I know you are, but what am I?" In fact,
> > Armstrong's entire "Facts 4 Lance" site, a blog he tweeted about last
> > night, reads like an attempt not to clear up the allegations that have
> > been floating around for years, but to smear the people who dare voice
> > their concerns about Armstrong's activities.
>
> > Hamilton, whose interview with 60 Minutes is part of the CBS news
> > show's six-month investigation into allegations about doping in
> > cycling, gets his own page dubbed simply "Hamilton Is Not Credible."
> > I'll save you the trouble of skimming it with this summation: the way
> > Armstrong's camp tells it, Hamilton can't be trusted because he's
> > doped himself and he's writing a book.
>
> > But let's consider this. A host of other people have made allegations
> > about Armstrong. People like Stephen Swart, a teammate of Armstrong's
> > in the '90s who claims Lance instigated EPO use by the whole team.
> > People like cyclist Floyd Landis, who claims Lance used private planes
> > to bypass customs with his illegal substances. People like Mike
> > Anderson, a bike mechanic who alleges he saw "andro" in Armstrong's
> > home (referring to androstene, a steroid). That's just the tip of the
> > iceberg, begging the question -- are they all former dopers writing
> > books too?
>
> > Now let's flip the coin. If we can't trust Hamilton because he's used
> > drugs and wants to make some money with a book deal, how can we trust
> > Armstrong himself? He's got a handful of books on the shelves. AND
> > it's looking more and more like he is himself a junkie, a doper, a
> > drug addict ... the sort of person he doesn't want us to trust. By his
> > own rubric, he's a liar, liar pants on fire!
>
> > Who do you believe? Is Armstrong innocent or lying?
Mike just wrote a post in RBR and wants to sell you a bike.
DOPER !!!!
== 5 of 8 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 9:00 am
From: Anton Berlin
On Jun 5, 7:43 am, Simply Fred <n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Zenon wrote:
> >> If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
> >> to brush up on his excuses.
> ilan wrote:
> > Armstrong doesn't have to convince anyone he doesn't dope. In fact,
> > proving you don't dope is impossible. The burden of proof is on his
> > accusers.
>
> Saddam never tested positive.
What we need is a blue dress with some EPO on it.
== 6 of 8 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 9:42 am
From: Fredmaster of Brainerd
On Saturday, June 4, 2011 9:46:43 PM UTC-7, Zenon wrote:
> Source: http://thestir.cafemom.com/sports/120621/more_proof_lance_armstrong_is
>
> If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
> to brush up on his excuses. To answer allegations on 60 Minutes from
> former teammate Tyler Hamilton that he saw Armstrong giving himself
> injections of red-cell boosting drug EPO, Lance has his attorneys out
> there doing damage control with gems like, "Most people will see this
> for exactly what it is: More washed-up cyclists talking trash for
> cash."
>
> We've heard this one on the playground, haven't we?
Dumbass,
cafemom.com ?
I long for the days when we had stupid equipment
arguments instead of stupid doping arguments.
I could really use some advice on strollers.
Fredmaster Ben
== 7 of 8 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 11:56 am
From: Steven Bornfeld
On 6/5/2011 12:42 PM, Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:
> On Saturday, June 4, 2011 9:46:43 PM UTC-7, Zenon wrote:
>> Source: http://thestir.cafemom.com/sports/120621/more_proof_lance_armstrong_is
>>
>> If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
>> to brush up on his excuses. To answer allegations on 60 Minutes from
>> former teammate Tyler Hamilton that he saw Armstrong giving himself
>> injections of red-cell boosting drug EPO, Lance has his attorneys out
>> there doing damage control with gems like, "Most people will see this
>> for exactly what it is: More washed-up cyclists talking trash for
>> cash."
>>
>> We've heard this one on the playground, haven't we?
>
> Dumbass,
>
> cafemom.com ?
>
> I long for the days when we had stupid equipment
> arguments instead of stupid doping arguments.
> I could really use some advice on strollers.
>
> Fredmaster Ben
I'm way behind in stroller technology. I'd avoid carbon fiber forks
though.
Steve
== 8 of 8 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:39 pm
From: Jimmy July
On 6/5/2011 9:00 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
> On Jun 5, 7:43 am, Simply Fred<n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>> Zenon wrote:
>>>> If Lance Armstrong wants to convince anyone he doesn't dope, he needs
>>>> to brush up on his excuses.
>> ilan wrote:
>>> Armstrong doesn't have to convince anyone he doesn't dope. In fact,
>>> proving you don't dope is impossible. The burden of proof is on his
>>> accusers.
>>
>> Saddam never tested positive.
>
> What we need is a blue dress with some EPO on it.
I'm sure we'll learn about it first from cafemom.com.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Is Damon Kluck Really so Anonymous?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/976cae4627e678ae?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 2:23 am
From: Simply Fred
Anton Berlin wrote:
> You're wrong as can be mate. When you see a grown man wearing a
> Jordan jersey
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILlohLVR-84>
== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 3:14 am
From: Simply Fred
Mike wrote:
>>> Is Damon Kluck really that "anonymous"
Simply Fred wrote:
>> Who the fuck is Damon Kluck ?
sender wrote:
> Who the Kluck is Damon Fuck ?
Suck also rhymes with kluck and fuck, however you would probably require
a sonnet in perfect iambic pentameter to woo Liz.
== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 9:09 am
From: Anton Berlin
On Jun 5, 4:23 am, Simply Fred <n...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Anton Berlin wrote:
> > You're wrong as can be mate. When you see a grown man wearing a
> > Jordan jersey
>
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILlohLVR-84>
Dallas is full of skank like that. Boring sluts.
== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 10:08 am
From: Scott
On Jun 4, 6:45 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 12:25 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 4, 10:47 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > People want to be part of something bigger than themselves, and this was
> > > > that opportunity.
>
> > > I've never wanted to be a part of anything bigger than me. Hero
> > > worship is for fags. I've never put the jersey of another man's name
> > > on my back. A USA champion's jersey I gave to a friend. My gf wears
> > > Schlecks Beijing jersey.
> > > I typically ride in t-shirts and never wore a yellow bracelet. Yellow
> > > bracelet = ignorant cocksucker in my book.
>
> > If you've truly never wanted to be part of something bigger than
> > yourself, and not just being argumentative, I feel very sorry for
> > you. It's not about hero worship, but I suppose a narcissist could
> > rationalize it that way. Until you've been part of something truly
> > special, I guess you'd never understand.
>
> You're wrong as can be mate. When you see a grown man wearing a
> Jordan jersey or can list the starting line up of any team in any
> sport you don't feel absolute pity for them ?
>
> That they don't have anything better in their lives going on then some
> crap on the idiot box? The douchebags that go to baseball games with
> a pad of paper and pencil and track statistics?
>
> No man - I don't wave flags - take oaths or make pledges - give a rats
> ass about borders - don't pray - don't worship and because of it I
> stay true to myself. I feel pity for anyone that doesn't.
I happen to be with you on the point in your first paragraph. As
for the rest of it, I'm thinking you must've had a really odd
childhood... how is it that you've grown up to hate everything?
== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:26 pm
From: Anton Berlin
On Jun 5, 12:08 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 6:45 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 4, 12:25 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 4, 10:47 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > People want to be part of something bigger than themselves, and this was
> > > > > that opportunity.
>
> > > > I've never wanted to be a part of anything bigger than me. Hero
> > > > worship is for fags. I've never put the jersey of another man's name
> > > > on my back. A USA champion's jersey I gave to a friend. My gf wears
> > > > Schlecks Beijing jersey.
> > > > I typically ride in t-shirts and never wore a yellow bracelet. Yellow
> > > > bracelet = ignorant cocksucker in my book.
>
> > > If you've truly never wanted to be part of something bigger than
> > > yourself, and not just being argumentative, I feel very sorry for
> > > you. It's not about hero worship, but I suppose a narcissist could
> > > rationalize it that way. Until you've been part of something truly
> > > special, I guess you'd never understand.
>
> > You're wrong as can be mate. When you see a grown man wearing a
> > Jordan jersey or can list the starting line up of any team in any
> > sport you don't feel absolute pity for them ?
>
> > That they don't have anything better in their lives going on then some
> > crap on the idiot box? The douchebags that go to baseball games with
> > a pad of paper and pencil and track statistics?
>
> > No man - I don't wave flags - take oaths or make pledges - give a rats
> > ass about borders - don't pray - don't worship and because of it I
> > stay true to myself. I feel pity for anyone that doesn't.
>
> I happen to be with you on the point in your first paragraph. As
> for the rest of it, I'm thinking you must've had a really odd
> childhood... how is it that you've grown up to hate everything?
http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/05/poll-finds-americans-angry-about-pretty-much-everything/
== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:39 pm
From: Michael Press
In article
<74139cd3-feb3-4b0b-be7f-7d13c26d87ae@z33g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
Anton Berlin <truth_88888@yahoo.com> wrote:
> You're wrong as can be mate. When you see a grown man wearing a
> Jordan jersey or can list the starting line up of any team in any
> sport you don't feel absolute pity for them ?
Krutov, Larionov, Makarov.
--
Michael Press
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Fabiani--Dumb and Dumber
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f78932074670ef38?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 3:00 am
From: Simply Fred
BL wrote:
> There are quite a few people who are regular posters to the Clinic on
> Lance Armstrong threads--other threads, too. Give it a try.
I must be an old fart since I prefer freedom of speech instead of
censorship by so called moderators.
== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 8:07 am
From: BL
On 6/5/2011 6:00 AM, Simply Fred wrote:
> BL wrote:
>> There are quite a few people who are regular posters to the Clinic on
>> Lance Armstrong threads--other threads, too. Give it a try.
>
> I must be an old fart since I prefer freedom of speech instead of
> censorship by so called moderators.
The moderation there is extremely light handed. Post there and your
illogical, personal and stupid comments will be simply ignored or you'll
be made fun of in a gentle, but condescending way. Try it.
== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:29 pm
From: Frederick the Great
In article <T6qdnV9N5vEpP3fQnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
BL <bl@verizon.net> wrote:
> There are quite a few people who are regular posters to the Clinic on
> Lance Armstrong threads
I have some of his Hot Five and Hot Seven recordings,
and am listening to some of them now.
--
Old Fritz
== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:44 pm
From: Jimmy July
On 6/5/2011 8:07 AM, BL wrote:
> On 6/5/2011 6:00 AM, Simply Fred wrote:
>> BL wrote:
>>> There are quite a few people who are regular posters to the Clinic on
>>> Lance Armstrong threads--other threads, too. Give it a try.
>>
>> I must be an old fart since I prefer freedom of speech instead of
>> censorship by so called moderators.
> The moderation there is extremely light handed. Post there and your
> illogical, personal and stupid comments will be simply ignored or you'll
> be made fun of in a gentle, but condescending way. Try it.
You're accusing SF of making personal insults? Do you ever _read_ this NG?
== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:48 pm
From: Frederick the Great
In article <PdmdnXVFMNHihHbQnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
BL <bl@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 6/4/2011 10:47 PM, Frederick the Great wrote:
> > In article<T6qdnVxN5vH0P3fQnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> > BL<bl@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/4/2011 3:00 PM, Frederick the Great wrote:
> >>> In article<v7WdnQsI59os-XfQnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> >>> BL<bl@verizon.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 6/4/2011 11:53 AM, Frederick the Great wrote:
> >>>>> In article<9pidnZD9rNDR9nTQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> >>>>> BL<bl@verizon.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> You might want to take a look at a real, informed discussion going on
> >>>>>> over in The Clinic Forum at CyclingNews. Try you bullshitting over
> >>>>>> there and one way or another you won't last long.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So it's okay to call your interlocutor "fucktard" in
> >>>>> The Clinic Forum at CyclingNews? Or did you not last long yourself?
> >>>>>
> >>>> FuckTard, we don't use language like that over there. It's reserved for
> >>>> morons like you on Usenet. Try posting your drivel and see how long you
> >>>> last before you're completely ignored over there. The only reason I
> >>>> reply to you here is because you're amusing in a pathetic sort of way.
> >>>> Carry on, Moron.
> >>>
> >>> You would not last long in The Clinic Forum at CyclingNews.
> >>>
> >> Moron, I've been posting over there for a long time. I'm a senior
> >> member by their reckoning. Go on over and start posting your stupidity
> >> there. See what happens.
> >
> > I propose that you post there as you do here.
> > Then we will see who lasts longer.
> >
> ROTFLMAO!!!
I accept your capitulation.
--
Old Fritz
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lance Armstrong Doping History
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/a32e82f2f9db2a39?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 7:32 am
From: --D-y
On Jun 5, 12:44 am, Zenon <zenon_jask...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/16226502/Lance-Armstrong-Doping-History
Oh boy:
(quoting) As one who was attracted to the sport in large measure by
the perso-
nalities of LeMond, Hampsten, Bauer et al., there is now a tragic
sense of things having gone terribly wrong.Their legacy as honest,
gentleman competitors and the reverence in which they held their
sport have been trampled underfoot, perhaps even lost entirely.The
glory of the 1980s, luminous with the courage and earnestness
which once made professional cycling an honorable calling, is now
faded and distant, eclipsed by the dark realities of doping and
excessive influence from financial/corporate interests. (end quote)
Wow. Attracted to Greg Lemond's personality.
"Luminous, with courage and earnestness which once made professional
cycling an honorable calling..."?
Gag me with purple prose.
--D-y
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 11:59 am
From: Steven Bornfeld
On 6/5/2011 10:32 AM, --D-y wrote:
> On Jun 5, 12:44 am, Zenon<zenon_jask...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/16226502/Lance-Armstrong-Doping-History
> Oh boy:
> (quoting) As one who was attracted to the sport in large measure by
> the perso-
> nalities of LeMond, Hampsten, Bauer et al., there is now a tragic
> sense of things having gone terribly wrong.Their legacy as honest,
> gentleman competitors and the reverence in which they held their
> sport have been trampled underfoot, perhaps even lost entirely.The
> glory of the 1980s, luminous with the courage and earnestness
> which once made professional cycling an honorable calling, is now
> faded and distant, eclipsed by the dark realities of doping and
> excessive influence from financial/corporate interests. (end quote)
>
> Wow. Attracted to Greg Lemond's personality.
> "Luminous, with courage and earnestness which once made professional
> cycling an honorable calling..."?
>
> Gag me with purple prose.
> --D-y
"Luminous" personality? Wow. To me he never seemed poised in front of
a microphone. Funny the little things that stick in your mind. I
remember him once blaming a loss on having caught a virus from his son
Geoffrey. I only got away with blaming my kid once.
Steve
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Cancer research could be the big loser in Lance Armstrong dopping
investigation
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/8a2852b8548e993f?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 9:11 am
From: Anton Berlin
Dumbass - cancer research will get along fine without GriftSTRONG .
Lance's lil charity is a gnat on the ass of benevolence.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Excessive EPO use leads to disfiguring facial deformities !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/eeaf0945d8f013f5?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 9:20 am
From: Anton Berlin
Another glaring example
http://nationalpostcomment.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/armstrong0603.jpg?w=620
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lance Is Selling One Of His Houses To Pay For Attorneys
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/e6e82895b72a5da6?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:30 pm
From: Frederick the Great
In article
<fc3f060e-78cc-41d1-af63-834b67eb92e6@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com>,
Zenon <zenon_jaskula@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.gottesmanresidential.com/homes/DeadMansHole/index.htm
Hadn't you heard? All his attorneys are working pro bono?
--
Old Fritz
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Youtube Video of Lance Testing Positive!!!!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/361f36c18ae42518?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 5 2011 12:36 pm
From: Jimmy July
On 6/4/2011 10:52 PM, Zenon wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KQ-9aBgoaWY
>
>
It's sad that you pulled something from Jan, 2011. Did you have to
remind us that Tuesday never came?
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.bicycles.racing"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.bicycles.racing+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
Posts
