http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots?hl=en
alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* What's ...Your... Name/ Little Girl - 7 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/a904b382b1c43df5?hl=en
* Man to man coverage smothers the Patriots. - 4 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/2a2b6134523b0ccc?hl=en
* Hard-working mom looking seeking fun - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/6c30cdd21ea4ca97?hl=en
* Tom Brady, pin-up girl for homosexuals - 6 messages, 6 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/862e71a8b290d054?hl=en
* Why NE wins the East - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/b3b80ab2bc21a206?hl=en
* who hates who... blame you who ...not me - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/ee34d8d54b7e4f53?hl=en
* OT: Herman Cain - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/8c3ae750c9e3ae0d?hl=en
* I SNIFFED JERRY SANDUSKY'S JOCK! - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/5978cd32af291878?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: What's ...Your... Name/ Little Girl
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/a904b382b1c43df5?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 7 ==
Date: Fri, Nov 11 2011 9:32 pm
From: who <**~.@.~**>
On 11/12/2011 12:09 AM, RävNspuke ® wrote:
> 2011 Regular Season Scoring Comparison
> Baltimore Ravens - Pittsburgh Steelers
>
> Joe Flacco's Ravens 57
>
> Joe Flacco's Bitches 27
>
> ~Drewtard aka PukeMeister
No doubt the PukeMeister is once again showing himself to be the
delusional football ng know-nothing of the decade.
Poor Puke... he couldn't when he had to.
== 2 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 8:42 am
From: BG@yahoo.com
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:09:47 -0500, "RävNsfän ®"
<noemail2u@nospam4me.org> wrote:
>2011 Regular Season Scoring Comparison
>Baltimore Ravens - Pittsburgh Steelers
>
>Joe Flacco's Ravens 57
>
>Joe Flacco's Bitches 27
>
> ~Drew
>
And this is in a Patriots news group why?
I seem to recall the Patriots go nowhere near Baltimore this week.
== 3 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 9:07 am
From: who
On 11/12/2011 11:42 AM, BG@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:09:47 -0500, "R�vNsf�n �"
> <noemail2u@nospam4me.org> wrote:
>
>> 2011 Regular Season Scoring Comparison
>> Baltimore Ravens - Pittsburgh Steelers
>>
>> Joe Flacco's Ravens 57
>>
>> Joe Flacco's Bitches 27
>>
>> ~Drew
>>
> And this is in a Patriots news group why?
> I seem to recall the Patriots go nowhere near Baltimore this week.
Because he's Drew, the notorious R�vNspuke, whose stock-in-trade in
over a decade of usenet activity has been to post in every pro football
ng other than Baltimore's, making gratuitous attempts to create virtual
friends, in the hope of finding some fresh butt to lick.
He's currently firmly ensconced in the Steelers ng, where he leads an
inner circle of those enthralled by the exposure of Steeler bandwagon
buttholes.
--
> Drew ~ R�vNspuke (usenet's #1 suck-up)
>
> "Talk is cheap... let's go gay."
== 4 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 4:22 pm
From: "RävNsfän ®"
"who" <stutterin' stanley that_is_who@odrewbeedo.I loveyou.org> wrote in
message jews_news_pedos_in_the_pews@_i_like_kike.shallom.net...
: On 11/12/2011 11:42 AM, BG@boohoo.com wrote:
: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:09:47 -0500, "RävNsfän ®"
: > <noemail2u@nospam4me.org> wrote:
:: > And this is in a Patriots news group why?
: whose stock-in-trade in over a decade of usenet activity has been to post
in every pro football ng other than Baltimore, making gratuitous attempts to
create virtual
: friends, in the hope of finding some fresh butt to lick.
Look, I did not mind that you have been tagging along after me for ten
years. I understand that when I spoke up against you in the Browns NG you
were going to attach yourself as firmly to my leg as you had been doing to
mopar-steveo. It's like the unwritten law of the wild west. If I kill the
bread winner I must support his family. In this instance I took away the
individual that you relied upon to vent your fat manic depressive ass off. I
have accepted my roll over these past ten years, however, your constant
attempts to drive away other posters so as to keep me all to yourself is
really pushing the envelope of my degree of guilt over my attempts to
maintain your unstable mental condition as your lone sounding board, ...and
it makes you look like a fag.
: He's currently firmly ensconced in the Steelers ng, where he leads an
: inner circle of those enthralled by the exposure of Steeler bandwagon
: buttholes.
Yes I left the Browns NG and I understand your feeling abandoned like you
were in the rec.auto and alt.depression forums before that, but you know
that the judge has promised to return you to your padded cell for the
remaining 12 years of your sentence if you start using your pedofile
"trigger terminology" that set you off in alt.teen.boys. So for your own
good just lay off the "butthole" speak and like triggers and try to mentally
take yourself back into your "safe place". You know that entails that you
must hug my virtual ankle all over Usenet and respond to every post that I
make, otherwise, I just know you will slip back into your dark fantasies
again. You remember the cops told you if there ever was a "next time" that
they catch you with another 9 year old, they are not going to bother cuffing
you and reading your rights to you.
== 5 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 4:44 pm
From: who
What else would one expect to be spewed forth from the PUKEMEISTER.
He is unlikely to change, in spite of the degraded manner in which it
must make him feel about himself. So he continues to conjure up
scenarios where HE is in control and probably, he begins to believe
them. He is a pathetic soul who doesn't really deserve any more commentary.
It is little wonder that his wife apparently farms him out, and so he
must advertize publicly for fulfilment in any way available.
== 6 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 5:53 pm
From: "R�vNsf�n �"
"who" <sit_is_me_that_is_who@nd_man_i_love my drewbeedo.net> wrote in
message free news for free jews@BrownsNoser.jewnews.alshallom.net...
: He is a pathetic soul who doesn't really deserve any more commentary
LMAO @ U Stutterin' Stanley, the BrownsNoser from Strongesville, NE Ohio.
No Masse! No Masse! ...whassup with that Stanley? You never could stand up
long enough to take a total ass_whoopin'. That other mental midget David was
always around to rescue you from us bullies. Is he still hangin' in the nut
forums as well? Oh well, I reckon I'll be seeing you in another 10 years my
bitch.
== 7 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 7:23 pm
From: Norton Flywater <*~.@.~*>
"RavNspuke" <dustylombardi@ravens2000.org> wrote in message
news:4a6b380f$0$6336$b42602f9@news.qis.net...
> Steve, had this pissant not responded to your post I would not have
> seen your email contact request. I long ago <plonked> you for
> responding endlessly to these morons.
That's funny Drew, as I recall you -NEVER- could send me an email,
moparholic@hotmail was always too much for your online skill level.
Now I see that's it's -YOU- that can't stop responding to the asswipe,
even to the point of cross posting your over-bloated ego to three or
four groups at a time.
You're also soiling the Steelers group with your foam.
I consider you a hypocrite and a straw man.
Later, fuk-face.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.cleve-browns/msg/827b158f2389b171?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Man to man coverage smothers the Patriots.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/2a2b6134523b0ccc?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 5:48 am
From: cloud dreamer
On 12/11/2011 1:22 AM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
> "cloud dreamer"<Save@ResourcesRight.now> wrote in message
> news:LvmdndncGqUtASDTnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@supernews.com...
>> On 11/11/2011 6:27 PM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
>>> "cloud dreamer"<Save@ResourcesRight.now> wrote in message
>>> news:Lvmdnd_cGqWMGSDTnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@supernews.com...
>>>> On 11/11/2011 4:29 PM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
>>>>> "mrl"<markrlondon@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:e5c98b62-a76d-416d-aec7-f142e86d61f4@r9g2000vbw.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204554204577024081645370896.html
>>>>>
>>>>> The Pats offense is just fine. the trouble is the defense.
>>>>> they have the worst set of DBs I've ever seen
>>>>> they had the lead against the Giants with 1:30 to play and the defense
>>>>> let
>>>>> the Giants easily walk down the field, with a few key penalties caused
>>>>> by
>>>>> players who were out of position and who ran over receivers trying to
>>>>> make
>>>>> up for it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There was something wrong with the offense. Why did they go from scoring
>>>> 30+ to struggling to get 20? When they were scoring 30+, it didn't
>>>> matter
>>>> that the defense was letting the other team get 20. Now that the offense
>>>> can't do that either, it becomes a problem.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there's a problem with the defense. It wasn't a concern until the O
>>>> started to flounder.
>>>>
>>>
>>> because the D can't get the ball. the enemy team gets the ball and they
>>> keep it for seven minute drives.
>>> the Pats are scoring lee because they have the Ball fewer times, but the
>>> O
>>> tleaves the field with the lead and the D gives it up.
>>> you aren't going to score 30 points in every game, and if that is what it
>>> takes then you are going to lose games.
>>
>>
>> But if the O can't keep the D off the field, the D will suffer, they will
>> tire. In the last three games, it's the O that's not spending enough time
>> on the field.
>>
>> Never said they had to score 30+ to win. I did say, yes, the D has
>> problems, but the O has made up for it with stellar performances. The O
>> made up for their shortcomings. In the last 3 games, the D's
>> accomplishments haven't changed much. The O has.
>>
>> Once they started faltering, they lost games.
>>
>> And why they went out of their way to give the Giants so much time at the
>> end of the game, I'll never understand. They were more than 15 yards from
>> the endzone. They could have used up a lot of time getting to 1st and
>> goal, but they repeated the mistake from the SB. They rushed it and gave
>> the Giants too much time.
>>
>> ..
>
>
> the O gets the ball and usually scores.
Exactly. They "usually" do. But in the last three games, they haven't
been. It's completely irrelevant how long Pitt or anyone else had the
ball. Why didn't NE put together some 5 or 8 minute drives? If they had
done that, like they had in the previous games, the D would have been
better rested and the other team's O would have had less time with the
ball.
Like I said, the D has always needed work and the O has made up for
their deficiencies. In the last three games, the D has managed to still
hold the opponent down in points despite more time on the field, but the
O hasn't been putting up the points to compensate.
They were more on their game in the second half of the last one. We'll
see tomorrow night if they have figured out what went on.
If not, that trip the New Zealand is looming!
..
--
We must change the way we live
Or the climate will do it for us
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 9:20 am
From: MuahMan
On Nov 11, 3:22 pm, cloud dreamer <S...@ResourcesRight.now> wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 4:29 PM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
>
> > "mrl"<markrlon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:e5c98b62-a76d-416d-aec7-f142e86d61f4@r9g2000vbw.googlegroups.com...
> >>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020455420457702408164537...
>
> > The Pats offense is just fine. the trouble is the defense.
> > they have the worst set of DBs I've ever seen
> > they had the lead against the Giants with 1:30 to play and the defense let
> > the Giants easily walk down the field, with a few key penalties caused by
> > players who were out of position and who ran over receivers trying to make
> > up for it.
>
> There was something wrong with the offense. Why did they go from scoring
> 30+ to struggling to get 20? When they were scoring 30+, it didn't
> matter that the defense was letting the other team get 20. Now that the
> offense can't do that either, it becomes a problem.
>
> Yes, there's a problem with the defense. It wasn't a concern until the O
> started to flounder.
>
> ..
>
> --
> We must change the way we live
> Or the climate will do it for us
Tom Brady is hurt and it's not in the reports. Guaranteed!
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 3:52 pm
From: "Ray O'Hara"
"cloud dreamer" <Save@ResourcesRight.now> wrote in message >>>>>> The Pats
offense is just fine. the trouble is the defense.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There was something wrong with the offense. Why did they go from
>>>>> scoring
>>>>> 30+ to struggling to get 20? When they were scoring 30+, it didn't
>>>>> matter
>>>>> that the defense was letting the other team get 20. Now that the
>>>>> offense
>>>>> can't do that either, it becomes a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, there's a problem with the defense. It wasn't a concern until the
>>>>> O
>>>>> started to flounder.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> because the D can't get the ball. the enemy team gets the ball and
>>>> they
>>>> keep it for seven minute drives.
>>>> the Pats are scoring lee because they have the Ball fewer times, but
>>>> the
>>>> O
>>>> tleaves the field with the lead and the D gives it up.
>>>> you aren't going to score 30 points in every game, and if that is what
>>>> it
>>>> takes then you are going to lose games.
>>>
>>>
>>> But if the O can't keep the D off the field, the D will suffer, they
>>> will
>>> tire. In the last three games, it's the O that's not spending enough
>>> time
>>> on the field.
>>>
>>> Never said they had to score 30+ to win. I did say, yes, the D has
>>> problems, but the O has made up for it with stellar performances. The O
>>> made up for their shortcomings. In the last 3 games, the D's
>>> accomplishments haven't changed much. The O has.
>>>
>>> Once they started faltering, they lost games.
>>>
>>> And why they went out of their way to give the Giants so much time at
>>> the
>>> end of the game, I'll never understand. They were more than 15 yards
>>> from
>>> the endzone. They could have used up a lot of time getting to 1st and
>>> goal, but they repeated the mistake from the SB. They rushed it and gave
>>> the Giants too much time.
>>>
>>> ..
>>
>>
>> the O gets the ball and usually scores.
>
>
> Exactly. They "usually" do. But in the last three games, they haven't
> been. It's completely irrelevant how long Pitt or anyone else had the
> ball. Why didn't NE put together some 5 or 8 minute drives? If they had
> done that, like they had in the previous games, the D would have been
> better rested and the other team's O would have had less time with the
> ball.
>
> Like I said, the D has always needed work and the O has made up for their
> deficiencies. In the last three games, the D has managed to still hold the
> opponent down in points despite more time on the field, but the O hasn't
> been putting up the points to compensate.
>
> They were more on their game in the second half of the last one. We'll see
> tomorrow night if they have figured out what went on.
>
> If not, that trip the New Zealand is looming!
>
> ..
don't be stupid. the defense always matters, it is the defense that's
killing this team,
this "Oh we'll just win in a shootout" every week is unrealistic.
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 4:01 pm
From: cloud dreamer
On 12/11/2011 8:22 PM, Ray O'Hara wrote:
> "cloud dreamer"<Save@ResourcesRight.now> wrote in message>>>>>> The Pats
> offense is just fine. the trouble is the defense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There was something wrong with the offense. Why did they go from
>>>>>> scoring
>>>>>> 30+ to struggling to get 20? When they were scoring 30+, it didn't
>>>>>> matter
>>>>>> that the defense was letting the other team get 20. Now that the
>>>>>> offense
>>>>>> can't do that either, it becomes a problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, there's a problem with the defense. It wasn't a concern until the
>>>>>> O
>>>>>> started to flounder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> because the D can't get the ball. the enemy team gets the ball and
>>>>> they
>>>>> keep it for seven minute drives.
>>>>> the Pats are scoring lee because they have the Ball fewer times, but
>>>>> the
>>>>> O
>>>>> tleaves the field with the lead and the D gives it up.
>>>>> you aren't going to score 30 points in every game, and if that is what
>>>>> it
>>>>> takes then you are going to lose games.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But if the O can't keep the D off the field, the D will suffer, they
>>>> will
>>>> tire. In the last three games, it's the O that's not spending enough
>>>> time
>>>> on the field.
>>>>
>>>> Never said they had to score 30+ to win. I did say, yes, the D has
>>>> problems, but the O has made up for it with stellar performances. The O
>>>> made up for their shortcomings. In the last 3 games, the D's
>>>> accomplishments haven't changed much. The O has.
>>>>
>>>> Once they started faltering, they lost games.
>>>>
>>>> And why they went out of their way to give the Giants so much time at
>>>> the
>>>> end of the game, I'll never understand. They were more than 15 yards
>>>> from
>>>> the endzone. They could have used up a lot of time getting to 1st and
>>>> goal, but they repeated the mistake from the SB. They rushed it and gave
>>>> the Giants too much time.
>>>>
>>>> ..
>>>
>>>
>>> the O gets the ball and usually scores.
>>
>>
>> Exactly. They "usually" do. But in the last three games, they haven't
>> been. It's completely irrelevant how long Pitt or anyone else had the
>> ball. Why didn't NE put together some 5 or 8 minute drives? If they had
>> done that, like they had in the previous games, the D would have been
>> better rested and the other team's O would have had less time with the
>> ball.
>>
>> Like I said, the D has always needed work and the O has made up for their
>> deficiencies. In the last three games, the D has managed to still hold the
>> opponent down in points despite more time on the field, but the O hasn't
>> been putting up the points to compensate.
>>
>> They were more on their game in the second half of the last one. We'll see
>> tomorrow night if they have figured out what went on.
>>
>> If not, that trip the New Zealand is looming!
>>
>> ..
>
>
> don't be stupid.
Seriously? Please don't lower yourself to the level of the trolls. Just
because you don't agree with my points doesn't necessitate insults.
the defense always matters, it is the defense that's
> killing this team,
> this "Oh we'll just win in a shootout" every week is unrealistic.
>
>
Never said the defense doesn't matter. Just that in the last three
games, the D has been no different. The O has.
..
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Hard-working mom looking seeking fun
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/6c30cdd21ea4ca97?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 9:19 am
From: alex ashley
Hard-working mom looking seeking fun !!!!! http://go.chaz6.com/Kz7
!!!!!!
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Tom Brady, pin-up girl for homosexuals
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/862e71a8b290d054?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 9:23 am
From: "Stinky Cheeks"
Tom the sissy. The favorite queer jack-off poster girl for dick
suckers.
== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 10:49 am
From: "(�`�.� Craig Chilton �.���) "
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:23:25 +0100,
"Stinky Cheeks" <stinkydick@queers.net> wrote:
Considering what you wrote below, immature LOWLIFE, it's
easy to see WHY you're too GUTLESS a dweeb to post under
your REAL, FULL name, as so many intelligent grownups do. ---
> Tom the sissy. The favorite queer jack-off poster girl for dick
> suckers.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
The IMMATURITY of Most Anti-Gay Rights Bigots
is About 6 Years BELOW that of the Onset of Teen-age
It is a hallmark of the IMMATURITY that is found in many
low-intellect 7-year-olds who've further been disadvantaged
by being raised by *ignorant* and bigoted parents who have
INDOCTRINATED them from birth in such ignorant, immature,
and irrational hate -- *whenever* an adult person (in terms of
years of age) is moronic enough to dwell on the way OTHER
people have sex, or to give a flying rat's ass or even a second
fleeting thought to it.
So they not only are social RETARDS, but they additionally
shine a bright spotlight upon themselves as severe cases of
*arrested development*.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
��� Rest in Peace ���
��� George Richard Tiller, MD ���
��� A True American HERO! ���
��� August 8, 1941 � May 31, 2009 ���
��� Visit -- http://iamdrtiller.com ���
"He saved the lives of thousands of women who would've
died otherwise, thousands who would've been made sterile
or gravely injured by childbirth. He knew his life was at grave
risk. Dr. Tiller was a true Saint."
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
-- Craig Chilton (E-Mail me if you wish, from top 5 websites below.)
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the hateful RRR Cult!
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Cult Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481 -- Excellent article!
http://base8.lavenderliberal.com/index.html -- Searchable Database
of the Proposition Hate (8) ENEMIES of Human Rights! KNOW the
enemies... and then HARASS and BOYCOTT the enemies, as much
as it is legally possible to do so!
== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 1:38 pm
From: "§pamÐuster" <§pamÐuster@gone.com>
"Stinky Cheeks" <stinkydick@queers.net> wrote in message
news:52abfbc894c1ff0db617e06dd482dc26@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 2:26 pm
From: "40%®Çonned" <40%®Çonned@dumb.ca>
"Stinky Cheeks" <stinkydick@queers.net> wrote in message
news:52abfbc894c1ff0db617e06dd482dc26@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> Tom the sissy. The favorite queer jack-off poster girl for dick
> suckers.
>
>
== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 4:57 pm
From: RedDog
On Nov 12, 5:23 pm, "Stinky Cheeks" <stinkyd...@queers.net> wrote:
> Tom the sissy. The favorite queer jack-off poster girl for dick
> suckers.
Although I utterly despise the Patriots, I still have to admit that
Brady is one of the best fricken quarterbacks in the history of the
NFL. And that only means the Pats, including that obnoxious fatass
loser Belicheat, are *wholly* unworthy of him. (Oh, and also that
you're a fucking liar).
== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 5:47 pm
From: A1247@gmail.com
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:23:25 +0100, "Stinky Cheeks"
<stinkydick@queers.net> wrote:
>Tom the sissy. The favorite queer jack-off poster girl for dick
>suckers.
Let me guess......Brady beat your team the last time they met.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Why NE wins the East
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/b3b80ab2bc21a206?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 12:48 pm
From: cloud dreamer
http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/34100/why-patriots-will-win-the-afc-east
..
--
We must change the way we live
Or the climate will do it for us
==============================================================================
TOPIC: who hates who... blame you who ...not me
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/ee34d8d54b7e4f53?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 4:51 pm
From: "RävNsfän ®"
"who" <who@drewbeedo.org> wrote in message
news:j9kvmc$qcg$1@news.albasani.net...
: who?
:
: Continued laughter at RãvNspuke, whose stock in trade was always
: gratuitous attempts to create virtual friends, particularly among
: rival fan groups and particularly those of the Browns...
:
: He obviously lives in a world of delusions of his own making.
:
: Of all of those whose skins Brownsbasher got under, the Puke's was by
: far the easiest AND the most reactionary.
:
: Long-ago Brownsbasher publicly called him out on his propensity for
: believing that he actually making friends by the suck-up route instead
: of the traditional way . . . offering something tangible and valuable in
: friendship.
:
: No doubt that played out in the Puke's every-day life off the Internet
: as well, and it's been going on since his days in the school yard where
: he found it cheaper than paying the boys not to taunt him and beat him
: up. (opps . . yet another of Puke's sores has been opened).
:
: This will no doubt engender an escalation of his delusional state and
: a flurry of additional inane pontifications and wishful daydreams from
: one who not long ago swore that there was no way the Brownsbasher could
: ever get him to respond to his commentary.
:
: So brace yourselves for raucous laughter, if only behind his back.
:
: Poor PukeMeister... he tried following the old Browns ng regulars
: to another forum outside usenet. But BT and Sarge finally showed him the
: door. So now he's planted himself firmly in the Steelers ng,
: where he leads the inner ring of those enthralled by the exposure
: of bandwagon buttholes.
:
: I have it on good authority that Bwian Allen has sublet his luxury
: apartment to the PukeMeister for the holding of the PM's Suck-Up Bash
: of the year where he will sit at Bwian's computer and Instant Message
: all of his virtual rival football ng friends.
:
: GEE . . I wonder if I will get a message. But I wouldn't read it
: no-how.
To follow either Brian and/or myself all over the Usenet NGs for the past 10
years you must have really had one hell of a man-crush on one or both of us
Stutterin' Stan. Your jealousy over the conversations I shared with regular
members in every NG always ate you alive and with good reason, because they
would not hesitate to respond to me in every NG, most importantly in your
own NG where they would never respond to you. That speaks volumes toward
your deflated ego Stutterin' Stanley, which obviously contributed in a big
way to your diagnosis of being a manic depressive. Yes we were all very
cruel in clearly rejecting you by ignoring your hundreds and thousands of
posts to us. You now you reacted like a psycho asshole back then and that
hasn't changed. You have in fact digressed to an even more irrelevant bitch.
So "who" indeed would do all that and pretend to be me and a hundred other
characters over this ten year span? Only a scorned loon with a sworn
dedication for revenge that for the life of your sick and sad 10 year effort
you have failed miserably in attaining. Anyone can see that you are a mental
pygmy and I feel bad at times taunting you into song and dance over ten year
old issues that you can't get past and refuse to seek professional help
with, it doesn't look like you will do that in the next ten years either
unless and until you finally off yourself as a result of the pain of your
overwhelming depression.
~Drew
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 6:24 pm
From: who
Continued laughter at RãvNspuke, whose delusions continue unabated.
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 6:33 pm
From: who
Wal-Mart greeter fired over semi-naked picture
Friday, November 11, 2011
BALTIMORE, Maryland (AP) -- A Wal-Mart greeter was sacked for apparently
showing too much of his friendly side to customers.
Drew Pukemeister, 64, was accused of greeting customers with a
computer-generated photo of himself in which he appeared to be naked --
except for a carefully placed Wal-Mart bag -- and of telling customers
that Wal-Mart was cutting costs and the sack was the company's new uniform.
A supervisor at the Baltimore store where Pukemeister had worked for
seven years told him to knock it off after customers complained. He was
fired five days later, in September, after he displayed the photo again.
Pukemeister's application for unemployment compensation was rejected by
an administrative law judge, who said "a reasonable person would know
the act of showing a naked body wearing a Wal-Mart sack would not be
good for the employer's business."
Pukemeister said he did not see the harm in the photo, which he said
was made by a friend who spliced a picture of Puke's head onto a
shot of another man's body.
"When I first seen it, I pretty near died laughing," he said.
Pity that Wal-Mart's management wasn't laughing.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: OT: Herman Cain
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/8c3ae750c9e3ae0d?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 5:31 pm
From: CC2155@gmail.clom
Herman Cain should fry in the electric chair.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: I SNIFFED JERRY SANDUSKY'S JOCK!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/t/5978cd32af291878?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 9:09 pm
From: "THE COLONEL"
There's just nothing like the smell of boy butt on a jockstrap.
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Nov 12 2011 9:52 pm
From: Marcus
On Nov 12, 9:09 pm, "THE COLONEL" <tsgi...@asianprincess.net> wrote:
> There's just nothing like the smell of boy butt on a jockstrap.
Colonel, with that sort of talk ernie is going to have to finger
herself twice as much as usual.
Thank you. That is all. Marcus
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
Posts
